Introduction

Chagas disease (CD) is considered an important public health issue in countries where is still endemic, additionally belongs to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), specifically SDG number 3 with regard to the health component [1].

CD or American Trypanosomiasis is an anthropozoonoses belonging to the group of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) that annually infects approximately 7 million people and remains endemic in 21 Latin American countries [2, 3]. This infection, initially was restricted to rural areas and due to intense urbanization and migratory phenomena, has increasingly taken over urbanized scenarios. The routes of transmission are diverse, ranging from vectorial transmission through contact with feces of the vector of the Triatominae genus infected by the Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) parasite; ingestion of food contaminated with feces of the infected vector; through contaminated transfusions; via congenital transmission or through transplants not screened for infection. Thus, if infection occurs, it can have manifestations which can be acute or chronic, sometimes going unnoticed by the health system [3,4,5] The purpose of the following research was to characterize the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) in relation to Chagas disease in two rural settlements of the Colombian Caribbean with previous records of the disease and/or the parasite [6].

Materials and methods

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. The research project also named “CHAGCOV project” because was performed during post-COVID took place in two rural settlements in the Colombian Caribbean region. The first one was a village in the Department of Atlántico named Corrales de San Luis (coordinates 10º52 × 27´´N74º58 × 43´´O), described by local research activities as a site of triatomine and T. cruzi circulation with no reports of positive cases of Chagas disease at the time of this research. Similarly, the municipality of Villanueva (coordinates 10º26 × 39´´N75º16 × 29´O) in the Department of Bolivar, was investigated, Villanueva had previous reports of orally transmitted Chagas cases [6, 7].

The target population age of the study was people over one (1) year old, being resident of the selected municipality. All the data was collected during 2021by an administered questionary to every recruited individual. All the dwellings of the selected populations were surveyed. Once the aim of the study was explained to the members of the house and after signing the informed consent form (individual or the responsible adult), the data collection instrument (administered questionary) was applied by the research member, remembering that the parent should answer the questions in the case o < 8 years old kids The structure of the instrument (survey) consisted initially of sociodemographic data (age, origin, sex, schooling, social security, occupation), variables related to household composition (number of inhabitants, basic sanitation); housing structure (construction material, use of repellents, domestic animals); knowledge of Chagas disease (7 questions on the disease, 7 questions on the vector); and the question of identification of positive cases in the community. Finally, the level of knowledge was rated as “Excellent”, “Fair” or Very Poor according to the responses obtained and the score applied of the answers.

All information was collected by health professionals. Informed consent was obtained for all patients who agreed to participate. All the information collected was recorded in an electronic database and analyzed with Epi-Info v. 7.1 CDC® software. The information collected was analyzed by descriptive statistics according to its nature, using statistical significance for all analyses as ≤ 0,05. Quantitative variableswill be explained by measures of central tendency (mean, media, mode). Parametric and no parametric test will be performed according the nature of the variables and its distribution (normality).

Results

Sociodemographic Characterization of the Population

A total of 272 inhabitants of both municipalities were included. In general, 65.8% of those surveyed were women, with an average age of 27 (interquartile range -RIC- 17–39) years, 92.7% were Colombian nationals and predominantly of socioeconomic stratum 1 (98.9%). In terms of access to social security, 66.5% belonged to a state subsidized regime and 7% had no access to the health system; with regard to occupation, 40.8% were engaged in housework, followed by school work (29.8%) and only 2.9% in agricultural work. In respect of schooling, 39.3% had secondary schooling and 7.4% had none. The demographic composition of the study population was distributed similarly in both municipalities (see Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic distribution of the population studied, Corrales de San Luis, Atlántico and Villanueva (Bolívar)

Home and Housing Infrastructure

Regarding housing and residence in the area, 81.6% of the surveyed were homeowners with a higher proportion in Corrales de San Luis, Atlántico (92.4%), as well as the time of residence in general was on average 11 (RIC 4–19) years, with a higher average length of stay in Corrales de San Luis, Atlántico (14 RIC 5–25 years). The average household composition was 4 (RIC 3–5) persons; with dwellings that on average had 2 (RIC 2–2) bedrooms and 16.5% overcrowded. Related to basic sanitation, 92.7% of the total population had access to potable water, 99.7% had access to electricity, and only 9% had access to sewerage service. Of the total included, 50.7% had access to propane gas for food preparation and 21.7% used firewood for cooking (see Table 2).

Table 2 Household infrastructure of the population studied, Corrales de San Luis, Atlántico and Villanueva (Bolívar)

In respect of household infrastructure, 94.5% of the houses had zinc tile roofs, 47.2% of the walls were made of cement followed by 22.1% of mud and wood. Specifically, in Corrales de San Luis Atlántico 43.3% of the homes had mud walls, 50% had cement floors and in Villanueva Bolívar 65.4% of the walls were made of cement and 71.4% had cement floors. Similarly, 91.9% of the households had independent spaces and 87.1% of the households were organized both intra and peri-domiciliary. The presence of domestic animals was found in 75.7%, with dogs predominating in 55.1%, followed by birds in 28.3%. This was related to the presence of 98.9% of peri-domiciliary space, 59.6% of which had domestic animals (see Table 2).

Knowledge about Chagas Disease (CD)

When asked about the level of knowledge about Chagas disease (CD), 60.7% of the surveyed stated that they had heard of the disease, with a higher proportion (72.9%) in Villanueva, Bolivar (p < 0.0001). When asked how CD was transmitted, only 25.4% of the population answered correctly (p < 0.003) and 14.7% (p 0.03) of the inhabitants knew some symptom of CD. In this way it was identified that 62.1% (p < 0.0001) of the respondents had some degree of knowledge about Chagas disease but when objectifying this knowledge, 86% of the subjects had a very poor level of knowledge about the disease (p 0.024) (See Table 3).

Table 3 Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to Chagas Diseases (CD) of population surveyed at Corrales de San Luis, Atlántico and Villanueva (Bolívar), Colombia

Vector Knowledge

Investigating the level of knowledge about the triatomine species and with the help of sample images of it, 44.5% of the population stated that they could identify the vector; they also knew the places where the vector was found in 21.3%, and only 10.3% knew correctly how it fed and how was transmitted the infection. It was found that 4.8% of those evaluated knew there was a relationship between the vector, domestic animals and the disease.

Regarding the presence of the vector in the home, 12.5% stated that they had seen it. Therefore, 93.8% (p 0.017) of the investigated subjects were rated regarding their level of knowledge about the vector as very poor (see Table 3).

Use of Preventive Measures

To avoid contact with the vector, 61.4% of the population uses insecticides, followed by skin repellents (23.2%) and intra-domiciliary mosquito nets (22.8%) (see Table 3).

In an analysis of the population evaluated in the two municipalities and taking into account the degree of knowledge of the disease, it was observed that the female sex had the lowest level of knowledge about the disease and the vector, especially in the age group between 50 and 59 years and in the sector with the lowest level of schooling without discrimination in the occupation developed, which when compared between the two municipalities was statistically significant (See Table 4).

Table 4 Knowledge level of Chagas Disease according to Sociodemographic distribution of the population studied, Corrales de San Luis, Atlántico and Villanueva (Bolívar)

Likewise, among the two populations studied, the worst level of knowledge about the disease and the vector was observed in the inhabitants who had lived in their homes for more than 5 years, regardless of the type of construction material (see Table 5).

Table 5 Knowledge level of Chagas Disease according to Household structure of the population studied vs. Chagas knowledge in Corrales de San Luis, Atlántico and Villanueva (Bolívar)

Discussion

The characterization of knowledge about Chagas disease (CD) in populations with risk factors is essential for prevention strategies like primary and secondary prevention activities aimed for instance to reduce the incidence of new cases, educate the community, and in general, try to control the frequency of the disease not only in populations with high infection rates but also in areas with susceptible communities and elevated probabilities of being infected due to the presence of the vector, the parasite and/or diagnosed patients [8, 9]. This study shows that in most of the surveyed individuals the lack of education related to Chagas and all the basic aspects of the disease is high and in some cases the perception of protection against the illness is wrong, despite of an elevated (apparently) degree of recognition to the illness; this is denoted as many gaps in the accuracy of knowledge in more than 80% of the population included, mostly in persons over 50 years who had the lowest levels of education and restricted healthcare access.

In Latin American countries similar studies and investigations in other regions of Colombia different from ours have findings in this regard. Ruiz et al. in Mexico documented a high nescience of CD in rural populations, with more than 70% of total ignorance about the disease, although this population had a better result in terms of practices related to CD [10]. Similarly, Sanmartino et al. in Argentina probed through KAP strategies that inhabitants of endemic areas have limited knowledge about the Triatominae genus compromising the attitude of the residents towards the presence of this vector in their communities [11].

On the other hand, in Colombia, the research performed in this area has controversial results; the KAP surveillance by Cano et al. in Casanare found an adequate degree of understanding about CD in more than 70% of the sample surveyed, and as a result of previous interventions it could be identified the community recognition of several aspects of the Chagas disease [12]. The Colombian (Boyacá) KAP Chagas study published in 2022 by Ramírez Lopez et al. in a different Colombian zone mostly in rural population with similar characteristics like our data, reporting an optimal percentage and level of knowledge but paradoxically with bad practices that did not prevent the disease from being found at home. Our results were that with a high level of knowledge of the disease (most related to transmission) and the vector (recognition), but objectively interpreted in 80% as bad percentage in both (knowledge of the CD and vector) and with satisfactory results of the “Practice”component, let us respectfully hypothesize that education strategies, media coverage of some recent cases at this communities, and sometimes the union between the inhabitants could play and important role. Now in the case of both localities (Corrales de San Luis and Villanueva) respect to vector knowledge some differences were found in favor of more recognition of the vector at Corrales de San Luis possible related to the research work done in the past by some universities that included community education strategies about the disease and the vector. Respecting of the cero reports of been bitten by the vector at Villanueva, this could be related with the “Very bad” percentage of vector knowledge witch was 97,1%, suggesting a possible false absent of being bitten by the Triatominae genus in Villanueva. Further studies should be necessary related to this aspect [13, 14].

In the case of interventions, Montes et al. in Honduras reported that in exposed populations followed for Chagas disease, a greater degree of knowledge and better practices in relation to the risk of contracting the infection is identified, highlighting also the relevance of health education and the application of prevention strategies at communities focused on train the population at risk against contact with vector and/or the parasite cause of Chagas disease [12, 15].

House infrastructure (housing) plays an important role related to vector transmission. A great percentage of the domiciles included were documented to have arranged spaces with low levels of overcrowding but, it was found to had partially connection to basic sanitation services. The insufficient access to sewage and the presence of animals in the peridomicile, predominantly dogs, were noteworthy [16, 17]. Similar investigations have revealed that for example the infrastructure of the dwellings, the construction material as well its internal environment distribution could play a role in favor of the vector reproduction and consequently the prevalence of the infection at risk areas of CD.

Entomological surveys in Central America documented infestation rates > 20%, which is considered high and emphasize the urgency of mitigation strategies. Interventions include housing infrastructure (changing construction materials), especially at the presence of risk factors for infection (vector infestation rate and/or overcrowding spaces and/or high frequency of nearby diagnosed cases) [18].

Prevention strategies to control the spread of the vector begins from the basics of parasite, vector and disease knowledge. Therefore, in our research the individuals surveyed revealed that nearly 50% of the sample affirmed to know the vector. Parisi et al. in Bolivia also informed adequate knowledge of the vector, but also found that in consequence of decrease at notification of new infections there was a relaxation of prevention measures and was possible to document a false sense of confidence of the population towards the vector [19, 20].

Therefore, the implementation of different strategies and prevention approaches to control the vector requires a multidisciplinary taskforce that includes interventions related to public health, healthcare access (laboratory diagnostic services, clinical updated guidelines) as well as basic sanitation conditions (sustainable development goals 1, 2, 3 6, 11, 13, 15, 17), all this forces together have directly positive impact on the epidemiological indicators of Chagas infection [1, 21, 22].

As limitations for this study the research team must declare that a bigger sample and better standardization of the instrument used during surveillance may resolve some doubts.

This original work with non-precedent in these Colombian Caribbean areas may validate the principle that public health intervention strategies in the case of Chagas Diseases should and must be monitored over time uninterruptedly in order to provide updated evidence of surveillance of this pathology that occurs with low frequency or is not reported yet in some Colombian risk areas (Corrales de San Luis and/or Villanueva, Colombia) but has scientific evidence of vector and/or parasite circulation [6, 23, 24].