Skip to main content
Log in

X-ray rocking curve analysis of ion implanted mercury cadmium telluride

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Junction formation by ion implantation is a critical step in producing high quality infrared focal plane arrays in mercury cadmium telluride (MCT). We have analyzed the structural properties of MCT implanted with B at doses of 1014 and 1015 cm−2 using double and triple crystal x-ray diffraction (DCD and TCD) to monitor the disorder and strain of the implanted region as a function of processing conditions. TCD (333) reflections show that a distinct tensile peak is produced by the high dose implant while the low dose implant shows only a low angle shoulder on the substrate peak. A preliminary association of the low angle shoulder with point defects has been made since no extended defects have been observed in the low dose range. For the high dose implant, extended defect formation has been reported and may be responsible for the tensile peak. After annealing, the low angle shoulder on the low dose implant has disappeared, while the high dose implant exhibits an increase in the tensile strain from 6.5 × 10−4 to 9.3 × 10−4 after 24 h of annealing and then decreases in tensile strain to 7.3 × 10−4 after 48 h of annealing. It is believed the changes in strain are associated with the Oswald ripening and dissolution of extended defects, which has been observed during annealing of ion implanted Si.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.G Robinson, D.H. Mao, B.L.Williams, S. Holander-Gleixner, J.E. Yu and C.R. Helms, J. Electron. Mater. 25,1336 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Holander-Gleixner, B.L. Williams, H.G. Robinson, and C.R. Helms, J. Electron. Mater. 26, 629 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Servidori and R. Fabbri, J. Phys. D 26, 22 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.R. Wie, Mater. Sci. Eng. R13, 1 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.K. Tanner, Adv. X-ray Anal. 33, 1 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.W. James, The optical principles of the diffraction of x-ray s, (Woodbridge, CN: Ox Box Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Declemy and P.O. Renault, Cryst. Growth 161,139 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Takagi, Acta Cryst. 15,1311 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P.H. Dedrichs, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 3, 471 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H.F. Schaake, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 2174 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. C.R. Wie, T.A. Tombrello and T. Vreeland, Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3743 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Berding, SRI/Stanford private communication, 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, B.L., Robinson, H.G., Helms, C.R. et al. X-ray rocking curve analysis of ion implanted mercury cadmium telluride. J. Electron. Mater. 26, 600–605 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-997-0201-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-997-0201-x

Key words

Navigation