Skip to main content
Log in

A Coupled Armstrong-Frederick Type Plasticity Correction Methodology for Calculating Multiaxial Notch Stresses and Strains

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the pseudo-strain method, a computational modeling technique coupling with Armstrong-Frederick type nonlinear kinematic hardening rule (Jiang-Sehitoglu model) is developed to calculate the multiaxial stress-strain responses of notched components. The pseudo-strain-true notch stress curve is determined using Neuber’s rule. The material constants in Jiang-Sehitoglu model are calculated using the Ramberg-Osgood curve. The presented method is applied to simulate the notch-tip deformations of circumferentially notched 1070 steel and S460N steel shafts subjected to various loadings, including box, circle, V-shape, zigzag-shape, and butterfly-shape loading paths. The calculated strain loops are in accord with experimental data and show reasonable accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Ye, O. Hertel, M. Vormwald, A unified expression of elastic-plastic notch stress-strain calculation in bodies subjected to multiaxial cyclic loading. Int. J. Solids Struct. 45, 6177–6189 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Chen, D.G. Shang, J. Xiong, A coupled plasticity correction approach to estimating notch root strains under multiaxial cyclic loading. Int. J. Fatigue 52, 39–48 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Glinka, Energy density approach to calculation of inelastic strain-stress near notches and cracks. Eng. Fract. Mech. 22, 485–508 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Hoffmann, T. Seeger, A generalized method for estimating multiaxial elastic-plastic notch stresses and strains. Part I: Theory/Part II: Application and general discussion. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. (Trans. ASME) 107, 250–260 (1985)

  5. V.B. Köttgen, M.E. Barkey, D.F. Socie, Pseudo stress and pseudo strain based approaches to multiaxial notch analysis. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 18, 981–1006 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Molski, G. Glinka, A method of elastic-plastic stress and strain calculation at a notch root. Mater. Sci. Eng. 50, 93–100 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Neuber, Theroy of stress concentration for shear-strained prismatic bodies with arbitrary nonlinear stress-strain law. J. Appl. Mech. (Trans. ASME) 28, 544–549 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T.H. Topper, R.M. Wetzel, J.D. Morrow, Neuber’s rule applied to fatigue of notched specimens. J. Mater. 1, 200–209 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Moftakhar, A. Buczynski, G. Glinka, Calculation of elastic-plastic strains and stresses in notches under multiaxial loading. Int. J. Fract. 70, 357–372 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Ince, G. Glinka, A. Buczynski, Computational modeling of multiaxial elasto-plastic stress-strain response for notched components under non-proportional loading. Int. J. Fatigue 62, 42–52 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y.L. Lee, Y.J. Chiang, H.H. Wong, A constitutive model for estimating multiaxial notch strains. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. (Trans. ASME) 117, 33–40 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y.S. Garud, A new approach to the evaluation of fatigue under multiaxial loadings. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. (Trans. ASME) 103, 118–125 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y.Y. Jiang, H. Sehitoglu, Comments on the Mróz multiple surface type plasticity models. Int. J. Solids Structures 33, 1053–1068 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O. Hertel, M. Vormwald, T. Seeger et al., Notch stress and strain approximation procedures for application with multiaxial nonproportional loading. MP Mater. Testing 47, 268–277 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y.Y. Jiang, H. Sehitoglu, Modeling of cyclic ratcheting plasticity, Part I: Development of constitutive equations/Part II: Implement of the new model and comparison of theory with experiments. J. Appl. Mech. (Trans. ASME), 63, 720–733 (1996b)

  16. M.E. Barkey, Calculation of notch strains under multiaxial nominal loading. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1993)

  17. Y.Y. Jiang, P. Kurath, Characteristics of the Armstrong-Frederick type plasticity models. Int. J. Plast. 12, 387–415 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Li, Z.P. Zhang, C.W. Li, An improved method for estimation of Ramberg-Osgood curves of steels from monotonic tensile properties. Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. 39, 412–426 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Lang, The difference of the solutions of the elastic and elastoplastic boundary value problem and an approach to multiaxial stress-strain correlation. Ph.D. dissertation. Technische Universität Kaiserslautern (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51601221 and 51575524), the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (No. 2015JM5240) and the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Air Force Engineering University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Li.

Appendix: The Derivation for Deviatoric Stress Increments

Appendix: The Derivation for Deviatoric Stress Increments

Mathematically, the condition that plastic flow occurs is defined by \( \Delta \hat{s}:\hat{n} \ge 0 \). Then, the plastic strain increments (Eq. 2) can be rewritten as

$$ d\hat{\varepsilon }_{p} = \frac{1}{H}\left( {d\hat{s}:\hat{n}} \right)\hat{n} $$
(19)

where the deviatoric stress increments are

$$ \Delta \hat{s} = 2G\Delta \hat{e} = 2G\left[ {\Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{t} - \Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{p} - \frac{1}{3}\left( {\Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{t} :\hat{I}} \right)\hat{I}} \right] $$
(20)

where \( \Delta \hat{e} \) is the deviatoric elastic strain increments. Using relations (19), (20) and noting the fact that \( \hat{n}:\hat{I} = 0 \), the following relations can be obtained

$$ \Delta \hat{s}:\hat{n} = 2G\left[ {\Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{t} - \frac{1}{H}\left( {d\hat{s}:\hat{n}} \right)\hat{n} - \frac{1}{3}\left( {\Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{t} :\hat{I}} \right)\hat{I}} \right]\hat{n} = 2G\left[ {\Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{t} :\hat{n} - \frac{1}{H}\left( {d\hat{s}:\hat{n}} \right)} \right] $$
(21)

From Eq. 21, the following relation can be obtained as

$$ \Delta \hat{s}:\hat{n} = \frac{2GH}{2G + H}\left( {\Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{t} :\hat{n}} \right) $$
(22)

Inserting Eq. 22 into Eq. 19, the plastic strain increments can be rewritten as

$$ \Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{p} = \frac{2G}{2G + H}\left( {\Delta \hat{\varepsilon }_{t} :\hat{n}} \right)\hat{n} $$
(23)

Then, the deviatoric stress increments expressed in terms of total strain increments can be obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Zhang, Zp. & Li, Cw. A Coupled Armstrong-Frederick Type Plasticity Correction Methodology for Calculating Multiaxial Notch Stresses and Strains. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 17, 706–716 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0287-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0287-2

Keywords

Navigation