Skip to main content
Log in

Bioactivities and phenolic constituents relationship of Muğla thyme and pine honey of Turkey with the chemometric approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemical ingredients of pine and thyme honey were studied, along with their medicinal activity properties. A method was validated for common honey compounds using LC-TOF/MS to analyze the ingredients. In vitro antiproliferative, antioxidant, anticholinesterase, anti-inflammatory, tyrosinase inhibitory, and urease inhibitory activities were used to investigate the therapeutic potentials. The antiproliferative activity was tested against HeLa, C6 (brain), PC3 (prostate), HT29 (colon), and MCF7 (breast) cancer cell lines while antioxidant activity using β-carotene-linoleic acid, DPPH, ABTS, and CUPRAC assays. Chlorogenic acid, syringic acid, protocatechuic acid, fumaric acid, cinnamic acid, vanillic acid, gentisic acid, salicylic acid, and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid were found in high amount in pine honey and less amount in thyme honey. Pine honey extracts and EtAc extract of thyme honey exhibited significant antiproliferative activity against PC3 and C6 cancer cell lines comparing to 5-fluorouracil. The ethyl acetate extracts of pine and thyme honey displayed essential and higher antioxidant activity than BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) and α-TOC (α-tocopherol) in all tests. Moreover, the pine honey extracts were more active than that of thyme. The EtAc extracts of both honey extracts exhibited good enzyme inhibitory and anti-inflammatory activity. The ethyl acetate extracts were susceptible to inhibiting butyrylcholinesterase and urease enzymes. The honey studied herein can be said that they contain antioxidant, anticholinesterase, and urease inhibitory compounds, having many beneficial effects. The pine and/or thyme honey are consumed in meals due to their taste and aroma. The results showed that the honey samples, particularly pine honey, are medicinal foods that could be significant for humans who regularly consume them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

5-FU:

5-Fluorouracil

ABTS:

2,2′-Azino bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt

Ach:

Acetylcholine

AChE:

Acetylcholinesterase

BCh:

Butyrylcholine

BChE:

Butyrylcholinesterase

BHA:

Butylated hydroxyl anisole

BuOH:

n-Butanol

C6:

Brain tumour cell line

CUPRAC:

Cupric reducing antioxidant capacity

DPPH:

1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

DTNB:

(5,5-Dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)

EtAc:

Ethyl acetate

HBSS:

Hanks balanced salt solution

HeLa:

Cervical cell line

HPLC-TOF/MS:

High performance liquid chromatography-time of flight/mass spectrometry

HT29:

Human colon cell line

IC50 :

Half-maximal inhibitory concentration

MCF-7:

Breast cell line

PC1:

First principal component

PC2:

Second principal component

PC3:

Prostate cell line

PCA:

Principal component analyses

PH:

Pine honey

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

TH:

Thyme honey

α-TOC:

α-Tocopherol

References

  1. I.K. Karabagias, E. Dimitriou, S. Kontakos, M.G. Kontominas, Eur. Food Res. Technol. 242, 1201–1210 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Yap, M.F. AbuBakar, H. Lim, D. Carrier, J. Apic. Res. 54, 163–172 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. I. Jasicka-Misiak, E. Makowicz, N. Stanek, Eur. Food Res. Technol. 244, 1169–1184 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ö. Saygın-Alparslan, N. Demirbaş, YYU J. Agric. Sci. 29, 526–538 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.N. Parın, P. Terzioğlu, Y. Sıcak, K. Yıldırım, M. Öztürk, J. Textile Inst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1773199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Dai, R. Jin, R. Verpoorte, W. Lam, Y.C. Cheng, Y. Xiao, J. Xu, L. Zhang, X.M. Qin, S. Chen, J. Ethnopharmacol. 250, 112460 (2020)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. P.L. Buldini, S. Cavalli, A. Mevoli, J. Sharma, Food Chem. 73, 487–495 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Assunta, M.D. Desideri, P. Paolo Battisti, I. Giardina, D. Gorietti, C. Roselli, Food Control 110, 107001 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N.E. Hau-Yama, D. Magaña-Ortiz, A.I. Oliva, E.O. Vázquez, J. Apic. Res. 59, 12–18 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S.D. Mračević, M. Krstić, A. Lolić, S. Ražić, Microchem. J. 152, 104420 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I.A.A. Da Silva, T.M.S. Da Silva, C.A. Camara, N. Queiroz, M. Magnani, J.S. De Novais, L.E.B. Soledade, E.O. Lima, A.L. De Souza, A.G. De Souza, Food Chem. 141, 3552–3558 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. O.O. Erejuwa, S.A. Siti, MS Ab Wahab. Molecules 19, 2497–2522 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Candiracci, E. Piatti, M. Dominguez-Barragan, D. Garcia-Antras, B. Morgado, D. Ruano, J.F. Gutierrez, J. Parrado, A. Castano, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 12304–12311 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Xie, M. Su, W. Qiu, M. Zhang, Z. Guo, B. Su, J. Liu, X. Li, L. Zhou, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 21215–21226 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. S.K. Jaganathan, Sci. World J. 1–8 (2012)

  16. S. Samarghandian, J.T. Afshari, S. Davoodi, Clinics 66, 1073–1079 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. C.H. Tananaki, A. Thrasyvoulou, J.L. Giraudel, M. Montury, Food Chem. 101, 1687–1693 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Eraslan, M. Kanbur, S. Silici, M. Karabacak, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 73, 1084–1091 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Erlinghagen, Apiacta 36, 131–137 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Ülgentürk, F. Szentkiralyi, N. Uygun, F. Fent, S.D. Gaimari, H. Civelek, B. Ayhan, Phytoparasitica 41, 529–537 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Mannaş, T. Altuğ, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 42, 133–138 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Özkök, Ö. Koru, K. Sorkun, Bee World 93, 98–101 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R.L. Siegel, M. Laversanne, I. Soerjomataram, A. Jemal, F. Bray, CA (2021)

  24. Z. Liu, Z. Ren, J. Zhang, C.C. Chuang, E. Kandaswamy, T. Zhou, L. Zuo, Front. Physiol. 9, 1–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Soholm, Adv. Ther. 15, 54–65 (1998)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Bhattacharyya, R. Chattopadhyay, S. Mitra, S.E. Crowe, Physiol. Rev. 94, 329–354 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Sastre, F.V. Pallardo, J. Vina, IUBMB Life 49, 427–435 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Sano, C. Ernesto, R.G. Thomas, M.R. Klauber, K. Schafer, M. Grundman, P. Woodbury, J. Growdon, C.W. Cotman, E. Pfeiffer, L.S. Schneider, L.J. Thal, N. Engl, J. Med. 336, 1216–1222 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Erenler, O. Sen, H. Akşit, I. Demirtaş, A. ŞahinYağlıoğlu, M. Elmastaş, I. Telci, J. Sci. Food Agric. 96, 822–836 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Kasımoğulları, H. Duran, A. Şahin Yağlıoğlu, S. Mert, I. Demirtaş, Monatshefte für Chemie-Chemical Monthly 146, 1743–1749 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. I. Demirtaş, I.H. Gecibesler, A. Şahin Yağlıoğlu, Phytochem. Lett. 6, 209–214 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M.B. Gürdere, E. Kamo, Y. Budak, A. Şahin Yağlıoğlu, M. Ceylan, Turk. J. Chem. 41, 179–189 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. H.M. Miller, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 48, 91 (1971)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Öztürk, U. Kolak, G. Topçu, S. Öksüz, M.I. Choudhary, Food Chem. 126, 31–38 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Re, N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggente, A. Pannala, M. Yang, C. Rice-Evans, Free Radical Biol. Med. 26, 1231–1237 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. M.S. Blois, Nature 181, 1199 (1958)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Apak, K. Güçlü, M. Özyüre, S.E. Karademir, J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 7970–7981 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. G.L. Ellman, K.D. Courtney, V. Andres Jr., R.M. Featherstone, Biochem. Pharmacol. 7, 88–95 (1961)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. V.J. Hearing, (Academic Press. New York) 142, 154–165 (1987)

  40. S. Khatib, O. Nerya, R. Musa, M. Shumel, S. Tamir, J. Vaya, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13, 433–441 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. M.W. Weatherburn, Anal. Chem. 3, 971–974 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. S. Helfand, J. Werkmeister, J. Roader, J. Exper. Med 156, 492–505 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. H. Imtara, A. Kmail, S. Touzani, M. Khader, H. Hamarshi, B. Saad, B. Lyoussi, Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 1–11 (2019)

  44. I.K. Karabagias, M.V. Vavoura, A. Badeka, S. Kontakos, M.G. Kontominas, Food Anal. Method. 7, 2113–2121 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. E. Spilioti, M. Jaakkola, T. Tolonen, M. Lipponen, V. Virtanen, I. Chinou, E. Kassi, S. Karabournioti, P. Moutsatsou, PLoS ONE 9, 94860 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Z. Can, O. Yildiz, H. Sahin, E. Akyuz Turumtay, S. Silici, S. Kolayli, Food. Chem. 180, 133–141 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. A.V. Tsiapara, M. Jaakkola, I. Chinou, K. Graikou, T. Tolonen, V. Virtanen, P. Moutsatsou, Food Chem. 116, 702–708 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. P. Nousias, I.K. Karabagias, K.A. Riganakos, Austin. J. Nutri. Food Sci. 6, 1098 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ş Kıvrak, İ Kıvrak, Int. J. Food Prop. 20, 864–876 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. M. Badolato, G. Carullo, E. Cione, F. Aiello, M.C. Caroleo, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 142, 290–299 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. M. Kassim, M. Achoui, M.R. Mustafa, M.A. Mohd, K.M. Yusoff, Nutr. Res. 30, 650–659 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. M.F. Seyhan, E. Yılmaz, Ö. Timirci-Kahraman, N. Saygılı, H.İ Kısakesen, A.P. Eronat, A.B. Ceviz, S.B. Gazioğlu, H. Yılmaz Aydoğan, O. Öztürk, IUBMB Life 69, 677–688 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. A. Alves, A. Ramos, M.M. Gonçalves, M. Bernardo, B. Mendes, J. Food Compos. Analy. 30, 130–138 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. A. Gül, T. Pehlivan, Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 25, 1056–1065 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  55. H. Imtara, Y. Elamine, B. Lyoussi, Food Sci. Nutr. 6, 2056–2065 (2018)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. M. Akbulut, M.M. Ozcan, H. Coklar, Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 23, 1–13 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. M. Öztürk, G. Tel-Çayan, F. Aydoğmuş-Öztürk, M.E. Duru, in Apiterapi. ed. by E. Akçiçek, B. Yücel (SIDAS, Izmir, 2015), p. 50

    Google Scholar 

  58. A. Zumla, A. Lulat, J. R. Soc. Med. 82, 384–385 (1989)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. M. Wijesinghe, M. Weatherall, K. Perrin, R. Beasley, N. Z Med. J. 122, 47–60 (2009)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. N. Muhammad, M. Saeed, A. Khan, A. Adhikari, A. Wadood, K.M. Khan, V. De Feo, Molecules 19, 16770–16778 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. H. Sipahi, G. Aydoğan, S. Helvacioğlu, M. Charehsaz, E. Guzelmeric, A. Aydın, Fabad J. Pharm. Sci. 42, 7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  62. H. Direman, H. Dibekoğlu, J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc. 86, 253–246 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a part of Yusuf SICAK’s Ph.D. thesis and was supported by the Research Foundation of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University with the project number 15/083.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Sıcak.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 118 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sıcak, Y., Şahin-Yağlıoğlu, A. & Öztürk, M. Bioactivities and phenolic constituents relationship of Muğla thyme and pine honey of Turkey with the chemometric approach. Food Measure 15, 3694–3707 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00940-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00940-8

Keywords

Navigation