Abstract
The European Federation of Food, Agriculture, and Tourism Trade Unions (EFFAT) called for the immediate ban on glyphosate in the 2022 renewal process, promoting the use of natural herbicides and recommending against the use of other harmful or hazardous chemicals. The new chemical testing and selection research agendas should consider the hormetic effects of individual natural herbicides, and their potential mixtures, on targeted and non-targeted organisms to avoid stimulation of pests and negative effects on non-targeted organisms. New scientific research programs are needed to study the effects of mixtures of natural pesticides on soils, plants, animals, and microorganisms within the context of agroforestry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The herbicide glyphosate has received heightened attention because of its accumulation in the environment and thereby its effects on the environment and humans (Duke 2018, 2021; Van Bruggen et al. 2018; Gillezeau et al. 2019; Kudsk and Mathiassen 2020). For example, dose- and time-dependent effects of glyphosate-based herbicides may be associated with impacted female reproductive systems in various animals such as rodent, lamb, and fish (Kaboli Kafshgiri et al. 2021), as well as suppressed and/or impaired immune systems in fish and mammals (Peillex and Pelletier 2020). Although several dose- and time-dependent effects have been observed in toxicological studies with human cells, epidemiological studies show contradictory findings (Agostini et al. 2020). Hence, the debate of whether glyphosate is carcinogenic continues, while different regulatory agencies have drawn different conclusions (Cressey 2015; Tarazona et al. 2017; Gillezeau et al. 2019). The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) considers it as “probably carcinogenic to humans”, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) found it “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans”, and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found it “not likely to be carcinogenic in humans” (Gillezeau et al. 2019). It is also widely documented that chronic exposure to glyphosate affects various organisms, alters the composition of microbial communities in animal guts, plants, and soil, and promotes drug resistance (Van Bruggen et al. 2018; Duke 2021). Such effects of glyphosate often occur at low, subtoxic concentrations (Belz and Duke 2017; Duke 2020, 2021; Jalal et al. 2021; Belz et al. 2022).
Pesticides are key to plant protection to ensure food security, and their abolition could translate to as much as 20 –40% losses in yield (Lykogianni et al. 2021). Sustainable use of pesticides can decrease the contamination burden to the environment, prevent environmental degradation, and protect the anthroposphere and biosphere (Lykogianni et al. 2021). The European Union’s (EU) current glyphosate approval expires at the end of 2022,Footnote 1 20 years after its first approval by the Union, requiring the implementation of new cropping practices (Kudsk and Mathiassen 2020). At the end of June 2021, the European Federation of Food, Agriculture, and Tourism Trade Unions (EFFAT) called for the glyphosate’s ban in the 2022 renewal process, promoted the use of natural herbicides, and recommended against the use of other harmful or hazardous chemicals (https://effat.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/EFFAT-Position-Paper-Ending-the-use-of-glyphosate-and-building-a-more-sustainable-agriculture.pdf). A ban on glyphosate may translate to high economic costs, e.g., a loss of more than USD 1.1 billion per year for UK farmers (Kudsk and Mathiassen 2020). The issue about the use of glyphosate, the world’s most used herbicide, has extended to other parts of the world, including the ban by the Mexican government that will be effective from January 2024 (Alcántara-de la Cruz et al. 2021) and the ban or phasing out by several local councils in Australia, despite the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) support for glyphosate use (Walsh and Kingwell 2021). A ban on glyphosate may result in significant economic impacts for Australia as well, for example, heavy-soils farms may face a decrease in profit of over USD 260 thousand (− 57%) per year because of increased costs associated with weed control and decreases in crop yields stemming from less effective weed control in the absence of glyphosate and paraquat and no offset of grain prices (Walsh and Kingwell 2021). An 11.1% increase in grain prices may be required to keep farm profits unchanged when both herbicides are banned (Walsh and Kingwell 2021). A global ban on glyphosate may bring an end to the cultivation of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GM-HT) crops, which could lead to a loss of farmers’ benefits from using this technology, such as easier control of weeds and lower costs (Brookes et al. 2017). This could result in an annual loss of farm income gains of USD 6.8 billion, while global prices of various economically important crops may increase by 0.4% (rice) to 5.4% (soybeans) (Brookes et al. 2017). Hence, the imminent ban on glyphosate may bring about a burden for the global economy, reinforcing the notion that more focus should be paid to the supply and correct use of pesticides, instead of merely banning specific ones.
The EU’s proposed replacement of glyphosate with natural herbicides may be an ineffective solution because natural pesticides do not differ from synthetic pesticides in their dose–response behaviour (Agathokleous and Calabrese 2020, 2021; Agathokleous et al. 2022a). The general occurrence of hormesis (Fig. 1) across pesticides, allelochemicals, and other types of chemicals with significant subtoxic responses, suggests that all pesticides would affect sensitive or resistant targeted and non-targeted organisms depending on concentration and time (Duke et al. 2006; Belz and Duke 2017; Carvalho et al. 2020; Shahid et al. 2020; Duke 2021; Erofeeva 2021, 2022; Jalal et al. 2021; Agathokleous et al. 2022a; Cutler et al. 2022; Rix and Cutler 2022). Hence, pesticide effects cannot be prevented by simply turning them into natural ones.
Nevertheless, considering the occurrence of the hormetic-biphasic dose–response relationship (Agathokleous et al. 2020b), the screening and selection of new, natural herbicides in research programs should cover the full dose–response spectrum, taking into account the potential effects of subtoxic doses on targeted and non-targeted organisms. Subtoxic effects should also be considered in research evaluating the effects and risks of pesticide mixtures because they can have antagonistic, additive, or synergistic effects on targeted and non-targeted organisms (Thrupp et al. 2018; Cong et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019; Kumari and Kumar 2020; Wang et al. 2020, 2021; Agathokleous et al. 2020b, 2022a; Huang et al. 2021; Li et al. 2021; Rui et al. 2021). Such effects are extended to microbiota, presenting an additional challenge of the implications to biodiversity conservation as well as to trees and forest health due to changes in pests dynamics, symbiotic relationships, and beneficial insects such as pollinators and natural enemies of pests (Cong et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019; Hu et al. 2020; Agathokleous et al. 2022a, b; Guedes et al. 2022; Tang et al. 2022). Hormetic responses have been largely neglected in ecotoxicological studies (Guedes et al. 2022; Sebastiano et al. 2022), but recent research programs have led to understanding its general occurrence. To ensure environmental health and minimize risks, the chemical testing and selection in the framework of the new EU policy should consider such sub-NOAEL (no observed adverse effect levels) effects on non-targeted organisms but to do so, improved experimental designs are needed to capture subtoxic effects such as by considerably increasing the sample size and number of doses (Calabrese et al. 2019; Agathokleous and Calabrese 2020; Sebastiano et al. 2022). Nanotechnology-based interventions with bio-encapsulated pesticides can also mitigate the adverse effects of pesticides on the environment and human health (Grillo et al. 2016; Camara et al. 2019; Hassanisaadi et al. 2022), offering a perspective for eco-friendlier pesticides. However, even if nano pesticides were to be promoted, relevant research should consider hormetic effects for their development and selection (Agathokleous et al. 2020a). Improved mathematical models of dose–response relationships, which account for sub-NOAEL effects and adequately capture hormesis, are also available and permit more sophisticated assessments (Belz and Duke 2022).
Agroforestry can mitigate agricultural impacts and improve ecosystem services by enhancing biodiversity, modifying climate, improving soil properties (e.g., carbon and nitrogen levels and enzyme activities) and the quality of the environment, by improving soil water relations (e.g., increase in storage and decreased evaporation), and by facilitating pest control (Tscharntke et al. 2005; Bianchi et al. 2006; Udawatta et al. 2008; Siriri et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2013). Expanding the conversion of cropping systems into agroforestry systems may accelerate the transition to a more sustainable food system in line with the European Commission’s “Farm to Fork Strategy” aiming at making food systems fair, healthy and environmentally friendly (https://ec.europa.eu/food/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en). In light of the recent reconsideration of the EU’s pesticide use practices and the imminent ban of glyphosate, agroforestry systems may play a more important role in pest management. However, it is reasonable to assume that pesticides would still be required in agroforestry practices, although the use of alternative methods for weed control could also be expanded, such as incorporation of various agronomic practices and an integrated control of weeds, potentially including redesigned crop rotations, mixed cropping and diversification of plantations, selection of optimum seeding rates, proper use of approved biostimulants, seed priming etc. Numerous weed species have developed resistance to current herbicides, and therefore it is urgent for the development of herbicides with new modes of action (Duke and Dayan 2021; Belz et al. 2022). Hormesis occurs independently of pesticide mode of action (Agathokleous et al. 2022a), indicating a need to consider hormetic responses in research programs to develop new pesticides, synthetic or natural ones.
Overall, recent bans on glyphosate by various countries and the imminent EU ban and their implications highlight the dependence on such pesticides for food security, national economies, and agroecosystems health. To facilitate the EU’s initiative to turn to natural herbicides, hormetic effects should be considered in research evaluations of the effects of individual pesticides and mixtures of pesticides on targeted and non-targeted (e.g., soil microbiota) organisms.
Notes
For more information the reader may refer to https://www.echa.europa.eu/en/web/guest/hot-topics/glyphosate
References
Agathokleous E, Calabrese EJ (2020) A global environmental health perspective and optimisation of stress. Sci Total Environ 704:135263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135263
Agathokleous E, Calabrese EJ (2021) Fungicide-induced hormesis in phytopathogenic fungi: a critical determinant of successful agriculture and environmental sustainability. J Agric Food Chem 69:4561–4563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01824
Agathokleous E, Feng ZZ, Iavicoli I, Calabrese EJ (2020a) Nano-pesticides: a great challenge for biodiversity? The need for a broader perspective. Nano Today 30:100808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100808
Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Calabrese EJ (2020b) Hormesis: Highly generalizable and beyond laboratory. Trends Plant Sci 25:1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.05.006
Agathokleous E, Barceló D, Rinklebe J, Sonne C, Calabrese EJ, Koike T (2022a) Hormesis induced by silver iodide, hydrocarbons, microplastics, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals: Implications for agroforestry ecosystems health. Sci Total Environ 820:153116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153116
Agathokleous E, Wang Q, Iavicoli I, Calabrese EJ (2022b) The relevance of hormesis at higher levels of biological organization: Hormesis in microorganisms. Curr Opin Toxicol 29:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2021.11.001
Agostini LP, Dettogni RS, dos Reis RS, Stur E, dos Santos EVW, Ventorim DP, Garcia FM, Cardoso RC, Graceli JB, Louro ID (2020) Effects of glyphosate exposure on human health: Insights from epidemiological and in vitro studies. Sci Total Environ 705:135808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135808
Alcántara-de la Cruz R, Cruz-Hipolito HE, Domínguez-Valenzuela JA, De Prado R (2021) Glyphosate ban in Mexico: potential impacts on agriculture and weed management. Pest Manag Sci 77:3820–3831. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6362
Belz RG, Duke SO (2022) Modelling biphasic hormetic dose responses to predict sub-NOAEL effects using plant biology as an example. Curr Opin Toxicol 29:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2022.01.003
Belz RG, Duke SO (2017) Herbicide-mediated Hormesis. In: Duke SO, Kudsk P, Solomon K (eds) Pesticide Dose: Effects on the Environment and Target and Non-Target Organisms. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 135–148
Belz RG, Carbonari CA, Duke SO (2022) The potential influence of hormesis on evolution of resistance to herbicides. Curr Opin Environ Sci Heal, 100360 (in Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100360
Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1715–1727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3530
Brookes G, Taheripour F, Tyner WE (2017) The contribution of glyphosate to agriculture and potential impact of restrictions on use at the global level. GM Crop Food 8:216–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2017.1390637
Calabrese EJ, Agathokleous E, Kozumbo WJ, Stanek EJ, Leonard D (2019) Estimating the range of the maximum hormetic stimulatory response. Environ Res 170:337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.020
Camara MC, Campos EVR, Monteiro RA, Pereira DES, De Freitas Proença PL, Fraceto LF, (2019) Development of stimuli-responsive nano-based pesticides: emerging opportunities for agriculture. J Nanobiotechnol 17:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-019-0533-8
Carvalho MEA, Castro PRC, Azevedo RA (2020) Hormesis in plants under Cd exposure: from toxic to beneficial element? J Hazard Mater 384:121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121434
Cong M, He S, Zhang J, Luo C, Zhu F (2019) Hormetic effects of mixtures of carbendazim and iprodione on the virulence of Botrytis cinerea. Plant Dis 103:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-05-18-0754-re
Cressey D (2015) Widely used herbicide linked to cancer. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.17181
Cutler GC, Amichot M, Benelli G, Guedes RNC, Qu Y, Rix RR, Ullah F, Desneux N (2022) Hormesis and insects: effects and interactions in agroecosystems. Sci Total Environ 825:153899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153899
Duke SO (2018) The history and current status of glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci 74:1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4652
Duke SO (2021) Glyphosate: uses other than in glyphosate-resistant crops, mode of action, degradation in plants, and effects on non-target plants and agricultural microbes. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 255:1–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2020_53
Duke SO, Dayan FE (2021) The search for new herbicide mechanisms of action: Is there a ‘holy grail’? Pest Manag Sci 78:1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6726
Duke S, Cedergreen N, Belz R, Velini E (2006) Hormesis: Is it an important factor in herbicide use and allelopathy? Outlooks Pest Manag 17:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1564/16feb10
Duke SO (2020) Glyphosate: Environmental fate and impact. In: Weed Science. Cambridge University Press, Canbridge, pp 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2019.28
Erofeeva EA (2021) Plant hormesis and Shelford’s tolerance law curve. J For Res 32:1789–1802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01312-0
Erofeeva EA (2022) Environmental hormesis of non-specific and specific adaptive mechanisms in plants. Sci Total Environ 804:150059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150059
Gillezeau C, Van Gerwen M, Shaffer RM, Rana I, Zhang L, Sheppard L, Taioli E (2019) The evidence of human exposure to glyphosate: a review. Environ Heal 18:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0435-5
Grillo R, Abhilash PC, Fraceto LF (2016) Nanotechnology applied to bio-encapsulation of pesticides. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 16:1231–1234. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2016.12332
Guedes RNC, Rix RR, Cutler GC (2022) Pesticide-induced hormesis in arthropods: towards biological systems. Curr Opin Toxicol 29:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2022.02.001
Hassanisaadi M, Barani M, Rahdar A, Heidary M, Thysiadou A, Kyzas GZ (2022) Role of agrochemical-based nanomaterials in plants: biotic and abiotic stress with germination improvement of seeds. Plant Growth Regul 1:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-021-00782-w
Hu S, Xu Q, Zhang Y, Zhu F (2020) Stimulatory effects of boscalid on virulence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum indicate hormesis may be masked by inhibitions. Plant Dis 104:833–840. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-07-19-1421-re
Huang P, Liu SS, Xu YQ, Wang Y, Wang ZJ (2021) Combined lethal toxicities of pesticides with similar structures to Caenorhabditis elegans are not necessarily concentration additives. Environ Pollut 286:117207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117207
Jalal A, Oliveira Junior JC, Ribeiro JS, Fernandes GC, Mariano GG, Trindade VDR, dose Reis AR (2021) Hormesis in plants: physiological and biochemical responses. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 207:111225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111225
Kaboli Kafshgiri S, Farkhondeh T, Miri-Moghaddam E (2021) Glyphosate effects on the female reproductive systems: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health 2021:000010151520210029. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0029
Kudsk P, Mathiassen SK (2020) Pesticide regulation in the European Union and the glyphosate controversy. Weed Sci 68:214–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2019.59
Kumari M, Kumar A (2020) Identification of component-based approach for prediction of joint chemical mixture toxicity risk assessment with respect to human health: a critical review. Food Chem Toxicol 143:111458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111458
Li X, Liu Y, Wang Y, Lin Z, Wang D, Sun H (2021) Resistance risk induced by quorum sensing inhibitors and their combined use with antibiotics: Mechanism and its relationship with toxicity. Chemosphere 265:129153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129153
Lykogianni M, Bempelou E, Karamaouna F, Aliferis KA (2021) Do pesticides promote or hinder sustainability in agriculture? The challenge of sustainable use of pesticides in modern agriculture. Sci Total Environ 795:148625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148625
Peillex C, Pelletier M (2020) The impact and toxicity of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides on health and immunity. J Immunotoxicol 17:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691x.2020.1804492
Rix RR, Cutler GC (2022) Review of molecular and biochemical responses during stress induced stimulation and hormesis in insects. Sci Total Environ 827:154085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154085
Rui Q, Hou H, Xiao K, Liu B, Liang S, Hu J, Bian S, Yang J (2021) Prediction on the combined toxicities of stimulation-only and inhibition-only contaminants using improved inverse distance weighted interpolation. Chemosphere 287:132045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132045
Sebastiano M, Messina S, Marasco V, Costantini D (2022) Hormesis in ecotoxicological studies: a critical evolutionary perspective. Curr Opin Toxicol 29:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2022.01.002
Shahid M, Niazi NK, Rinklebe J, Bundschuh J, Dumat C, Pinelli E (2020) Trace elements-induced phytohormesis: a critical review and mechanistic interpretation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 50:1984–2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1689061
Siriri D, Wilson J, Coe R, Tenywa MM, Bekunda MA, Ong CK, Black CR (2012) Trees improve water storage and reduce soil evaporation in agroforestry systems on bench terraces in SW Uganda. Agrofor Syst 87:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9520-x
Smith J, Pearce BD, Wolfe MS (2013) Reconciling productivity with protection of the environment: Is temperate agroforestry the answer? Renew. Agric Food Syst 28:80–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170511000585
Tang L, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Sun H (2022) The role of energy/substrate in microbial hormesis. Curr Opin Toxicol 29:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2021.12.001
Tarazona JV, Court-Marques D, Tiramani M, Reich H, Pfeil R, Istace F, Crivellente F (2017) Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. Arch Toxicol 91:2723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5
Thrupp TJ, Runnalls TJ, Scholze M, Kugathas S, Kortenkamp A, Sumpter JP (2018) The consequences of exposure to mixtures of chemicals: Something from ‘nothing’ and ‘a lot from a little’ when fish are exposed to steroid hormones. Sci Total Environ 619–620:1482–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.081
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Adamson BW, Anderson SH (2008) Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Appl Soil Ecol 39:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.12.002
Van Bruggen AHC, He MM, Shin K, Mai V, Jeong KC, Finckh MR, Morris JG (2018) Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate. Sci Total Environ 616–617:255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309
Walsh A, Kingwell R (2021) Economic implications of the loss of glyphosate and paraquat on Australian mixed enterprise farms. Agric Syst 193:103207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103207
Wang ZJ, Liu SS, Feng L, Xu YQ (2020) BNNmix: A new approach for predicting the mixture toxicity of multiple components based on the back-propagation neural network. Sci Total Environ 738:140317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140317
Wang Z-J, Zheng Q-F, Liu S-S, Huang P, Ding T-T, Xu Y-Q (2021) New methods of top-to-down mixture toxicity prediction: A case study of eliminating of the effects of cosolvent from binary mixtures. Chemosphere 289:133190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133190
Zhang R, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Li J, Zhu F (2019) Hormetic effects of mixtures of dimethachlone and prochloraz on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis 103:546–554. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-06-18-1071-re
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Project funding: This study was supported by The Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (NUIST), Nanjing, China (Grant No. 003080) and the Jiangsu Distinguished Professor Program of the People’s Government of Jiangsu Province.
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com.
Corresponding editor: Lei Yu.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Agathokleous, E. European Union’s imminent ban on glyphosate: Hormesis should be considered in new chemical screening and selection. J. For. Res. 33, 1103–1107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01474-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01474-5