Introduction

Castings made of chromium cast iron are generally working in hostile conditions, where intense wear is the main problem. In industries such as mining, mineral processing or energetics, chromium cast iron is commonly used for elements exposed to increased wear. Ball and ring mill parts, rollers, transporting elements, abrasion shields, excavator teeth, etc., are parts, whose working conditions are very hard, and for this reason, in order to avoid frequent replacements of those parts, selection of proper material is vital to achieve the longest possible life span of the casting (Ref 1, 2). There are many materials that have better wear resistance than chromium cast iron, but their price is much higher. One of the reasons why chromium cast iron is such an attractive material is its excellent ration between wear resistance and production cost.

But what if wear resistance of selected chromium cast iron is insufficient for our needs? One of the possibilities is to use alloying elements different than chromium, which will form different carbides, resulting in enhancement of wear resistance, but such action will highly increase the cost of production. However, if the amount of the element would be small enough, we would deal with inoculation rather than with alloying, while the cost would stay comparatively low and wear resistance would increase.

Inoculation is the perfect way to change the kinetics of the crystallization process in a way to affect formation of microstructure and characteristic crystallization temperatures, which will result in improvement of casting properties.

Usually, a fraction of percent of weight is enough to clearly see inoculants’ effect on the microstructure. However, higher amounts of inoculants were used in this work to not only ensure refinement of grain, but also provide significant increase in the wear resistance.

Studies concentrated on heterogeneous inoculation with ferrotitanium (FeTi67) and mischmetal consisting mainly of Ce and La (67% Ce and 33% La). In order to create underlay which can increase the rate of crystallization, the mismatch δ between lattice parameters of the underlay and inoculated phase should be as low as possible. It was determined that inoculation is most effective when δ < 6%, its effectiveness is moderate between 6 and 12%, and it is ineffective if δ > 12%.

Ma et al. calculated the lattice parameters of Cr7C3 carbides present in examined high chromium cast irons and obtained the following results: a = b = 6.88 Å; c = 4.54 Å in a hexagonal system, as well as a = b = c = 4.32 Å (δ = 4.8) in case of TiC carbides in a regular system. Also, TiC has high melting point allowing its formation before the crystallization of Cr7C3, as well as hardness of up to 9.5 in Mohs’ scale, which could influence the wear resistance of the final alloy (Ref 3,4,5).

According to calculations of Qu et al. (Ref 6), lattice parameters of Cr7C3 carbides are a = b = 6.99 Å; c = 4.036 Å, and the parameters of Ce2O2S, are a = b = 6.942; c = 4.036 Å (δ = 0.69) in a hexagonal system. These studies proved that both TiC and Ce2O2S are effective inoculants of Cr7C3 carbides.

It is a fact that both mischmetal and ferrotitanium are often used as inoculants for Cr7C3 carbides (Ref 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14). However, usually one is used without the presence of the other. In this work, both inoculants were simultaneously added to the melt in order to evaluate their synergistic effect.

Materials and Methodology of the Studies

The initial W0 melt was eutectic chromium cast iron melted using electric induction furnace with the capacity of 50 kg, including corundum lining. Charge consisted of materials commonly used in industrial conditions: steel scrap, ferrochromium and carburizer. Inoculated melts were made in electric induction furnace with the capacity of 20 kg with corundum lining by re-melting W0 melt and adding an inoculant into the ladle. In case of TiMM004 sample, the following amount of inoculants was added: mischmetal—0.06% by weight of the charge, titanium—0.06% by weight of the charge, while in case of TiMM1 the amount was: mischmetal—2% by weight of the charge, titanium—2% by weight of the charge. Table 1 presents chemical compositions of obtained melts prepared using LECO spectrometer.

Table 1 Chemical composition of examined high chromium cast iron

Thermal-derivative analysis method (TDA) can be used to present the entire crystallization process. In this case, it was used to examine the kinetics of the primary crystallization. Figure 1 shows used test stand, consisting of a computer linked to CRYSTALDIGRAPH device connected to two testers reflecting two different cooling speeds in order to examine crystallization with two different solidification times: ATD-C with shorter solidification time (W0, TiMM004, TiMM1) and ATD-Is with longer solidification time (W0i, TiMM004i, TiMM1i). Solidification time of the melt in ATD-Is tester is approximately two times longer than in ATD-C tester.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Scheme of the test stand (Ref 1)

Crystallization kinetics was measured with the use of CRYSTALDIGRAPH analyzer designed and manufactured in cooperation with the Department of Foundry Engineering of Silesian University of Technology. Type “S” (PtRh10-Pt) thermocouples were used. Application of TDA method allowed registration of cooling (\(T = f(t)\)) and crystallization (\(T^{\prime } = \frac{{{\text{d}}T}}{{{\text{d}}t}}\)) curves. Analysis of both curves was conducted according to theories of prof. Stanisław Jura (Ref 15,16,17,18,19), Polish authority in the field of crystallization examination. Analysis allowed authors to designate characteristic temperatures of examined melts crystallization. Methodology of temperature designation is schematically shown in Fig. 2 presenting crystallization curves of a) for eutectic alloy, b) and c) for near eutectic alloy. Figure 2(b) presents the variant in which crystallization curve reaches positive values which results in the presence of metastable crystallization temperature, and Fig. 2(c) shows the variant in which the derivative value is negative and only stable temperature is present. Description of each analyzed characteristic point is shown in Table 2 for eutectic alloy and Table 3 for near eutectic alloy.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Methodology of characteristic temperatures designation for (a) eutectic alloy, (b) and (c) near eutectic alloy

Table 2 Description of each analyzed characteristic point of TDA for eutectic alloy
Table 3 Description of each analyzed characteristic point of TDA for near eutectic alloy

Wear resistance tests based on modified pin-on-disk method were conducted with the use of Tribotester 3-POD device. In this method, the wear of the examined sample was compared to the wear of a wear test reference sample made of Creusabro 8000 (C8) wear resistant steel. Samples for wear resistance tests were extracted from overflow parts of TDA testers. Dry wear tests were done using C120 SiC abrasive paper with a disk rotational speed of 155 rpm, a sample holder speed of 400 rpm, a load of 220 g and test cycle time of 10 min for six cycles.

Results and Discussion

Crystallization Analysis

Figure 3 shows cooling and crystallization curves of W0 melt, and Table 4 presents characteristic temperatures and points of crystallization process. It should be noticed that melt W0 in both tester variants crystallized as a eutectic alloy. In both testers, crystallization started with metastable liquidus temperature, which means that supercooling was necessary to initiate the crystallization process. In case of ATD-C tester, eutectic recalescence, expressed as the difference between TS and TSM (Ref 20, 21), was ΔRC = 2.4 °C, and in case of ATD-Is tester—ΔRIs = 3.8 °C. Occurrence of metastable crystallization temperature is typical for non-inoculated alloys.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TDA curves of W0 melt

Table 4 Characteristic temperatures of W0 and W0i samples

Figure 4 presents cooling and crystallization curves of TiMM004 melt, while Table 5 shows characteristic temperatures and melting points of the crystallization process, which was typical for near eutectic alloy. In this case, there was no visible eutectic recalescence, which means that there was no metastable temperature of crystallization that could indicate ineffectiveness of inoculation. In both ATD-C and ATD-Is testers, the values of TL, TS and TH were higher compared to W0 melt, which showed higher crystallization start potential. There is a visible heat effect on the crystallization curve before point A depicting TL; this effect starts at temperature of 1310.4 °C and ends at 1287.1 °C. In the authors’ opinion, this effect is caused by crystallization of TiC and Ce2O2S; however, this will be verified in further research.

Fig. 4
figure 4

TDA curves of TiMM004 melt

Table 5 Characteristic temperatures of TiMM004 and TiMM004i samples

Figure 5 presents cooling and crystallization curves of TiMM1 melt, and Table 6 shows characteristic temperatures and points of crystallization process, which, again, was typical for near eutectic alloy. Just like in the previously analyzed melt, in this case, there was no visible eutectic recalescence, which proves that inoculation was effective. In ATD-Is tester, TL and TH were higher compared to W0 melt, but TS had decreased. In case of ATD-C tester, TL, TS and TH were lower than in W0 melt. This shows that inoculation took place, but the crystallization start potential was reduced. As in the case of the previous melt, there was a heat effect prior to TL between 1441.9 °C and 1287.1 °C. Again, authors believe it is associated with precipitation of TiC and Ce2O2S.

Fig. 5
figure 5

TDA curves of TiMM1 melt

Table 6 Characteristic temperatures of TiMM1 and TiMM1i samples

It is important to emphasize the fact that the results obtained from isolated testers are closer to the conditions of equilibrium, because longer crystallization time facilitated diffusion of elements in liquid and solid state. Longer crystallization time also corresponds to the actual industrial conditions of high chromium cast iron crystallization to a greater extent, as castings made from this material are usually characterized by thick walls.

Metallographic Analysis

Metallographic photography of W0 melt is shown in Fig. 6, where Cr7C3 carbides in matrix consisting of alloy pearlite and austenite are visible. Figure 7 shows metallographic photography of TiMM004 melt with Cr7C3 and TiC carbides in matrix consisting of alloy pearlite and austenite. Interesting change takes place in case of TiMM1 melt visible in Fig. 8, where Cr7C3 and TiC carbides are still present, but matrix consists of austenite. Such transition may be explained by slightly increased amount of C content in TiMM1 sample; however, the presence of Ti binding C in TiC moves the eutectic point. This change can also be linked with a phenomenon present in the third generation of AHSS steels, where grain refinement decreases starting temperature of martensitic transition, thus leaving the matrix austenitic in room temperature (Ref 22,23,24). The presence of austenitic matrix should highly increase the impact strength of the alloy, and for this reason, this change will be carefully analyzed in future studies.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Microstructure of W0 sample, on the left ATD-C, on the right ATD-Is

Fig. 7
figure 7

Microstructure of TiMM004 sample, on the left ATD-C, on the right ATD-Is

Fig. 8
figure 8

Microstructure of TiMM1 sample, on the left ATD-C, on the right ATD-Is

Image analysis allowed to determine that in both inoculated samples, the average area of carbides and their average length have decreased, while the rounding coefficient has increased. In case of W0, the average area of carbide was 73.276 µm2, the average length was 12.594 µm, and the rounding coefficient was 0.402. In TiMM004 sample, the average area of carbide was 59.021 µm2, the average length was 9.707 µm, and the rounding coefficient was 0.411. Sample TiMM1 reached the average area of carbide of 50.919 µm2, the average length of 9.889 µm, and the rounding coefficient was 0.452. In case of each sample, the analysis was carried out on 20 microstructure photographs. Results prove that refinement of the structure took place, while carbides in inoculated samples are rounded, as opposed to non-inoculated samples, so their impact strength should be greater. In case of TiMM004, the average carbide area was 19% lower, the length was 23% lower, and rounding was 2% larger than in W0 sample. In TiMM1 sample, the average carbide area was 30% lower, the length was 21% lower, and rounding was 9% larger. The results indicate that mixture of Ti and REE has a positive impact on the microstructure of the alloy as significant refinement of microstructure was achieved.

Addition of larger amount of Ti resulted in formation of TiC conglomerate, as its distribution in the matrix was far from uniform. This phenomenon is perfectly visible in Fig. 12. Titanium carbides formed in the melt may present a tendency to move upward, toward the surface. This effect can be a result of density difference between molten metal (6.6-7.1 g/cm3) and TiC (4.91 g/cm3) as well as with convection movements. In case of Cr7C3, the density difference is lower, as their density (6.68 g/cm3) is very similar to the liquid metals density and no chromium carbide conglomerates were present. Formation of conglomerates can be caused by entrapment and entanglement of emerging titanium carbides into oxide bifilms formed during turbulent mold filling which is consistent with prof. John Campbells theories (Ref 25). This mechanism of conglomerate formation can be supported by authors’ unpublished studies confirming segregation of TiC on the castings height.

Wear Analysis

Figure 9 presents diagram of weight loss of the examined chromium cast iron samples during wear resistance test measurement cycles. Figure 10 presents relative weight loss of the examined samples compared to the wear resistance test reference sample Ref (C8).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Weight loss of the samples in wear measurement cycles

Fig. 10
figure 10

Relative weight loss of examined samples in comparison with the wear test reference sample C8 and hardness HRC

When analyzing Fig. 9, it can be noticed that wear of W0 sample was 69% lower than the wear of C8 sample, while both inoculated samples presented better wear resistance than W0 and C8 samples. The best wear resistance in the examined conditions was achieved by TiMM1 sample. Wear of TiMM004 sample was 29% lower than the wear of W0 sample, and 71% lower than C8 sample, the wear of TiMM1 sample was 41% lower than the wear of W0 sample, and 76% lower than C8 sample, while the wear of TiMM1 sample was 17% lower than the wear of TiMM004 sample. Increase in wear resistance in inoculated samples can be linked with the presence of TiC which, because of its hardness, can decrease the wear as well as the refinement of Cr7C3 which can decrease their chipping rate. The change in matrix from pearlite and austenite to pure austenite can result in enhanced plasticity of the matrix and increase in carbide support which also can reduce their chipping rate.

In comparison with authors previous research (Ref 1), in which W0 sample was contrasted with samples inoculated only with FeTi, weight loss of TiMM1 sample inoculated with combination of FeTi and REE was similar. However, in case of TiMM004, application of over three times less inoculant provided only slight (17%) decrease in weight loss compared to other inoculated samples from both experiments. This may prove that from economical point of view mixture of FeTi and REE can be effective and attractive combination of inoculants to use in iron foundries.

Hardness Analysis

Samples used for the examination of wear resistance were subjected to hardness evaluation using Rockwell method. The results of the hardness test presented in Fig. 10 show the average value from six measuring points on each sample.

There is a known proportional relationship between hardness and wear resistance; however, hardness of each inoculated sample was lower in comparison with sample W0 (not inoculated one), which is the result of carbide phase refinement, as well as the change in the metal matrix of the alloy from pearlite to austenite. Similar effect of hardness reduction was obtained in other research (Ref 2) where inoculation was performed with only FeTi.

SEM Analysis

The EDS (energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy) analysis was performed on Phenom Pro-X scanning electron microscope. This part of the study can show the influence of inoculants on crystallization process and microstructure of the analyzed chromium cast iron.

Figures 11 and 12 shows the element distribution map for TiMM1 sample, where it can be clearly seen that titanium carbides are adjacent to the eutectic carbides, which can translate into their ability to serve as an underlay for the crystallization of Cr7C3 carbides. The presence of TiC in such matter and the volume in eutectic precipitations can indicate that they are not only an inoculant of eutectic carbides, but constitute the eutectic itself.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Element distribution map for TiMM1 sample and SEM EDS scan

Fig. 12
figure 12

Maps of individual element distribution for TiMM1 sample and SEM EDS scan

Analysis of the map of a selected area of TiMM1 sample shows that the microstructure of alloy was determined by four elements—Fe, Cr, Ti, C; however, there are some light particles visible in the marked microstructure which were not detected by the analyzer. The chemical composition (in wt.%) measured in the analyzed area is 64.6% Fe, 18.6% Cr, 9.6% Ti and 7.2% C.

Particles with higher amount of Ti and C were identified as TiC particles. After execution of the linear analysis for those precipitations and light elements of the structure, the results presented in Fig. 13 were obtained.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Linear analysis of particles in TiMM1 sample and SEM EDS scan

High amounts of cerium and lanthanum can be observed on the light points, and close to those points, we can see M7C3 eutectic precipitations, along with TiC, which means that Ce and La compound can be used as an effective underlay for M7C3 carbides, as well as an underlay for titanium carbide particles crystallization.

Summary

Eutectic recalescence was eliminated in both inoculated samples, which proves that effective inoculation took place. In TiMM04 sample, TL, TS and TH temperatures were higher compared to W0 sample, which could indicate higher crystallization start potential. In TiMM1 sample, in case of ATD-Is tester, TL and TH had increased compared to W0 melt, while TS had decreased. In case of ATD-C tester, TL, TS and TH were lower than in W0 melt, which shows reduced crystallization start potential. In both inoculated samples, heat effects prior to TL were present. In the authors’ opinion, they can be related to TiC and Ce2O2S precipitation. Further studies will be carried out to confirm this theory.

In TiMM004 and TiMM1 samples, the average carbide area and length had significantly decreased, while the rounding in inoculated samples was greater compared to the W0 sample. The analysis indicates that inoculation took effect, potentially increasing their impact strength. The transformation of the matrix from mixture of alloy pearlite and austenite to austenite in TiMM1 sample can be linked to a phenomenon where grain refinement decreases starting temperature of martensitic transition broadening stability of austenitic matrix to a room temperature. In TiMM1 samples, addition of a large amount of Ti resulted in formation of TiC conglomerates, as TiC was not evenly distributed in the matrix. Uneven distribution of TiC should be avoided, as it could contribute to increased wear in areas without TiC, as well as it might cause cracks in areas with conglomerates due to their high hardness. Addition of different inoculating elements, such as RE, should be promoted, because it allows to enhance properties of the alloy without creating additional conglomerated phases.

Inoculated samples were characterized by decreased hardness, compared to W0 sample, due to carbide refinement and change in matrix from alloy pearlite to austenite.

Inoculated samples presented better wear resistance than non-inoculated W0 sample. The best wear resistance was demonstrated by TiMM1 sample, as it was 17% better than TiMM004 sample. The important question is, whether achieving 17% less wear is worth using over three times more expensive alloying elements. For some applications, it may be, but the decision depends on various factors, which should be considered when planning the use of this material, because low manufacturing cost is a vital factor in case of high chromium cast iron.

In SEM analysis, we can observe that TiC, Ce and La compounds are positioned adjacent to Cr7C3 carbides in TiMM004 and TiMM1 samples, which can indicate that both TiC and Ce2O2S work as an effective nucleus for crystallization of Cr7C3 carbides. The research also showed that Ce2O2S can work as a crystallization underlay for TiC. To substantiate that, it is necessary to conduct further studies including XRD analysis, image analysis and impact strength test.