Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of minimally processed carrots in perforation-mediated modified-atmosphere packaging (PM-MAP)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies were carried out to investigate the effect of PM-MAP on minimally processed carrots with different number of perforations (0, 4, 12 and control) on flexible package, stored at 2 °C temperature. The effect of PM-MAP on headspace oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration, weight loss, surface color, firmness, pH, total soluble solid, β-carotene and microbial load were evaluated. It was observed that equilibrium modified atmospheric condition of 5–7 % oxygen and 7.8 % carbon dioxide was achieved in 4 perforation pack. Whiteness index (WI) increased in all the samples from the initial value of 22.75 to a range of 30–35 within 8 days of storage. After that, it remained almost constant for all samples except for 0 perforation packs where a decreasing trend was observed. Chroma value (CV) of samples also followed similar trends like WI and reduced from initial value of 63.08 to a range of 50–55 within 8 days of storage and remained in a constant range during further storage. Firmness of carrot slices decreased to 22–24 N and 25–28 N for 4 and 12 perforation pack respectively from initial value of 30 N after 40 days of storage. Lower oxygen availability in 4 perforation pack was main reason behind lower microbial count (5.2 log10 cfu/g) after 30 days of storage. Reduction of 5.52 % and 10.10 % in β-carotene content was observed in 4 and 12 perforation pack samples. Thus for PM-MAP, 150 g of carrot samples in 4 perforation packs proved to be better than other conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.D. Sharma, S. Karki, N.S. Thakur, S. Attri, J. Food Sci. Technol. 49, 22–32 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Ayhan, O. Eştűrk, E. Taş, Turk. J. Agric. For. 32, 57–64 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Montanez, F.A.R. Oliveira, J. Frais, M. Pinelo, P.V. Mahajan, L.M. Cunha, M.C. Manso, Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 118, 423–428 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Mangaraj, T.K. Goswami, S.K. Giri, M.K. Tripathi, Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 71, 1–12 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Hailu, T.S. Workneh, D. Belew, J. Food Sci. Technol. 51, 2947–2963 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Mangaraj, T.K. Goswami, S.K. Giri, C.G. Joshy, J. Food Sci. Technol. 51, 2925–2946 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H.R. Bolin, C.C. Huxsoll, J. Food Sci. 42, 1319–1321 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Kato-Noguchi, A.E. Watada, Hortic. Sci. 32, 136 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N.R. Sahoo, M.K. Panda, L.M. Bal, U.S. Pal, D. Sahoo, Sci. Hortic. 182, 1–7 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. N.R. Sahoo, L.M. Bal, U.S. Pal, D. Sahoo, J Food Meas. Charact. 8, 164–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L.M. Bal, A. Kar, S. Satya, S.N. Naik, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 46, 827–833 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. N.R. Sahoo, L.M. Bal, U.S. Pal, D. Sahoo, Food Packag. Shelf Life 5, 56–62 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Fikselová, S. Šilhár, J. Mareček, H. Frančáková, Czech J. Food Sci. 26, 268–274 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Tirkey, U.S. Pal, L.M. Bal, N.R. Sahoo, C.K. Bakhara, M.K. Panda, Food Packag. Shelf Life 1, 190–197 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.G. Klaiber, S. Baur, G. Wolf, W.P. Hammes, R. Carle, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 6, 351–362 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K.A. Khan, M.B. Patel, SAARC J. Agric. 8, 29–38 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Dhalsamant, S.K. Dash, L.M. Bal, M.K. Panda, Sci. Hortic. 189, 41–51 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Izumi, A.E. Watada, J. Food Sci. 59, 106–109 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Pilon, M. Oetterer, R. Cláudio, C.R. Gallo, M.H.F. Spoto, Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment. 26, 150–158 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. L.R. Howard, T. Dewim, J. Food Sci. 61, 643–645 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Li, M.M. Barth, Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 14, 51–60 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DGHM, http://www.lm.mibi.uni-bonn.de/dghm.html (2002)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lalit M. Bal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawange, S.P., Dash, S.K., Bal, L.M. et al. Quality of minimally processed carrots in perforation-mediated modified-atmosphere packaging (PM-MAP). Food Measure 10, 746–754 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9359-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9359-3

Keywords

Navigation