Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of chitosan edible coatings made with natural extracts of Solanum lycopersicum and Moringa oleifera for preserving fresh pork tenderloin

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop edible films based on chitosan that also incorporate natural extracts of tomato (T) and moringa (M). The formulated films were evaluated for their physical, optical, mechanical, barrier, and bioactive properties. The incorporation of extracts into the biopolymeric matrix with 40% glycerol significantly decreased light transmission in the UV range (especially at 400 nm) from 30 to 0%, with respect uncoated films. Moreover, the antioxidant activity of the films was increased to 41.92 mg ET/100 g film (DPPH) and 34.67 mg ET/100 g film (ABTS). The formulation 60/40-TM was applied to the fresh pork loin, and the physical, microbiological, and sensory properties of coated and uncoated samples were evaluated during storage at 4 °C for 14 days. Compared with coated films (0.892 g), uncoated films showed higher water loss on day 14 (1.132 g). The results of microbiological analyses showed no changes in the coated samples that is, there was no microbial growth on the subsequent days of storage (days 5 and 10). However, the uncoated samples showed bacterial growth of fecal coliforms (11 MPN/g) and E. coli (3 log10 CFU/g) on day 10. Sensory analysis of the samples with the treatments showed good overall acceptability with no significant difference (p ≥ 0.05). The coatings formulated with both extracts and higher concentrations of glycerol presented good material properties, making them suitable for application in pork loin; these results are promising for food preservation.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. D.H. Song, V.B. Hoa, H.W. Kim, S.M. Khang, S.H. Cho, J.S. Ham, K.H. Seol, Coatings 11, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. G.H. Zhou, X.L. Xu, Y. Liu, Meat Sci. 86, 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Sayadi, A. Mojaddar Langroodi, D. Jafarpour, J. Food Meas. Charact. 15, 5231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-01096-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Jouki, M.J. Shakouri, N. Khazaei, J. Food Meas. Charact. 15, 5485 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-01116-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Ghadermazi, J. Keramat, S.A.H. Goli, J. Food Nutr. Res. 55, 22 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Suhag, N. Kumar, A.T. Petkoska, A. Upadhyay, Food Res. Int. 136, 109582 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. J.A. Jennings, Controlling chitosan degradation properties in vitro and in vivo, in Controlling chitosan degradation properties in vitro and in vivo. ed. by J.A. Jennings, J.D. Bumgardner (Woodhead Publishing, 2017), p.159

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Bajić, T. Ročnika, A. Oberlintnera, F. Scognamigliob, U. Novaka, B. Likozar, Food Packag Shelf Life. 21, 100365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Rodríguez-Núñez, T.J. Madera-Santana, D.I. Sánchez-Machado, J. López-Cervantes, H. Soto-Valdez, J. Polym. Environ. 22, 41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-013-0621-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D.I. Chan-Matú, V.M. Toledo-López, M.L. de Vargas y Vargas, S. Rincón-Arriaga, A. Rodríguez-Félix, T.J. Madera-Santana, J. Food Meas. Charact. 15, 4813 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-01055-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kalkan, M.R. Otag, M.S. Engin, Food Chem. 307, 125524 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. A.M. Ribeiro, B.N. Estevinho, F. Rocha, Food Bioproc. Tech. 14, 209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-020-02528-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C.U. López-Palestina, C.L. Aguirre-Mancilla, J.C. Raya-Pérez, J.G. Ramirez-Pimentel, A. Vargas-Torres, A.D. Hernández-Fuentes, CYTA—J. Food. 17, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2018.1564793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Jodaini-Jafari, M. Kargozari, R. Ranjbar, H. Rostami, H. Hamedi, J. Food Process. Preserv. 42, e13336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Bonilla, P.J. Sobral, Food Biosci. 16, 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2016.07.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Tanase, S. Coșarcă, D.L. Muntean, Molecules 24, 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Perveen, H.A.R. Suleria, F.M. Anjum, M.S. Butt, I. Pasha, S. Ahmad, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 55, 7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.657809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Azabou, H. Sebii, F.B. Taheur, Y. Abid, M. Jridi, M. Nasri, Food Biosci. 36, 100664 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Zanfini, G. Corbini, C. La Rosa, E. Dreassi, LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 43, 67 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.06.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N.M. Mgbemena, G.A. Obodo, J. Mol. Stud. Med. Res. 1, 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18801/jmsmr.010216.07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Bukar, A. Uba, T. Oyeyi, Bayern J. Pure Appl. Sci. 3, 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v3i1.58706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Nouraddini, M. Esmaiili, F. Mohtarami, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 120, 1639 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Genskowsky, L.A. Puente, J.A. Pérez-Álvarez, J. Fernandez-Lopez, L.A. Muñoz, M. Viuda-Martos, LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 64, 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Brand-Williams, M.E. Cuvelier, C. Berset, LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 28, 25 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Müller, K. Fröhlich, V. Böhm, Food Chem. 129, 139 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. S.M.B. Hashemi, D. Jafarpour, J. Food Process. Pres. 44, e14651 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Zhang, P. He, H. Kang, X. Li, LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 93, 470 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Bonilla, L. Atarés, M. Vargas, A. Chiralt, Food Hydrocoll. 26, 9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.03.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R.Q. Assis, S.M. Lopes, T.M. Costa, S.H. Flores, A. Oliveira-Rios, Ind. Crops Prod. 109, 818 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. R.A. de Carvalho, C.S. Fávaro-Trindade, P.J. Sobral, In Novel technologies in food science: their impact on products, consumer trends and the environment, ed. by A. McElhatton, P.J.A. Sobral (Integrating Food Science and Engineering Knowledge Into the Food, 2012), pp. 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7880-6.

  31. J.H. Li, J. Miao, J.L. Wu, S.F. Chen, Q.Q. Zhang, Food Hydrocoll. 37, 166 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.10.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M.G.A. Vieira, M.A. da Silva, L.O. dos Santos, M.M. Beppu, Eur. Polym. J. 47, 3 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. J.T. Martins, M.A. Cerqueira, A.A. Vicente, Food Hydrocoll. 27, 220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.06.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Z. Shen, D.P. Kamdem, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 74, 289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. C. Anderson, S. Simsek, Food Hydrocoll. 86, 78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. N. Hari, S. Francis, A.G. Rajendran Nair, A.J. Nair, Foof Packag Shelf Life 16, 69 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. L. Pollini, C. Tringaniello, F. Ianni, F. Blasi, J. Manes, L. Cossignani, Antioxidants. 9, 277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9040277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Y. Ali, A.A.I. Sina, S.S. Khandker, L. Neesa, E.M. Tanvir, A. Kabir, I. Khalil, S.H. Gan, Foods. 10, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Y.H.B. Kim, R.D. Warner, K. Rosenvold, Anim. Prod. Sci. 54, 4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Hunt, A. King, In Meat color measurement guidelines, 1st edn. (American Meat Science Association, Champaign, 2012), pp.3–10

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Noshad, B. Alizadeh Behbahani, H. Jooyandeh, M. Rahmati-Joneidabad, M.E. Hemmati Kaykha, M. Ghodsi Sheikhjan, Food Sci. Nutr. 9, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. A.C.P. Vital, A. Guerrero, J.D.O. Monteschio, M.V. Valero, C.B. Carvalho, B.A. de Abreu Filho, G. Scaramal Madrona, I.N. Do Prado, PLoS ONE 11, 8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. G.P. Cardoso, M.P. Dutra, P.R. Fontes, A.L.S. de Ramos, L.A.M. de Gomide, E.M. Ramos, Meat Sci. 114, 85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.12.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Heydari, H. Jooyandeh, B. Alizadeh Behbahani, M. Noshad, Food Sci. Nutr. 8, 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Y. Xiong, M. Chen, R.D. Warner, Z. Fang, Food Control 110, 107018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. F. Anwar, S.L. Muhammad Ashraf, A.H. Gilani, Phytother. Res. 21, 17 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. L. Liu, S. Chen, X. Zhang, Z. Xue, S. Cui, X. Hua, L. Cong, J. Wang. Sci. Adv. 6, 27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb9593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Chaparro-Hernández, S. Ruiz-Cruz, E. Márquez-Ríos, J.D.J. Ornelas-Paz, C.L. Del Toro-Sánchez, L.E. Gassos-Ortega, G.E. Devora-Isiordia, Coatings 9, 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9120827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MSc. Canché-López received a scholarship from The Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT). The authors would like to thank MSc. Judith Fortiz-Hernandez at CIAD, A.C. for her technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Víctor M. Toledo-López or Tomás J. Madera-Santana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known conflict of interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Canché-López, K.C., Toledo-López, V.M., Vargas y Vargas, M. et al. Characterization of chitosan edible coatings made with natural extracts of Solanum lycopersicum and Moringa oleifera for preserving fresh pork tenderloin. Food Measure 17, 2233–2246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01784-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01784-6

Keywords

Navigation