Skip to main content
Log in

A hybrid model for predicting spatial distribution of soil organic matter in a bamboo forest based on general regression neural network and interative algorithm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general regression neural network model, combined with an interative algorithm (GRNNI) using sparsely distributed samples and auxiliary environmental variables was proposed to predict both spatial distribution and variability of soil organic matter (SOM) in a bamboo forest. The auxiliary environmental variables were: elevation, slope, mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, and normalized difference vegetation index. The prediction accuracy of this model was assessed via three accuracy indices, mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) for validation in sampling sites. Both the prediction accuracy and reliability of this model were compared to those of regression kriging (RK) and ordinary kriging (OK). The results show that the prediction accuracy of the GRNNI model was higher than that of both RK and OK. The three accuracy indices (ME, MAE, and RMSE) of the GRNNI model were lower than those of RK and OK. Relative improvements of RMSE of the GRNNI model compared with RK and OK were 13.6% and 17.5%, respectively. In addition, a more realistic spatial pattern of SOM was produced by the model because the GRNNI model was more suitable than multiple linear regression to capture the nonlinear relationship between SOM and the auxiliary environmental variables. Therefore, the GRNNI model can improve both prediction accuracy and reliability for determining spatial distribution and variability of SOM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alomair OA, Garrouch AA (2016) A general regression neural network model offers reliable prediction of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 6:351–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antanasijević DZ, Ristić MD, Perić-Grujić AA, Pocajt VV (2013) Forecasting human exposure to PM10 at the national level using an artificial neural network approach. J Chemom 27:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens T, Förster H, Scholten T, Steinrücken U, Spies ED, Goldschmitt M (2005) Digital soil mapping using artificial neural networks. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 168:21–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FQ, Zhou QG, Lv ZQ, Wang XM, Liu GC (2014) Spatial prediction of soil organic matter content integrating artificial neural network and ordinary kriging in Tibetan Plateau. Ecol Indic 45:184–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam R, Panigrahi S, Franzen D, Sims A (2011) Residual soil nitrate prediction from imagery and non-imagery information using neural network technique. Biosyst Eng 110:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo PT, Wu W, Sheng QK, Li MF, Liu HB, Wang ZY (2013) Prediction of soil organic matter using artificial neural network and topographic indicators in hilly areas. Nutr Cycl Agroeco Syst 95:333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Stein A (2004) A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging. Geoderma 120:75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Rossiter DG (2007) About regression-kriging: from equation to case studies. Comput Geosci 33:1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SW, Singh VP, Seo YM, Kim HS (2014) Modeling nonlinear monthly evapotranspiration using soft computing and data reconstruction techniques. Water Resour Manag 28:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knotters M, Brus DJ, Oude Voshaar JH (1995) A comparison of kriging, cokriging and kriging combined with regression for spatial interpolation of horizon depth with censored observations. Geoderma 67:227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Lal R, Liu DS (2012) A geographically weighted regression kriging approach for mapping soil organic carbon stock. Geoderma 189–190:627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CF, Bovik AC, Wu XJ (2011) Blind image quality assessment using a general regression neural network. IEEE T Neural Netw 22:793–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li QQ, Yue TX, Wang CQ, Zhang WJ, Yu Y, Li B, Yang J, Bai GH (2013) Spatially distributed modeling of soil organic matter across China: an application of artificial neural network approach. CATENA 104:210–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li QQ, Zhang X, Wang CQ, Li B, Gao XS, Yuan DG, Luo YL (2016) Spatial prediction of soil nutrient in a hilly area using artificial neural network model combined with kriging. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:1541–1553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SM (2013) Analysis of service satisfaction in web auction logistics service using a combination of fruit fly optimization algorithm and general regression neural network. Neural Comput Appl 22:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Mendonca Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora-Vallejo A, Claessens L, Stoorvogel J, Heuvelink GBM (2008) Small scale digital soil mapping in Southeastern Kenya. CATENA 76:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeh I, McBratney AB, Chittleborough DJ (1994) Spatial prediction of soil properties from landform attributes derived from a digital elevation model. Geoderma 63:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pebesma EJ (2004) Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput Geosci 30:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simbahan GC, Dobermann A, Goovaerts P, Ping J, Haddix ML (2006) Fineresolution mapping of soil organic carbon based on multivariate secondary data. Geoderma 132:471–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somaratne S, Seneviratne G, Coomaraswamy U (2005) Prediction of soil organic carbon across different land-use patterns: a neural network approach. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1580–1589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Specht DF (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE T Neural Networ 2:568–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Zhang CR, Li WD (2012) Comparison of geographically weighted regression and regression kriging for estimating the spatial distribution of soil organic matter. GIsci Remote Sens 49:915–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Zhang CR, Li WD, Lin J, Zhang DX (2014) Mapping soil organic matter with limited sample data using geographically weighted regression. J Spat Sci 59:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CF, Wu JP, Luo YM, Zhang LM, DeGloria SD (2009) Spatial prediction of soil organic matter content using cokriging with remotely sensed data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1202–1208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JF, Peng DH, Li ZP, Zhao L, Ling HZ (2015) Network intrusion detection based on a general regression neural network optimized by an improved artificial immune algorithm. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0120976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap KS, Lim CP, Abidin IZ (2008) A hybrid ART-GRNN online learning neural network with a epsilon-insensitive loss function. IEEE T Neural Netw 19:1641–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wang KL, Chen HS, He XY, Zhang JG (2012) Ancillary information improves kriging on soil organic carbon data for a typical karst peak cluster depression landscape. J Sci Food Agric 92:1094–1102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZY, Chow TL, Rees HW, Yang Q, Xing ZS, Meng FR (2009) Predict soil texture distribution using an artificial neural network model. Comput Electron Agric 65:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZY, Yang Q, Benoy G, Chow TL, Xing ZS, Rees HW, Meng FR (2010) Using artificial neural network models to produce soil organic carbon content distribution maps across landscapes. Can J Soil Sci 90:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou QP, Jiang HY, Wang JZ, Zhou JL (2014) A hybrid model for PM2.5 forecasting based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and a general regression neural network. Sci Total Environ 496:264–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewer and the editor for their valuable comments. Dr. Eryong LIU thanks Professor Wenzhong SHI for his guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunyong Yu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Project funding: The article is supported by National Key Research and Development Projects of P. R. China (No.2018YFD0600100).

The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Corresponding editor: Zhu Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, E., Liu, J., Yu, K. et al. A hybrid model for predicting spatial distribution of soil organic matter in a bamboo forest based on general regression neural network and interative algorithm. J. For. Res. 31, 1673–1680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00980-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00980-3

Keywords

Navigation