Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimizing bioethanol production by regulating yeast growth energy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Systems and Synthetic Biology

Abstract

The goal of this work is to optimize production of bio-ethanol by fermentation through regulating yeast growth energy (YGE), and provide the mechanism of ethanol production from food-waste leachate (FWL) using yeast (S. cerevisiae) as inoculums to be predictable and controllable. The wide range of reduced sugar concentration (RSC) which is commonly administered from low (35 g per liter) to very high (100 g per liter) is responsible for costs increasing besides risks of FWL contamination and death of yeast cells. A mathematical model is presented to describe yeast growth energy (YGE) due to RSC doses along with predicting the amounts of ethanol yield by each dose to identify the optimum one. Simulations of the presented model showed that YGE, energy intake (EI), and their produced ethanol energy (PEE) are always balanced during fermentation process according to the law of conservation of energy. For a better fermentation rate in a continuous process and a large-scale production; YGE should be less than half of EI and more than its quarter (i.e. \( \frac{ 1}{ 4}{\text{EI}} \le {\text{YGE}} \le \frac{1}{2}{\text{EI}} \)) which keeps the residual energy less than YGE to avoid risks of osmotic stresses or aging of cells allowing the survival of all yeast cells as long as possible to maximize ethanol production and decrease productivity costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EI:

Energy intake

RE:

Residual energy

CE:

Consumed energy

PPE:

Produced ethanol energy

tD :

Doubling time

CGE:

Cell growth energy

YGE:

Yeast growth energy

References

  • APHA (1998) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington D.C

  • Austriaco NRJ (1996) Review: to bud until death: the genetics of ageing in the yeast Saccharomyces. Yeast 12:623–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai F, Anderson W, Young M (2007) Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 26:89–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Ricci J, Tsu M, Bailey J (1992) Biotechnol Bioeng 39:59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douka E, Koukkou A, Vartholomatos G, Frillingos S, Papamichael E, Drianas C (1999) A Zymomonas mobilis mutant with delayed growth on high glucose concentrations. J Bacteriol 181(15):4598–4604

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garda J, Macedo RM, Faria R, Bernd L, Dors GC, Furlong EB (2005) Alcoholic fermentation effects on malt spiked with trichothecenes. Food Control 16:423–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill P, Klaptach T, Lynd L (1993) Biotechnol Bioeng 42:873–883

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadambiniguar (2006) PROCESS optimization for the production of ethanol via fermentation, Patiala-147004

  • Kennedy B, Austriaco NRJ, Guarente L (1994) Daughter cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from old mothers display a reduced life span. J Cell Biol 127:1985–1993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang K, Lang P, Bauer C (2005) Mechanisms of suicidal erythrocyte death. Cell Physiol Biochem 15(5):195–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Man H, Kim JW, Park HS (2008) Optimization of ethanol production from Korean food waste leachate using response surface methodology. In Korea Society of Waste Management conference, Sunchon University, Sunchon,Republic of Korea 8–10 May

  • Le Man H, Behera S, Park H (2010) Optimization of operational parameters for ethanol production from Korean food waste leachate. Int J Environ Sci Tech 7(1):157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Man H, Rene E, Behera S, Park H (2011) Main and interaction effects of process parameters on the ethanol production capacity of food: waste leachate by saccharomyces cerevisiae. KSCE J Civil Eng 15(6):1015–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GL (1959) Use of DNS reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moawad E (2010) Isolated system towards a successful radiotherapy treatment. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moawad E (2011a) Radiotherapy and risks of tumor regrowth or inducing second cancer. Cancer Nano 2:81–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moawad E (2011) Bioethanol production by fermentation is an energy balance process, 19th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, DOI: 10.5071/19thEUBCE2011VP4.5.1. http://www.etaflorence.it/proceedings/index.asp?detail=6521&searchstring=Bioethanol

  • Moawad EY (2012a) Clinical and pathological cancer staging at the nanoscale, Cancer Nanotechnol. doi:10.1007/s12645-012-0028-x

  • Moawad EY (2012b) Reconciliation between the clinical and pathological staging of cancer, Comp Clin Pathol. doi:10.1007/s00580-012-1603-6

  • Nahvi I, Emtiaxi G, Alkabi L (2002) Isolation of a flocculating Saccharomyces cerevisiae and investigation of its performance in the fermentation of beet molasses to ethanol. Biomass Bioenerg 23:481–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pena A, Cinco G, Gomez-Puyou A, Tuena M (1972) Effect of the pH of the incubation medium on glycolysis and respiration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Biochem Biophys 153(2):413–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phisalaphong M, Srirattana N, Tanthapanichakoon W (2005) Mathematical modeling to investigate temperature effect on kinetic parameters of ethanol fermentation”. Biochem Eng J 28:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger G (1996) Carbohydrate metabolism in Zymomonas mobilis: a catabolic highway with some scenic routes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 145:301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Koike Y, Liu K, An M, Morimura S, Wu X, Kida K (2008) Ethanol production from kitchen waste using the flocculating yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain KF-7. Biomass Bioenerg 32:1037–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voet D, Voet J (1995) Biochemistry (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN978-0471586517

  • Xin L, Yongfei L, Zuoying D, Zhouygui M (2003) The effect of effect of different substrate concentration on ethanol fermentation. Fd Ferment Indus 29:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav B, Sheoran A, Rani U, Singh D (1997) High ethanol productivity in an immobilized cell reactor Indian. J Microbiol 37:65–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest concerning this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emad Y. Moawad.

Additional information

The author is a member of the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine and of the World Conference of Interventional Oncology (WCIO) USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moawad, E.Y. Optimizing bioethanol production by regulating yeast growth energy. Syst Synth Biol 6, 61–68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-012-9099-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-012-9099-6

Keywords

Navigation