Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Systems-Based Analysis of China-Tianjin Port Fire and Explosion: A Comparison of HFACS, AcciMap, and STAMP

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China-Tianjin Port fire and explosion on August 12, 2015, was a major accident that involved hazardous chemicals and resulted in 165 fatalities and 798 injuries. Three-system-based accident models, human factor analysis and classification system (HFACS), AcciMap, and system theoretic accident modeling and process (STAMP), were applied to identify contributory factors and relationships in the accident. The analysis outputs and usage of the three techniques were compared. The three-system accident models show several differences in terms of the emphasis on the models, system structure, classification of contributory factors, and interactions between system components. An important advantage of HFACS is the taxonomic nature, which can be easily applied in practical application. AcciMap provides a clear graphic representation of the causal flow of accidents, which is suitable for academic research. STAMP is suitable for both academic research and practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accident Investigation Team of the State Council (AITSC) (2016) Investigation Report of Special Major Fire and Explosion Accident in Hazardous Goods Warehouse of Ruihai Company in Tianjin Port. http://www.gov.cn/foot/2016-02/05/content_5039788.htm

  2. E. Akyuz, A hybrid accident analysis method to assess potential navigational contingencies: the case of ship grounding. Saf. Sci. 79(11), 268–276 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Celik, S. Cebi, Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41(1), 66–75 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Inherent Safer Chemical Process: A Life Cycle Approach, 2nd edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Chauvin, S. Lardjane, G. Morel, J.P. Clostermann, B. Langard, Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accid. Anal. Prev. 59(5), 26–37 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.T. Chen, A. Wall, P. Davies, Z. Yang, J. Wang, Y.-H. Chou, A human and organisational factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS-maritime accidents (HFACS-MA). Saf. Sci. 60(12), 105–114 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Christou, Analysis and control of major accidents from the intermediate temporary storage of dangerous substances in marshalling yards and port areas. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12(1), 109–119 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A.Y. Daramola, An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) framework. J. Air Trans. Manag. 35(4), 39–50 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R.M. Darbra, J. Casal, Historical analysis of accidents in seaports. Saf. Sci. 42(2), 85–98 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Debrincat, C. Bil, G. Clark, Assessing organisational factors in aircraft accidents using a hybrid reason and AcciMap model. Eng. Fail. Anal. 27(1), 52–60 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S.W.A. Dekker, Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. J. Saf. Res. 33(3), 371–385 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S.W.A. Dekker, The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error (Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Dien, N. Dechy, E. Guillaume, Accident investigation: from searching direct causes to finding in-depth causes-problem of analysis or/and analyst? Saf. Sci. 50(6), 1398–1407 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Dirk, H.R. Sebastian, W. Jan, S. Eckehard, Integration of Petri Nets into STAMP/CAST on the example of Wenzhou 7.23 accident, inControl and Automation Theory for Transportation Applications September 16–17, 2013. Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 65–70

  15. G. Drogaris, Learning from major accidents involving dangerous substances. Saf. Sci. 16(2), 89–113 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Elvik, Laws of accident causation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(4), 742–747 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W.H. Heinrich (ed.), Industrial Accident Prevention (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941)

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Hollnagel, Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method—CREAM (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Hollnagel, FRAM-The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (Ashgate, Farnham, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Jang, J. Koo, D. Shin et al., Development of chemical accident database: considerations, accident trend analysis and suggestions. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29(1), 36–41 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. C.W. Johnson, I.M.D. Almeida, An investigation into the loss of the Brazilian space programme’s launch vehicle VLS-1 V03. Saf. Sci. 46(1), 38–53 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Katsakiori, G. Sakellaropoulos, E. Manatakis, Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models. Saf. Sci. 47(7), 1007–1016 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Kazaras, K. Kirytopoulos, A. Rentizelas, Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment. Saf. Sci. 50(9), 1806–1817 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Kee, G.T. Jun, P. Waterson, R. Haslam, A systemic analysis of South Korea Sewol ferry accident-Striking a balance between learning and accountability. Appl. Ergon. 59 Part B, 504–516 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Assessment of risks posed by chemical industries–application of a new computer automated tool MAXCRED-III. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12(6), 455–469 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Major accidents in process industries and an analysis of causes and consequences. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12(5), 361–378 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Kidam, M. Hurme, Method for identifying contributors to chemical process accidents. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91(5), 367–377 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. T. Kim et al., A STAMP-based causal analysis of the Korean Sewol ferry accident. Saf. Sci. 83, 93–101 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Lee, Y.B. Moh, M. Tabibzadeh, N. Meshkati, Applying the AcciMap methodology to investigate the tragic Sewol Ferry accident in South Korea. Appl. Ergon. 59 Part B, 517–525 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. M.G. Lenné, P.M. Salmon, C.C. Liu, M. Trotter, A systems approach to accident causation in mining: an application of the HFACS method. Accid. Anal. Prev. 48(3), 111–117 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Leveson, System Safety Engineering: Back to the Future (Aeronautics and Astronautics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. Leveson, A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42(4), 237–270 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. N. Leveson, Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. Leveson, A. Samost, S. Dekker et al., A systems approach to analyzing and preventing hospital adverse events. J. Patient Saf. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Newnam, N. Goode, Do not blame the driver: a systems analysis of the causes of road freight crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 76, 141–151 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Ouyang, L. Hong, M.-H. Yu, Q. Fei, STAMP-based analysis on the railway accident and accident spreading: taking the China-Jiaoji railway accident for example. Saf. Sci. 48(5), 544–555 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J.M. Patterson, S.A. Shappell, Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42(4), 1379–1385 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. T. Pawlicki, A. Samost, D.W. Brown et al., Application of systems and control theory-based hazard analysis to radiation oncology. Med. Phys. 43(3), 1514–1530 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. H.S.J. Rashid, C.S. Place, G.R. Braithwaite, Helicopter maintenance error analysis: beyond the third order of the HFACS-ME. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40(6), 636–647 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Rasmussen, Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27(2–3), 183–213 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J. Rasmussen, I. Svedung, Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society (Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. J.T. Reason, Human Error (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. J.T. Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents (Ashgate, Aldershot, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. Reinach, A. Viale, Application of human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(2), 396–406 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. F. Rigas, S. Sklavounos, Risk and consequence analysis of hazardous chemicals in marshalling yards and warehouses at Ikonio/Piraeus harbour, Greece. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15(6), 531–544 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. P.M. Salmon, N. Goodea, F. Archerb, C. Spencerb, D. McArdleb, R.J. McClureb, A systems approach to examining disaster response: using Accimap to describe the factors influencing bushfire response. Saf. Sci. 70, 114–122 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. P.M. Salmon, M. Cornelissen, M.J. Trotter, Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Saf. Sci. 50(4), 1158–1170 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. P.M. Salmon, G.J.M. Read, N.J. Stevens, Who is in control of road safety? A STAMP control structure analysis of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia. Accid. Anal. Prev. 96, 140–151 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. L. Shaw, H.S. Sichel, Accident Proneness. Research in the Occurrence, Causation and Prevention of Road Accidents (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  50. S.A. Shappell, D.A. Wiegmann, Applying reason: the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). Gastroenterol. Res. 1(5), 207–212 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  51. O. Soner, U. Asan, M. Celik, Use of HFACS-FCM in fire prevention modelling on board ships. Saf. Sci. 77, 25–41 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. I. Svedung, J. Rasmussen, Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accident. Saf. Sci. 40(5), 397–417 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. K. Tsunekawa, B.L. Liu, J.M. Gao et al., The initial researches on management of chemical work safety at home and abroad as the cooperation project between China and Japan. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 3(5), 87–91 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  54. P. Underwood, P. Waterson, Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 68(1), 75–94 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. G. Vierendeels, G.L.L. Reniers, B.J.M. Ale, Modeling the major accident prevention legislation change process within Europe. Saf. Sci. 49(3), 513–521 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Waterson, P. and Jenkins, D.P. (2010), Methodological considerations in using Accimaps and the risk management framework to analyse large-scale systemic failures. in Paper presented at the 5th IET International System Safety Conference, Manchester, UK, pp.1-6

  57. D.A. Wiegmann, S.A. Shappell, A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The human Factors Analysis and Classification System (Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Burlington, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Y. Zhang, L. Jing, Q. Bai, T. Liu, Y. Feng, A systems approach to extraordinarily major coal mine accidents in China from 1997 to 2011: an application of the HFACS approach. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1415404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Y. Zhang, W. Shao, M. Zhang, H. Li, S. Yin, Y. Xu, Analysis 320 coal mine accidents using structural equation modelling with unsafe conditions of the rules and regulations as exogenous variables. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92, 189–201 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Y. Zhang, T. Liu, Q. Bai, W. Shao, Q. Wang, New systems-based method to conduct analysis of road traffic accidents. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 54, 96–109 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. M.Q. Zheng, X.H. Zhuang, A tentative idea for setting-up port emergency response counterplan on dangerous chemical accident. Traffic Environment Protection 24(3), 22–25 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Project ID: 16BGL176).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826, China

    Yingyu Zhang, Linlin Jing & Chang Sun

Authors
  1. Yingyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linlin Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingyu Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Jing, L. & Sun, C. Systems-Based Analysis of China-Tianjin Port Fire and Explosion: A Comparison of HFACS, AcciMap, and STAMP. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 18, 1386–1400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0534-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0534-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation