Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of ambient light and moisture, and edible coatings in different storage period, on pressurized kiwifruit antioxidant properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different storage conditions after a quasi-static load on the amount of some qualitative properties of kiwifruit, including antioxidants, phenol, soluble solid, pH, and hardness. After applying the load, three different coatings were applied to the samples, including grape, dates, and berries juice solution. Then kiwifruit samples were stored for 5, 10, and 15 days. The storage conditions included 90% and 95% humidity, the lighting conditions were completely dark and light with the use of energy-saving lamps. After completion of the storage period, the qualitative properties of kiwifruit samples including antioxidants, phenols, soluble solids, pH, and hardness were measured. The results of the experiments showed that the highest and lowest phenolic content in grape cover and storage period was 10 days with 99.33 mg/100 g and in berry cover and storage period was 15 days with 85.34 mg/100 g. The highest pH was observed in berry cover and storage period of 15 days with 3.49. Also, the lowest pH in grape cover and storage period was 10 days with a value of 2.79. In the stiffness study of the samples, the highest stiffness was observed in grape cover and storage period of 10 days with 15.008 N. In general, the placement of samples in a dark environment could have a beneficial effect on the amount of phenolic content of the samples. Examining the percentage of antioxidants and phenolic content of the samples, the date juice cover, the amount of soluble solids, and the hardness of the grape juice cover and the pH of the berry juice cover were higher than the rest of the factor levels. Increasing the storage period also reduced the amount of antioxidants and increased the amount of soluble solids in kiwifruit samples. Finally, dark ambient light conditions, 5–10 days storage time and grape cover for storing kiwi fruit were the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.R. Choi, S. Tilahun, D.S. Park, Y.M. Lee, J.H. Choi, M.W. Baek, C.S. Jeong, Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 256, 108523 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. I. dos S. Moreira, W. P. da Silva, J. P. Gomes, D. S. de Castro, L. M. de Melo Silva, F. C. de Sousa, J. P. Lima, J. F. Lisboa, H. V. Moura, Aust. J. Crop Sci. 14, 524 (2020).

  3. H. Hu, H. Zhou, P. Li, Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 244, 31 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Du, M. Li, F. Ma, D. Liang, Food Chem. 113, 557 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Tavarini, E. Degl’Innocenti, D. Remorini, R. Massai, L. Guidi, Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 120, 342 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S.K. Lee, A.A. Kader, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 20, 207 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Simonetti, N. Pucci, E. Brasili, A. Valletta, I. Sammarco, E. Carnevale, G. Pasqua, S. Loreti, Plant Biosyst. Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 154, 100 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Masoudi, A. Tabatabaeefar, A. Borghei, Food Eng. Res. 27, 61 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. C. Strik, H. Cahn, Growing Kiwi Fruit (Oregon State University, 2000), pp 1–21

  10. T. Sawada, Y. Seo, H. Morishima, K. Imou, Y. Kawagoe, J. Jpn. Soc. Agric. Mach. 54, 61 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Passafiume, R. Gaglio, G. Sortino, V. Farina, Foods 9, 939 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Janick, Horticultural Reviews (Wiley, New York, 2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. M. D. Ardakani, Y. Mostofi, R. Hedayatnejad, in 6th Int. Postharvest Symp. (2010), pp. 8–12.

  14. S.T. Jeong, N. Goto-Yamamoto, S. Kobayashi, M. Esaka, Plant Sci. 167, 247 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Jemriić, N. Pavičić, in Prod. Pract. Qual. Assess. Food Crop. (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 213–227.

  16. P.-J. Chien, F. Sheu, H.-R. Lin, Food Chem. 100, 1160 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. K.Z. Navgaran, L. Naseri, M. Esmaiili, J. Food Res. 24, 89 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Ziaratban, M. Azadbakht, A. Ghasemnezhad, J. Agric. Eng. 41, 97 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Roueita, M. Hojjati, M. Noshad, Int. J. Fruit Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1741057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Azadbakht, M.J. Mahmoodi, M.V. Torshizi, P.A. Kashi, Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 22, 169 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.V. Torshizi, M. Azadbakht, Iranian Food Sci Technol Res J 15, 113 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.J. Mahmoodi, M. Azadbakht, Innov. Food Technol. 6, 247 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Azadbakht, M. Vahedi Torshizi, Int. J. Fruit Sci. 20(1), 38–59 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Toure, M. Bouatia, M.O.B. Idrissi, M. Draoui, J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 7, 409 (2015)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Yousefi, S. Akhavan, Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol. 79, 873–877 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.C. Valentines, R. Vilaplana, R. Torres, J. Usall, C. Larrigaudiere, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 36, 227 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. A.B. Martín-Diana, D. Rico, J.M. Barat, C. Barry-Ryan, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 10, 590 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Azadbakht, M.J. Mahmoodi, M. Vahedi Torshizi, Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 6, 177 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. A.M. Spinardi, Int Postharvest Symp. 682, 135–140 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Z.-G. Ju, Y.-B. Yuan, C.-L. Liou, S.-H. Xin, Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 61, 215 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M.-M. Oh, E.E. Carey, C.B. Rajashekar, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 47, 578 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. F. Feng, M. Li, F. Ma, L. Cheng, Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 165, 123 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Huang, B. Yu, Y. Teng, J. Su, Q. Shu, Z. Cheng, L. Zeng, Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 121, 149 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. I. D. S. Moreira, W. P. da Silva, J. P. Gomes, D. S. de Castro, L. M. de Melo Silva, F. C. de Sousa, J. P. Lima, C. Maria, D. P. S. E. Silva, J. F. Lisbôa, H. V. Moura, Aust. J. Crop Sci. 14, 524 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A. Carrillo-lopez, A. Cruz-hernandez, F. Guevara-lara, O. Paredes-lopez, J. Food Sci. Technol. 40, 461 (2003)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. P. Thumula, Studies on Storage Behavior of Tomatoes Coated with Chitosan-Lysozyme Films (McGill University, 2006)

  37. H. Dong, L. Cheng, J. Tan, K. Zheng, Y. Jiang, J. Food Eng. 64, 355 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. F. Cong, Y. Zhang, W. Dong, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 46, 71 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. T. Jiang, L. Feng, X. Zheng, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 188 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Ghasemnezhad, M.A. Shiri, Casp. J. Environ. Sci. 8, 25 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. T. Solomos, G.G. Laties, Nature 245, 390 (1973)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Azadbakht.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azadbakht, M., Rezaeiasl, A., Mahmoodi, M.J. et al. Evaluation of ambient light and moisture, and edible coatings in different storage period, on pressurized kiwifruit antioxidant properties. Food Measure 15, 697–706 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00674-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00674-z

Keywords

Navigation