# Multiple-path Quantum Interference Effects in a Double-Aharonov-Bohm Interferometer

## Abstract

We investigate quantum interference effects in a double-Aharonov-Bohm (AB) interferometer consisting of five quantum dots sandwiched between two metallic electrodes in the case of symmetric dot-electrode couplings by the use of the Green’s function equation of motion method. The analytical expression for the linear conductance at zero temperature is derived to interpret numerical results. A three-peak structure in the linear conductance spectrum may evolve into a double-peak structure, and two Fano dips (zero conductance points) may appear in the quantum system when the energy levels of quantum dots in arms are not aligned with one another. The AB oscillation for the magnetic flux threading the double-AB interferometer is also investigated in this paper. Our results show the period of AB oscillation can be converted from 2π to π by controlling the difference of the magnetic fluxes threading the two quantum rings.

### Keywords

Aharonov-Bohm interferometer Fano effects Quantum dots Transport propertiesThanks to rapid developments in the fabrication and self-assembly techniques, the electrical transport through nanoscale quantum systems such as a single quantum dot, multiple quantum dots, atoms or molecules coupled to metallic electrodes has been an interesting subject in recent years [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. In the nanoscale quantum systems, the electrical transport is ballistic, while the phase coherence of the electrons is preserved. Especially, the quantum interference effects in an AB ring including a quantum dot have been reported [7]. The results showed that Fano effect with asymmetric parameters was a good probe to quantum interference effects in the nanoscale systems. The transport properties of a quantum ring consisting of two parallel-coupled quantum dots sandwiched between two metallic electrodes have been also studied theoretically and experimentally in the last few decades [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. For example, an AB interferometer including two coupled quantum dots with each quantum dot inserted in each arm was presented, and an oscillating electric current was detected experimentally [8, 9]. Such a double-quantum-dot model consisting of the parallel-coupled double-dot system has been studied extensively in some previous theoretical works [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. When the interdot coupling is considered, a bonding molecular state and an antibonding molecular state are developed. A swap effect can be found in the quantum system by tuning the magnetic flux threading the quantum ring, which may be used in the future quantum computations [15].

Recently, the transport properties of multi-parallel-coupled quantum dots have attracted considerable attention due to their potential applications and abounding physics [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Zeng et al. studied the AB effects in a quantum ring consisting of four quantum dots sandwiched between two metallic electrodes, and a Fano dip is developed when the energy levels of quantum dots in two arms are mismatched [23]. Guevara et al. offered a quantum model describing multi-parallel-coupled quantum-dot molecule, and Fano effects in the quantum system were studied in detail [24]. More recently, Li et al. studied the electrical transport through a triple-arm AB interferometer consisting of three parallel quantum dots with electron-electron interactions under an applied electric field [25].

*n*+ 1)π(

*n*= 0, 1, 2,…).

## Model and Methods

*H*

_{leads}in Eq. (1) describes the left and right electrodes in the noninteracting electron approximation

_{αk}and momentum

*k*in electrode α. The second term in Eq. (1) describes the dynamics of the five parallel-coupled quantum dots, which can be modeled by using the following five-site Hamiltonian

_{j}in the

*j*th quantum dot, and the AB phase Open image in new window and the flux quantum Open image in new window.

*t*

_{ij}describes the interdot tunneling coupling between the dot

*i*and dot

*j*, for convenience, which is regarded as a real number. The third term in Eq. (1) describing the tunneling coupling between the quantum dots and the electrodes is divided into two parts

*V*

_{αj}in the presence of the magnetic flux, and they can be written as Open image in new window, Open image in new window, Open image in new window, Open image in new window. In order to study the transport through the double-quantum ring, we need know the retarded (advanced) Green’s function Open image in new window. The retarded Green’s function is defined as

*j*= 1, 2 for α =

*L*;

*j*= 4, 5 for α =

*R*). The advanced Green’s function

**G**

^{a}is obtained by the relation Open image in new window. The linear conductance of the double quantum ring at zero temperature can be calculated by the Landauer Formula [32],

## Results and Discussion

In this section, the dependence of the linear conductance σ on system parameters is discussed numerically and analytically. The coupling strength between the quantum dots and the metallic electrodes Open image in new window is taken as the energy unit. Through this paper, all energy levels in quantum dots, tunneling couplings and Fermi energy are measured by Open image in new window.

### Without Magnetic Flux

_{j}= 0,

*j*= 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) in the absence of the magnetic fluxes (ϕ

_{L}= ϕ

_{R}= 0). Figure 2a shows the linear conductance σ of the double-quantum-ring structure as a function of the Fermi level

*E*

_{F}in the case of symmetrical interdot tunneling couplings. The same interdot tunneling coupling strengths are chosen as

*t*

_{13}=

*t*

_{23}=

*t*

_{34}=

*t*

_{35}=

*t*. There are total five molecular states in center five-dot quantum system, but three molecular states of which with zero energy are degenerate. Other two molecular states are located at −2

*t*and 2

*t*, respectively. So we find that there are three resonance peaks with σ = 2

*e*

^{2}/

*h*appearing at 0, 2

*t*and −2

*t*, respectively. With

*t*increasing, the position of the center conductance peak has no changing, while the other two conductance peaks move in the opposite direction as shown in Fig. 2a. In Fig. 2b and 2c, we display the linear conductance σ as a function of the Fermi energy

*E*

_{F}in the case of asymmetrical interdot tunneling couplings. In Fig. 2b, we assume the interdot tunneling coupling strengths as Open image in new window and

*t*

_{34}=

*t*

_{35}. In this case, three conductance peaks are located at 0, Open image in new window, and Open image in new window, respectively. As

*t*

_{34}decreases, the conductance peaks are suppressed and become narrower as shown in Fig. 2b. In Fig. 2c, we examine the transport properties of the double-quantum-ring structure by tuning

*t*

_{23}and

*t*

_{34}. Here we fix the interdot tunneling couplings

*t*

_{13}and

*t*

_{35}at Open image in new window. A Fano dip (zero conductance point) appears at

*E*

_{F}= 0 when

*t*

_{23}(

*t*

_{34}) is different from

*t*

_{13}(

*t*

_{35}). The behind reason is the destructive interference effects between the electron waves directly transmitting through the three coupled quantum dots in series and side-coupled quantum dots (see the inset in Fig. 2c). As

*t*

_{23}and

*t*

_{34}decrease, a three-peak structure in the linear conductance spectrum evolves into the four-peak structure. When

*t*

_{23}=

*t*

_{34}= 0, the quantum device becomes a three quantum-dot array sandwiched between two metallic electrodes with side-coupled quantum dots as shown in the inset of Fig. 2c. The Fano dip is located at the energy levels of the side-coupled quantum dots (ε

_{2}= ε

_{4}= 0). It is noted that two peaks become closer and narrower as

*t*

_{23}and

*t*

_{34}decrease. When

*t*

_{23}=

*t*

_{34}= 0, the two conductance peaks are located at Open image in new window.

*E*

_{F}when the energy level of the third quantum dot ε

_{3}is not aligned with those of the other four quantum dots. Five molecular states appear at Open image in new window, respectively. When ε

_{3}= 0, three conductance peaks with σ = 2

*e*

^{2}/

*h*are centered at 0, Open image in new window and Open image in new window, respectively. The linear conductance σ as a function of

*E*

_{F}under the different values of ε

_{3}is plotted in Fig. 3a and 3b. The left two conductance peaks evolve into a single conductance peak, and the right conductance peak moves in the right direction in the case of ε

_{3}> 0. We also find the height of the left conductance peak is suppressed. In the case of ε

_{3}< 0, the situation is in inverse. The right two conductance peaks evolve into a single conductance peak, and the height of the conductance peak is suppressed. The left conductance peak moves in the left direction, and the height of the conductance peak has no changing. In order to explore the dependence of the linear conductance on the energy level of the intermediate quantum dot 3, we plot the linear conductance as a function of ε

_{3}under several different interdot couplings in Fig. 4. With ε

_{3}increasing, the linear conductance first increases and reaches the maximum value at the certain value ε

_{3m}. When the interdot couplings become small, ε

_{3m}moves toward the Fermi energy. Once the interdot couplings are enough small, the resonant conductance peak is almost pined at

*E*

_{F}. The transport properties of the double-quantum ring are similar with these of a single quantum dot coupled straightly to metallic electrodes.

*t*

_{13}=

*t*

_{23}=

*t*

_{34}=

*t*

_{35}=

*t*= Open image in new window) are considered, and the energy levels of quantum dots parameters are chosen as Open image in new window, Open image in new window and Open image in new window, respectively. Since the degenerate states are opened in this case, five conductance peaks appear in the linear conductance spectrum. The linear conductance σ consists of three Breit-Wigner peaks and two sharp asymmetric Fano peaks. A Fano dip happens at Open image in new window, while the other Fano dip appears at Open image in new window. The numerical results may be explained by using Eq. (21). The linear conductance in the absence of magnetic flux can be written as

From the above equation, we see clearly σ = 0 for Open image in new window or Open image in new window. The linear conductance spectrum has mirror symmetry around ε_{3} in the case of ε_{3} = 0. With increasing ε_{3}, the mirror symmetry is broken. The left Fano peak is suppressed, while the right Fano peak is firstly suppressed, then it is enhanced.

### With Magnetic Flux

_{L}= ϕ

_{R}= ϕ) is shown in Fig. 6. The same interdot tunneling couplings Open image in new window and the same quantum-dot energy levels ε

_{1}= ε

_{2}= ε

_{3}= ε

_{4}= ε

_{5}= ε

_{0}= 0 are considered. When the magnetic flux ϕ is presented, a Fano dip is developed when the Fermi energy is aligned with ε

_{0}. With ϕ increasing, the three-peak structure disappears, while a four-peak structure in the linear conductance spectrum appears. When the magnetic fluxes are further increased, the four-peak structure evolves into a double-peak structure. The results may be explained by the following expressions. After some algebra, we derive the linear conductance σ in the presence of the magnetic flux as the following analytical form

*E*

_{F}= 0, and four molecular states are located around Open image in new window and Open image in new window, respectively. With ϕ increasing, the two middle conductance peaks are suppressed obviously, while the outside conductance peaks become shaper as shown in Fig. 6. When ϕ approaches π, we can obtain an approximate formula for the linear conductance

where δ_{1} and δ_{2} represent two small quantities. Equation (26) shows two narrower conductance peaks are centered at Open image in new window as shown in Fig. 6. When ϕ = *n* π(*n* is odd number), the linear conductance disappears everywhere for any value of *E*_{F}.

_{L}and the Fermi energy

*E*

_{F}. The same interdot couplings and same quantum-dot levels are considered. Open image in new window denotes the difference between magnetic fluxes through the left quantum ring and right quantum ring. When Open image in new window, a general 2π-periodic AB oscillation for ϕ

_{L}is obtained as shown in Fig. 7a and 7b. When Open image in new window, a π-periodic AB oscillation appears in the quantum system as shown in Fig. 7c. The above results can be explained as following expressions. When the magnetic fluxes through the double-quantum ring are considered, using Eq. (24), we arrive at

So an AB oscillation with π-period is developed as shown in Fig. 7c and 7d.

_{L}under the different energy levels in the quantum dot 3 or several different values of ϕ

_{R}is shown in Fig. 8. The Fermi energy

*E*

_{F}is fixed at Open image in new window, and other system parameters are chosen as in Fig. 6. The AB oscillation for ϕ

_{L}in the presence of different energy levels of the quantum dot 3 is potted in Fig. 8a. For ε

_{3}= 0, a series of shaper resonant peaks appear at 2

*n*π(

*n*= 0, 1, 2…), and the linear conductance reaches a minimum (σ = 0) when ϕ

_{L}approaches (2

*n*+ 1) π(

*n*= 0, 1, 2…). When the energy level in quantum dot 3 is not aligned with other quantum-dot levels, the single conductance peak around 2

*n*π splits into the two conductance peaks. With ε

_{3}moving away from zero energy point, two conductance peaks move in the opposite direction. It is noted that the double-peak structure around 2

*n*π disappears slowly as the magnetic flux threading the right quantum ring increases.

## Summary

In summary, the transport properties and quantum interference effects in a double-AB interferometer in series consisting of five quantum dots in the case of symmetric dot-electrode tunneling couplings are studied by using Green’s function equation of motion method. The energy levels of all quantum dots can be tuned by the voltages applied on the quantum dots in experiments. The linear conductance can be effectively modified by the intermediate quantum dot 3. As the energy level in the quantum dot 3 changes, a three-peak structure in the linear conductance spectrum evolves into a two-peak structure. When the quantum-dot levels in arms are not aligned with one another, two Fano resonances with different Fano factors may appear in the quantum device. The AB oscillation for the magnetic flux in the double-AB interferometer is also studied in this work. The results show that the AB oscillating behavior depends strongly on the difference between the magnetic fluxes threading the left and right quantum rings. An AB oscillation with π-period for the magnetic flux threading the left quantum ring is developed when the difference between the two magnetic fluxes is (2*n* + 1)π(*n* = 0, 1, 2,…).

## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The authors thank the supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 10947130 and the Science Foundation of the Education Committee of Jiangsu Province under Grant No. 09KJB140001. The authors also thank the supports of the Foundations of Changshu Institute of Technology.

**Open Access**

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

### References

- 1.Goldhaber-Gordon D, Shtrikman H, Mahalu D, Abusch-Magder D, Meirav U, Kastner MA:
*Nature (London)*. 1998,**391:**156. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmtVGqsw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1998Natur.391..156G] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmtVGqsw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1998Natur.391..156G] 10.1038/34373CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.Vanderwiel WG, Franceschi SD, Elgerman JM, Tarucha S, Kouwenhoven LP:
*Rev. Mod. Phys*. 2003,**75:**1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Lang ND:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 1995,**52:**5335. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXnslequ7g%3D]; Bibcode number [1995PhRvB..52.5335L] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXnslequ7g%3D]; Bibcode number [1995PhRvB..52.5335L] 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.5335CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.Di Ventra M, Lang ND:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2001,**65:**045402. Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65d5402D] Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65d5402D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.045402CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Liu YS, Chen H, Fan XH, Yang XF:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2006,**73:**115310. Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..73k5310L] Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..73k5310L] 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115310CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Liu YS, Yang XF, Xia XJ:
*Solid State Commun.*. 2008,**146:**502. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmsFCgtbs%3D]; Bibcode number [2008SSCom.146..502L] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmsFCgtbs%3D]; Bibcode number [2008SSCom.146..502L] 10.1016/j.ssc.2008.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Kobayashi K, Aikawa H, Katsumoto S, Iye Y:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 2002,**88:**256806. Bibcode number [2002PhRvL..88y6806K] Bibcode number [2002PhRvL..88y6806K] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.256806CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.Holleitner AW, Blick RH, Huttel AK, Eberl K, Kotthaus JP:
*Science*. 2002,**297:**70. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XltFGgu74%3D]; Bibcode number [2002Sci...297...70H] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XltFGgu74%3D]; Bibcode number [2002Sci...297...70H] 10.1126/science.1071215CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Holleitner AW, Decker CR, Qin H, Eberl K, Blick RH:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 2001,**87:**256802. COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptlCmug%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2001PhRvL..87y6802H] COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptlCmug%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2001PhRvL..87y6802H] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.256802CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.Clerk AA, Waintal X, Brouwer PW:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 2001,**86:**4636. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjsVKlu7g%3D]; Bibcode number [2001PhRvL..86.4636C] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjsVKlu7g%3D]; Bibcode number [2001PhRvL..86.4636C] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4636CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Ladrónde Guevara ML, Claro F, Orellana PA:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2003,**67:**195335. Bibcode number [2003PhRvB..67s5335G] Bibcode number [2003PhRvB..67s5335G] 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.195335CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Zeng ZY, Claro F:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2002,**65:**193405. Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65s3405Z] Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65s3405Z] 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.193405CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Kubala B, König J:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2002,**65:**245301. Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65x5301K] Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65x5301K] 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.245301CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.Bai ZM, Yang MF, Chen YC:
*J. Phys. Condens. Matter*. 2004,**16:**2053. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsFKjsL0%3D]; Bibcode number [2004JPCM...16.2053B] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsFKjsL0%3D]; Bibcode number [2004JPCM...16.2053B] 10.1088/0953-8984/16/12/014CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.Lu HZ, Lü R, Zhu BF:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2005,**71:**235320. Bibcode number [2005PhRvB..71w5320L] Bibcode number [2005PhRvB..71w5320L] 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.235320CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.Liu YS, Chen H, Yang XF:
*J. Phys. Condens. Matter.*. 2007,**19:**246201. Bibcode number [2007JPCM...19x6201L] Bibcode number [2007JPCM...19x6201L] 10.1088/0953-8984/19/24/246201CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.
- 18.Chi F, Li SS:
*J. Appl. Phys.*. 2006,**99:**043705. Bibcode number [2006JAP....99d3705C] Bibcode number [2006JAP....99d3705C] 10.1063/1.2173036CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.
- 20.Chen KW, Chang CR:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2008,**78:**235319. Bibcode number [2008PhRvB..78w5319C] Bibcode number [2008PhRvB..78w5319C] 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.235319CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.Wu BH, Cao JC:
*J. Phys. Condens. Matter.*. 2004,**16:**8285. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVOmur3O]; Bibcode number [2004JPCM...16.8285W] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVOmur3O]; Bibcode number [2004JPCM...16.8285W] 10.1088/0953-8984/16/46/015CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.Tanaka S, Garmon S, Ordonez G, Petrosky T:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2007,**76:**153308. Bibcode number [2007PhRvB..76o3308T] Bibcode number [2007PhRvB..76o3308T] 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.153308CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Zeng ZY, Claro F, Pérez A:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2002,**65:**085308. Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65h5308Z] Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65h5308Z] 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.085308CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.Ladronde Guevara ML, Orellana P:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2006,**73:**205303. Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..73t5303L] Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..73t5303L] 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205303CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.Li YX:
*J. Phys. Condens. Matter.*. 2007,**19:**496219. 10.1088/0953-8984/19/49/496219CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 26.Liu YS, Yang XF, Zhang X, Xia YJ:
*Phys. Lett. A*. 2008,**372:**3318. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXksFOjtrg%3D]; Bibcode number [2008PhLA..372.3318L] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXksFOjtrg%3D]; Bibcode number [2008PhLA..372.3318L] 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.01.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 27.Wang R, Liang JQ:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2006,**74:**144302. Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..74n4302W] Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..74n4302W] 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.144302CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.Gong WJ, Zheng YS, Liu Y, Lü TQ:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2006,**73:**245329. Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..73x5329G] Bibcode number [2006PhRvB..73x5329G] 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.245329CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.
- 30.Zhai F, Xu HQ:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2005,**72:**195346. Bibcode number [2005PhRvB..72s5346Z] Bibcode number [2005PhRvB..72s5346Z] 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.195346CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 31.Jana S, Chakrabarti A:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2008,**77:**155310. Bibcode number [2008PhRvB..77o5310J] Bibcode number [2008PhRvB..77o5310J] 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.155310CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 32.Haug H, Jauho A-P:
*Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors, 2nd edn*. Springer, Berlin; 2007.Google Scholar