Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy: a technological review

  • Review
  • Published:
Frontiers of Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is widely used to treat cancer. Technological advances in RT have occurred in the past 30 years. These advances, such as three-dimensional image guidance, intensity modulation, and robotics, created challenges and opportunities for the next breakthrough, in which artificial intelligence (AI) will possibly play important roles. AI will replace certain repetitive and labor-intensive tasks and improve the accuracy and consistency of others, particularly those with increased complexity because of technological advances. The improvement in efficiency and consistency is important to manage the increasing cancer patient burden to the society. Furthermore, AI may provide new functionalities that facilitate satisfactory RT. The functionalities include superior images for real-time intervention and adaptive and personalized RT. AI may effectively synthesize and analyze big data for such purposes. This review describes the RT workflow and identifies areas, including imaging, treatment planning, quality assurance, and outcome prediction, that benefit from AI. This review primarily focuses on deep-learning techniques, although conventional machine-learning techniques are also mentioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW, Martinez AA. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53(5): 1337–1349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mutic S, Dempsey JF. The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2014; 24(3): 196–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brahme A. Current algorithms for computed electron beam dose planning. Radiother Oncol 1985; 3(4): 347–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brahme A, Andreo P. Dosimetry and quality specification of high energy photon beams. Acta Radiol Oncol 1986; 25(3): 213–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brahme A, Roos JE, Lax I. Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy. Phys Med Biol 1982; 27(10): 1221–1229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brahme A, Agren AK. Optimal dose distribution for eradication of heterogeneous tumours. Acta Oncol 1987; 26(5): 377–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woods K, Lee P, Kaprealian T, Yang I, Sheng K. Cochlea-sparing acoustic neuroma treatment with 4π radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 3(2): 100–107

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu VY, Landers A, Woods K, Nguyen D, Cao M, Du D, Chin RK, Sheng K, Kaprealian TB. A prospective 4π radiation therapy clinical study in recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101(1): 144–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murzin VL, Woods K, Moiseenko V, Karunamuni R, Tringale KR, Seibert TM, Connor MJ, Simpson DR, Sheng K, Hattangadi-Gluth JA. 4π plan optimization for cortical-sparing brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127(1): 128–135

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tran A, Woods K, Nguyen D, Yu VY, Niu T, Cao M, Lee P, Sheng K. Predicting liver SBRT eligibility and plan quality for VMAT and 4π plans. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12(1): 70

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Woods K, Nguyen D, Tran A, Yu VY, Cao M, Niu T, Lee P, Sheng K. Viability of non-coplanar VMAT for liver SBRT as compared to coplanar VMAT and beam orientation optimized 4π IMRT. Adv Radiat Oncol 2016; 1(1): 67–75

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rwigema JC, Nguyen D, Heron DE, Chen AM, Lee P, Wang PC, Vargo JA, Low DA, Huq MS, Tenn S, Steinberg ML, Kupelian P, Sheng K. 4π noncoplanar stereotactic body radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: potential to improve tumor control and late toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 91(2): 401–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen D, Rwigema JC, Yu VY, Kaprealian T, Kupelian P, Selch M, Lee P, Low DA, Sheng K. Feasibility of extreme dose escalation for glioblastoma multiforme using 4π radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9(1): 239

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong P, Lee P, Ruan D, Long T, Romeijn E, Low DA, Kupelian P, Abraham J, Yang Y, Sheng K. 4π noncoplanar stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located or larger lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86(3): 407–413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong P, Lee P, Ruan D, Long T, Romeijn E, Yang Y, Low D, Kupelian P, Sheng K. 4π non-coplanar liver SBRT: a novel delivery technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85(5): 1360–1366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor D, Yu V, Nguyen D, Ruan D, Sheng K. Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for non-coplanar IMRT. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63(4): 045015

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Keyrilainen J, Fernandez M, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Virkkunen P, Leidenius M, von Smitten K, Sipila P, Fiedler S, Suhonen H, Suortti P, Bravin A. Toward high-contrast breast CT at low radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 249(1): 321–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen H, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhang W, Sun H, Lv Y, Liao P, Zhou J, Wang G. LEARN: learned experts’ assessment-based reconstruction network for sparse-data CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(6): 1333–1347

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ha S, Mueller K. A look-up table-based ray integration framework for 2-D/3-D forward and back projection in X-ray CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(2): 361–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. He J, Yang Y, Wang Y, Zeng D, Bian Z, Zhang H, Sun J, Xu Z, Ma J. Optimizing a parameterized plug-and-play ADMM for iterative low-dose CT reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019; 38(2): 371–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang E, Chang W, Yoo J, Ye JC. Deep convolutional framelet denosing for low-dose CT via wavelet residual network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(6): 1358–1369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li S, Zeng D, Peng J, Bian Z, Zhang H, Xie Q, Wang Y, Liao Y, Zhang S, Huang J, Meng D, Xu Z, Ma J. An efficient iterative cerebral perfusion CT reconstruction via low-rank tensor decomposition with spatial-temporal total variation regularization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019; 38(2): 360–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mechlem K, Ehn S, Sellerer T, Braig E, Munzel D, Pfeiffer F, Noel PB. Joint statistical iterative material image reconstruction for spectral computed tomography using a semi-empirical forward model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(1): 68–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cai A, Li L, Zheng Z, Wang L, Yan B. Block-matching sparsity regularization-based image reconstruction for low-dose computed tomography. Med Phys 2018; 45(6): 2439–2452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kang E, Koo HJ, Yang DH, Seo JB, Ye JC. Cycle-consistent adversarial denoising network for multiphase coronary CT angiography. Med Phys 2019; 46(2): 550–562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Nierop BJ, Prince JF, van Rooij R, van den Bosch M, Lam M, de Jong H. Accuracy of SPECT/CT-based lung dose calculation for Holmium-166 hepatic radioembolization before OSEM convergence. Med Phys 2018; 45(8): 3871–3879

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gu C, Zeng D, Lin J, Li S, He J, Zhang H, Bian Z, Niu S, Zhang Z, Huang J, Chen B, Zhao D, Chen W, Ma J. Promote quantitative ischemia imaging via myocardial perfusion CT iterative reconstruction with tensor total generalized variation regularization. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63(12): 125009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holbrook M, Clark DP, Badea CT. Low-dose 4D cardiac imaging in small animals using dual source micro-CT. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63(2): 025009

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu W, Wang C, Nie X, Zeng D. Sparsity-induced dynamic guided filtering approach for sparse-view data toward low-dose X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63(23): 235016

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bian J, Yang K, Boone JM, Han X, Sidky EY, Pan X. Investigation of iterative image reconstruction in low-dose breast CT. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59(11): 2659–2685

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shan H, Zhang Y, Yang Q, Kruger U, Kalra MK, Sun L, Cong W, Wang G. 3-D convolutional encoder-decoder network for low-dose CT via transfer learning from a 2-D trained network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(6): 1522–1534

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang Q, Yan P, Zhang Y, Yu H, Shi Y, Mou X, Kalra MK, Zhang Y, Sun L, Wang G. Low-dose CT image denoising using a generative adversarial network with wasserstein distance and perceptual loss. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(6): 1348–1357

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yi X, Babyn P. Sharpness-aware low-dose CT denoising using conditional generative adversarial network. J Digit Imaging 2018; 31(5): 655–669

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. You C, Yang Q, Shan H, Gjesteby L, Li G, Ju S, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Cong W, Wang G. Structurally-sensitive multi-scale deep neural network for low-dose CT denoising. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 41839–41855

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kang E, Min J, Ye JC. A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction. Med Phys 2017; 44(10): e360–e375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen H, Zhang Y, Kalra MK, Lin F, Chen Y, Liao P, Zhou J, Wang G. Low-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2017; 36(12): 2524–2535

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen H, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liao P, Li K, Zhou J, Wang G. Low-dose CT via convolutional neural network. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8(2): 679–694

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lyu Q, Yang C, Gao H, Xue Y, O’Connor D, Niu T, Sheng K. Technical Note: Iterative megavoltage CT (MVCT) reconstruction using block-matching 3D-transform (BM3D) regularization. Med Phys 2018; 45(6): 2603–2610

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lyu Q, Ruan D, Hoffman J, Neph R, McNitt-Gray M, Sheng K. Iterative reconstruction for low dose CT using Plug-and-Play alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework. SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing 2019; 2019: 10949

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stankovic U, Ploeger LS, van Herk M, Sonke JJ. Optimal combination of anti-scatter grids and software correction for CBCT imaging. Med Phys 2017; 44(9): 4437–4451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu J, Sisniega A, Zbijewski W, Dang H, Stayman JW, Wang X, Foos DH, Aygun N, Koliatsos VE, Siewerdsen JH. Modeling and design of a cone-beam CT head scanner using task-based imaging performance optimization. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61(8): 3180–3207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang H, Kong F, Ren L, Jin JY. An inter-projection interpolation (IPI) approach with geometric model restriction to reduce image dose in cone beam CT (CBCT). In: Zhang YJ, Tavares JMRS. Computational Modeling of Objects Presented in Images. Fundamentals, Methods, and Applications. CompIMAGE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8641. Springer, Cham. 2014: 12–23

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stankovic U, van Herk M, Ploeger LS, Sonke JJ. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid. Med Phys 2014; 41(6): 061910

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sisniega A, Zbijewski W, Badal A, Kyprianou IS, Stayman JW, Vaquero JJ, Siewerdsen JH. Monte Carlo study of the effects of system geometry and antiscatter grids on cone-beam CT scatter distributions. Med Phys 2013; 40(5): 051915

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ren L, Yin FF, Chetty IJ, Jaffray DA, Jin JY. Feasibility study of a synchronized-moving-grid (SMOG) system to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Phys 2012; 39(8): 5099–5110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jin JY, Ren L, Liu Q, Kim J, Wen N, Guan H, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Phys 2010; 37(11): 5634–5644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sun M, Star-Lack JM. Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55(22): 6695–6720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lu Y, Peng B, Lau BA, Hu YH, Scaduto DA, Zhao W, Gindi G. A scatter correction method for contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60(16): 6323–6354

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dang H, Stayman JW, Sisniega A, Xu J, Zbijewski W, Wang X, Foos DH, Aygun N, Koliatsos VE, Siewerdsen JH. Statistical reconstruction for cone-beam CT with a post-artifact-correction noise model: application to high-quality head imaging. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60(16): 6153–6175

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Watson PG, Mainegra-Hing E, Tomic N, Seuntjens J. Implementation of an efficient Monte Carlo calculation for CBCT scatter correction: phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16(4): 216–227

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim C, Park M, Sung Y, Lee J, Choi J, Cho S. Data consistency-driven scatter kernel optimization for X-ray cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60(15): 5971–5994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Xu Y, Bai T, Yan H, Ouyang L, Pompos A, Wang J, Zhou L, Jiang SB, Jia X. A practical cone-beam CT scatter correction method with optimized Monte Carlo simulations for image-guided radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60(9): 3567–3587

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Sisniega A, Zbijewski W, Xu J, Dang H, Stayman JW, Yorkston J, Aygun N, Koliatsos V, Siewerdsen JH. High-fidelity artifact correction for cone-beam CT imaging of the brain. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60(4): 1415–1439

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ritschl L, Fahrig R, Knaup M, Maier J, Kachelriess M. Robust primary modulation-based scatter estimation for cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2015; 42(1): 469–478

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Bootsma GJ, Verhaegen F, Jaffray DA. Efficient scatter distribution estimation and correction in CBCT using concurrent Monte Carlo fitting. Med Phys 2015; 42(1): 54–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zbijewski W, Sisniega A, Stayman JW, Muhit A, Thawait G, Packard N, Senn R, Yang D, Yorkston J, Carrino JA, Siewerdsen JH. High-performance soft-tissue imaging in extremity cone-beam CT. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2014; 9033: 903329

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Pawlowski JM, Ding GX. An algorithm for kilovoltage X-ray dose calculations with applications in kV-CBCT scans and 2D planar projected radiographs. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59(8): 2041–2058

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Li J, Yao W, Xiao Y, Yu Y. Feasibility of improving cone-beam CT number consistency using a scatter correction algorithm. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2013; 14(6): 4346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Aootaphao S, Thongvigitmanee SS, Rajruangrabin J, Junhunee P, Thajchayapong P. Experiment-based scatter correction for cone-beam computed tomography using the statistical method. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013; 2013: 5087–5090

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Thing RS, Bernchou U, Mainegra-Hing E, Brink C. Patient-specific scatter correction in clinical cone beam computed tomography imaging made possible by the combination of Monte Carlo simulations and a ray tracing algorithm. Acta Oncol 2013; 52(7): 1477–1483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Muhit AA, Arora S, Ogawa M, Ding Y, Zbijewski W, Stayman JW, Thawait G, Packard N, Senn R, Yang D, Yorkston J, Bingham CO 3rd, Means K, Carrino JA, Siewerdsen JH. Peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) using a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT scanner. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2013; 8672: 867203

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Meng B, Lee H, Xing L, Fahimian BP. Single-scan patient-specific scatter correction in computed tomography using peripheral detection of scatter and compressed sensing scatter retrieval. Med Phys 2013; 40(1): 011907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Boylan CJ, Marchant TE, Stratford J, Malik J, Choudhury A, Shrimali R, Rodgers J, Rowbottom CG. A megavoltage scatter correction technique for cone-beam CT images acquired during VMAT delivery. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57(12): 3727–3739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Niu T, Al-Basheer A, Zhu L. Quantitative cone-beam CT imaging in radiation therapy using planning CT as a prior: first patient studies. Med Phys 2012; 39(4): 1991–2000

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Hunter AK, McDavid WD. Characterization and correction of cupping effect artefacts in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41(3): 217–223

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Niu T, Zhu L. Scatter correction for full-fan volumetric CT using a stationary beam blocker in a single full scan. Med Phys 2011; 38(11): 6027–6038

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. van Herk M, Ploeger L, Sonke JJ. A novel method for megavoltage scatter correction in cone-beam CT acquired concurrent with rotational irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100(3): 365–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rührnschopf EP, Klingenbeck K. A general framework and review of scatter correction methods in X-ray cone-beam computerized tomography. Part 1: Scatter compensation approaches. Med Phys 2011; 38(7): 4296–4311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Elstrøm UV, Muren LP, Petersen JB, Grau C. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region. Acta Oncol 2011; 50(6): 908–917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Sun M, Nagy T, Virshup G, Partain L, Oelhafen M, Star-Lack J. Correction for patient table-induced scattered radiation in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Phys 2011; 38(4): 2058–2073

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang J, Mao W, Solberg T. Scatter correction for cone-beam computed tomography using moving blocker strips: a preliminary study. Med Phys 2010; 37(11): 5792–5800

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lazos D, Williamson JF. Monte Carlo evaluation of scatter mitigation strategies in cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2010; 37(10): 5456–5470

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Niu T, Sun M, Star-Lack J, Gao H, Fan Q, Zhu L. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images. Med Phys 2010; 37(10): 5395–5406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Mainegra-Hing E, Kawrakow I. Variance reduction techniques for fast Monte Carlo CBCT scatter correction calculations. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55(16): 4495–4507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yu L, Vrieze TJ, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM, DeLone DR, Pallanch JF, Lindell EP, McCollough CH. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194(2): W193–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Guan H, Dong H. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54(20): 6239–6250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Reitz I, Hesse BM, Nill S, Tucking T, Oelfke U. Enhancement of image quality with a fast iterative scatter and beam hardening correction method for kV CBCT. Z Med Phys 2009; 19(3): 158–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Poludniowski G, Evans PM, Hansen VN, Webb S. An efficient Monte Carlo-based algorithm for scatter correction in keV cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54(12): 3847–3864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Li H, Mohan R, Zhu XR. Scatter kernel estimation with an edge-spread function method for cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53(23): 6729–6748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rinkel J, Gerfault L, Esteve F, Dinten JM. A new method for X-ray scatter correction: first assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52(15): 4633–4652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Letourneau D, Wong R, Moseley D, Sharpe MB, Ansell S, Gospodarowicz M, Jaffray DA. Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67(4): 1229–1237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Jarry G, Graham SA, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DJ, Siewerdsen JH, Verhaegen F. Characterization of scattered radiation in kV CBCT images using Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys 2006; 33(11): 4320–4329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Siewerdsen JH, Daly MJ, Bakhtiar B, Moseley DJ, Richard S, Keller H, Jaffray DA. A simple, direct method for X-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2006; 33(1): 187–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Ning R, Tang X, Conover D. X-ray scatter correction algorithm for cone beam CT imaging. Med Phys 2004; 31(5): 1195–1202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Wang A, Maslowski A, Messmer P, Lehmann M, Strzelecki A, Yu E, Paysan P, Brehm M, Munro P, Star-Lack J, Seghers D. Acuros CTS: a fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography scatter — Part II: system modeling, scatter correction, and optimization. Med Phys 2018; 45(5): 1914–1925

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Maslowski A, Wang A, Sun M, Wareing T, Davis I, Star-Lack J. Acuros CTS: a fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography scatter — Part I: core algorithms and validation. Med Phys 2018; 45(5): 1899–1913

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Harms J, Lei Y, Wang T, Zhang R, Zhou J, Tang X, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. Paired cycle-GAN-based image correction for quantitative cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2019; 46(9): 3998–4009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Jiang Y, Yang C, Yang P, Hu X, Luo C, Xue Y, Xu L, Hu X, Zhang L, Wang J, Sheng K, Niu T. Scatter correction of cone-beam CT using a deep residual convolution neural network (DRCNN). Phys Med Biol 2019; 64(14): 145003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Liang X, Chen L, Nguyen D, Zhou Z, Gu X, Yang M, Wang J, Jiang S. Generating synthesized computed tomography (CT) from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using CycleGAN for adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64(12): 125002

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Nomura Y, Xu Q, Shirato H, Shimizu S, Xing L. Projection-domain scatter correction for cone beam computed tomography using a residual convolutional neural network. Med Phys 2019; 46(7): 3142–3155

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Hansen DC, Landry G, Kamp F, Li M, Belka C, Parodi K, Kurz C. ScatterNet: a convolutional neural network for cone-beam CT intensity correction. Med Phys 2018; 45(11): 4916–4926

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Jiang Y, Yang C, Yang P, Hu X, Luo C, Xue Y, Xu L, Hu X, Zhang L, Wang J, Sheng K, Niu T. Scatter correction of cone-beam CT using a deep residual convolution neural network (DRCNN). Phys Med Biol 2019; 64(14): 145003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47(6): 1202–1210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, Scholmerich J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Volk M, Herfarth H. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2(6): 491–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Paganelli C, Kipritidis J, Lee D, Baroni G, Keall P, Riboldi M. Image-based retrospective 4D MRI in external beam radiotherapy: a comparative study with a digital phantom. Med Phys 2018; 45 (7): 3161–3172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Paganelli C, Summers P, Gianoli C, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Riboldi M. A tool for validating MRI-guided strategies: a digital breathing CT/MRI phantom of the abdominal site. Med Biol Eng Comput 2017; 55(11): 2001–2014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Li G, Wei J, Olek D, Kadbi M, Tyagi N, Zakian K, Mechalakos J, Deasy JO, Hunt M. Direct comparison of respiration-correlated four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstructed using concurrent internal navigator and external bellows. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97(3): 596–605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Bernatowicz K, Peroni M, Perrin R, Weber DC, Lomax A. Four-dimensional dose reconstruction for scanned proton therapy using liver 4DCT-MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95(1): 216–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Glide-Hurst CK, Kim JP, To D, Hu Y, Kadbi M, Nielsen T, Chetty IJ. Four dimensional magnetic resonance imaging optimization and implementation for magnetic resonance imaging simulation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2015; 5(6): 433–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Paganelli C, Summers P, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Riboldi M. Liver 4DMRI: a retrospective image-based sorting method. Med Phys 2015; 42(8): 4814–4821

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Panandiker AS, Winchell A, Loeffler R, Song R, Rolen M, Hillenbrand C. 4DMRI provides more accurate renal motion estimation in IMRT in young children. Pract Radiat Oncol 2013; 3 (2 Suppl 1): S1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Han F, Zhou Z, Du D, Gao Y, Rashid S, Cao M, Shaverdian N, Hegde JV, Steinberg M, Lee P, Raldow A, Low DA, Sheng K, Yang Y, Hu P. Respiratory motion-resolved, self-gated 4D-MRI using Rotating Cartesian K-space (ROCK): initial clinical experience on an MRI-guided radiotherapy system. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127(3): 467–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58(6): 1182–1195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Lingala SG, Hu Y, DiBella E, Jacob M. Accelerated dynamic MRI exploiting sparsity and low-rank structure: k-t SLR. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30(5): 1042–1054

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Otazo R, Candes E, Sodickson DK. Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73(3): 1125–1136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Asif MS, Hamilton L, Brummer M, Romberg J. Motion-adaptive spatio-temporal regularization for accelerated dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Med 2013; 70(3): 800–812

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Zhao N, O’Connor D, Basarab A, Ruan D, Sheng K. Motion compensated dynamic MRI reconstruction with local affine optical flow estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2019; 66(11): 3050–3059

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Zhou Z, Han F, Ghodrati V, Gao Y, Yin W, Yang Y, Hu P. Parallel imaging and convolutional neural network combined fast MR image reconstruction: applications in low-latency accelerated realtime imaging. Med Phys 2019; 46(8): 3399–3413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Biswas S, Aggarwal HK, Jacob M. Dynamic MRI using modelbased deep learning and SToRM priors: MoDL-SToRM. Magn Reson Med 2019; 82(1): 485–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Xiang L, Chen Y, Chang W, Zhan Y, Lin W, Wang Q, Shen D. Deep leaning based multi-modal fusion for fast MR reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2019; 66(7): 2105–2114

    Google Scholar 

  111. Yang G, Yu S, Dong H, Slabaugh G, Dragotti PL, Ye X, Liu F, Arridge S, Keegan J, Guo Y, Firmin D. DAGAN: deep de-aliasing generative adversarial networks for fast compressed sensing MRI reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(6): 1310–1321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Schlemper J, Caballero J, Hajnal JV, Price AN, Rueckert D. A deep cascade of convolutional neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(2): 491–503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Zhang D, Banalagay R, Wang J, Zhao Y, Noble JH, Dawant BM. Two-level training of a 3D U-Net for accurate segmentation of the intra-cochlear anatomy in head CTs with limited ground truth training data. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2019; 10949

  114. Byra M, Wu M, Zhang X, Jang H, Ma YJ, Chang EY, Shah S, Du J. Knee menisci segmentation and relaxometry of 3D ultrashort echo time cones MR imaging using attention U-Net with transfer learning. Magn Reson Med 2020; 83(3): 1109–1122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Park J, Yun J, Kim N, Park B, Cho Y, Park HJ, Song M, Lee M, Seo JB. Fully automated lung lobe segmentation in volumetric chest CT with 3D U-Net: validation with intra- and extra-datasets. J Digit Imaging 2020; 33(1): 221–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Nguyen D, Jia X, Sher D, Lin MH, Iqbal Z, Liu H, Jiang S. 3D radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a hierarchically densely connected U-net deep learning architecture. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64(6): 065020

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Huang Q, Sun J, Ding H, Wang X, Wang G. Robust liver vessel extraction using 3D U-Net with variant dice loss function. Comput Biol Med 2018; 101: 153–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Blanc-Durand P, Van Der Gucht A, Schaefer N, Itti E, Prior JO. Automatic lesion detection and segmentation of 18F-FET PET in gliomas: a full 3D U-Net convolutional neural network study. PLoS One 2018; 13(4): e0195798

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Boldrini L, Bibault JE, Masciocchi C, Shen Y, Bittner MI. Deep learning: a review for the radiation oncologist. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 977

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Ibragimov B, Toesca D, Chang D, Yuan Y, Koong A, Xing L. Development of deep neural network for individualized hepatobiliary toxicity prediction after liver SBRT. Med Phys 2018; 45(10): 4763–4774

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Valdes G, Interian Y. Comment on ‘Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning for rectum toxicity prediction in cervical cancer radiotherapy: a feasibility study’. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63(6): 068001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Zhen X, Chen J, Zhong Z, Hrycushko B, Zhou L, Jiang S, Albuquerque K, Gu X. Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning for rectum toxicity prediction in cervical cancer radiotherapy: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62(21): 8246–8263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Epp ER, Weiss H, Djordjevic B, Santomasso A. The radio-sensitivity of cultured mammalian cells exposed to single high intensity pulses of electrons in various concentrations of oxygen. Radiat Res 1972; 52(2): 324–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Adrian G, Konradsson E, Lempart M, Back S, Ceberg C, Petersson K. The FLASH effect depends on oxygen concentration. Br J Radiol 2020; 93(1106): 20190702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Maxim PG, Tantawi SG, Loo BW Jr. PHASER: a platform for clinical translation of FLASH cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2019; 139: 28–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Vozenin MC, De Fornel P, Petersson K, Favaudon V, Jaccard M, Germond JF, Petit B, Burki M, Ferrand G, Patin D, Bouchaab H, Ozsahin M, Bochud F, Bailat C, Devauchelle P, Bourhis J. The advantage of FLASH radiotherapy confirmed in mini-pig and Catcancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25(1): 35–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Zhu YM, Dean AE, Horikoshi N, Heer C, Spitz DR, Gius D. Emerging evidence for targeting mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction in cancer therapy. J Clin Invest 2018; 128(9): 3682–3691

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Alexander MS, Wilkes JG, Schroeder SR, Buettner GR, Wagner BA, Du J, Gibson-Corley K, O’Leary BR, Spitz DR, Buatti JM, Berg DJ, Bodeker KL, Vollstedt S, Brown HA, Allen BG, Cullen JJ. Pharmacologic ascorbate reduces radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity and enhances tumor radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2018; 78(24): 6838–6851

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Schoenfeld JD, Sibenaller ZA, Mapuskar KA, Wagner BA, Cramer-Morales KL, Furqan M, Sandhu S, Carlisle TL, Smith MC, Abu Hejleh T, Berg DJ, Zhang J, Keech J, Parekh KR, Bhatia S, Monga V, Bodeker KL, Ahmann L, Vollstedt S, Brown H, Kauffman EPS, Schall ME, Hohl RJ, Clamon GH, Greenlee JD, Howard MA, Schultz MK, Smith BJ, Riley DP, Domann FE, Cullen JJ, Buettner GR, Buatti JM, Spitz DR, Allen BG. Correction: O2− and H2O2-mediated disruption of Fe metabolism causes the differential susceptibility of NSCLC and GBM cancer cells to pharmacological ascorbate. Cancer Cell 2017; 32(2): 268–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Aykin-Burns N, Ahmad IM, Zhu Y, Oberley LW, Spitz DR. Increased levels of superoxide and H2O2 mediate the differential susceptibility of cancer cells versus normal cells to glucose deprivation. Biochem J 2009; 418(1): 29–37

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Schoenfeld JD, Sibenaller ZA, Mapuskar KA, Wagner BA, Cramer-Morales KL, Furqan M, Sandhu S, Carlisle TL, Smith MC, Abu Hejleh T, Berg DJ, Zhang J, Keech J, Parekh KR, Bhatia S, Monga V, Bodeker KL, Ahmann L, Vollstedt S, Brown H, Kauffman EPS, Schall ME, Hohl RJ, Clamon GH, Greenlee JD, Howard MA, Shultz MK, Smith BJ, Riley DP, Domann FE, Cullen JJ, Buettner GR, Buatti JM, Spitz DR, Allen BG. O2− and H2O2-mediated disruption of Fe metabolism causes the differential susceptibility of NSCLC and GBM cancer cells to pharmacological ascorbate. Cancer Cell 2017; 31(4): 487–500.e8

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 2d ed. Hagerstown, MD: Medical Dept., Harper & Row, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  133. Balakrishnan G, Zhao A, Sabuncu MR, Guttag J, Dalca AV. VoxelMorph: a learning framework for deformable medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019; 38(8): 1788–1800

    Google Scholar 

  134. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 4th ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  135. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  136. Gutiontov SI, Shin EJ, Lok B, Lee NY, Cabanillas R. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck surgeons. Head Neck 2016; 38(Suppl 1): E2368–E2373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Nelms BE, Tome WA, Robinson G, Wheeler J. Variations in the contouring of organs at risk: test case from a patient with oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82(1): 368–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Castelli J, Simon A, Lafond C, Perichon N, Rigaud B, Chajon E, De Bari B, Ozsahin M, Bourhis J, de Crevoisier R. Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 2018; 57(10): 1284–1292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Gupta V, Wang Y, Mendez Romero A, Myronenko A, Jordan P, Maurer C, Heijmen B, Hoogeman M. Fast and robust adaptation of organs-at-risk delineations from planning scans to match daily anatomy in pre-treatment scans for online-adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal tumors. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127(2): 332–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Pollard JM, Wen Z, Sadagopan R, Wang J, Ibbott GS. The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided. Br J Radiol 2017; 90(1073): 20160667

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Han X, Hoogeman MS, Levendag PC, Hibbard LS, Teguh DN, Voet P, Cowen AC, Wolf TK. Atlas-based auto-segmentation of head and neck CT images. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2008; 11(Pt 2): 434–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Bondiau PY, Malandain G, Chanalet S, Marcy PY, Habrand JL, Fauchon F, Paquis P, Courdi A, Commowick O, Rutten I, Ayache N. Atlas-based automatic segmentation of MR images: validation study on the brainstem in radiotherapy context. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61(1): 289–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Roberts MG, Cootes TF, Adams JE. Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with dynamically sequenced active appearance models. In: Duncan JS, Gerig G. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3750. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  144. Fritscher KD, Peroni M, Zaffino P, Spadea MF, Schubert R, Sharp G. Automatic segmentation of head and neck CT images for radiotherapy treatment planning using multiple atlases, statistical appearance models, and geodesic active contours. Med Phys 2014; 41(5): 051910

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Setio AA, Ciompi F, Litjens G, Gerke P, Jacobs C, van Riel SJ, Wille MM, Naqibullah M, Sanchez CI, van Ginneken B. Pulmonary nodule detection in CT images: false positive reduction using multi-view convolutional networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; 35(5): 1160–1169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Qi D, Hao C, Lequan Y, Lei Z, Jing Q, Defeng W, Mok VC, Lin S, Pheng-Ann H. Automatic detection of cerebral microbleeds from MR images via 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; 35(5): 1182–1195

    Google Scholar 

  147. Li X, Chen H, Qi X, Dou Q, Fu CW, Heng PA. H-DenseUNet: hybrid densely connected UNet for liver and tumor segmentation from CT volumes. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(12): 2663–2674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Chen L, Bentley P, Mori K, Misawa K, Fujiwara M, Rueckert D. DRINet for medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37(11): 2453–2462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Moeskops P, Viergever MA, Mendrik AM, de Vries LS, Benders MJ, Isgum I. Automatic segmentation of MR brain images with a convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; 35(5): 1252–1261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Cao X, Yang J, Wang L, Xue Z, Wang Q, Shen D. Deep learning based inter-modality image registration supervised by intramodality similarity. Mach Learn Med Imaging 2018; 11046: 55–63

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Haskins G, Kruecker J, Kruger U, Xu S, Pinto PA, Wood BJ, Yan P. Learning deep similarity metric for 3D MR-TRUS image registration. Int J CARS 2019; 14(3): 417–425

    Google Scholar 

  152. Zhu X, Ding M, Huang T, Jin X, Zhang X. PCANet-based structural representation for nonrigid multimodal medical image registration. Sensors (Basel) 2018; 18(5): 1477

    Google Scholar 

  153. Ibragimov B, Xing L. Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks. Med Phys 2017; 44(2): 547–557

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Tong N, Gou S, Yang S, Ruan D, Sheng K. Fully automatic multiorgan segmentation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy using shape representation model constrained fully convolutional neural networks. Med Phys 2018; 45(10): 4558–4567

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Tong N, Gou S, Yang S, Cao M, Sheng K. Shape constrained fully convolutional DenseNet with adversarial training for multiorgan segmentation on head and neck CT and low-field MR images. Med Phys 2019; 46(6): 2669–2682

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  157. Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  158. Wang ZS, Wei LF, Wang L, Gao YZ, Chen WF, Shen DG. Hierarchical vertex regression-based segmentation of head and neck CT images for radiotherapy planning. IEEE Trans Image Process 2018; 27(2): 923–937

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Moore KL, Brame RS, Low DA, Mutic S. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81(2): 545–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Yuan L, Ge Y, Lee WR, Yin FF, Kirkpatrick JP, Wu QJ. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. Med Phys 2012; 39(11): 6868–6878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Nelms BE, Robinson G, Markham J, Velasco K, Boyd S, Narayan S, Wheeler J, Sobczak ML. Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: an inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. Pract Radiat Oncol 2012; 2(4): 296–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Shiraishi S, Moore KL. Knowledge-based prediction of three-dimensional dose distributions for external beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2016; 43(1): 378–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. McIntosh C, Purdie TG. Voxel-based dose prediction with multipatient atlas selection for automated radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62(2): 415–431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Ziemer BP, Shiraishi S, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Sanghvi P, Moore KL. Fully automated, comprehensive knowledge-based planning for stereotactic radiosurgery: preclinical validation through blinded physician review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7(6): e569–e578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, Kazhdan M, Simari P, Chuang M, Taylor R, Jacques R, McNutt T. Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. Med Phys 2009; 36(12): 5497–5505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Zhu X, Ge Y, Li T, Thongphiew D, Yin FF, Wu QJ. A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. Med Phys 2011; 38(2): 719–726

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Tran A, Woods K, Nguyen D, Yu VY, Niu T, Cao M, Lee P, Sheng K. Predicting liver SBRT eligibility and plan quality for VMAT and 4p plans. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12(1): 70

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Nguyen D, Long T, Jia X, Lu W, Gu X, Iqbal Z, Jiang S. A feasibility study for predicting optimal radiation therapy dose distributions of prostate cancer patients from patient anatomy using deep learning. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1): 1076

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Men K, Geng H, Zhong H, Fan Y, Lin A, Xiao Y. A deep learning model for predicting xerostomia due to radiotherapy for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma in the RTOG 0522 clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105(2): 440–447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Ma M. Buyyounouski MK, Vasudevan V, Xing L, Yang Y. Dose distribution prediction in isodose feature-preserving voxelization domain using deep convolutional neural network. Med Phys 2019; 46: 2978–2987

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Ma M, Kovalchuk N, Buyyounouski MK, Xing L, Yang Y. Incorporating dosimetric features into the prediction of 3D VMAT dose distributions using deep convolutional neural network. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64(12): 125017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Liu Z, Fan J, Li M, Yan H, Hu Z, Huang P, Tian Y, Miao J, Dai J. A deep learning method for prediction of three-dimensional dose distribution of helical tomotherapy. Med Phys 2019; 46(5): 1972–1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Kajikawa T, Kadoya N, Ito K, Takayama Y, Chiba T, Tomori S, Takeda K, Jingu K. Automated prediction of dosimetric eligibility of patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a convolutional neural network. Radiological Phys Technol 2018; 11(3): 320–327

    Google Scholar 

  174. Heijmen B, Voet P, Fransen D, Penninkhof J, Milder M, Akhiat H, Bonomo P, Casati M, Georg D, Goldner G, Henry A, Lilley J, Lohr F, Marrazzo L, Pallotta S, Pellegrini R, Seppenwoolde Y, Simontacchi G, Steil V, Stieler F, Wilson S, Breedveld S. Fully automated, multi-criterial planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy — an international multi-center validation for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128(2): 343–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. van Duren-Koopman MJ, Tol JP, Dahele M, Bucko E, Meijnen P, Slotman BJ, Verbakel WF. Personalized automated treatment planning for breast plus locoregional lymph nodes using Hybrid RapidArc. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8(5): 332–341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Babier A, Boutilier JJ, McNiven AL, Chan TCY. Knowledge-based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer. Med Phys 2018; 45(7): 2875–2883

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Zhang Y, Li T, Xiao H, Ji W, Guo M, Zeng Z, Zhang J. A knowledge-based approach to automated planning for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19(1): 50–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Ziemer BP, Sanghvi P, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Moore KL. Heuristic knowledge-based planning for single-isocenter stereotactic radio-surgery to multiple brain metastases. Med Phys 2017; 44(10): 5001–5009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Ziemer BP, Shiraishi S, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Sanghvi P, Moore KL. Fully automated, comprehensive knowledge-based planning for stereotactic radiosurgery: preclinical validation through blinded physician review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7(6): e569–e578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Buergy D, Sharfo AW, Heijmen BJ, Voet PW, Breedveld S, Wenz F, Lohr F, Stieler F. Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases — a comparison to manual planning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12(1): 33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Wu H, Jiang F, Yue H, Zhang H, Wang K, Zhang Y. Applying a RapidPlan model trained on a technique and orientation to another: a feasibility and dosimetric evaluation. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11(1): 108

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. Krayenbuehl J, Norton I, Studer G, Guckenberger M. Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10(1): 226

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Clivio A, Vanetti E, Laksar S, Tozzi A, Scorsetti M, Cozzi L. A broad scope knowledge based model for optimization of VMAT in esophageal cancer: validation and assessment of plan quality among different treatment centers. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10(1): 220

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Schmidt M, Lo JY, Grzetic S, Lutzky C, Brizel DM, Das SK. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans. Med Phys 2015; 42(8): 4428–4434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Fan J, Wang J, Chen Z, Hu C, Zhang Z, Hu W. Automatic treatment planning based on three-dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique. Med Phys 2019; 46(1): 370–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Landers A, O’Connor D, Ruan D, Sheng K. Automated 4π radiotherapy treatment planning with evolving knowledge-base. Med Phys 2019; 46(9): 3833–3843

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Landers A, Neph R, Scalzo F, Ruan D, Sheng K. Performance comparison of knowledge-based dose prediction techniques based on limited patient data. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2018; 17: 1533033818811150

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  188. Li HH, Wu Y, Yang D, Mutic S. Software tool for physics chart checks. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 4(6): e217–e225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Yim WW, Yetisgen M, Harris WP, Kwan SW. Natural language processing in oncology: a review. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2(6): 797–804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Interian Y, Rideout V, Kearney VP, Gennatas E, Morin O, Cheung J, Solberg T, Valdes G. Deep nets vs expert designed features in medical physics: an IMRT QA case study. Med Phys 2018; 45(6): 2672–2680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Nyflot MJ, Thammasorn P, Wootton LS, Ford EC, Chaovalitwongse WA. Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance: Identifying errors in radiotherapy delivery by radiomic analysis of gamma images with convolutional neural networks. Med Phys 2019; 46(2): 456–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Tomori S, Kadoya N, Takayama Y, Kajikawa T, Shima K, Narazaki K, Jingu K. A deep learning-based prediction model for gamma evaluation in patient-specific quality assurance. Med Phys 2018; 45(9): 4055–4065

    Google Scholar 

  193. Shiradkar R, Podder TK, Algohary A, Viswanath S, Ellis RJ, Madabhushi A. Radiomics based targeted radiotherapy planning (Rad-TRaP): a computational framework for prostate cancer treatment planning with MRI. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11(1): 148

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Arimura H, Soufi M, Kamezawa H, Ninomiya K, Yamada M. Radiomics with artificial intelligence for precision medicine in radiation therapy. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2019; 60(1): 150–157

    Google Scholar 

  195. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, Bussink J, Monshouwer R, Haibe-Kains B, Rietveld D, Hoebers F, Rietbergen MM, Leemans CR, Dekker A, Quackenbush J, Gillies RJ, Lambin P. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014; 5(1): 4006

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  196. Bergom C, West CM, Higginson DS, Abazeed ME, Arun B, Bentzen SM, Bernstein JL, Evans JD, Gerber NK, Kerns SL, Keen J, Litton JK, Reiner AS, Riaz N, Rosenstein BS, Sawakuchi GO, Shaitelman SF, Powell SN, Woodward WA. The implications of genetic testing on radiotherapy decisions: a guide for radiation oncologists. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105(4): 698–712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. El Naqa I, Kerns SL, Coates J, Luo Y, Speers C, West CML, Rosenstein BS, Ten Haken RK. Radiogenomics and radiotherapy response modeling. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62(16): R179–R206

    Google Scholar 

  198. Sollini M, Cozzi L, Chiti A, Kirienko M. Texture analysis and machine learning to characterize suspected thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: where do we stand? Eur J Radiol 2018; 99: 1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Rathore S, Akbari H, Doshi J, Shukla G, Rozycki M, Bilello M, Lustig R, Davatzikos C. Radiomic signature of infiltration in peritumoral edema predicts subsequent recurrence in glioblastoma: implications for personalized radiotherapy planning. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2018; 5(2): 021219

    Google Scholar 

  200. Pota M, Scalco E, Sanguineti G, Farneti A, Cattaneo GM, Rizzo G, Esposito M. Early prediction of radiotherapy-induced parotid shrinkage and toxicity based on CT radiomics and fuzzy classification. Artif Intell Med 2017; 81: 41–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Leger S, Zwanenburg A, Pilz K, Lohaus F, Linge A, Zophel K, Kotzerke J, Schreiber A, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Sak A, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rodel C, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Monnich D, Zips D, Krause M, Baumann M, Troost EGC, Lock S, Richter C. A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-to-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 13206

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  202. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Head and Neck Quantitative Imaging Working Group. Investigation of radiomic signatures for local recurrence using primary tumor texture analysis in oropharyngeal head and neck cancer patients. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 1524

    Google Scholar 

  203. Sun W, Jiang M, Dang J, Chang P, Yin FF. Effect of machine learning methods on predicting NSCLC overall survival time based on radiomics analysis. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13(1): 197

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  204. Sun R, Limkin EJ, Vakalopoulou M, Dercle L, Champiat S, Han SR, Verlingue L, Brandao D, Lancia A, Ammari S, Hollebecque A, Scoazec JY, Marabelle A, Massard C, Soria JC, Robert C, Paragios N, Deutsch E, Ferte C. A radiomics approach to assess tumourinfiltrating CD8 cells and response to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy: an imaging biomarker, retrospective multicohort study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19(9): 1180–1191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Peeken JC, Bernhofer M, Spraker MB, Pfeiffer D, Devecka M, Thamer A, Shouman MA, Ott A, Nusslin F, Mayr NA, Rost B, Nyflot MJ, Combs SE. CT-based radiomic features predict tumor grading and have prognostic value in patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated with neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2019; 135: 187–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Li S, Wang K, Hou Z, Yang J, Ren W, Gao S, Meng F, Wu P, Liu B, Liu J, Yan J. Use of radiomics combined with machine learning method in the recurrence patterns after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a preliminary study. Front Oncol 2018; 8: 648

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  207. Giraud P, Giraud P, Gasnier A, El Ayachy R, Kreps S, Foy JP, Durdux C, Huguet F, Burgun A, Bibault JE. Radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 174

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  208. Elhalawani H, Lin TA, Volpe S, Mohamed ASR, White AL, Zafereo J, Wong AJ, Berends JE, AboHashem S, Williams B, Aymard JM, Kanwar A, Perni S, Rock CD, Cooksey L, Campbell S, Yang P, Nguyen K, Ger RB, Cardenas CE, Fave XJ, Sansone C, Piantadosi G, Marrone S, Liu R, Huang C, Yu K, Li T, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Zhu H, Morris JS, Baladandayuthapani V, Shumway JW, Ghosh A, Pöhlmann A, Phoulady HA, Goyal V, Canahuate G, Marai GE, Vock D, Lai SY, Mackin DS, Court LE, Freymann J, Farahani K, Kaplathy-Cramer J, Fuller CD. Machine learning applications in head and neck radiation oncology: lessons from open-source radiomics challenges. Front Oncol 2018; 8: 294

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  209. de Jong EEC, van Elmpt W, Rizzo S, Colarieti A, Spitaleri G, Leijenaar RTH, Jochems A, Hendriks LEL, Troost EGC, Reymen B, Dingemans AC, Lambin P. Applicability of a prognostic CT-based radiomic signature model trained on stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2018; 124: 6–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Cha YJ, Jang WI, Kim MS, Yoo HJ, Paik EK, Jeong HK, Youn SM. Prediction of response to stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases using convolutional neural networks. Anticancer Res 2018; 38(9): 5437–5445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. Buizza G, Toma-Dasu I, Lazzeroni M, Paganelli C, Riboldi M, Chang Y, Smedby O, Wang C. Early tumor response prediction for lung cancer patients using novel longitudinal pattern features from sequential PET/CT image scans. Phys Med 2018; 54: 21–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Hosny A, Parmar C, Coroller TP, Grossmann P, Zeleznik R, Kumar A, Bussink J, Gillies RJ, Mak RH, Aerts H. Deep learning for lung cancer prognostication: a retrospective multi-cohort radiomics study. PLoS Med 2018; 15(11): e1002711

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  213. Cui S, Luo Y, Tseng HH, Ten Haken RK, El Naqa I. Combining handcrafted features with latent variables in machine learning for prediction of radiation-induced lung damage. Med Phys 2019; 46(5): 2497–2511

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  214. Cui S, Luo Y, Tseng HH, Ten Haken RK, El Naqa I. Artificial neural network with composite architectures for prediction of local control in radiotherapy. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 2019; 3(2): 242–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Lee J, An JY, Choi MG, Park SH, Kim ST, Lee JH, Sohn TS, Bae JM, Kim S, Lee H, Min BH, Kim JJ, Jeong WK, Choi DI, Kim KM, Kang WK, Kim M, Seo SW. Deep learning-based survival analysis identified associations between molecular subtype and optimal adjuvant treatment of patients with gastric cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2018; 2(2): 1–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. Boon IS, Au Yong TPT, Boon CS. Assessing the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical oncology: utility of machine learning in radiotherapy target volume delineation. Medicines (Basel) 2018; 5(4): 131

    Google Scholar 

  217. Xu Y, Hosny A, Zeleznik R, Parmar C, Coroller T, Franco I, Mak RH, Aerts H. Deep learning predicts lung cancer treatment response from serial medical imaging. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25(11): 3266–3275

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  218. Ehteshami Bejnordi B, Veta M, Johannes van Diest P, van Ginneken B, Karssemeijer N, Litjens G, van der Laak J; the CAMELYON16 Consortium. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA 2017; 318(22): 2199–2210

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  219. Grossmann P, Stringfield O, El-Hachem N, Bui MM, Rios Velazquez E, Parmar C, Leijenaar RT, Haibe-Kains B, Lambin P, Gillies RJ, Aerts HJ. Defining the biological basis of radiomic phenotypes in lung cancer. eLife 2017; 6: e23421

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  220. Zanfardino M, Pane K, Mirabelli P, Salvatore M, Franzese M. TCGA-TCIA impact on radiogenomics cancer research: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20(23): 6033

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  221. Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M, Tarbox L, Prior F. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging 2013; 26(6): 1045–1057

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  222. Tomczak K, Czerwinska P, Wiznerowicz M. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2015; 19(1A): A68–A77

    Google Scholar 

  223. Pavlopoulou A, Bagos PG, Koutsandrea V, Georgakilas AG. Molecular determinants of radiosensitivity in normal and tumor tissue: a bioinformatic approach. Cancer Lett 2017; 403: 37–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA

    Ke Sheng

Authors
  1. Ke Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Sheng.

Ethics declarations

Ke Sheng is a co-founder of Celestial Oncology, a company developing robotic RT devices. This work is a review article. No new human studies were performed for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheng, K. Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy: a technological review. Front. Med. 14, 431–449 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0761-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0761-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation