Skip to main content
Log in

Response surface methodology for microwave-assisted extraction of pectin from cocoa pod husk (Theobroma cacao) mediated by oxalic acid

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rather than disposed of as waste, cocoa pod husk has a potential to be the source of natural pectin. An efficient extraction process can provide a sufficient amount of pectin. This study aims to analyze the performance of microwave-assisted extraction to separate pectin from cocoa pod husk mediated by cheaper and milder acidifying agent, oxalic acid. Response surface methodology was performed to investigate the effect of pH, ratio of liquid to solid, and irradiation time on the quantity of pectin extracted. Our model showed that reducing ratio of liquid to solid did not dramatically affect extraction yield. Higher oxalic acid concentration, i.e. lower pH, and prolonged irradiation time increased yield, yet decreased degree of esterification which influences the gelling ability of pectin. This technique also significantly shortened the extraction time compared to conventional method. Our finding complements the application of microwave-assisted extraction as a modern separation technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CCD:

Central composite design

CPH:

Cocoa pod husk

CPHF:

Cocoa pod husk flour

DE:

Degree of esterification

FTIR:

Fourier-transform infrared

L/S:

Ratio of liquid (solvent) to solid (sample)

MAE:

Microwave-assisted extraction

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

RSM:

Response surface methodology

References

  1. L. Pipitone, ICCO Cocoa Market Outlook Conference September 2016. (International Cocoa Organization, 2016). https://www.icco.org/about-us/international-cocoa-agreements/cat_view/294-cocoa-market-outlook-conference-september-2016.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2019.

  2. M.S. Beg, S. Ahmad, K. Jan, K. Bashir, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 66, 6 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E.O.K. Oddoye, C.K. Agyente-Badu, E. Gyedu-Akoto, in Chocolate in Health and Nutrition, ed. by R. Watson, V. Preedy, S. Zibadi (Humawa Press, Totowa, 2013), p. 23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Campos-Vega, K.H. Nieto-Figueroa, B.D. Oomah, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 81, 172 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J.N. BeMiller, Am. Chem. Soc. (1986). https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1986-0310.ch001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Muralikrishna, R.N. Tharanathan, Food Chem. 50, 87 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. B.R. Thakur, R.K. Singh, A.K. Handa, M.A. Rao, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 37, 47 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Sriamornsak, Silpakorn. Univ Int. J. 3, 206 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Begum, Y.A. Yusof, M.G. Aziz, M.B. Uddin, Int. J. Food Prop. 20, S190 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S.Y. Chan, W.S. Choo, Food Chem. 141, 3752 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. L.C. Vriesmann, R.F. Teófilo, C.L.O. Petkowicz, Carbohydr. Polym. 84, 1230 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L.C. Vriesmann, R.F. Teófilo, C.L.O. Petkowicz, LWT Food Sci. Technol. 49, 108 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kaya, A.G. Sousa, M.J. Crépeau, S.O. Sørensen, M.C. Ralet, Ann Bot. 114, 1319 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Priyangini, S.G. Walde, C. Ramalingam, C. Carbohydr. Polym. 202, 497 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M.M. Dominiak, A Novel Perspective on Pectin Extraction (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2014), p. 37

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Ueno, M. Tanaka, M. Hosino, M. Sasaki, M. Goto, Sep. Purif. Technol. 62, 513 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Zhang, X. Ye, T. Ding, X. Sun, Y. Xu, D. Liu, Ultrason. Sonochem. 20, 222 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Vasco-correa, A.D.Z. Zapata, LWT Food Sci. Technol. 80, 280 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Wang, F. Chen, J. Wu, Z. Wang, X. Liao, X. Hu, J. Food Eng. 78, 693 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Guolin, S. Jeffrey, Z. Kai, H. Xiaolan, J. Anal. Methods Chem. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/302059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. J.P. Maran, V. Sivakumar, K. Thirugnanasambandham, R. Sridhar, Carbohydr. Polym. 97, 703 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W.W. Wai, A.F.M. Alkarkhi, A.M. Easa, Food Bioprod. Process. 88, 209 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Pagán, A. Ibarz, M. Llorca, L. Coll, J. Sci. Food Agric. 79, 1038 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Chaharbaghi, F. Khodaiyan, S.S. Hosseini, Carbohydr. Polym. 173, 103 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Bagherian, F.Z. Ashtiani, A. Fouladitajar, M. Mohtashamy, Chem. Eng. Process Process Intensif. 50, 1237 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Incentive Program Research National Innovation System (INSINAS) by Ministry of Research and Technology of Republic Indonesia.

Funding

This study was Funded by Ministry of Research and Technology of Republic Indonesia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to conceive the study and planned the experimental design. Material preparation, data collection, analysis, and characterization were performed by RP, SA, ABJ and UP. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RP (main author) and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radityo Pangestu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 80 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pangestu, R., Amanah, S., Juanssilfero, A.B. et al. Response surface methodology for microwave-assisted extraction of pectin from cocoa pod husk (Theobroma cacao) mediated by oxalic acid. Food Measure 14, 2126–2133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00459-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00459-4

Keywords

Navigation