Skip to main content
Log in

Mineralogical Aspects of Reducing Lump Iron Ore, Pellets, and Sinter with Hydrogen

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iron ore, pellets, and sinter were reduced with hydrogen at 800 °C to understand the degree of reduction and the mineralogical aspects. The weight loss of goethite and limonite iron ore was noticed to be lower than that of magnetite and hematite varieties. X-ray diffractometry (XRD) indicated 100 pct Fe in the case of hematite, 93 pct in magnetite, 53 pct in goethite, and as low as 15 pct in limonite. The phenomenon of cracking of pellets was not evidenced when reduced with hydrogen whereas cracks were noticed when reduced in 30 pct CO at 950 °C. Finer grains of 10 to 20 μm in the case of lump ore and 40 to 100 μm in the case of pellets were noticed. In the case of sinter, grain size up to 20 to 50 μm was noticed. A maximum Fe up to 96 pct in some locations in pellets and 99 pct in sinter was observed when reduced with hydrogen. Applications of hydrogen/hydrogen-rich gas in the sinter plant and COREX were discussed briefly in this article. A unique zebra pattern of magnetite and silico ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) was observed when hydrogen-rich coke oven gas was injected into the sinter bed. Magnetite formation in sinter was predominant and is attributed to the high diffusion rate of hydrogen.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

(adapted from Ref. [21])

Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

adapted from Ref. [38])

Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

COG:

Coke oven gas

DRI:

Direct reduced iron

EDS:

Energy dispersive spectroscope

EPMA:

Electron probe micro analyzer

FeOOH:

Goethite

FeOOH.H2O:

Limonite

FeO:

Wüstite

Fe2O3 :

Hematite

Fe3O4 :

Magnetite

GUR:

Gas utilization rate

LOI:

Loss on ignition

NTP:

Normal temperature and pressure

QEMSCAN:

Quantitative evaluation of materials by scanning electron microscopy

RDI:

Reduction degradation index

RI:

Reducibility index

SFCA:

Silico ferrite of calcium and aluminum

TI:

Tumbler index

XRD:

X-ray diffractometer

References

  1. Q. Hu, D.Y. Kim, W. Yang, L. Yang, Y. Meng, L. Zhang, and H.K. Mao: Nature., 2016, vol. 534, pp. 241–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Yamada, N. Suzuki, K. Nakata, C. Terashima, N. Matsushita, K. Okada, A. Fujishima, and K. Katsumata: Chemistry., 2020, vol. 26, pp. 2380–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Chen, C. Zeilstra, J. van der Stel, J. Sietsma, and Y. Yang: Ironmak. Steelmak., 2019, pp. 1–7.

  4. D. Spreitzer and J. Schenk: Steel Res. Int., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201900108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.N. Abu Tahari, F. Salleh, T.S. Tengku Saharuddin, A. Samsuri, S. Samidin, and M.A. Yarmo: Int. J. Hydrogen Energy., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Patisson and O. Mirgaux: Metals (Basel)., 2020, vol. 10, pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Abdelrahim, M. Iljana, M. Omran, T. Vuolio, H. Bartusch, and T. Fabritius: ISIJ Int., 2020, vol. 60, pp. 2206–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Qie, Q. Lyu, J. Li, C. Lan, and X. Liu: ISIJ Int., 2017, vol. 57, pp. 404–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Sun, B. Li, H. Guo, W. Yang, S. Li, and J. Guo: Energies., 2020, vol. 13, p. 5053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Sun, B. Li, W. Yang, J. Guo, and H. Guo: Energies., 2020, vol. 13, p. 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Wagner, O. Devisme, F. Patisson, and D. Ablitzer: Sohn Int. Symp. San Diego., 2006, vol. 2, pp. 111–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Hou, H. Zhang, H. Li, and Q. Zhu: Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2012, vol. 20, pp. 10–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Buergler and J. Prammer: BHM Berg- Huettenmaenn. Monatsh., 2019, vol. 164, pp. 447–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Buergler, S. Gmbh, C.O. Emissions, D. Reduction, B. Technology, P.E.M. Electrolyzer, and P. Smelting: pp. 2–5.

  15. D. Guo, M. Hu, C. Pu, B. Xiao, Z. Hu, S. Liu, X. Wang, and X. Zhu: Int. J. Hydrogen Energy., 2015, vol. 40, pp. 4733–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Bhaskar, M. Assadi, and H. Nikpey Somehsaraei: Energies., 2020, vol. 13, p. 758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Ji, H. Zhou, X. Fan, M. Gan, Q. Liu, X. Huang, X. Chen, and H. Li: Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 2020, vol. 135, pp. 91–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Murakami, T. Kodaira, and E. Kasai: ISIJ Int., 2015, vol. 55, pp. 1181–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Krüger, J. Andersson, S. Grönkvist, and A. Cornell: Int. J. Hydrogen Energy., 2020, vol. 45, pp. 29966–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Al-Kelesh and M.I. Nasr: Mater. Res., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A.V.B. Acharyulu, K. Sudhakar, G. Ramarao, A. Gowthaman, G. Thimmappa, L.R. Singh, and S.S. Baral: J. Sustain. Metall., 2021, pp. 1–15.

  22. X. Liu, C. Liu, B. Wang, and F. Ye: J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 2019, vol. 119, pp. 445–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Degen, M. Sadki, E. Bron, U. König, and G. Nénert: Powder Diffr., 2014, vol. 29, pp. S13–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. B.E. Monsen, E.S. Thomassen, I. Bragstad, E. Ringdalen, and P.H. Hoegaas: in AISTech - Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, 2015.

  25. G. Fritsch, W. Sterrer, and J. Wurm: in ABM Proceedings, Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração, 2013, pp. 229–41.

  26. N.A. El-Hussiny, I.A. Nafeaa, M.G. Khalifa, S.S. Abdel-Rahim, and M.E.H. Shalabi: Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 2016, vol. 7, pp. 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.A. El-Geassy and V. Rajakumar: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1985, vol. 25, pp. 1202–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. A.A. El-Geassy, M.I. Nasr, and M.M. Hessien: ISIJ Int., 1996, vol. 36, pp. 640–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Garant, G. Paquet, A. Audet, and S. Morris: in AISTech - Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, 2007.

  30. R. Béchara, H. Hamadeh, O. Mirgaux, and F. Patisson: Metals (Basel)., 2020, vol. 10, p. 367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Hammam, Y. Li, H. Nie, L. Zan, W. Ding, Y. Ge, M. Li, M. Omran, and Y. Yu: Min. Metall. Explor., 2021, vol. 38, pp. 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Dapiaggi, L. Pagliari, A. Pavese, L. Sciascia, M. Merli, and F. Francescon: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2015, vol. 35, pp. 4547–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. E. Bitay, I. Kacsó, C. Tănăselia, D. Toloman, G. Borodi, S.-P. Pánczél, Z. Kisfaludi-Bak, and E. Veress: Appl. Sci., 2020, vol. 10, p. 5373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Fuwa and S. Ban-Ya: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1969, vol. 9, pp. 137–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Sharma, R.C. Gupta, and B. Prakash: ISIJ Int., 1992, vol. 32, pp. 1268–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Kumar, H. Baghel, and S.K. Patel: Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev., 2013, vol. 34, pp. 249–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Longbottom and L. Kolbeinsen: Ulcos Semin. - New Direct Reduct., 2008, pp. 1–13.

  38. V.B. Angalakuditi, S. Karre, L.R. Singh, and S.S. Baral: Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2021, vol. 74, pp. 713–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Q.F. Hou, M. Samman, J. Li, and A.B. Yu: ISIJ Int., 2014, vol. 54, pp. 1772–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the teams of R&D QEMSCAN, EPMA, EDS, XRD, and Optical Microscopy Laboratories, QMC High-Temperature Laboratory, and Chemical Laboratory for their support. The authors thank the management of JSW and Birla Institute of Technology & Science for their encouragement and support for this research work.

Author Contributions

Paramesha Bhadravathi contributed the RDI test apparatus used for hydrogen reduction in the QMC Laboratory and conducting the laboratory tests. Ramarao Gujare contributed with QEMSCAN, EPMA, and EDS in the R&D Laboratories for characterization of the samples reduced in hydrogen. Gowthaman Ayyappan contributed with the XRD to detect FeO2 and phase analysis of various samples reduced in hydrogen. Lokendra Raj Singh organized the resources, consented to the study in COREX, supervised the experimental work, and validated the results. He provided resources for installing COG injection system in a sinter plant and helped in optimizing the process parameters. Saroj Sundar Baral supervised the entire work, guided through the manuscript writing and editing, and reviewed the research. Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, experimentation, formal analysis, and manuscript writing were done by the corresponding author, Veera Brahmacharyulu Angalakuditi.

Funding

There has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Data Availability

The data generated through experimentation at JSW Steel Ltd., Vijayanagar Works, are presented in this manuscript. We confirm that the data are an outcome of the recent research work. The figures and tables can be accessed with the cross-referenced hyperlinks in the manuscript. The data are available from the corresponding author. Experimental data are not available in any public domain but can be obtained from the corresponding author with permission.

Competing interests

We confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Ethical Approval

There are no human and animal data in this manuscript. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions, and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address that is accessible by the corresponding author and which has been configured to accept emails.

Consent for Publication

This manuscript does not contain any individual/person’s data. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, concerning intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We confirm to publish the data provided in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veera Brahmacharyulu Angalakuditi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angalakuditi, V.B., Bhadravathi, P., Gujare, R. et al. Mineralogical Aspects of Reducing Lump Iron Ore, Pellets, and Sinter with Hydrogen. Metall Mater Trans B 53, 1036–1065 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-022-02442-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-022-02442-4

Navigation