Skip to main content
Log in

Blackspot bruise in potatoes: susceptibility and biospeckle activity response analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blackspot bruise in potatoes can lead to enormous economic losses and pose threat to human diet, making an undesired damage that can be easily ignored due to its invisibility to human naked eyes. Susceptibility analysis addressing potato part (i.e. body, stem-end and bud-end) and volume (i.e. small, medium and big) was first carried out. Biospeckle imaging technique, possessing the merits of low-cost, fast, non-destructive and qualitative/quantitative processing, was then investigated for extraction of biospeckle activity (BA). BA responses to blackspot bruise in potatoes were evaluated afterwards. Two modified BA extraction methods (i.e. CCSP_WE and CCSP_MWE) were proposed for comparison with original method THSP_WE. Potato volume and bruised part were analyzed to study their influences on BA responses using the three methods. CCSP_WE method was superior to CCSP_MWE and THSP_WE for its better robustness and discrimination ability. Afterwards, all samples were divided into two sets (i.e. control and test), where the test set consisted of normal and blackspot bruised samples. It was found that BA of blackspot bruise was bigger than that of control samples, but it behaved similarly when compared with normal samples. Therefore, it was concluded that BAs derived from the three methods in this study are not sensitive to blackspot bruise in potatoes. Unsatisfactory results of this study are expected to serve as a contrast in improvement of related discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CHMI:

Constant height multiple impacts

BA:

Biospeckle activity

RBA:

Relative BA

THSP:

Time history of speckle patterns

CCSP:

Correlation of contiguous speckle patterns

IM:

Inertia moment

WE:

Wavelet entropy

MWE:

Modified wavelet entropy

GLCM:

Grey level co-occurrence matrix

References

  1. N. Strehmel, U. Praeger, C. König, I. Fehrle, A. Erban, M. Geyer, J. Kopka, J.T.V. Dongen, Postharvest Biol. Technol. (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Hara-Skrzypiec, H. Jakuczun, Am. J. Potato Res. (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9319-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. López-Maestresalas, J.C. Keresztes, M. Goodarzi, S. Arazuri, C. Jarén, W. Saeys, Food Control. (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Storey, in Potato Biology and Biotechnology: Advances and Perspectives, ed. by D. Vreugdenhil (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 441–470

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. J.B. Adams, H.M. Brown, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. (2007) https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390600762647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. U. Praeger, W.B. Herppich, C. König, B. Herold, M. Geyer, J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. (2009)

  7. A. Goyer, J. Pelle, J. Sci. Food Agr. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D.L. Corsini, J.J. Pavek, B. Dean, Am. Potato J. (1992) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B.B. Dean, N. Jackowiak, M. Nagle, J. Pavek, D. Corsini, Am. Potato J. (1993) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Esehaghbeygi, N. Raghami, A. Kargar, Am. J. Potato Res. (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-010-9177-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kumari, A.K. Nirala, Laser Phys. (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/1054-660X/26/11/115601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Arefi, P.A. Moghaddam, A. Hassanpour, K. Mollazade, A.M. Motlagh, Postharvest Biol. Technol. (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Gao, J. Geng, X. Rao, Y. Ying, Sensors (2016) https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Gancarz, Postharvest Biol. Technol. (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Gancarz, Postharvest Biol. Technol. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Oulamara, G. Tribillon, J. Duvernoy, J. Mod. Opt. (1989) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500348914550221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Zdunek, A. Adamiak, P.M. Pieczywek, A. Kurenda, Opt. Laser Eng. (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Passoni, A.D. Pra, H. Rabal, M. Trivi, R. Arizaga, Opt. Commun. (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2004.10.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Anna, Z. Artur, K. Andrzej, R. Krzysztof, Sensors (2012) https://doi.org/10.3390/s120303215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Skic, M. Szymańskachargot, B. Kruk, M. Chylińska, P.M. Pieczywek, A. Kurenda, A. Zdunek, K.P. Rutkowski, Sensors (2016) https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Kurenda, A. Adamiak, A. Zdunek, Postharvest Biol. Technol. (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Zdunek, W.B. Herppich, Postharvest Biol. Technol. (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N.N. Mohsenin, Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials (Gordon and Breach Science publishers, New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  24. A.L. Baritelle, G.M. Hyde, Trans. Asabe (1999) https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. N.K. Subramanian, P.J. White, M.R. Broadley, G. Ramsay, Ann. Bot. (2011) https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. R.M. Reeve, E. Hautala, M.L. Weaver, Am. Potato J. (1970) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S.C. Hand, I. Hardewig, Annu. Rev. Physiol. (1996) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.002543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Guppy, P. Withers, Biol. Rev. (1999) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0006323198005258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. W.G. Burton, Potato Res. (1974) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Teper-Bamnolker, Y. Buskila, Y. Lopesco, S. Ben-Dor, I. Saad, V. Holdengreber, E. Belausov, H. Zemach, N. Ori, A. Lers, D. Eshel, Plant Physiol. (2012) https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.194076

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the financial support of National key R&D plan of China (2016YFD070010501). Yingwang Gao and Xiuqin Rao conceived and designed the experiments; Yingwang Gao performed the experiments, analyzed the data and composed the article. The authors thank Prof. Yibin Ying for his valuable suggestions and Dr. Dong Hu for his contribution in proof reading of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuqin Rao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Rao, X. Blackspot bruise in potatoes: susceptibility and biospeckle activity response analysis. Food Measure 13, 444–453 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9958-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9958-2

Keywords

Navigation