Abstract
Ground-level ozone pollution is a menace for vegetation in the northern hemisphere, limiting photosynthetic pigments and suppressing photosynthesis in trees and other types of plants. Phaeophytinization is the process of converting chlorophylls into phaeophytins, for example by acidification. Ozone is a highly oxidizing molecule and well known to degrade chlorophylls; however, the effect of ozone on phaeophytinization in leaves of higher plants is largely unknown. To reveal ozone effect on phaeophytinization and evaluate the potential of phaeophytinization as an index of ozone stress in trees, the absorbance at the optical density of 665 nm was measured before (OD665) and after (OD665a) acidification in three independent experiments with nearly 30 conditions of ozone exposure. Both current ambient and elevated ozone widely affected phaeophytinization, as indicated by decreases or increases in the phaeophytinization quotient OD665/OD665a. These effects were commonly moderate to large in magnitude and practically significant, and occurred even in ozone-asymptomatic leaves. It emerges that the ozone effect on phaeophytinization is bimodal, likely depending on the intensity of ozone stress. These results indicate a promising feature of OD665/OD665a as a thorough index of ozone stress in the future, but further studies are needed to reveal the underlying biochemical mechanisms of the bimodal effect on phaeophytinization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
One of the most common effects of oxidative stress in plants is the long-known degradation of chlorophyll (Nobel 1974; Hendry et al. 1987; Kuai et al. 2018; Lu et al. 2022). Due to the relatively easy and fast-forward evaluation of chlorophylls in the leaf (often estimated non-destructively), the degradation of chlorophylls has received heightened interest in programs investigating the presence and phytotoxic potential of abiotic stressors such as air pollutants (Knudson et al. 1977; Gottardini et al. 2014). It is also widely used in studies assessing the sensitivity of plants to air pollutants such as ozone (O3), the air pollutant most threatening forests and other types of vegetation (Tiwari and Agrawal 2009; Döring et al. 2014; Pellegrini 2014; Pellegrini et al. 2015; Kitao et al. 2016; Mills et al. 2018; Proietti et al. 2020; Sicard et al. 2021).
Phaeophytin is a molecule involved in the electron transfer pathway of photosystem II (PSII), which acts as the first electron carrier intermediate (Klimov 2003). Phaeophytins a and b (molecular weight: 871.18 and 885.16) are Mg-free derivatives of chlorophylls a and b, whose transformation is facilitated by weak acids (Lichtenthaler 1987). In other terms, phaeophytin is a chlorophyll molecule with no central Mg2+ ion. Some phaeophytin a is widely present in plant pigment extracts, and phaeophytins were found in many pigment extracts from leaves exposed to air pollutants (e.g., NO2 and SO2) and other environmental challenges, such as heat and light (Lichtenthaler 1987). Early stages of chlorophyll breakdown proceed for example from chlorophyll b to chlorophyll a to phein a to pheide a during leaf senescence (Tanaka et al. 1998; Schelbert et al. 2009; Kuai et al. 2018). Phaeophytinization is the process of transforming chlorophylls into phaeophytins, such as by artificially treating a pigment extract with weak acid, and the phaeophytin formation is favored in plants with organic acids reservoirs in the vacuoles (Lichtenthaler 1987). The chlorophyll-phaeophytin relationship is controlled by light intensity, temperature, and the duration of exposure (Ignatov and Litvin 1994). Besides the overall degradation of chlorophylls by oxidative stressors (e.g., O3), chlorophyll a is often more sensitive than chlorophyll b to both oxidative stressors and phaeophytinization (Lichtenthaler 1987; Tiwari and Agrawal 2009; Pellegrini 2014; Döring et al. 2014; Pellegrini et al. 2015). These processes and functions highlight the important role of phaeophytins in stressed plants. However, phaeophytinization has barely been studied in O3-stressed plants, despite the abundant literature on O3 effects on plants and chlorophylls (Senser 1990; Barnes et al. 1992; González et al. 1996; Siefermann-Harms et al. 2005). Yet, recent studies also indicate the possibility of enhanced phaeophytin emission intensity in O3-exposed leaves of O3-tolerant trees (e.g. Passiflora edulis), with conversion of chlorophyll to phaeophytin (Fernandes et al. 2019). These further indicate the potential of O3 to affect phaeophytinization in both susceptible and tolerant trees, although it can be expected that the magnitude of the effect would depend on plant sensitivity, level of O3 exposure, and actual O3 influx into leaf.
The degradation of chlorophyll to phaeophytin in extracts can be evaluated with artificial acidification in the lab (Lichtenthaler 1987). For instance, the absorbance at the optical density of 665 nm can be measured before (OD665) and after (OD665a) artificial acidification, followed by calculation of the phaeophytinization quotient OD665/OD665a. The phaeophytinization quotient OD435/OD415, which is the ratio of absorbance at the optical density of 435 nm to the absorbance at the optical density of 415 nm, has also been used in some studies as an indicator of degradation of chlorophyll a to phaeophytin a, particularly in foliose lichens (Ronen and Galun 1984; Kardish et al. 1987; Barnes et al. 1992; Manrique et al. 1989; Backor et al. 2003). A preliminary literature survey suggested that the potential of OD435/OD415 as an index of O3 stress was not evaluated in higher plants, though it was successfully used in trees exposed to different stressors (Penuelas et al. 1995). A survey in the Web of Science Core Collection with the keywords ‘435’ AND ‘ozone’ AND ‘plant’ revealed no results; replacing ‘435’ with ‘phaeophytin’ or ‘pheophytin’ revealed only 2 results (non-specific to O3-higher plants) (All Fields search; 14 September 2022). Considering the under-investigated effect of O3 on phaeophytinization, data were collected in five independent experiments with tree species, to assess phaeophytinization (using OD665/OD665a and OD435/OD415) as a biomarker of O3 stress. The multifactorial design of the experiments provided approximately 30 experimental conditions for evaluation. Based on recent research advancements demonstrating the common enhancement of photosynthesis and chlorophylls by low doses of various environmental contaminants and other abiotic stressors (Adamakis et al. 2021; Agathokleous 2021; Moustakas et al. 2022), there is a possibility that O3 (and potentially other stressors) can both decrease and increase phaeophytinization depending on the intensity of stress.
Materials and methods
All the experiments included in this study were conducted at the Sapporo Experimental Forest (43°0' N, 141°2' E, 15 m a.s.l.) of the Field Science Center of Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. The experiments were conducted at different times within the growing seasons of the years 2014 − 2017. All the experiments have been published, and detailed methodological and general experimental information can be found in the relevant publications (Agathokleous et al. 2016, 2017, 2018, 2022a, b).
The taxa studied were willow (Salix sachalinensis F. Schmid) (Agathokleous et al. 2016, 2018, 2022b), a hybrid larch (Larix gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaempferi) (Agathokleous et al. 2017 and 2022a), and Japanese larch (L. kaempferi (Lamb.) Carr.) (Agathokleous et al. 2017). Therefore, deciduous broadleaf (willow) and needle-leaf (larches) taxa with considerable differences in leaf structure were included in this study. The experimental plants were saplings of different ages across experiments, ranging from 0-year-old (current year) to 3-year-old, and thus differed widely in their size. For example, the larches were from approximately 20 cm to over 1 m tall whereas the willows were from approximately 40 cm to nearly 3 m tall.
All the experiments but one were conducted in a free-air O3-concentration enrichment (FACE) system where plants were exposed to either ambient air or O3-enriched air. The average O3 concentrations during the exposures were generally 15 − 35 nmol mol−1 in the ambient air plots and 56 − 76 nmol mol−1 in the O3-enriched plots, depending on the experiment. The experiment that was not conducted in the FACE system was conducted in ambient fully-open plots with an average O3 concentration of approximately 24 nmol mol−1 (Agathokleous et al. 2016). In the latter experiment, different treatments of the antiozonant ethylenediurea (EDU) were included; therefore, plants treated with 0 mg L−1 EDU can be considered O3-stressed and those treated with higher EDU doses, commonly ~ 100 − 500 mg L−1, can be considered less O3-stressed (Manning et al. 2011; Singh et al. 2015). EDU was included in several of the other experiments too, thus providing more groups of comparisons between plants with different degrees of O3 stress. Plants were exposed to the O3 treatments for at least several weeks within a single growing season to three growing seasons with treatment lasting several months in each growing season.
The protocol, chemicals, and instruments used for the analysis of photosynthetic pigments were same in all experiments, and are reported in detail in previous publications (Agathokleous et al. 2018). Extraction was performed with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Shinano et al. 1996), and the extracts were kept in dark and warm (65 °C) conditions until the thallus becomes “ghost-like”. The absorbance at 665 nm was measured according to Barnes et al. (1992). The absorbance at 635 and 415 nm were measured according to Ronen and Galun (1984). Following analysis, the extracts of three experiments were subjected to acidification (Lichtenthaler 1987). Per 10 mL of extract, 1 M HCl (60 μL) was added, and the extracts (with closed tubes) were stored in dark and cold (4 °C) conditions for 12 min. Then, the absorbance at 665 nm was measured again. GeneSpec III (Hitachi Genetic Systems; MiraiBio, Alameda, CA) was used for all the pigment analyses.
The raw data of studies “1” (Agathokleous et al. 2018), “2” (Agathokleous et al. 2016), and “4” (Agathokleous et al. 2017), which are used for the calculation of effect size, were reported in the original publications. The raw data of studies “3” (Agathokleous et al. 2022a) and “5” (Agathokleous et al. 2022b), which are used for the calculation of effect size, are newly reported in Supplementary Materials. Hence, from the 26 and 31 effect sizes of OD665/OD665a and OD435/OD415, 21 and 21 are based on data newly reported here (Supplementary Materials).
Cohen’s delta (δ) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated to evaluate the size of O3 effect on phaeophytinization quotients, using an MS Excel built-in application (Agathokleous and Saitanis 2020). Effects in the range of δ values |0 − 0.2|, |0.2 − 0.5|, |0.5 − 0.8|, and |0.8|+ indicate neutral, small, moderate, and large effect, respectively, and values |0.25 − 0.5| and >|0.5| indicate educational and practical significance respectively (Tallmadge 1977; Wolf 1986; Cohen 1988). When both EDU and O3 treatments existed in a study, effect size was calculated by comparing: (a) the EDU-free control (0 mg L−1) with EDU-treated (> 0 mg L−1) plants within each O3 condition, and (b) the O3 control (ambient levels) with the elevated O3 for each EDU treatment. Comparisons between AOZ and EOZ treatments for plants treated with 200 or 400 mg EDU L−1 were excluded because EDU protects against O3 and would confound the results. In study 2 (Agathokleous et al. 2016), comparison of EDU control (0 mg L−1) with 1600 mg EDU L−1 was excluded because the latter concentration is multifold higher than the range of concentrations known to protect plants against O3 and EDU might produce direct side effects. For extracts evaluated for both phaeophytinization quotients, a linear regression was developed (MS Excel) to assess the magnitude of correlation.
Results and discussion
Twenty six effect sizes from three independent experiments were calculated for OD665/OD665a (Fig. 1). Both negative (54% of δ values) and positive (46% of δ values) effects were found. The mean δ ranged from − 2.59 (min) to 1.69 (max), while the average of the 26 values of δ was − 0.09 (95% CI: − 0.47 to 0.29) (Fig. 1). There was no clear distinction in the direction of the effect between species (willow and hybrid larch), between O3 exposures (ambient or elevated), or between symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves. These results suggest that O3 can influence phaeophytinization in these plants even in the absence of foliar injury that is visible to naked eye, at both current and artificially-elevated concentrations. However, the direction of O3 effect on OD665/OD665a seems to exhibit a clearer dependence upon the cultivation soil (Fig. 1). Only 4 (15%) of the δ values were smaller than |0.2|, indicating neutral effect of O3. Six (23%), 7 (27%), and 9 (35%) of the δ values were in the ranges |0.2 − 0.5|, |0.5 − 0.8|, and |0.8|+ , respectively, indicating small, moderate, and large effects. Five (19%) δ values were in the range |0.25 − 0.5| and sixteen (62%) were >|0.5|, indicating educational and practical significance, respectively. These results indicate that O3 can influence phaeophytinization in these plants across a range of experimental conditions, and the majority of these effects are moderate or large (62%) and practically significant (62%).
Data from the same aforementioned studies (26 effects) as well as data from two more studies (5 effects) were analyzed for the effect of O3 on OD435/OD415 (Fig. 2). From the 31 effects, 18 (58%) were small and of no practical significance (δ <|0.5|), and the effects widely mismatched the effect on OD665/OD665a (for extracts commonly evaluated for the two phaeophytinization quotients in the same studies). These results indicate that OD435/OD415 is less sensitive to O3 and inaccurate compared to OD665/OD665a in these experimental settings. To further assess whether the two phaeophytinization quotients are linearly correlated, a linear function was built, and the size of correlation was considerably weak despite a relatively large N (Fig. 3). Hence, OD435/OD415 is not in good agreement with OD665/OD665a as a phaeophytinization index.
Acidic pollutants can cause acidification, leading to loss of chlorophyll as well as its Mg+ to form phaeophytin (Sabaratnam et al. 1988; Fernandes et al. 2019). Chlorophyll degradation often occurs together with production of Mg2+ and phaeophytin a (Verkroost 1974). Here, in a series of experiments and a plethora of experimental conditions, we show that current ambient and elevated O3 exposures affect phaeophytinization. O3 increases or decreases OD665/OD665a, indicating the bimodal character of phaeophytinization in response to O3 and suggesting that more traits indicative of stress status should be integrated to better understanding the underlying biochemical mechanisms. An increase in OD665/OD665a indicates greater degradation of chlorophyll following acidification. While a decrease in OD665/OD665a indicates smaller degradation of chlorophyll by acidification, the underlying reasons explaining this are unclear. A possible explanation may be that mild O3 stress may enhance chlorophylls and concurrently protect them against degradation and breakdown to phaeophytins (Agathokleous 2021). Moreover, two pathways of chlorophyll breakdown may exist under O3 stress. Specifically, (i) via direct oxidative damage by reactive oxygen species (ROS), and (ii) due to involvement in enzymatic processes via accelerated leaf senescence, two common mechanisms of O3-induced stress in plants (Kitao et al. 2016; Tiwari and Agrawal 2018; Dusart et al. 2019; Grulke and Heath 2020; Gupta et al. 2022). (Note: for the role of senescence in chlorophyll breakdown see Kuai et al. (2018)). The former (i) can be considered ‘acute O3 effect’ and the latter (ii) ‘mild O3 effect’. To evaluate these possibilities, new studies should evaluate phaeophytinization in leaves with quantified O3 stress (e.g., in terms of % of visible foliar injury, senescence acceleration, and ROS).
In conclusion, current ambient and elevated O3 exposures commonly affect phaeophytinization at a moderate to large extent, an effect that is practically significant. Further assessment of the phaeophytinization using different methodological modifications, such as different acids, level of acidity, and duration of exposure to acid, in O3-stressed leaves is needed.
References
Adamakis IDS, Sperdouli I, Hanć A, Dobrikova A, Apostolova E, Moustakas M (2021) Rapid hormetic responses of photosystem II photochemistry of clary sage to cadmium exposure. Int J Mol Sci 22:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010041
Agathokleous E (2021) The rise and fall of photosynthesis: Hormetic dose response in plants. J for Res 32:789–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01252-1
Agathokleous E, Saitanis C (2020) Plant susceptibility to ozone: a tower of babel? Sci Total Environ 703:134962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134962
Agathokleous E, Paoletti E, Saitanis CJ, Manning WJ, Shi C, Koike T (2016) High doses of ethylene diurea (EDU) are not toxic to willow and act as nitrogen fertilizer. Sci Total Environ 566–567:841–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.122
Agathokleous E, Vanderstock A, Kita K, Koike T (2017) Stem and crown growth of Japanese larch and its hybrid F1 grown in two soils and exposed to two free-air O3 regimes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:6634–6647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8401-2
Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Qingnan C, Saitanis CJ, Paoletti E, Manning WJ, Watanabe T, Koike T (2018) Effects of ozone (O3) and ethylenediurea (EDU) on the ecological stoichiometry of a willow grown in a free-air exposure system. Environ Pollut 238:663–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.061
Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Koike T (2022a) Ethylenediurea (EDU) effects on hybrid larch saplings exposed to ambient or elevated ozone over three growing seasons. J for Res 33:117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01352-6
Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Shi C, Masui N, Abu-ElEla S, Hikino K, Satoh F, Koike T (2022b) Ethylenediurea (EDU) spray effects on willows (Salix sachalinensis F. Schmid) grown in ambient or ozone-enriched air: implications for renewable biomass production. J for Res 33:397–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01400-1
Backor M, Paulikova K, Geralska A, Davidson R (2003) Monitoring of air pollution in Košice (eastern slovakia) using lichens. Polish J Environ Stud 12:141–150
Barnes JD, Balaguer L, Manrique E, Elvira S, Davison AW (1992) A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environ Exp Bot 32:85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(92)90034-y
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. L. Erlbaum Associates, New York
Döring AS, Pellegrini E, Campanella A, Trivellini A, Gennai C, Petersen M, Nali C, Lorenzini G (2014) How sensitive is Melissa officinalis to realistic ozone concentrations? Plant Physiol Biochem 74:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.11.006
Dusart N, Gandin A, Vaultier M-N, Joffe R, Cabané M, Dizengremel P, Jolivet Y (2019) Importance of detoxification processes in ozone risk assessment: need to integrate the cellular compartmentation of antioxidants? Front for Glob Chang 2:45. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00045
Fernandes FF, Esposito MP, da Silva Engela MRG, Cardoso-Gustavson P, Furlan CM, Hoshika Y, Carrari E, Magni G, Domingos M, Paoletti E (2019) The passion fruit liana (Passiflora edulis Sims, Passifloraceae) is tolerant to ozone. Sci Total Environ 656:1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.425
González CM, Casanovas SS, Pignata ML (1996) Biomonitoring of air pollutants from traffic and industries employing Ramalina ecklonii (Spreng.) Mey. and Flot. in Córdoba. Argentina Environ Pollut 91:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(95)00076-3
Gottardini E, Cristofori A, Cristofolini F, Nali C, Pellegrini E, Bussotti F, Ferretti M (2014) Chlorophyll-related indicators are linked to visible ozone symptoms: Evidence from a field study on native Viburnum lantana L. plants in northern Italy. Ecol Indic 39:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.021
Grulke NE, Heath RL (2020) Ozone effects on plants in natural ecosystems. Plant Biol 22:12–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12971
Gupta A, Yadav DS, Agrawal SB, Agrawal M (2022) Individual effects of high temperature and tropospheric ozone on tomato: a review. J Plant Growth Regul. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10678-2
Hendry GAF, Houghton JD, Brown SB (1987) The degradation of chlorophyll -a biological enigma. New Phytol 107:255–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-8137.1987.tb00181.x
Ignatov NV, Litvin FF (1994) Photoinduced formation of pheophytin/chlorophyll-containing complexes during the greening of plant leaves. Photosynth Res 42:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00019055
Kardish N, Ronen R, Bubrick P, Garty J (1987) The influence of air pollution on the concentration of ATP and on chlorophyll degradation in the lichen, Ramalina duriaei (De Not.) Bagl. New Phytol 106:697–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00170.x
Kitao M, Yasuda Y, Kominami Y, Yamanoi K, Komatsu M, Miyama T, Mizoguchi Y, Kitaoka S, Yazaki K, Tobita H, Yoshimura K, Koike T, Izuta T (2016) Increased phytotoxic O3 dose accelerates autumn senescence in an O3-sensitive beech forest even under the present-level O3. Sci Rep 6:32549. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32549
Klimov VV (2003) Discovery of pheophytin function in the photosynthetic energy conversion as the primary electron acceptor of photosystem II. Photosynth Res 76:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024990408747
Knudson LLL, Tibbitts TWW, Edwards GEE (1977) Measurement of ozone injury by determination of leaf chlorophyll concentration. Plant Physiol 60:606–608. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.60.4.606
Kuai B, Chen J, Hörtensteiner S (2018) The biochemistry and molecular biology of chlorophyll breakdown. J Exp Bot 69:751–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx322
Lichtenthaler HK (1987) [34] Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
Lu C, Zhao C, Liu J, Li K, Wang B, Chen M (2022) Increased salinity and groundwater levels lead to degradation of the Robinia pseudoacacia forest in the yellow river delta. J for Res 33:1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01422-9
Manning WJ, Paoletti E, Sandermann H, Ernst D (2011) Ethylenediurea (EDU): A research tool for assessment and verification of the effects of ground level ozone on plants under natural conditions. Environ Pollut 159:3283–3293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.005
Manrique E, Redondo F, Seriñá E, Izco J (1989) Estimation of chlorophyll degradation into phaeophytin in Anaptychia ciliaris as a method to detect air pollution. Lazaroa 11:141–148. https://doi.org/10.5209/laza.11227
Mills G, Pleijel H, Malley CS, Sinha B, Cooper OR, Schultz MG, Neufeld HS, Simpson D, Sharps K, Feng Z, Gerosa G, Harmens H, Kobayashi K, Saxena P, Paoletti E, Sinha V, Xu X (2018) Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation. Elementa 6:47. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302
Moustakas M, Moustaka J, Sperdouli I (2022) Hormesis in photosystem II: a mechanistic understanding. Curr Opin Toxicol 29:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2022.02.003
Nobel PS (1974) Ozone effects on chlorophylls a and b. Sci Nat 61:80–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00596204
Pellegrini E (2014) PSII photochemistry is the primary target of oxidative stress imposed by ozone in Tilia americana. Urban for Urban Green 13:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.006
Pellegrini E, Campanella A, Paolocci M, Trivellini A, Gennai C, Muganu M, Nali C, Lorenzini G (2015) Functional leaf traits and diurnal dynamics of photosynthetic parameters predict the behavior of grapevine varieties towards ozone. PLoS ONE 10:e0135056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135056
Penuelas J, Filella I, Lloret P, Munoz F, Vilajeliu M (1995) Reflectance assessment of mite effects on apple trees. Int J Remote Sens 16:2727–2733. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954588
Proietti C, Fornasier MF, Sicard P, Anav A, Paoletti E, De Marco A (2020) Trends in tropospheric ozone concentrations and forest impact metrics in Europe over the time period 2000–2014. J for Res 32:543–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01226-3
Ronen R, Galun M (1984) Pigment extraction from lichens with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and estimation of chlorophyll degradation. Environ Exp Bot 24:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(84)90004-2
Sabaratnam S, Gupta G, Mulchi C (1988) Effects of nitrogen dioxide on leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen content of soybean. Environ Pollut 51:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(88)90200-x
Schelbert S, Aubry S, Burla B, Agne B, Kessler F, Krupinska K, Hörtensteiner S (2009) Pheophytin pheophorbide hydrolase (pheophytinase) is involved in chlorophyll breakdown during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21:767–785. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.064089
Senser M (1990) Influence of soil substrate and ozone plus acid mist on the frost resistance of young Norway spruce. Environ Pollut 64:265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(90)90050-m
Shinano T, Lei TT, Kawamukai T, Inoue MT, Koike T, Tadano T (1996) Dimethylsulfoxide method for the extraction of chlorophylls a and b from the leaves of wheat, field bean, dwarf bamboo, and oak. Photosynthetica 32:409–415
Sicard P, Hoshika Y, Carrari E, De Marco A (2021) Paoletti E (2021) Testing visible ozone injury within a Light Exposed Sampling Site as a proxy for ozone risk assessment for European forests. J for Res 32:1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01327-7
Siefermann-Harms D, Payer HD, Schramel P, Lütz C (2005) The effect of ozone on the yellowing process of magnesium-deficient clonal Norway spruce grown under defined conditions. J Plant Physiol 162:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.06.009
Singh AA, Singh S, Agrawal M, Agrawal SB (2015) Assessment of ethylene diurea-induced protection in plants against ozone phytotoxicity. Rev Environ Cont Tox 233:129–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10479-9_4
Tallmadge G (1977) Ideabook: The joint dissemination review panel. U.S. dept. of health, education and welfare, National Institute of Education, U.S. Office of Education, Washington
Tanaka A, Ito H, Tanaka R, Tanaka NK, Yoshida K, Okada K (1998) Chlorophyll a oxygenase (CAO) is involved in chlorophyll b formation from chlorophyll a. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12719–12723. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.21.12719
Tiwari S, Agrawal M (2009) Protection of palak (Beta vulgaris L. var Allgreen) plants from ozone injury by ethylenediurea (EDU): roles of biochemical and physiological variations in alleviating the adverse impacts. Chemosphere 75:1492–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.034
Tiwari S, Agrawal M (2018) Tropospheric ozone and its impacts on crop plants, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Verkroost M (1974) The effect of ozone on photosynthesis and respiration of Scenedesmus obtusiusculus Chod., with a general discussion of effects of air pollutants in plants. Meded. Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen 7. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen
Wolf FM (1986) Meta-analysis: quantitative methods for research synthesis, 1st edn. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, p 72
Funding
This research was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 4210070867), the Research grant #201605 of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Japan, and KAKENHI grant #JP17F17102 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). Evgenios Agathokleous was an International Research Fellow (ID No: P17102) of the JSPS. JSPS is a non-profit, independent administrative institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Evgenios Agathokleous is Associate Editor-in-Chief of this journal; however, he was not involved in the peer-review process of this manuscript. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Project funding: This research was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 4210070867), the Research grant #201605 of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Japan, and KAKENHI grant #JP17F17102 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). Evgenios Agathokleous was an International Research Fellow (ID No: P17102) of the JSPS. JSPS is a non-profit, independent administrative institution.
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com.
Corresponding editor: Yu Lei.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Agathokleous, E., Kitao, M. & Koike, T. Testing phaeophytinization as an index of ozone stress in trees. J. For. Res. 34, 1167–1174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01556-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01556-4