Abstract
Early diagnosis of subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment (svMCI) is clinically essential because it is the most reversible subtype of all cognitive impairments. Since structural alterations of hippocampal sub-regions have been well studied in neurodegenerative diseases with pathophysiological cognitive impairments, we were eager to determine whether there is a selective vulnerability of hippocampal sub-fields in patients with svMCI. Our study included 34 svMCI patients and 34 normal controls (NCs), with analysis of T1 images and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. Gray matter volume (GMV) of hippocampal sub-regions was quantified and compared between the groups, adjusting for age, sex, and education. Additionally, we explored correlations between altered GMV in hippocampal sub-fields and MoCA scores in svMCI patients. Patients with svMCI exhibited selectively reduced GMV in several left hippocampal sub-regions, such as the hippocampal tail, hippocampal fissure, CA1 head, ML-HP head, CA4 head, and CA3 head, as well as decreased GMV in the right hippocampal tail. Specifically, GMV in the left CA3 head was inversely correlated with MoCA scores in svMCI patients. Our findings indicate that the atrophy pattern of patients with svMCI was predominantly located in the left hippocampal sub-regions. The left CA3 might be a crucial area underlying the distinct pathophysiological mechanisms of cognitive impairments with subcortical vascular origins.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cognitive impairment is one of the primary public health challenges in our era (Hampel & Lista, 2016). Vascular-related cognitive decline is the second most prevalent cause, and in East Asia, it may take precedence as the primary cause (Iadecola et al., 2019). Subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment (svMCI) is a type of cognitive impairment caused by cerebral small vessel disorder (Zotin et al., 2021). svMCI is characterized by a gradual onset and is mainly associated with attention and executive function impairment (Hamilton et al., 2021; Zotin et al., 2021). As the prodromal stage of subcortical vascular dementia, svMCI is the most responsive subtype to treatment through modification of vascular risk factors (Iadecola et al., 2019; Van Der Flier et al., 2018), signifying the early phase of the disease. As a result, identifying svMCI at an early stage is of great importance in clinical practice. The mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment associated with subcortical vascular lesions need to be largely explored.
Hippocampal atrophy is a common structural and pathophysiological change in various cognitive dysfunctions, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Devanand et al., 2007), post stroke dementia, and subjective cognitive decline (Das et al., 2019; Devanand et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2022). Moreover, dynamic hippocampal atrophy has been observed during healthy human aging (Oschwald et al., 2019). Neurofibrillary tangle deposition and neuronal death are linked to hippocampal shrinkage, which is a significant cause of cognitive impairment in vascular illness (Yamamoto et al., 2021) and is linked to hippocampal atrophy. Even minor vascular disorders can result in hippocampus atrophy and cognitive deterioration (Han et al., 2020). However, the hippocampus was considered a single, homogeneous structure in most previous studies, and potentially useful information about its sub-regions has been discarded. Several distinct sub-regions with various structural and functional profiles have been identified in the bilateral hippocampus (Fraser et al., 2015). Among these, a statistical atlas of the hippocampal using ultra-high resolution ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with in vivo data in the FreeSurfer 6 and above version (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/rel7downloads) has been widely adopted to investigate structural alterations of the hippocampal at the sub-regional level in many brain disorders (Bai et al., 2019; Christidi et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2022). Previous studies have demonstrated that selective atrophy of hippocampal sub-regions is associated with particular brain diseases. For example, the cornu ammonis 2/3 subfield and the hippocampus-amygdala transition area are the most affected regions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in contrast to AD, where the presubiculum and subiculum are the most vulnerable regions (Christidi et al., 2019). Moreover, some studies reported that patients with mild cognitive impairment showed smaller gray matter volumes, primarily in cornu ammonis CA1-2 volumes, compared to healthy controls (Mueller et al., 2010). Considering the various etiologies of svMCI, whether there is a selective vulnerability of hippocampal sub-fields is extremely worth to be further explored.
Consequently, we hypothesized that patients with svMCI would exhibit distinctive atrophy patterns of volumetric changes in hippocampal sub-regions. To test this hypothesis, we obtained T1 images from 34 svMCI patients and 34 normal controls, and performed hippocampal segmentation of these T1 images using FreeSurfer 7.1. The gray matter volume (GMV) of the hippocampal sub-regions was measured and compared between groups after adjusting for age, sex and educational level. Finally, Pearson’s correlation was performed between changed GMV and MoCA in the svMCI.
Methods and materials
Participants
This research was conducted in the Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital and authorized by their Institutional Review Board (K2021-041). The diagnosis of MCI was made by two neurological physicians with more than five years of experience (XDQ and JJW) based on Peterson’s criteria as follows (Jia et al., 2016; Petersen et al., 1999). The inclusion criteria required cognitive complains in memory and/or other cognitive domains for at least three months, objective cognitive impairments not meeting the DSM-IV criteria for dementia, an abnormal clinical dementia rating (CDR) of ≥ 0.5 on at least one domain and a global score ≤ 0.5 (Saygin et al., 2017), a Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) score of < 26 (Nasreddine et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2023), and normal or near-normal performance of daily life activities. The following cases were excluded from the study: individuals with a history of psychiatric disorder in any two lines of first- to third-degree biological family; those with a history of strokes or transient ischemic attack within three months; those with a history of seizures, schizophrenia, or major depressive disorder; those with an inherited or inflammatory small vessel illness; those who previously suffered from a head injury with unconsciousness; those who used nootropics, such as Donepezil and Kabalatine; those with significant clinical or surgical conditions; those with physical disabilities, including aphasia, blindness, or hemiplegia, which can prevent the fulfillment of neuropsychological tests; and those with contraindications for MRI.
Patients with svMCI needed to meet at least one of the following criteria: three or more supratentorial subcortical minor infarcts with or without white matter lesions of any severity; moderate to severe white matter lesion (score ≥ 2 on the Fazekas rating scale) with or without small infarcts; or one or more subcortical minor infarcts strategically positioned in the caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, or thalamus. The evaluation of MRI images was done by two experienced radiologists (JXC and HQL), who were unaware of the participants’ identities. In cases of disagreement, they would re-evaluate the images after discussion.
The NCs were recruited through advertisements from the community of Shenzhen and had no prior history of neurological or psychiatric disorders, no cognitive issues, and their conventional brain MRI images were normal. Herein, 34 svMCI and 34 NCs were involved. The demographics and clinical characteristics of all participants are presented in Table 1.
MRI acquisition
MRI scanning was performed on a 3T scanner (GE medical system, MR750) with a 32-channel head coil. The scanning criteria of T1 images were as follows: repetition time = 8.656 ms, echo time = 3.22 ms, inversion time = 450 ms, flip angle = 12, matrix size = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 1 mm, voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3, and sections = 152.
Image processing
Utilizing the usual “recon-all” process in FreeSurfer 7.1 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/), the cortical surface was reconstructed. Overall, the pictures were preprocessed by movement correction, brain retrieval, Talairach transformation, intensity correction, and segmentation of gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid from the brain tissue. Additionally, the barrier between gray matter and white matter was tessellated. The segmentation of subcortical structures was further explored using a nonlinear warping atlas.
Hippocampal segmentation
The hippocampal segmentation was performed using the automated hippocampal module in FreeSurfer 7.1. Specifically, it was carried out using a Bayesian inference technique that employed a probabilistic atlas of the hippocampal formation that was trained on a hybrid data set involving in-vivo ultra-high-resolution (0.1 mm) MRI and ex-vivo autopsied brain MRI from multiple subjects. This probabilistic atlas was registered to T1 images in the individual space for each subject. The published works of Saygin et al. (Saygin et al., 2017), Iglesias et al. (Iglesias et al., 2015), and Van Leemput et al. (Puonti et al., 2016) provided extra details on the segmentation technique. To evaluate the quality of these segmentations, all segmented volumes of participants were visually inspected by a trained operator (JXC). Moreover, hippocampal subfield volumes were plotted and outliers were flagged for a secondary inspection.
Gray matter volume alterations of hippocampal sub-regions
Two-sample t-tests were employed to identify volume shifts in hippocampal sub-regions adjusting for age, sex, education, and estimated total intracranial volume (eTIV) (Jack et al., 2015; Perrotin et al., 2015) utilizing SPSS Statistics (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., v.19.0). p < 0.05 was judged statistically significant, not corrected.
Correlation analyses
Pearson’s partial correlation analyses between the volume and MoCA scores of all hippocampal sub-regions that exhibited gray matter atrophy were performed with age, sex, eTIV, and educational level as covariates. The p < 0.05 was judged statistically significant, not corrected. These analyses were performed using SPSS 25.
Results
Demographics and clinical data
Demographics and clinical data (Table 1) were compared between the two groups using a two-sample t-test. Sex was analyzed using χ2. Consequently, we found no significant variation in age (p = 0.137), sex (p = 0.807), education (p = 0.072), or eTIV (p = 0.296), but there was a significant difference in MoCA between svMCI and NCs (p < 0.001).
Hippocampal segmentation
Hippocampal segmentation resulted in 19 sub-regions for each hemisphere (Fig. 1): the hippocampal tail, subiculum body, subiculum head, cornu ammonis (CA) 1 body, CA1 head, CA3 body, CA3 head, CA4 head, CA4 body, hippocampal fissure, presubiculum head, presubiculum body, parasubiculum, molecular layer hippocampal (ML-HP) head, ML-HP body, granule cell molecular layer of dentate gyrus (GC-ML-DG) head, GC-ML-DG body, fimbria, and hippocampus-amygdala-transition-area (HATA).
Segmentation results of hippocampus on T1 MRI scans. The images were shown with FSLeyes (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FSLeyes). Abbreviations: HATA, hippocampus-amygdala-transition-area; CA, cornu ammonis; GC-ML-DG, granule cell molecular layer of the dentate gyrus; ML-HP, molecular layer hippocampus
GMV shifts of hippocampal sub-regions
In contrast to NCs, patients with svMCI demonstrated significantly reduced GMV in several left hippocampal sub-regions, including the left hippocampal tail(puncorrected = 0.004), left hippocampal fissure (puncorrected = 0.040), left CA1 head(puncorrected = 0.011), left ML-HP head(puncorrected = 0.011), left CA4 head(puncorrected = 0.033), and left CA3 head(puncorrected = 0.011), but only in the hippocampal tail in the right hippocampal sub-regions(puncorrected = 0.016) (Tables 2and Fig. 2).
The gray matter volume changes of hippocampal sub-regions. Two-sample t-tests were employed to identify volume changes in hippocampal sub-regions adjusting for age, sex, education, and estimated total intracranial volume (eTIV) between patients with svMCI and NC.* represents significant results with puncorrected< 0.05
Results of correlation analyses
The GMV in the left CA3 head was negatively correlated with MoCA scores in the svMCI (r = -0.468, p = 0.005, Fig. 3). However, no significant correlations were observed between GMV of other altered hippocampal sub-regions and MoCA scores in the svMCI (Table 3).
Relationship between gray matter volume and cognitive impairments in patients with svMCI. The gray matter volume of left CA3 head was adjusted by regressing out covariates of age, sex, eTIV, and educational level. Then, Pearson’s correlation analyses between the volume of left CA3 head and MoCA scores in the patients with svMCI were performed. Abbreviations: MoCA, Montreal cognitive assessment
Discussion
Herein, we identified that the svMCI group presented hippocampal atrophy primarily in the right hippocampal tail and several left hippocampal sub-regions, such as the hippocampal tail, hippocampal fissure, CA1 head, ML-HP head, CA4 head, and CA3 head. Moreover, the GMV in the left CA3 head was negatively associated to the MoCA scores in patients with svMCI. Our results confirm a selective vulnerability of hippocampal sub-fields in patients with svMCI, which adds to our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of cognitive impairment with subcortical vascular origins.
Notably, the findings of this study have demonstrated a discernible susceptibility of bilateral hippocampal sub-regions, with a notable emphasis on the left. Consistent with this finding, a previous study reported that hippocampal atrophy in the svMCI group was more lateralized towards the left hemisphere, particularly in the left subiculum and presubiculum (Li et al., 2016). Furthermore, the shape of the left anterior hippocampus was reduced in patients with svMCI, while those with moderate-to-severe clinical severities had a reduction in the shape of both anterior hippocampi (Thong et al., 2014). Previous research with more severe cognitive impairments reported more remarkable morphological alterations in the right hippocampal sub-regions (He et al., 2022). In healthy elderly adults, the right hippocampus tends to exhibit a larger volume than the left hippocampus, with the left hippocampus being more susceptible to vascular pathology than the right (Hou et al., 2013; Sarica et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2009; Woolard & Heckers, 2012). Furthermore, the asymmetry analysis in specific brain regions was observed to be sensitive for predicting cognitive decline (Long et al., 2018). It is possible to speculate that the left hippocampus might be more sensitive than the right one in the disease progression of svMCI.
We identified alterations in CA1, ML, CA4, and CA3 in the individuals with svMCI. These results were similar to previous studies on amnestic mild cognitive impairment (Kang et al., 2018), another sub-type of mild cognitive impairment, which shared similar symptoms especially memory impairments. Hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons play a crucial role in the memory circuit of the medial temporal lobe and are particularly susceptible to damage during the course of Alzheimer’s disease. Meanwhile, research has depicted that the CA1 subfield of the hippocampus in gerbils appears to be vulnerable to anoxic-ischemic insults (Huang et al., 2022; Kirino & Sano, 1984). Further, autopsy studies of patients with microvascular pathology have demonstrated notable atrophy and neuronal loss in the CA1 region (Kril et al., 2002). Consequently, alterations identified in neurodegenerative and vascular cognitive impairments may imply a common pathological mechanism for cognitive decline. Meanwhile, the current investigation revealed that the hippocampal tail, hippocampal fissure, and ML-HP head displayed discernible features that could differentiate svMCI from control subjects. This suggests that the subcortical vascular origin of this condition may result in a distinctive pattern of hippocampal damage. However, different whole hippocampal volumes derived from automatically or manually segmented MRI scans have been published (Pluta et al., 2012; Yushkevich et al., 2010). It is important to note that it is unsuitable to directly compare our results to previous ones if different hippocampal subfields were used. In this regard, we used the latest one, which is built with ultra-high resolution ex vivo MRI data (∼ 0.1 mm isotropic) and ex-vivo autopsied brain MRI from multiple subjects.
Unexpected, we identified a negative correlation between decreased GMV in the left CA3 head and MoCA scores in individuals with svMCI. The hippocampus CA3 is primarily responsible for memory and cognitive control and is composed of pyramidal neurons (Kesner, 2013; Nakashiba et al., 2009; Suthana et al., 2015). The arterial vascularization of the hippocampus depends on the collateral branches of the posterior cerebral artery and the anterior choroidal artery, whereas the CA3 region may only be supplied by the large dorsal hippocampal artery (Tatu & Vuillier, 2014). As a consequence, brain ischemia has a particularly detrimental impact on CA3, one of the most vulnerable subregions of the hippocampus (Vatrinet et al., 2017). Hypoxia in the CA3 area of the hippocampus may impede energy production, lead to hippocampal degeneration, and ultimately result in neural malfunction by triggering inflammation and disrupting the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (Liu et al., 2022). Since all subcortical infarcts were very small (< 20 mm) and white matter lesions (WMLs) were around the ventricle or randomly distributed in the whole brain, it is extremely difficult to obtain all lacunas and microvascular lesions and calculate WMH volume for each subject. Thus, we did not explore the relationship between WMH volume and adjusted CA3 volume of the subjects in this study to exclude the possibility that CA3 might be susceptible to ischemic lesions. Additional attention should be paid to explain the negative relationship between CA3 volume and MoCA in the svMCI.
Limitations
This research has some drawbacks. First, the relatively small sample size with heterogeneous vascular factors by nature could reduce the external validity of current findings. A larger sample size with multi-center is necessary to replicate our results. Second, the cross-sectional research was unable to establish a cause-and-effect connection between neuroimaging alterations and cognitive deficits. Third, this study focused on the structural modifications of hippocampus sub-regions. Further studies considering the relationship between the hippocampus and the rest of the whole brain are required. Fourth, in the analysis of the relationship between changes in imaging and clinical symptoms, specific focus on regions such as executive function and their correlation with imaging changes was unexplored. Additionally, future studies should consider including information on amyloid-beta deposition and APOE genotyping, as these were important biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Finally, the significant p value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons. More caution is needed for the explanation of our results.
Conclusions
In our investigation, we observed several modifications in GMV that were primarily localized in the left hippocampal sub-regions of individuals with svMCI. Notably, a reduction in GMV within the left CA3 head sub-region was significantly associated with disease severity. Our findings reveal distinct patterns of atrophy within the hippocampal subfields that underlie the pathophysiological mechanisms of cognitive impairment in patients with svMCI. These results may serve as a valuable resource for future investigations aimed at elucidating svMCI pathogenesis.
Data availability
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
References
Bai, T., Wei, Q., Xie, W., Wang, A., Wang, J., Gong-Jun, J., & Tian, Y. (2019). Hippocampal-subregion functional alterations associated with antidepressant effects and cognitive impairments of electroconvulsive therapy. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 49(8), 1357–1364.
Christidi, F., Karavasilis, E., Rentzos, M., Velonakis, G., Zouvelou, V., Xirou, S., & Ferentinos, P. (2019). Hippocampal pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Selective vulnerability of subfields and their associated projections. Neurobiology Of Aging, 84, 178–188.
Das, T., Hwang, J. J., & Poston, K. L. (2019). Episodic recognition memory and the hippocampus in Parkinson’s disease: A review. Cortex, 113, 191–209.
Devanand, D., Pradhaban, G., Liu, X., Khandji, A., De Santi, S., Segal, S., & Mayeux, R. (2007). Hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy in mild cognitive impairment: Prediction of Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 68(11), 828–836.
Fraser, M. A., Shaw, M. E., & Cherbuin, N. J. N. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal hippocampal atrophy in healthy human ageing. 112, 364–374.
Hamilton, O. K., Backhouse, E. V., Janssen, E., Jochems, A. C., Maher, C., Ritakari, T. E., & Wardlaw, J. M. (2021). Cognitive impairment in sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 17(4), 665–685.
Hampel, H., & Lista, S. (2016). The rising global tide of cognitive impairment. Nature Reviews Neurology, 12(3), 131–132.
Han, J. W., Maillard, P., Harvey, D., Fletcher, E., Martinez, O., Johnson, D. K., & DeCarli, C. (2020). Association of vascular brain injury, neurodegeneration, amyloid, and cognitive trajectory. Neurology, 95(19), e2622–e2634. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000010531.
He, M., Li, Y., Zhou, L., Li, Y., Lei, T., Yan, W., & Chen, L. (2022). Relationships between Memory impairments and hippocampal structure in patients with subcortical ischemic vascular disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 14, 823535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.823535.
Hou, G., Yang, X., & Yuan, T. F. (2013). Hippocampal asymmetry: Differences in structures and functions. Neurochemical Research, 38(3), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-012-0954-3.
Huang, Y., Huang, L., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Lo, C. Y. Z., & Guo, Q. (2022). Differential associations of visual memory with hippocampal subfields in subjective cognitive decline and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 1–10.
Iadecola, C., Duering, M., Hachinski, V., Joutel, A., Pendlebury, S. T., Schneider, J. A., & Dichgans, M. (2019). Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: JACC scientific expert panel. Journal of the american college of cardiology. 73(25), 3326–3344.
Iglesias, J. E., Augustinack, J. C., Nguyen, K., Player, C. M., Player, A., Wright, M., & Wald, L. L. (2015). A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI. J N, 115, 117–137.
Jack, C. R. Jr., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Knopman, D. S., Mielke, M. M., Vemuri, P., & Petersen, R. C. (2015). Different definitions of neurodegeneration produce similar amyloid/neurodegeneration biomarker group findings. (1460–2156 (Electronic)).
Jia, J., Wei, C., Liang, J., Zhou, A., Zuo, X., Song, H., & Huang, L. (2016). The effects of DL-3-n-butylphthalide in patients with vascular cognitive impairment without dementia caused by subcortical ischemic small vessel disease: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 12(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.010.
Kang, D. W., Lim, H. K., Joo, S., Lee, N. R., & Lee, C. U. (2018). J. N. d., & treatment. The association between hippocampal subfield volumes and education in cognitively normal older adults and amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients. 143–152.
Kesner, R. P. (2013). An analysis of the dentate gyrus function. Behavioural Brain Research, 254, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.01.012.
Kirino, T., & Sano, K. (1984). Selective vulnerability in the gerbil hippocampus following transient ischemia. ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA, 62, 201–208.
Kril, J., Patel, S., Harding, A., & Halliday, G. (2002). Patients with vascular dementia due to microvascular pathology have significant hippocampal neuronal loss. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 72(6), 747–751.
Li, X., Li, D., Li, Q., Li, Y., Li, K., Li, S., & Han, Y. (2016). Hippocampal subfield volumetry in patients with subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 20873.
Liu, T., Deng, R., Wang, X., Liu, P., Xiao, Q. X., Liu, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Mechanisms of hypoxia in the hippocampal CA3 region in postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01865-z.
Long, X., Jiang, C., & Zhang, L. (2018). Morphological Biomarker Differentiating MCI Converters from Nonconverters: Longitudinal Evidence Based on Hemispheric Asymmetry. Behav Neurol, 2018, 3954101. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3954101.
Mueller, S. G., Schuff, N., Yaffe, K., Madison, C., Miller, B., & Weiner, M. W. (2010). Hippocampal atrophy patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Human brain mapping, 31(9), 1339–1347.
Nakashiba, T., Buhl, D. L., McHugh, T. J., & Tonegawa, S. (2009). Hippocampal CA3 output is crucial for ripple-associated reactivation and consolidation of memory. Neuron, 62(6), 781–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.013.
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips Na Fau - Bédirian, V., Bédirian, V., Fau - Charbonneau, S., Charbonneau, S., Fau - Whitehead, V., Whitehead, V. F., Collin, I., Collin, I. F., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. (0002-8614 (Print)).
Oschwald, J., Guye, S., Liem, F., Rast, P., Willis, S., Röcke, C., & Mérillat, S. (2019). Brain structure and cognitive ability in healthy aging: A review on longitudinal correlated change. Reviews in the neurosciences, 31(1), 1–57.
Perrotin, A., de Flores, R., Lamberton, F., Poisnel, G., La Joie, R., de la Sayette, V., & Chételat, G. (2015). Hippocampal subfield volumetry and 3D surface mapping in subjective cognitive decline. (1875–8908 (Electronic)).
Petersen, R. C., Ge Fau, S., Waring, S. C., Waring Sc Fau - Ivnik, R. J., Ivnik Rj Fau - Tangalos, E. G., Tangalos Eg Fau - Kokmen, E., & Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. (0003-9942 (Print)).
Pluta, J., Yushkevich, P., Das, S., & Wolk, D. J. (2012). J. o. A. s. d. In vivo analysis of hippocampal subfield atrophy in mild cognitive impairment via semi-automatic segmentation of T2-weighted MRI. 31(1), 85–99.
Puonti, O., Iglesias, J. E., & Van Leemput, K. J. N. (2016). Fast and sequence-adaptive whole-brain segmentation using parametric bayesian modeling. 143, 235–249.
Sarica, A., Vasta, R., Novellino, F., Vaccaro, M. G., Cerasa, A., & Quattrone, A. (2018). MRI asymmetry index of hippocampal Subfields increases through the Continuum from the mild cognitive impairment to the Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Neurosci, 12, 576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00576.
Saygin, Z. M., Kliemann, D., Iglesias, J. E., van der Kouwe, A. J. W., Boyd, E., Reuter, M., & Augustinack, J. C. (2017). High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging reveals nuclei of the human amygdala: Manual segmentation to automatic atlas. Neuroimage, 155, 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.046.
Shi, F., Liu, B., Zhou, Y., Yu, C., & Jiang, T. (2009). Hippocampal volume and asymmetry in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: Meta-analyses of MRI studies. Hippocampus, 19(11), 1055–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20573.
Sun, R., Ge, B., Wu, S., Li, H., & Lin, L. J. A. (2023). J. o. P. Optimal cut-off MoCA score for screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 103691.
Suthana, N. A., Donix, M., Wozny, D. R., Bazih, A., Jones, M., Heidemann, R. M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2015). High-resolution 7T fMRI of human hippocampal subfields during associative learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(6), 1194–1206. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00772.
Tatu, L., & Vuillier, F. (2014). Structure and vascularization of the human hippocampus. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience, 34, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356440.
Thong, J. Y., Du, J., Ratnarajah, N., Dong, Y., Soon, H. W., Saini, M., & Qiu, A. (2014). Abnormalities of cortical thickness, subcortical shapes, and white matter integrity in subcortical vascular cognitive impairment. Human Brain Mapping, 35(5), 2320–2332. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22330.
Van Der Flier, W. M., Skoog, I., Schneider, J. A., Pantoni, L., Mok, V., Chen, C. L., & Scheltens, P. (2018). Vascular cognitive impairment. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 4(1), 1–16.
Vatrinet, R., Leone, G., De Luise, M., Girolimetti, G., Vidone, M., Gasparre, G., & Porcelli, A. M. (2017). The α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex in cancer metabolic plasticity. Cancer Metab, 5, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-017-0165-0.
Woolard, A. A., & Heckers, S. (2012). Anatomical and functional correlates of human hippocampal volume asymmetry. Psychiatry Research, 201(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.07.016.
Xu, J., Li, W., Bai, T., Li, J., Zhang, J., Hu, Q., & Wang, K. (2022). Volume of hippocampus-amygdala transition area predicts outcomes of electroconvulsive therapy in major depressive disorder: High accuracy validated in two independent cohorts (pp. 1–10). PSychological Medicine.
Yamamoto, Y., Hase, Y., Ihara, M., Khundakar, A., Roeber, S., Duering, M., & Kalaria, R. N. (2021). Neuronal densities and vascular pathology in the hippocampal formation in CADASIL. Neurobiology of Aging, 97, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.09.016.
Yushkevich, P. A., Avants, B. B., Das, S. R., Pluta, J., Altinay, M., Craige, C., & Neuroimage, A. (2010). s. D. N. I. J. Bias in estimation of hippocampal atrophy using deformation-based morphometry arises from asymmetric global normalization: an illustration in ADNI 3 T MRI data. 50(2), 434–445.
Zotin, M. C. Z., Sveikata, L., Viswanathan, A., & Yilmaz, P. (2021). Cerebral small vessel disease and vascular cognitive impairment: From diagnosis to management. Current opinion in neurology. 34(2), 246.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the volunteers and patients for their participation in our study.
Funding
This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number. 82004284), Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (No. 2023A1515030265), Guangdong Medical Science Foundation (Grant number. A2021199), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant number. RCBS202007141149g59156; JCYJ20210324111206017), Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital 3030 program (Grant number. G3030202116), and Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (Grant number. SZZYSM202111011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XQ, YH, and HL designed this study. JW, JC, KD, XL, JZ, XQ, HL, and YH participated in the data collection. HL, JC, JW and XL analyzed the data. JC and JW wrote the manuscript. All authors have contributed to the manuscript and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (K2021-041). All participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Wang, J., Duan, K. et al. Selective vulnerability of hippocampal sub-regions in patients with subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment. Brain Imaging and Behavior (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00881-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00881-y