Skip to main content
Log in

Tuber Ruler: a mobile application for evaluating image-based potato tuber size

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the potato processing industry, the length-to-width (L/W) ratio of potato tubers is a critical quality indicator, especially for products like French fries and chips. Traditional measurement methods such as manual scales or calipers are labor-intensive and subject to variability. Addressing this challenge, we introduce a mobile application (Tuber Ruler) developed for Android smartphones, which employs image analysis to accurately measure the L/W ratio of potato tubers. By integrating standard image-processing and machine learning (ML) techniques, Tuber Ruler offers a dual-approach analysis, allowing for rapid and precise tuber sizing against both standard black and diverse natural backgrounds. The application exhibits acceptable performance metrics when compared to ground truth measurements obtained via digital calipers. Specifically, Tuber Ruler achieved a Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) of 0.98 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.03 for russet potatoes, demonstrating consistent accuracy across diverse potato varieties (yellow tubers: r = 0.98, MAE = 0.02; red tubers: r = 0.91, MAE = 0.04). The app can be used in challenging natural environments such as soil and grass backgrounds. Moreover, Tuber Ruler maintains high accuracy (r ≥ 0.99, MAE = 0.01–0.04) even when image resolution is reduced to 25% of the original size, showcasing its resilience to resolution degradation. A significant aspect of Tuber Ruler is the effective use of ML to complement standard image-processing approach, enhancing the application’s adaptability to varied backgrounds and tuber types. This dual-approach analysis, coupled with swift processing times (standard image-processing: 2.0 s; ML: 4.0 s), positions Tuber Ruler as an alternative to traditional sizing methods. By offering a scalable, precise, and user-friendly tool for tuber sizing, Tuber Ruler has the potential to significantly enhance productivity and operational efficiency in the potato industry, becoming a valuable tool to growers, processors and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data will be available upon request.

Code availability

The associated codes and APK are publicly released at GitHub: https://github.com/kay795/Potato-Assessment-Application. The application will be launched in Google Play soon.

References

  1. Potato USA, https://potatoesusa.com/research-reports/category/market-insights/. Accessed 27 Sept 2022

  2. J.M. Blauer, M.J. Pavek, 2023 Potato cultivar yield and postharvest quality evaluations (2023). https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/2742/2024/01/2023-Potato-Cultivar-Yield-and-Postharvest-Quality-EvaluationsWebVersion.pdf

  3. J. Pandey, D.C. Scheuring, J.W. Koym, M.I. Vales, Genomic regions associated with tuber traits in tetraploid potatoes and identification of superior clones for breeding purposes. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 952263 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.952263

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. T.R. Stefaniak, S. Fitzcollins, R. Figueroa, A.L. Thompson, C. Schmitz Carley, L.M. Shannon, Genotype and variable nitrogen effects on tuber yield and quality for red fresh market potatoes in Minnesota. Agronomy 11(2), 255 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C.J. Dean, Manipulating apical dominance, tuber set, size, and shape to optimize yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University (2018)

  6. Potato Association of America, Annual report of the Potato Association of America (PAA). Am. J. Potato Res. 96, 317–378 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-019-09723-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Potato Variety Management Institute (PVMI), https://3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/2742/2022/01/2021-Potato-Cultivar-Yield-and-Postharvest-Quality-Evaluations.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2022

  8. J.N. Townsend, Potato field greening and response to potassium fertilization in the Columbia Basin. MS Thesis, Washington State University (2021). https://rex.libraries.wsu.edu/esploro/outputs/99900592256501842

  9. M. Barnes, T. Duckett, G. Cielniak, Boosting minimalist classifiers for blemish detection in potatoes, in 24th International IEEE Conference on Image and Vision Computing, New Zealand (2009), pp. 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVCNZ.2009.5378372

  10. A. Beyaz, D. Gerdan, Potato classification by using ultrasonic sensor with LabVIEW. Agric. Sci. Dig. 40(4), 376–381 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Neilson, A.M. Smith, L. Mesina, R. Vivian, S. Smienk, D. De Koyer, Potato tuber shape phenotyping using RGB imaging. Agronomy 11(9), 1781 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Tao, C.T. Morrow, P.H. Heinemann, H.J. Sommer, Fourier-based separation technique for shape grading of potatoes using machine vision. Trans. ASAE 38, 949–957 (1995). https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Zhou, V. Chalana, Y. Kim, PC-based machine vision system for real-time computer-aided potato inspection. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 9(6), 423–433 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(1998)9:6%3c423::AID-IMA4%3e3.0.CO;2-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Si, S. Sankaran, N.R. Knowles, M.J. Pavek, Potato tuber length-width ratio assessment using image analysis. Am. J. Potato Res. 94(1), 88–93 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-016-9545-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Si, S. Sankaran, N.R. Knowles, M.J. Pavek, Image-based automated potato tuber shape evaluation. J. Food Meas. Charact. 12(2), 702–709 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9683-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Aquino, I. Barrio, M.P. Diago, B. Millan, J. Tardaguila, vitisBerry: An Android-smartphone application to early evaluate the number of grapevine berries by means of image analysis. Comput. Electron. Agric. 148, 19–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Wang, A. Koirala, K. Walsh, N. Anderson, B. Verma, In field fruit sizing using a smart phone application. Sensors 18(10), 3331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Liu, L. Yu, D. Wu, J. Ye, H. Feng, Q. Liu, W. Yang, PocketMaize: an android-smartphone application for maize plant phenotyping. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 770217 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.770217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. T.W. Rife, C. Courtney, J. Hershberger, M.A. Gore, M. Neilsen, J. Poland, Prospector: a mobile application for portable, high-throughput near-infrared spectroscopy phenotyping. Plant Phenome J 4(1), e20024 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppj2.20024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Röckel, T. Schreiber, D. Schüler, U. Braun, I. Krukenberg, F. Schwander, A. Peil, C. Brandt, E. Willner, D. Gransow, R. Töpfer, Phenoapp: a mobile tool for plant phenotyping to record field and greenhouse observations. F1000Research 11(12), 12–14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74239.2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Lindqvist-Kreuze, A. Khan, E. Salas, S. Meiyalaghan, S. Thomson, R. Gomez, M. Bonierbale, Tuber shape and eye depth variation in a diploid family of Andean potatoes. BMC Genet. 16(1), 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0213-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H.J. Van Eck, J.M. Jacobs, P. Stam, J. Ton, W.J. Stiekema, E. Jacobsen, Multiple alleles for tuber shape in diploid potato detected by qualitative and quantitative genetic analysis using RFLPs. Genetics 137(1), 303–309 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/137.1.303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded in part by the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) competitive, and hatch and multistate project (Accession Number 1028108, 1014919, NC1212), and Washington State University’s College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences’ Emerging Research Issues competitive grant opportunity (ERI-20-04).The prototype app was developed as a part of the senior design course, which was further debugged and modified into the current version. The authors would like to thank Dr. Yongsheng Si, College of Information Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei, China, for assisting in the initial development of the image processing algorithm. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Worasit Sangjan, Dr. Afef Marzougui, Milton Valencia-Ortiz, and Kingsley Umani for their assistance in collecting data for app evaluation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sindhuja Sankaran.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veloo, K., Glenn, A.E., King, A.B. et al. Tuber Ruler: a mobile application for evaluating image-based potato tuber size. Food Measure (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02542-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02542-6

Keywords

Navigation