Abstract
Currently, the treatments for postparalysis facial synkinesis are still inadequate. However, neuroimaging mechanistic studies are very limited and blurred. Instead of mapping activation regions, we were devoted to characterizing the organizational features of brain regions to develop new targets for therapeutic intervention. Eighteen patients with unilateral facial synkinesis and 19 healthy controls were enrolled. They were instructed to perform task functional magnetic resonance imaging (eye blinking and lip pursing) examinations and resting-state scans. Then, we characterized group differences in task-state fMRI to identify three foci, including the contralateral precentral gyrus (PreCG), supramarginal gyrus (SMG), and superior parietal gyrus (SPG). Next, we employed a novel approach (using dynamic causal modeling) to identify directed connectivity differences between groups in different modes. Significant patterns in multiple regions in terms of regionally specific actions following synkinetic movements were demonstrated, although the resting state was not significant. The couplings from the SMG to the PreCG (p = 0.03) was significant in the task of left blinking, whereas the coupling from the SMG to the SPG (p = 0.04) was significant in the task of left smiling. We speculated that facial synkinesis affects disruption among the brain networks, and specific couplings that are modulated simultaneously can compensate for motor deficits. Therefore, behavioral or brain stimulation technique treatment could be applied to alter reorganization within specific couplings in the rehabilitation of facial function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, A. R., Gluck, M. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Long-term test-retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task. NeuroImage, 29(3), 1000–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.010
Baugh, R. F., Basura, G. J., Ishii, L. E., Schwartz, S. R., Drumheller, C. M., Burkholder, R., & Vaughan, W. (2013). Clinical practice guideline: Bell’s Palsy. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 149(3_suppl), S1–S27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813505967
Bolognini, N., Convento, S., Banco, E., Mattioli, F., Tesio, L., & Vallar, G. (2015). Improving ideomotor limb apraxia by electrical stimulation of the left posterior parietal cortex. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 138(Pt 2), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu343
Büchel, C., Holmes, A. P., Rees, G., & Friston, K. J. (1998). Characterizing stimulus–response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments. NeuroImage, 8(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0351
Buxton, R. B., Wong, E. C., & Frank, L. R. (1998). Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 39(6), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910390602
Cattaneo, L., Giampiccolo, D., Meneghelli, P., Tramontano, V., & Sala, F. (2020). Cortico-cortical connectivity between the superior and inferior parietal lobules and the motor cortex assessed by intraoperative dual cortical stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 13(3), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.023
Chao, C. C., Karabanov, A. N., Paine, R., Carolina de Campos, A., Kukke, S. N., Wu, T. … Hallett, M. (2015). Induction of motor associative plasticity in the posterior parietal cortex-primary motor network. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 25(2), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht230
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017
Daunizeau, J., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Stochastic dynamic causal modelling of fMRI data: Should we care about neural noise? NeuroImage, 62(1), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.061
David, O., Guillemain, I., Saillet, S., Reyt, S., Deransart, C., Segebarth, C., & Depaulis, A. (2008). Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: An electrophysiological validation. PLoS Biology, 6(12), 2683–2697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060315
Davis, K. D., Taylor, K. S., & Anastakis, D. J. (2011). Nerve injury triggers changes in the brain. The Neuroscientist, 17(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858410389185
Frässle, S., Stephan, K. E., Friston, K. J., Steup, M., Krach, S., Paulus, F. M., & Jansen, A. (2015). Test-retest reliability of dynamic causal modeling for fMRI. NeuroImage, 117, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.040
Friston, K., & Penny, W. (2011). Post hoc Bayesian model selection. NeuroImage, 56(4), 2089–2099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.062
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1273–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7
Friston, K. J., Kahan, J., Biswal, B., & Razi, A. (2014). A DCM for resting state fMRI. NeuroImage, 94, 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.009
Friston, K. J., Li, B., Daunizeau, J., & Stephan, K. E. (2011). Network discovery with DCM. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1202–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.039
Friston, K. J., Litvak, V., Oswal, A., Razi, A., Stephan, K. E., van Wijk, B. C. M., & Zeidman, P. (2016). Bayesian model reduction and empirical Bayes for group (DCM) studies. NeuroImage, 128, 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.015
Gosain, A. K., Birn, R. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Localization of the cortical response to smiling using new imaging paradigms with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 108(5), 1136–1144. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200110000-00005
Heinen, K., Feredoes, E., Ruff, C. C., & Driver, J. (2017). Functional connectivity between prefrontal and parietal cortex drives visuo-spatial attention shifts. Neuropsychologia, 99, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.024
Henson, R. N. A. (2001). Repetition effects for words and nonwords as indexed by event-related fMRI: A preliminary study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00229
Huang, M. X., Lee, R. R., Gaa, K. M., Song, T., Harrington, D. L., Loh, C., & Granholm, E. (2010). Somatosensory system deficits in schizophrenia revealed by MEG during a median-nerve oddball task. Brain Topography, 23(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0122-5
Husseman, J., & Mehta, R. P. (2008). Management of synkinesis. Facial Plastic Surgery: FPS, 24(2), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1075840
Kamali, A., Flanders, A. E., Brody, J., Hunter, J. V., & Hasan, K. M. (2014a). Tracing superior longitudinal fasciculus connectivity in the human brain using high resolution diffusion tensor tractography. Brain Structure and Function, 219(1), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0498-y
Kamali, A., Sair, H. I., Radmanesh, A., & Hasan, K. M. (2014b). Decoding the superior parietal lobule connections of the superior longitudinal fasciculus/arcuate fasciculus in the human brain. Neuroscience, 277, 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.035
Kanaya, K., Ushio, M., Kondo, K., Hagisawa, M., Suzukawa, K., Yamaguchi, T., & Yamasoba, T. (2009). Recovery of facial movement and facial synkinesis in Bell’s Palsy patients. Otology & Neurotology, 30(5), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ab31af
Karnath, H. (1997). Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352(1360), 1411–1419. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0127
Kheradmand, A., Lasker, A., & Zee, D. S. (2015). Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the Supramarginal Gyrus: a window to perception of upright. Cerebral Cortex, 25(3), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht267
Koenigs, M., Barbey, A. K., Postle, B. R., & Grafman, J. (2009). Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(47), 14980–14986. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3706-09.2009
Li, B., Daunizeau, J., Stephan, K. E., Penny, W., Hu, D., & Friston, K. (2011). Generalised filtering and stochastic DCM for fMRI. NeuroImage, 58(2), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.085
Loubinoux, I., Carel, C., Alary, F., Boulanouar, K., Viallard, G., Manelfe, C., & Chollet, F. (2001). Within-session and between-session reproducibility of cerebral sensorimotor activation: A test–retest effect evidenced with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism: Official Journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 21(5), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-200105000-00014
Markey, J. D., & Loyo, M. (2017). Latest advances in the management of facial synkinesis. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 25(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000376
Moran, C. J., & Neely, J. G. (1996). Patterns of facial nerve synkinesis. The Laryngoscope, 106(12), 1491–1496. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199612000-00009
Morecraft, R. J., Stilwell Morecraft, K. S., & Rossing, W. R. (2004). The motor cortex and facial expression: new insights from neuroscience. The Neurologist, 10(5), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nrl.0000138734.45742.8d
Nakamura, K. (2003). Biofeedback rehabilitation for prevention of synkinesis after facial palsy. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 128(4), 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(02)23254-4
Pelgrims, B., Andres, M., & Olivier, E. (2009). Double dissociation between motor and visual imagery in the posterior parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 19(10), 2298–2307. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn248
Penny, W. D., Stephan, K. E., Mechelli, A., & Friston, K. J. (2004). Comparing dynamic causal models. NeuroImage, 22(3), 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.026
Reed, C. L., & Caselli, R. J. (1994). The nature of tactile agnosia: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 32(5), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90142-2
Sadjadpour, K. (1975). Postfacial palsy phenomena: Faulty nerve regeneration or ephaptic transmission? Brain Research, 95(2–3), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(75)90117-1
Sayegh, P. F., Hawkins, K. M., Neagu, B., Crawford, J. D., Hoffman, K. L., & Sergio, L. E. (2014). Decoupling the actions of the eyes from the hand alters beta and gamma synchrony within SPL. Journal of Neurophysiology, 111(11), 2210–2221. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00793.2013
Schulze, L., Wheeler, S., McAndrews, M. P., Solomon, C. J. E., Giacobbe, P., & Downar, J. (2016). Cognitive safety of dorsomedial prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(7), 1213–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.04.004
Schuyler, B., Ollinger, J. M., Oakes, T. R., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2010). Dynamic Causal Modeling applied to fMRI data shows high reliability. NeuroImage, 49(1), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.015
Shinn, J. R., Nwabueze, N. N., Du, L., Patel, P. N., Motamedi, K. K., Norton, C., & Stephan, S. J. (2019). Treatment patterns and outcomes in botulinum therapy for patients with facial synkinesis. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 21(3), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1962
Song, W., Dai, M., Xuan, L., Cao, Z., Zhou, S., Lang, C. … Kong, J. (2017). Sensorimotor cortical neuroplasticity in the early stage of Bell’s Palsy. Neural Plasticity, 2017, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8796239
Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Daunizeau, J., Moran, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2009). Bayesian model selection for group studies. NeuroImage, 46(4), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.025
Tenney, A. P., Livet, J., Belton, T., Prochazkova, M., Pearson, E. M., Whitman, M. C., & Henderson, C. E. (2019). Etv1 controls the establishment of non-overlapping motor innervation of neighboring facial muscles during development. Cell Reports, 29(2), 437–4524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.078
Terzis, J. K., & Karypidis, D. (2012). Therapeutic strategies in post–facial paralysis synkinesis in adult patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 129(6), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230e758
VanSwearingen, J. M., & Brach, J. S. (2003). Changes in facial movement and synkinesis with facial neuromuscular reeducation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 111(7), 2370–2375. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000061007.36637.88
Vendetti, M. S., & Bunge, S. A. (2014). Evolutionary and developmental changes in the lateral frontoparietal network: a little goes a long way for higher-level cognition. Neuron, 84(5), 906–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.035
Wang, Y., Wang, W. W., Hua, X. Y., Liu, H. Q., & Ding, W. (2018). Patterns of cortical reorganization in facial synkinesis: A task functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neural Regeneration Research, 13(9), 1637. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.235304
Wang, Y., Yang, L., Wang, W., Ding, W., & Liu, H. (2019). Decreased distance between representation sites of distinct facial movements in facial synkinesis—A task fMRI study. Neuroscience, 397, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.11.036
Wei, X., Yoo, S. S., Dickey, C. C., Zou, K. H., Guttmann, C. R. G., & Panych, L. P. (2004). Functional MRI of auditory verbal working memory: Long-term reproducibility analysis. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1000–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.039
Wu, J., Lu, Y., Zheng, M., Hua, X., Xu, J., Ding, W., & Shan, C. (2019). Motor control deficits in facial synkinesis patients: neuroimaging evidences of cerebral cortex involvement. Neural Plasticity, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7235808
Xiao, F. L., Gao, P. Y., Sui, B. B., Wan, H., Lin, Y., Xue, J., & Liu, S. (2015). Time-course of changes in activation among facial nerve injury: a functional imaging Study. Medicine, 94(43), e1582. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001582
Zeidman, P., Jafarian, A., Corbin, N., Seghier, M. L., Razi, A., Price, C. J., & Friston, K. J. (2019). A guide to group effective connectivity analysis, part 1: First level analysis with DCM for fMRI. NeuroImage, 200, 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.031
Zhao, S., Rangaprakash, D., Venkataraman, A., Liang, P., & Deshpande, G. (2017). Investigating focal connectivity deficits in Alzheimer’s disease using directional brain networks derived from resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00211
Zuo, X. N., Xu, T., & Milham, M. P. (2019). Harnessing reliability for neuroscience research. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0655-x
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by a grant of the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (STCSM, No: 18401970400) .
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jian-Guang Xu and Ye-Chen Lu contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and were performed by Wei Ding. Data analysis and the first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhen-Zhen Ma. Ye-Chen Lu revised the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Informed consent
All patients provided written informed consent according to the Helsinki declaration.
Ethical standard
This study has been approved by the local ethics committee and performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 14.8 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, ZZ., Lu, YC., Wu, JJ. et al. Effective connectivity decreases in specific brain networks with postparalysis facial synkinesis: a dynamic causal modeling study. Brain Imaging and Behavior 16, 748–760 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-021-00547-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-021-00547-z