Abstract
Background
Alterations in taste/smell after bariatric surgery have been observed, but few data is available. Some authors documented these changes and their role on weight loss but there is no evidence after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
Methods
Cohort study with patients submitted to laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) and LSG that were asked to participate in a validated survey. The primary objective was to determinate the differences between procedures for taste and smell changes; a demographic and anthropometric analysis were also performed. Secondarily, the relation between food aversion and weight loss was also obtained.
Results
Final analysis was based on 154 patients (104 LGBP and 50 LSG). The overall mean time between surgery and questionnaire was 10 ± 6.7 months. Most of the patients (87.6 %) experienced some taste/smell change. There were no differences between procedures for any change, taste or smell change. More patients submitted to LGBP referred that food smelled different (51.9 vs 34 % for the LSG group; p = 0.040). Higher %EWL was observed for patients presenting food aversion (73.3 ± 19.7 vs 65.8 ± 19.4 % for those without aversion; p = 0.046). Based on type of surgery, the LGBP group had the same trend (%EWL of 78.2 ± 17.3 vs 70.4 ± 18.6 % for those without aversion; p = 0.044).
Conclusion
The majority of patients presented taste and olfactory changes soon after surgery independently of type of procedure. Patients submitted to LGBP referred more often a different smell in food. Higher %EWL was observed in patients presenting any food aversion, especially in the LGBP group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brolin RE. Update: NIH consensus conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Nutrition. 1996;12:403–4.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.
Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1605–11.
Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23:427–36.
Attiah MA, Halpern CH, Balmuri U, et al. Durability of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a meta-regression study. Ann Surg. 2012;256:251–4.
Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 1969;170:329–39.
Brolin RE, LaMarca LB, Kenler HA, et al. Malabsorptive gastric bypass in patients with superobesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:195–203. discussion 4-5.
Tadross JA, le Roux CW. The mechanisms of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Int J Obes. 2009;33 Suppl 1:S28–32.
Burge JC, Schaumburg JZ, Choban PS, et al. Changes in patients’ taste acuity after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:666–70.
Scruggs DM, Buffington C, Cowan Jr GS. Taste acuity of the morbidly obese before and after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 1994;4:24–8.
Harris AM, Griffin SM. Postoperative taste and smell deficit after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery—an unreported complication. J Surg Oncol. 2003;82:147–50. discussion 50-2.
Tichansky DS, Boughter Jr JD, Madan AK. Taste change after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:440–4.
Graham L, Murty G, Bowrey DJ. Taste, smell and appetite change after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1463–8.
Halmi KA, Mason E, Falk JR, et al. Appetitive behavior after gastric bypass for obesity. Int J Obes. 1981;5:457–64.
Brown EK, Settle EA, Van Rij AM. Food intake patterns of gastric bypass patients. J Am Diet Assoc. 1982;80:437–43.
Kenler HA, Brolin RE, Cody RP. Changes in eating behavior after horizontal gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;52:87–92.
Tichansky DS, Glatt AR, Madan AK, et al. Decrease in sweet taste in rats after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1176–81.
Peterli R, Steinert RE, Woelnerhanssen B, et al. Metabolic and hormonal changes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized, prospective trial. Obes Surg. 2012;22:740–8.
Ramon JM, Salvans S, Crous X, et al. Effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy on glucose and gut hormones: a prospective randomised trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1116–22.
Dotson CD, Geraedts MC, Munger SD. Peptide regulators of peripheral taste function. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013;24:232–9.
Martin B, Dotson CD, Shin YK, et al. Modulation of taste sensitivity by GLP-1 signaling in taste buds. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:98–101.
Martin C, Passilly-Degrace P, Chevrot M, et al. Lipid-mediated release of GLP-1 by mouse taste buds from circumvallate papillae: putative involvement of GPR120 and impact on taste sensitivity. J Lipid Res. 2012;53:2256–65.
Richardson BE, Vander Woude EA, Sudan R, et al. Altered olfactory acuity in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg. 2004;14:967–9.
Richardson BE, Vanderwoude EA, Sudan R, et al. Gastric bypass does not influence olfactory function in obese patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22:283–6.
Miras AD, le Roux CW. Bariatric surgery and taste: novel mechanisms of weight loss. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26:140–5.
Still CD, Wood GC, Chu X, et al. Clinical factors associated with weight loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obesity. 2014;22:888–94.
Palmisano S, Silvestri M, Giuricin M, et al. Preoperative predictive factors of successful weight loss and glycaemic control 1 year after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2015
Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;17:565–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Informed Consent
Does not apply.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zerrweck, C., Zurita, L., Álvarez, G. et al. Taste and Olfactory Changes Following Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 26, 1296–1302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1944-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1944-8