Skip to main content
Log in

Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent, Thomomys bottae

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A model for calculating the energy cost of burrowing by fossorial rodents is presented and used to examine the energetics of foraging by burrowing. The pocket gopher Thomomys bottae (Rodentia: Geomyidae) digs burrows for access to food. Feeding tunnels of Thomomys are broken into segments by laterals to the surface that are used to dispose of excavated soil. Energy cost of burrowing depends on both soil type and on burrow structure, defined by the length of burrow segments, angle of ascent of laterals, depth of feeding tunnels, and burrow diameter. In a desert scrub habitat, Thomomys adjust burrow segment length to minimize cost of burrowing. Observed segment lengths (mean=1.33 m) closely approximate the minimum-cost segment length of 1.22 m. Minimizing energy expended per meter of tunnel constructed maximizes efficiency of foraging by burrowing in the desert scrub. Burrow diameter and cost of burrowing increase with body size, while benefits do not, so foraging by burrowing becomes less enconomical as body size increases. Maximum possible body size of fossorial mammals depends on habitat productivity and energy cost of burrowing in local soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldous CM (1951) The feeding habits of pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) in the high mountain ranges of central Utah. J Mammal 32:84–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt WJ, Grossenheider RP (1976) A field guide to the mammals. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter FL, MacMillen RE (1976) Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science 194:639–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Saibene FP Margaria R (1963) Mechanical work in running. J Appl Physiol 18:249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis WB (1938) Relation of size of pocket gophers to soil and altitude. J Mammal 19:338–342 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman JR (1956) The subterranean mammals of the world. Trans Roy Soc S Afr 35:11–20 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eloff G (1951) Adaptation in rodent moles and insectivorous moles, and the theory of convergence. Nature (London) 168:1001–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100:611–617 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB, Wolf LL (1975a) Foraging strategies of East African sunbirds at mistletoe flowers. Am. Nat. 109:491–510 (1975a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB, Wolf LL (1975b) Economics of feeding territoriality in the golden-winged sunbird. Ecology 56:333–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell J (1923) The burrowing rodents of California as agents in soil formation. J Mammal. 4:137–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL (1972) Energetics of nectar extraction in a small, high altitude, tropical hummingbird, Selasphorus flammula. J Comp Physiol 80:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) Bumble-bee Economics. Harvard University Press

  • Halvorsen WL, Patten DT (1975) Productivity and flowering of winter ephemerals in relation to Sonoran Desert shrubs. Am Midl Nat 93:311–319 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RM, Miller RS (1959) Observations on plural occupancy of pocket gophers' burrowing systems. J Mammal 40:577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JE (1937) Morphology of the pocket gopher genus Thomomys. Univ Calif Berkeley Publ Zool 42:81–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger CD (1916) Anatomical adaptations in the thoracic limb of the California pocket gopher and other rodents. Univ Calif Berkeley Publ Zool 13:447–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard WE, Childs HE (1959) Ecology of pocket gophers with emphasis on Thomomys bottae mewa. Hilgardia 29:277–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingles LG (1949) Ground water and snow as factors affecting the seasonal distribution of pocket gophers, Thomomys monticola. J Mammal 30:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennerly TE (1959) Contact between the ranges of two allopatric species of pocket gophers. Evolution 13:247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab BK (1966) The metabolism of fossorial rodents: A study of convergence. Ecology 47:712–733

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab BK (1979) The influence of body size on the energetics and distribution of fossorial mammals. Ecology 60:1010–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller MA (1957) Burrows of the Sacramento Valley pocket gopher in flood-irrigated alfalfa fields. Hilgardia 26:431–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RS (1964) Ecology and distribution of pocket gophers (Geomyidae) in Colorado. Ecology 45:256–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: A selective review of theories and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1979) Ecology. 2nd edition. New York: Chiron Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1969) Models of optimal size for a solitary predator. Am Nat 103:277–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan TA (1963) Movements made by two species of pocket gophers. Am Midl Nat 69:367–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Vleck D (1979) The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiol Zool 52:122–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker EP (1975) Mammals of the World (Vol. 2, 3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1970) Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillen New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf LL (1975) Energy intake and expenditures in a nectar-feeding sunbird. Ecology 56:92–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf LL, Hainsworth FR, Gill FB (1975) Foraging efficiencies and time budgets in nectar-feeding birds. Ecology 56:117–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vleck, D. Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent, Thomomys bottae . Oecologia 49, 391–396 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347605

Keywords

Navigation