Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Causes of Plasco Building Accident in Iran Using Timed MTO and ACCIMAP Methods

Investigation of Plasco 4 Building Accident in Iran

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate major accidents such as the Plasco collapse in Iran, it is essential to conduct a thorough review of such events via the Proactive Safety approach. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze and root out the event comprehensively and scientifically and utilize the identified causes as a basis for the prevention of similar accidents. In this study, the causes of Plasco building accident were investigated using Timed MTO (TM) and Accimap methods. Studying national authenticated reports and consulting and interviewing safety experts, we explored the details of Plasco accident. Then, the identified causes were first categorized at the organizational level using TM method and, to carry out a more in-depth investigation, the causes were categorized into 6 levels via the Accimap method. The findings showed that the lack of safety monitoring and inspection systems at all levels was the most root cause of the Plasco accident. Non-compliance with building safety rules and NFPA standards and poor safety culture was also identified as the main causes of failure in firefighting. Our results showed that both TM and Accimap could be used as a comprehensive tool to fully investigate the causes of accidents, particularly building accidents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

http://www.qudsonline.ir/)

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Accimap:

Accident Map

TM:

Timed-MTO

PIP:

Pre Incident Plan

MTO:

Man-Technology-Organization

NFPA:

National Fire Protection Association

SOP:

Standard Operating Procedures

References

  1. F.A. Manuele, Incident investigation: our methods are flawed. Prof. Saf. 59(10), 34–43 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Falobi, Nigeria: tackling disaster at grassroots in lagos. Daily Independent Newspaper (2009)

  3. F. Ghasemi, I. Mohammadfam, A.R. Soltanian, S. Mahmoudi, E. Zarei, Surprising incentive: an instrument for promoting safety performance of construction employees. Saf Health Work 6(3), 227–232 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.A. Manik, J. Yardley, B. Dhaka, Building collapse in Bangladesh leaves scores dead. The New York Times 24 (2013)

  5. S. Oloyede, C. Omoogun, O. Akinjare, Tackling causes of frequent building collapse in Nigeria. J. Sustain. Dev. 3(3), 127 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Hu, J. Shi, C.W.W. Ng, Field investigation of collapse of a 13-Story high-rise residential building in Shanghai. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31(4), 04017012 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Fitch, G. Villanueva, M.M. Quadir, H.K. Sagiraju, H. Alamgir, The prevalence and risk factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among workers injured in Rana Plaza building collapse in Bangladesh. Am. J. Ind. Med. 58(7), 756–763 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Griffith, T. Howarth, Construction health and safety management (Abingdon, London, 2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Shirali, I. Mohammadfam, M. Motamedzade, V. Ebrahimipour, A. Moghimbeigi, Assessing resilience engineering based on safety culture and managerial factors. Process Saf. Prog. 31(1), 17–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Statistics of work-related accidents in the country. Iran: Center for Strategic Statistics and Information (2017)

  11. V.V. Khanzode, J. Maiti, P.K. Ray, Occupational injury and accident research: a comprehensive review. Saf. Sci. 50(5), 1355–1367 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Fabiano, C. Vianello, A. Reverberi, E. Lunghi, G. Maschio, A perspective on Seveso accident based on cause-consequences analysis by three different methods. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 49, 18–35 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Hollnagel, Barriers and accident prevention (Routledge, Abingdon, 2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Akyuz, A hybrid accident analysis method to assess potential navigational contingencies: the case of ship grounding. Saf. Sci. 79, 268–276 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.J. Rooney, L.N.V. Heuvel, Root cause analysis for beginners. Qual. Progress. 37(7), 45–56 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Chen, Y. Zhao, T. Zhao, An AcciMap Analysis on the China-Yongwen Railway Accident. Engineering Asset Management-Systems, Professional Practices and Certification (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 1247–1253

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Lee, Y.B. Moh, M. Tabibzadeh, N. Meshkati, Applying the AcciMap methodology to investigate the tragic Sewol Ferry accident in South Korea. Appl. Ergon. 59, 517–525 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Tabibzadeh , S. Stavros, M.S. Ashtekar, N. Meshkati (eds). A Systematic Framework for Root-Cause Analysis of the Aliso Canyon Gas Leak Using the AcciMap Methodology. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics; 2017: Springer

  19. Y. Zhang, L. Jing, C. Sun, Systems-based analysis of China-Tianjin port fire and explosion: a comparison of HFACS, AcciMap, and STAMP. J. Failure Anal. Prev. 18(6), 1386–1400 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O. F. Hamim, M.S. Hoque, R.C. McIlroy, K.L. Plant, N.A. Stanton editors. Applying the AcciMap methodology to investigate the tragic Mirsharai road accident in Bangladesh. MATEC Web of Conferences; 2019: EDP Sciences

  21. IFE O. The MTO Perspective and Selected Research Activities at the Halden Project1. Technical Meeting on the Interaction between Individuals, Technology and Organization – A Systemic Approach to Safety in Practice; Vienna, Austria10–13 June 2014

  22. accident TNBoIotPB. National Staff Report on PLASCO Accident Investigation. Tehran: 2018

  23. M. Tabibzadeh, S. Stavros, M.S. Ashtekar, N. Meshkati, A systematic framework for root-cause analysis of the aliso canyon gas leak using the AcciMap methodology: implication for underground gas storage facilities. J. Sustain. Energy Eng. 5(3), 212–242 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Sklet, Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. J. Hazard. Mater. 111(1–3), 29–37 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Rasmussen, Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27(2), 183–213 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O. Igene, C. Johnson, Comparing HFACS and AcciMaps in a Health Informatics Case Study—the Analysis of a Medication Dosing Error. Safety and Reliability–Safe Societies in a Changing World (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018), pp. 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Bakhtiari, M. Ghasemzadeh, Third issue of the National Building Regulations - Protection of Buildings Against Fire: Changes and Prospects Ahead. National Conference on Fire Protection of Buildings and Transportation Systems; Iran (2016)

  28. (ISIRI) IIoSaIR. Safety and fire prevention facilities in the warehouse of ordinary goods. Iran2015

  29. law M. Eliminate all dangers in buildings and walls in public places. Iran2019

  30. law C. The owner of the building was responsible for the damage. Iran2019

  31. Regulations NB. Care and Maintenance. Iran2013

  32. Association NFP. Standard on Emergency Services Incident Management System and Command Safety. Quincy, Massachusetts, US2014

  33. K. Butler, E. Kuligowski, S. Furman, R. Peacock, Perspectives of occupants with mobility impairments on evacuation methods for use during fire emergencies. Fire Saf. J. 91, 955–963 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Association NFP. Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. Quincy, Massachusetts, US2020

  35. P.M. Salmon, N. Goode, F. Archer, C. Spencer, D. McArdle, R.J. McClure, A systems approach to examining disaster response: using Accimap to describe the factors influencing bushfire response. Saf. Sci. 70, 114–122 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Beringer, Community fire safety at the urban/rural interface: the bushfire risk. Fire Saf. J. 35(1), 1–23 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A.P. Goncalves Filho, G.T. Jun, P. Waterson, Four studies, two methods, one accident–An examination of the reliability and validity of Accimap and STAMP for accident analysis. Saf. Sci. 113, 310–317 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Chakraborty, A. Ibrahim, A.M. Cruz, A study of accident investigation methodologies applied to the Natech events during the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 51, 208–222 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was carried out in the form of an academic project at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamran Gholamizadeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadfam, I., Gholamizadeh, K. Investigation of Causes of Plasco Building Accident in Iran Using Timed MTO and ACCIMAP Methods. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 20, 2087–2096 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-01025-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-01025-2

Keywords

Navigation