Skip to main content
Log in

Root Cause Analysis Reports for MIC/MID Cases: Practical Tips

  • Lessons Learned
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical corrosion has four elements (anode, cathode, a metallic path, and electrolyte). For non-metals, the first three elements are absent. Thus, corrosion is exclusive used for metals and deterioration for non-metals. Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) applies to metals and microbiologically influenced deterioration (MID) applies to non-metals such as polymers and composites. In this article, a four-step algorithm/guide to prepare root cause analysis reports for MIC/MID cases is presented. By applying this algorithm, making syntax errors in such analyses will become as low as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Reference 6, We proposed the Greek term “Temenos” instead of biofilm.

  2. Although there are methods that can be used in the field (the so-called quick field tests (e.g., BART®) or even a limited number of electrochemical techniques may also be applied on filed applications.

  3. Some similarities with standards such as TM)194 may be felt however the formats presented here is shorter and more straight in engineering terms.

  4. It does not matter if the bottle is a glass or plastic bottle As per standards NACE Standard TM0194-2004 section 2.2.1 and NACE Standard TM0106-2016 section 5.1.1 a (NACE TM0194-2014 is silent about this issue. However, due to the weight of the glass and also that glass is a fragile material, based on our experience we can recommend using plastic bottles.

References

  1. M. Dubiel, C.H. Hsu, C.C. Chien, F. Mansfeld, D.K. Newman, Microbial iron respiration can protect steel from corrosion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68(3), 1440–1445 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Parthipan, J. Narenkumar, P. Elumalai et al., Neem extract as a green inhibitor formicrobiologically influenced corrosion of carbon steel API 5LX in a hypersaline environment. J. Molecul. Liq. 240, 121–127 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. B.J. Little, D.J. Blackwood, J. Hinks, F.M. Lauro, E. Marsili, A. Okamoto, S.A. Rice, S.A. Wade, H.-C. Flemming, Microbially influenced corrosion—Any progress? Corros. Sci. 170, 108641 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Javaherdashti, MIC myths: avoiding common pitfalls in the practice of hydrotesting and likelihood of Microbial induced corrosion”, Corrosion Management, pp: 11–14, January/February 2009.

  5. B.J. Little, P. Wagner, Myths related to microbiologically influenced corrosion. Mater. Perform. 36(6), 40–44 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Javaherdashti, Some thoughts about misconceptions surrounding the term ‘biofilm’. Corr. Eng. Sci. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1478422X.2020.1774106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D.G. Enos, S.R. Taylor, Influence of sulfate-reducing bacteria on alloy 625 and austenitic stainless-steel weldments. Corrosion. 52(11), 831–842 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Javaherdashti, A pathological mini-atlas of microbiologically influenced corrosion and deterioration (MIC/MID) cases. (Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Yazdi, F. Khan, R. Abbassi, N. Quddus, H. Castaneda-Lopez, A review of risk-based decision-making models for microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in offshore pipelines. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safety. 223, 108474 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Javaherdashti, Microbiologically influenced corrosion-an engineering insight, 2nd edn. (Springer, London, 2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Javaherdashti, “MIC and Cracking of Mild and Stainless Steels”, (PhD Thesis). VDM Publishing, Germany, 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Javaherdashti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javaherdashti, R. Root Cause Analysis Reports for MIC/MID Cases: Practical Tips. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 23, 2298–2304 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-023-01806-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-023-01806-5

Keywords

Navigation