Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wildlife and Safety of Earthen Structures: A Review

  • Feature
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wide range of nuisance wildlife dwells in proximity to and within earthen dams and levee systems. Burrowing animals often dig tunnels and holes inside earth structures for habitat or grub and flatten the external slopes for maneuvering and in search for food or preys. Other animals and cattle have less invasive effects on earthen structures. Most of these detrimental activities result in altering external and internal geometry of earthen structures. Damage caused by wildlife in earthen hydraulic structures is typically associated with internal and external erosion and sometimes boils. Animal burrows have an adverse impact on the hydraulic performance and structural integrity of the earthen dams. In addition to their direct damage, wildlife activities could have serious influence on human life, public health and safety, agriculture, food chain, environmental balance, and ecology. Several federal, state, and local agencies in the United States and other agencies and organizations worldwide have reported information on observed wildlife activities in earth dams and levee systems. This information, however, is generally incomprehensive and often sparsely published in local periodicals and maintenance reports. The consequences of animal presence and their activities on earthen structures are recognized by some involved agencies; however, they appear to be generally given disproportionate attention. As such, the majority of the pertinent literature addresses wildlife damage to earthen structures as a nuisance issue that require more efficient management plans and proper maintenance procedures. This review article summarizes published articles as well as internet cited material on nuisance wildlife behavior in earth dams and levee systems. More emphasis is placed on the animals that pose imminent threats to the performance and functionality of earthen structures. Common characteristics of animal burrows and intrusions in earthen dams are discussed and summarized. Documented damages and reported failures of earth structures initiated by animal activities are compiled. Current wildlife management techniques are discussed. Available estimates of cost of damages and failures due to wildlife intrusions are also highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FEMA, Technical Manual for Dam Owners: Impacts of Animals on Earthen Dams, pp: 1–115. Management Agency (FEMA) and the Association of State Dam Safety Officials. FEMA 534/September 2005

  2. Tobin, M.E., Michael, W., Fall, M.W.: Pest control: rodents. wildlife damage management, Internet Center for USDA National Wildlife Research Center—Staff Publications. University of Nebraska—Lincoln Year 2004

  3. Blach, M., Jurist, K., Morton, S.: U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, Region IX. Anticipating California Levee Failure: Government response strategies for protecting natural resources from freshwater oil spills. www.epa.gov/oem/docs/oil/fss/fss06/port_2.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2010

  4. Marks, D., Tschantz, B.A.: A Technical Manual on the Effects of Tree and Woody Vegetation Root Penetrations on the Safety Of Earthen Dams. Compiled by: Marks Enterprises of NC, Arden, North Carolina 28704, December 2002

  5. Hester, G., Kirby, H.K., Inamine, M., Lee, R., Bartlett, J., Sin, Y., Jimenez, M., Yang, J., Fougeres, D., Ugarte, N.: 2012 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan—Levee Performance Scope Definition—Work Group Summary Report. November 2009. The Natural Resources Agency, Department of Water Resources, State of California (2009)

  6. Berentsen, A.R., Salmon, T.P.: The structure of California ground squirrel burrows: control Implications. Transact. West. Sect. Wildl. Soc. 37, 66–70 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harder, L.F.: Testimony Before the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment May 19, 2009

  8. Fell, R., Wan, C.F., Cyganiewicz, J., Foster, M.: Time for development of internal erosion and piping in embankment dams. J. Geotechn. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 129(4), 307–314 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCook, D.K.: A comprehensive discussion of piping and internal erosion failure mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Phoenix, Arizona, September 26–30, 2004 (2004)

  10. Reichman, O.J., Smith, S.C.: Burrows and burrowing behavior by mammals, Chap. 5. In: Genoways, H.H. (ed.) Current Mammalogy, pp. 197–244. Plenum Press, New York, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laundre’, J.W., Reynolds, T.D.: Effects of soil structure on burrow characteristics of five small mammal species. Great Basin Nat. 53(4), 358–366 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lawrence, C.S.: Morphology and Incidence of Yabby (Cherax albidus) Burrows in Western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 129, pp. 1–26 (2001)

  13. Chamberlain, P.A.: Armadillos: problems and control. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings collection. Proceedings of the 9th Vertebrate Pest Conference (1980). University of Nebraska—Lincoln Year (1980)

  14. Hanson, G.J., Tejral, R.D., Hunt, S.L., Temple, O.M.: Internal Erosion and Impact of Erosion Resistance. Collaborative Management of Integrated Watersheds. http://ussdams.com/proceedings/773-784.pdf. Accessed September 22 (2010)

  15. Seabloom, E.W., Reichman, O.J.: The effect of hillslope angle on pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) burrow geometry. Oecologia 125, 26–34 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reichman, O.J., Aitchison, S.: Mammal trails on mountain slopes: optimal paths in relation to slope angle and body weight. Am. Nat. 117(3), 416–420 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vleck, D.: Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent (Thomomys bottae). Oecologia 49, 391–396 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. BDOC Staff, Delta Levee and Channel Repair and Maintenance Issues. Assisted by: Frank Wernette, Anna Hegedus, and Ed Littrell. http://www.calwater.ca.gov/Admin_Record/D-000742.pdf. Accessed September 4 (2010)

  19. CECW-CE, 2007. Treatment of Vegetation within Local Flood-Damage-Reduction Systems. Prepared 20 April 2007. http://www.familywateralliance.com/pdf/ACOE_Standards.pdf. Accessed September 9 (2010)

  20. J. Dunn, Sacramento Levees Challenges for the Future. USACE, South Pacific Division. http://www.metalithh2o.com/assets/pdfs/Dunn_Sacramento_Levees_4_Dec_2007.pdf. Accessed Sep 17, 2010 (2007)

  21. Reynolds, T.D., Wakkinen, W.L.: Characteristics of burrows of four species of rodents in undisturbed soils in southeastern Idaho. Am. Midl. Nat. 118(2), 245–250 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D Van Troostwijk, W.J.: Muskrat Control in The Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the 8th Vertebrate Pest Conference University of Nebraska—Lincoln Year 1978. Wildlife Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, The Hague, The Netherlands (1978)

  23. Clevenger, C.E.: Mississippi Earthen Dams and the Beaver “Beavers and Earthen Dams Don’t Mix.” ASDSO/FEMA Specialty Workshop on “Plant and Animal Penetrations of Earthfilled Dams”, November 30–December 2, 1999, University of Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN (1999)

  24. Woodward, D.K., Mayfield, S.M.: A Survey of ASDSO/ICODS Representatives on Animal Damage to Earthfilled Dams and Appurtenances. ASDSO/FEMA Specialty Workshop on “Plant and Animal Penetrations of Earthfilled Dams”, November 30–December 2, University of Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN (1999)

  25. New York’s Wildlife Resources Publication, Muskrat. New York’s Wildlife Resources Publication—an extension publication of the department of natural resources. New York state college of agriculture and life sciences. A statutory college of the state university at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Number 19 (1984)

  26. Kadlec, R.H., Priesb, J., Mustar, H.: Muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) in treatment wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 29, 143–153 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bangerter, L.R.: A Cooperative Approach to Resolving a Marmot Damage Problem in an Urban Recreational Site. Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conferences, 6th Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln (1993)

  28. USACE, Guidelines for Landscape Planting and Vegetation Management at Levees, Floodwalls, Embankments, and Appurtenant Structures, 43 pp (2009)

  29. LeBlanc, D.J.: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage—Nutria. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 1994

  30. Jojola, S., Witmer, G., Nolte, D., Nutria: an invasive rodent pest or valued resource? In: D.L. Nolte, K.A. Fagerstone (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th Wildlife Damage Management Conference. 2005, pp. 120–126 (2005)

  31. Sementelli, A., Smith, H.T., Meshaka, W.E., Engeman, R.M.: Just Green Iguanas? The associated costs and policy implications of exotic invasive wildlife in South Florida. Public Works Manage. Policy 12(4), 599–606 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thayer, D.: Written Testimony on Oversight Hearing “How to Constrict Snakes and Other Invasive Species”. Department of Vegetation and Land Management, South Florida Water Management District. http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/xrepository/sfwmd_repository_pdf/testimony_2010_0323_thayer_pythons.pdf. Accessed on July (2010)

  33. Witmer, G.W., Engeman, R.M.: Subterranean Rodents as Pests: The Case of the Pocket Gopher. Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for USDA National Wildlife Research Center—Staff Publications. University of Nebraska—Lincoln (2007)

  34. Hegdal, P.L., Harbour, A.J.: Prevention and Control of Animal Damage to Hydraulic Structures. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, DC (1991)

  35. The Bell Report—International Edition, 2010. Hollandse Delta protects dikes and tulips from rats with Bell’s TOMCATBLOX. Vol. 13, No. 3, July–September (2010)

  36. Camici, S., Moramarco, T., Brocca, L., Melone, F., Lapenna, V., Perrone, A., Loperte, A.: On mechanisms triggering the levee failure along the Foenna stream on 1st January 2006 and which caused the flooding in the urban area of Sinalunga, Tuscany Region (Italy). A case study. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 12, 12037 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ali, A.M., Hafez, H.: Proceedings of the 7th Vertebrate Pest Conference University of Nebraska—Lincoln Year 1976. Wildlife and Vertebrate Pests, in Egypt, (1976)

  38. Fishar, M.R.: Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) In River Nile, Egypt—Case Study. National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (2006)

  39. Zhang, Z., Chen, A., Ning, Z., Huang, X.: In: Singleton, G., Hinds, L., Leirs, H., Zhang, Z (eds.) Ecologically-based management of rodent pests. Section 3 case studies in Asia and Africa. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra 1999. http://www.irri.org/irrc/Rodents/publications/EBRM%20Book/Prelims.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2010 (1999)

  40. Fall, M.W., Jackson, W.B.: A new era of vertebrate pest control? An introduction. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 42(3), 85–91 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Feldhamer, G.A., Thompson, B.C., Chapman, J.A.: Wild mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hill, E.P.: Beaver. In: Chapman, J.A., Feldhamer, G.A. (eds.) Wild Mammals of North America, pp. 256–281. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Miller, J.E., Yarrow, G.K.: Beavers. In: Timm, R.M. (ed.) Prevention and control of wildlife damage. Great Plains Agricultural Council Wildlife Committee and Nebraska Cooperation Extension Services, pp. B1–B11. University of Nebraska, Lincoln (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Miller, J.E.: Beaver damage control. In: Proceedings Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Work. 2, pp. 23–27 (1975)

  45. Fitzgerald, W.S., Thompson, R.A.: Problems Associated With Beaver In Stream Or Floodway Management. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings Collection. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference, pp. 190–195 (1988)

  46. Hammerson, G.A.: Beaver (Caster canadensis) ecosystem alterations, management and monitoring. Nat. Areas J. 14, 44–57 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jensen, P.G., Curtis, P.D., Hamelin, D.L. Managing Nuisance Beavers Along Roadsides. A Guide for Highway Department, Cornell Cooperative Extension. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., 1999

  48. Olson, R., Hubert, W.A.: Beaver: water resources and riparian habitat manager, p. 48. University of Wyoming Press, Laramie (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Buech, R.R.: Beaver in water impoundments: Understanding a problem of water level management. In: Knighton, M.D. (ed.) Proceedings, Water Impoundments for Wildlife: A Habitat Management Workshop, pp. 95–105. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, General Technical Report NC-100 (1985)

  50. Basey, J.M.: Foraging behavior of beaver (Castor Canadensis), plant secondary compounds, and management concerns. In: Busher, P.E., Dzieciolowski, R.M. (eds.) Beaver Potection, Management, and Utilization in Europe and North America, pp. 129–146. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Kieth, J.O., Hansen, R.M., Ward, A.L.: Changes in abundance and food habits of pocket gophers following treatment of range with 2, 4-D. J. Wildl. Manage. 23(2), 14–137 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tietjen, H.P., Halvorsen, C.H., Hegdal, P.L., Johnson, A.M.: 2,4-D herbicide, vegetation, and pocket gopher relationships Black Mesa, Colorado. Ecology 48, 634–643 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Witmer, G.W., Matschke, G.H., Campbell, D.L.: Field trials of pocket gopher control with cholecalciferol. Crop Prot. 14, 307–309 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. O’Neil, T.: The Muskrat in the Louisiana Coastal Marshes, 152 pp. Louisiana Department of Wildlife Fishery, New Orleans (1949)

  55. Errington, P.L.: Muskrats and Marsh Management. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  56. eXtension, Muskrat damage management, 2008. http://www.extension.org. Accessed June 1, 2010

  57. Wilson, K.: Investigation on the effects of controlled water levels upon muskrat production. In: Proceedings of the Southeastern Association Game and Fish Commissioners, pp. 3–7 (1949)

  58. Wilson, K.: Fur production on southeastern coastal marshes. In: J.D. Newsom (ed.) Proceedings of the Marsh and Estuary management symposium, pp. 149–162. Division of Continuing Educ., Louisiana State University, 1968

  59. Clark, W.R.: Habitat selection by muskrats in experimental marshes undergoing succession. Can. J. Zool. 72, 675–680 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Friend, M., Cummings, G.E., Morse, J.S.: Effects of changes in winter water levels on muskrat weights and harvest at the Monte- zuma National Wildlife Refuge. N.Y. Fish Game J. 11, 125–131 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Proulx, G., McDonnell, J.A., Gilbert, F.F.: The effect of water level fluctuations on muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus, predation by mink, Mustela vison. Can. Field Nat. 101, 89–92 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Virgil, J.A., Messier, F.: Population structure, distribution, and demography of muskrats during the ice-free period under contrasting water fluctuations. Ecoscience 3, 54–62 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Van Vuren, D., Kuenzi, A.J., Leoredo, I., Leider, A.L., Morrison, M.L.: Translocation as a nonlethal alternative for managing California ground squirrels. J. Wildl. Manage. 61, 351–359 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Stroud, D.C.: An Evaluation of Burrow Destruction as a Ground Squirrel Control Method. Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings (1983)

  65. DWR, How a Delta Earthquake Could Devastate California’s Economy. Department of Water Resources. November (2005)

  66. Olkowski, W., Olkwski, H., Daar, S.: Making the transition to an integrated pest management program for ground squirrel on DWR Levees. Report to Division of Planning, p. 125. Department of Water Resources, Berkley, CA (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fitzgerald, W.S., Marsh, R.E.: Potential of Vegetation Management for Ground Squirrel Control. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings Collection, Proceedings of the 12th Vertebrate Pest Conference, pp. 102–107 (1986)

  68. McKinstry, M.C., Anderson, S.H.: Using snares to live-capture beaver, Castor canadensis. Can. Field Nat. 112, 469–473 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Proulx, G.: Evaluation of strychnine and zinc phosphide baits to control northern pocket gophers, Thomomys talpoides. Canadian Field-Naturalist 11, 640–643 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Barnes, V.G., Martin, P., Tietjen, H.P.: Pocket gopher control on ponderosa pine plantations. J. For. 68, 433–435 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tickes, B.R., Cheatheam, L.K., Stair, J.L.: A comparison of selected rodenticides for the control of the common Valley pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae). In: Marsh, R.E. (ed.) Proceedings Tenth Vertebrate Pest Conference, pp. 201–204. University of California, Davis, CA (1982)

  72. Marsh, R.E.: Reflections on current (1992) pocket gopher control in California. Proc. Vertebr. Pest Conf. 15, 289–295 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Deems, E.F., Pursley, D. (eds.) North American furbearers: their management, research and harvest status in 1976: International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies in cooperation with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources-Wildlife Administration: College Park, University of Maryland, University Press, 165 p (1978)

  74. Miller, J.E.: Muskrat damage control. In: Proceedings Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Work. 2, pp. 17–22 (1975)

  75. Marsh, R.E.: Historical review of ground squirrel corp damage in California. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 42, 93–99 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. El Hani, A., Mason, J.R., Nolte, D.L., Schmidt, R.H.: Flavor avoidance learning and its implications in reducing strychnine baiting hazards to non-target animals. Physiol. Behav. 64, 585–589 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Hegdal, P.L., Fagerstone, K.A., Gatz, T.A., Glahn, J.F., Matschkf, G.H.: Hazards to wildlife associated with 1080 baiting for California ground squirrels. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 14, 11–21 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Marsh, R.E.: Current ground squirrel control practices in California. In: Halverson, W.S., Crabb, A.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Vertebrate Pest Conference, vol. 16, pp. 61–65, 1–3 March, Santa Clara, California, USA (1994)

  79. Matschke, G.H., Marsh, M.P., Otis, D.L.: Efficacy of zinc phosphide broadcast baiting for controlling Richardson’s ground squirrel on rangeland. J. Range Manag. 36, 504–506 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Anderson, N., Ismail, A.: A generalized protocol for selecting appropriate geophysical techniques. Geophysical Technologies for Detecting Underground Coal Mine Voids Forum, July 28–30, 2003—Lexington, Kentucky (2003)

  81. Benson, R.C., Yuhr, L., Kaufmann, R.D.: Some considerations for selection and successful application of surface geophysical methods. In the 3rd International Conference on Applied Geophysics, Hotel Royal Plaza, Orlando, Florida, December 8–12 (2003)

  82. Butler, D.K.: Microgravimetric and gravity gradient techniques for the detection of subsurface cavities. Geophysics 49, 1084–1096 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lagabrielle, R.: Sciences de la terre et exploration archéologique. In: Marinos, Koukis (eds.) Engineering Geology of Ancient Works, Monuments and Historical Sites, pp. 1909–1914. Balkema, Rotterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Roth Jr., M.J.S., Mackey, J.R., Mackey, C., Nyquist, J.E.: A case study of the reliability of multielectrode earth resistivity testing for geotechnical investigations in karst terrains. Eng. Geol. 65, 225–232 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Branham, K.L., Steeples, D.W.: Cavity detection using high-resolution seismic reflection methods. Min. Eng. 40(2), 115–119 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Bachrach, R., Nur, A.: High resolution shallow seismic experiments in sand: Part I—water table, fluid flow and saturation. Geophysics 63, 1225–1233 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Fullagar, P.K., Livleybrooks, D.: Trial of tunnel radar for cavity and ore detection in the Sudbury mining camp. Ontario. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, pp. 883–894. Waterloo Centre for Groundwater Research: Waterloo, Canada (1994)

  88. Szynkiewicz, A.: GPR monitoring of earthen flood banks/levees. In: Eighth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4084, pp. 85–90 (2000)

  89. Kinlaw, A.E., Conyers, L., Zajac, W.: Use Of ground penetrating radar to image burrows of the Gopher Tortoise (Gopher polyphemus). Herpetol. Rev. 38(1), 50–55 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Di Prinzio, M., Bittelli, M., Castellarin, A., Pisa, P.R.: Application of GPR to the monitoring of river embankments. J. Appl. Geophys. 71, 53–61 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Agri-Facts Government of Alberta, http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca. Accessed on July 15 (2002)

  92. Rocque Jr., A.J.: Guidelines for Inspection and Maintenance of Dams. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. Available at http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/water_inland/dams/guidelinesforinspectionandmaintenanceofdams.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2010 (2001)

  93. Texas Commission on Environment Quality (TCEQ) Guidelines for operation and maintenance of dams in Texas, pp. 65–72 (2006)

  94. Resio, D., Boc, S., Maynord, S., Ward, D., Abraham, D., Dudeck, W., Welsh, B.: Development and Demonstration of Rapid Repair of Levee Breaching Technology, p. 124. Report to Development of Homeland Security (2009)

  95. Moss, R.E.S., Eller, J.M.: Estimating the Probability of Failure and Associated Risk of the California Bay Delta Levee System. GeoDenver, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, GSP 170, Special Issue on Probabilistic Application in Geotechnical Engineering (2007)

  96. Suddeth, R.J., Mount, J., Lund, J.R.: Levee decisions and sustainability for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 8(2) (2010)

  97. Slogar, B.: Animal Penetrations Into Earthen Embankments. ASDSO/FEMA Specialty Workshop on “Plant and Animal Penetrations of Earthfilled Dams”, pp. 189–193, November 30–December 2, 1999, University of Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN (1999)

  98. CBS News, 2008. Missouri Citizens Scramble As Levee Breaks. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/27/national/main4215324.shtml. Accessed September 19 (2010)

  99. Schnabel, D.L.: Comments of The California Department of Food and Agriculture on The United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Document Titled “Analysis of Rodenticide Bait Use”. In Response to: Federal Register Vol. 69, Number 183, pages 56756-56758 Rodenticides; Availability of Revised Comparative Ecological Risk Assessment. Submitted to: Docket OPP-2004-0033, January 14, 2005

  100. Schmutte, C., Porterfield, R., Forsythe, W., Yomogida, S.: Delta Levee and Channel Management Issues - General Issues Related to the Physical Integrity of Delta Levees. California Department of water resources, division of planning, Delta Planning Branch. http://www.calwater.ca.gov/Admin_Record/C-071873.pdf. Accessed August 13 (2010)

  101. County of San Joaquin, Jones Tract flooding update. County of San Joaquin, Office of Emergency Services. http://www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/Oes/disasters/Jones04/news.6_07.pdf. Accessed September 28 (2010)

  102. Souza, C.: Levee break floods San Joaquin County farms. California Farm Bureau Federation. Issued June 9, 2004. http://www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/Oes/disasters/Jones04/news.6_07.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2010 (2004)

  103. Gillam, C.: Missouri Levee Breaks at U.S. Flooding Continues. http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKN2745863920080627. Accessed July 15, 2010 (2008)

  104. Harder, L.F.: Inspection of Levee Distress and Breaches During the Spring 2008 Midwest Flood. The Society of American Military Engineers (SAME) presentation on Nov 10, 2009

  105. Department of Ecology—State of Washington Iowa Beef Processors Waste Pond. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/dams/iowa.html. Accessed August 19 (2010)

  106. Kolo, T.V.: Hundreds of Homes Flooded by Ruptured Levee. http://www.kolotv.com/home/headlines/13286002.html. Accessed July 19, 2010 (2008)

  107. USA Today, Nev. Levee Break Floods Hundreds of Homes. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-01-05-nevadalevee_N.htm. Accessed July 19, 2010 (2008)

  108. Benjamin, J.R.: Preliminary Seismic Risk Analysis Associated with Levee Failures in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Jack R. Benjamin & Associates, Inc., in association with Resource Management Associates and Economic Insights June (2005)

  109. Lund, J., Hanak, E., Fleenor, W., Howitt, R., Mount, J., Moyle, P.: The Future of the Delta as an Aquatic Ecosystem - Envisioning Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Public Policy Institute of California. ISBN: 978-1-58213-126-9. TD225.D29E58 2007 (2007)

  110. URS Corporation, Delta Risk Management Strategy (DRMS) Phase 1—Risk Analysis Report, prepared by URS and Jack R. Benjamin & Associates, Inc. For California Department of Water Resources (DWR). Summary of Section 9, Sunny-Day Risk Analysis corporation, Posted—March 2009. http://www.water.ca.gov/floodmgmt/dsmo/sab/drmsp/docs/Risk_Report_Section_9_Final.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2010 (2008)

  111. Morris, D.: Special Report: Dam Disaster Ahead. http://www.jacksonsun.com/article/20100513/NEWS01/5130322/Special-report-Dam-disaster-ahead. Accessed August 10, 2010

  112. Mullins, C.K.: Sludge Spill Stirs Concerns in Kentucky. http://www.kentucky.com/2008/12/24/636656/sludge-spill-stirs-concerns-in.html. Accessed July 18, 2010 (2008)

  113. Shrum, P., Madsen, M.: Catastrophic Failure of the Bonneville Dam. http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~madsenmi. Accessed September 23, 2010 (2009)

  114. Logan, T.: State Legislators Don’t Give A Dam About The Ct River Valley—Ban on Trapping Threatens Integrity of Connecticut River Flood Protection Dikes. http://www.ctnwcoa.com/Press%20Release%20March%2026,%202009.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2010 (2009)

  115. McClelland, D.E.: Wildlife Damage to Earthen Dams, Dikes, Levees, and Related Structures. ASSO/FEMA Specialty Workshop on “Animal Borrows and Vegetation on USDA Forest Service Dams”, November 30–December 3, 1999, University of Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN (1999)

  116. Bjugstad, A.J.: Rodent Management on the Northern High Plains. Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings at University of Nebraska—Lincoln Year (1983)

  117. Notle, D.L., Owens, R.D.: Wildlife Services Activities to Prevent Animal Penetration to Earthen Dams. In: Miller, J.E. (ed.) Wildlife Damage to Earthen Dams, Dikes, Levees, and Related Structures. ASDSO/FEMA Specialty Workshop on “Plant and Animal Penetrations of Earth-filled Dams,” pp. 124–141, November 30–December 3, 1999, University of Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN (1999)

  118. Bishop, L., Styles, P., Emsley, S.J., Ferguson, N.S.: The detection of cavities using the microgravity technique: case histories from mining and karstic environments. In: McCann, D.M., Fenning, P.J., Reeves, G.M. (eds.) Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology. Geological Society, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  119. Linford, N.T.: Geophysical survey at Boden Vean, Cornwall, including an assessment of the microgravity technique for the location of suspected archaeological void features. Archaeometry 40, 187–216 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Mickus, K.: The gravity method in engineering and environmental applications. In: 3rd International Conference on Applied Geophysics, Hotel Royal Plaza, Orlando, Florida, December 8–12, 2003

  121. Smith, D.L., Smith, G.L.: Use of vertical gravity gradient analyses to detect near-surface dissolution voids in karst terrains. In: Beck, B.F., Wilson, W.L. (eds.) Karst Hydrology: Engineering and Environmental Applications, pp. 205–210. Rotterdam, Balkema (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  122. Manzanilla, L., Barba, L., Cha′vez, R., Tejero, A., Cifuentes, G., Peralta, N.: Caves and geophysics: an approximation to the underworld of Teotihuacan, Mexico. Archaeometry 36, 141–157 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  123. Noel, M., Xu, B.: Cave detection using electrical resistivity tomography. Cave Sci. 19, 91–94 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  124. Inazaki, T., Yamanaka, Y., Kawamura, S., Tazawa, O.: High-resolution seismic reflection survey using Land Streamers for near-surface cavity detection. In: Proceedings of 7th SEGJ International Symposium, pp. 475–480. November 24–26, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2004)

  125. Miller, R.D., Steeples, D.W.: Detecting voids in a 0.6-m coal seam, 7 m deep, using seismic reflection. Geoexploration 28, 109–119 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Washington Dept. of Ecology. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/dams/Reports/damfailure_ws.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2010

  127. Hansen, D.T.: Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees. Presented by David T. Hansen at the ESRI User Conference, 2008, San Diego California, August 6, 2008 (2008)

  128. Ohio Emergency Management Agency. http://ema.ohio.gov/Documents/OhioMitigationPlan/SOHMP_Sec_2_6.pdf. Accessed August 23 (2010)

  129. Washington Dept. of Ecology. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/dams/iowa.html. Accessed September 21, 2010

  130. McCann, M.W.: Plant and Animal Penetrations of Dams Incidents. ASSO/FEMA Specialty Workshop on Plant & animal Penetrations of EarthFilled Dams on USDA Forest Service Dams, November 30–December 3, 1999, University of Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN (1999)

  131. Mierzwa, M., Suits, B.: Jones Tract, Levee Break DSM2 Simulation. Methodology for Flow and Salinity Estimates in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh. 26th Annual Progress Report, October 2005. http://modeling.water.ca.gov/delta/reports/annrpt/2005/2005Ch3.pdf (2005)

  132. Hensley, P.J., Delp, J.L.: Truckee Canal Issue Evaluation. Truckee Canal Headworks and Derby Diversion Dam. Design, Estimating and Construction Review. Newlands Project, Nevada. Mid-Pacific Region. http://www.usbr.gov/mp/PA/truckee/FinalTruckeeCanalDECReport.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2010 (2008)

  133. Fishar, M.R.: Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) In River Nile, Egypt—Case Study. The Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int. Accessed September 17 (2010)

  134. Howard, W.E., Childs, H.E.: Ecology of pocket gophers with emphasis on Thomomys bottae mewa. Hilgardia 29, 277–358 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  135. NAFSMA, National Levee Safety Issues-Testimony of the National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agency, 8 pp. Available at: www.nafsma.org/pdf/NAFSMAFinalWRDA.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2010 (2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ardaman and Associates, Inc, Jefferson, LA, USA

    Ahmed Bayoumi

  2. McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Mohamed A. Meguid

Authors
  1. Ahmed Bayoumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed A. Meguid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Bayoumi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bayoumi, A., Meguid, M.A. Wildlife and Safety of Earthen Structures: A Review. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 11, 295–319 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-011-9439-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-011-9439-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation