Skip to main content
Log in

Reaction Characteristics Between Sinter and Serpentine

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, adding an appropriate amount of serpentine into a blast furnace (BF) is considered to be a popular countermeasure to cope with the usage of iron ores with high Al2O3 content; this is because MgO in serpentine can improve the fluidity and desulphurization ability of BF slag with high Al2O3. Aimed to better understand the reaction characteristics between sinter and serpentine, a series of experiments were carried out between 1100 °C and 1300 °C under air atmosphere with a sinter to serpentine ratio between 100:1 and 100:6. The results indicated that higher temperatures and greater serpentine additions led to increased magnesioferrite formation. Samples with a sinter-to-serpentine ratio of 100:1 exposed to temperatures below 1300 °C did not have sufficient activation energy for diffusion to occur between the sinter and serpentine under the conditions to form magnesioferrite. But at 1300 °C, large amounts of magnesioferrite and silicate phases could be observed, and the major phases are magnesioferrite phase. At higher serpentine additions, where the sinter-to-serpentine ratio exceeded 100:3, the magnesioferrite reaction could be completed after reaching 1200 °C. Also, the serpentine first reacted with hematite followed by the reaction with SFCA (Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum). The SiO2 in the serpentine formed silicate phases with CaO/Fe2O3 in the sinter. The findings from this work may provide guidelines for adding serpentine into BF and improve the operational performances of BF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Sohn and D.J. Min: Steel Res. Int., 2012, vol. 83, pp. 611-620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J.H. Park and D.S. Kim: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2005, vol. 36B, pp. 495-502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Saito, N. Hori, K. Nakashima and K. Mori: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2003, vol. 34B, pp. 509-516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Shankar, M. Gornerup, A.K. Lahiri and S. Seetharaman: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2007, vol. 34, pp. 477-481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Q.L. Wen, F.M. Shen, H.Y. Zheng, J.Y. Yu, X. Jiang and Q.J. Gao: ISIJ Int., 2018, vol. 58, pp. 792-798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Yadav, B.D. Pandey, B.K. Das and D.N. Jena: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2002, vol. 29, pp. 91-95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ueda, T. Kon, T. Miki, S.J. Kim and H. Nogami: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, vol. 47B, pp. 2371-2377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F.M. Shen, H.Y. Zheng, X. Jiang, G. Wei and Q.L. Wen: Iron and Steel, 2014, vol. 49, pp. 1-6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C.H. Jiang, K.J. Li, J.L. Zhang, Q.H. Qin, Z.J. Liu, W. Liang, M.M. Sun and Z.M. Wang: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2019, vol. 50B, pp. 367-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F.M. Shen, X. Jiang, G. S. Wu, G. Wei, X.G. Li and Y.S. Shen: ISIJ Int., 2006, vol. 46, pp. 65-69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hayashi, H. Tanaka, T. Watanabe and M. Susa: ISIJ Int., 2017, vol. 57, pp. 2124-2130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Yang, X.M. Guo, N. Saito, K. Nakashima and J.T. Zhao: ISIJ Int., 2018, vol. 58, pp. 1406-1412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Umadevi, P.C. Mahapatra and M. Prabhu: Mineral Processing & Extractive Metallurgy, 2014, vol. 122, pp. 238-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Jang, X.D. Ma, J.M. Zhu, H.F. Xu, G. Wang and B.J. Zhao: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2017, vol. 48B, pp. 1547-1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Sunahara, K. Nakano, M. Hoshi, T. Inada, S. Komatsu and T. Yamamoto: Tetsu-to-Hagané, 2006, vol. 92, pp. 875-884.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Papanastassiou, P. Nicolaou and A. Send: Stahl Eisen, 2000, vol. 120, pp. 59-64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. P.C. Li and X.J. Ning: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, vol. 47B, pp. 446-457.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Cheremisina, J. Schenk, L. Nocke, A. Paul and G. Wimmer: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2019, vol. 50B, pp. 1269-1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B.Z. Ma, P. Xing, W.J. Yang, C.Y. Wang, Y.Q. Chen and H. Wang: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2017, vol. 48B, pp. 2037-2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kadrolkar, N.I. Andersson and N. Dogan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2017, vol. 48B, pp. 99-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y.F. Guo and X.M. Guo: ISIJ Int., 2017, vol. 57, pp. 228-235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J.G. Paik, M.J. Lee and S.H. Hyun: Thermochim. Acta., 2005, vol. 425, pp. 131-136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A.V. Zubets: Inorg. Mater., 2002, vol. 38, pp. 718-722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Wang, D.W. Yang, Z. Yang, R.S. Xu and M.M. Song: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2019, vol. 50B, pp. 678-687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H.M. Long, X.J. Wu, T.J. Chun, Z.X. Di and B. Yu: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, vol. 47B, pp. 2830-2836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N.A.S. Webster, M.I. Pownceby, I.C. Madsen, A.J. Studer, J.R. Manuel and J.A. Kimpton: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2014, vol. 45B, pp. 2097-2105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. X. Ding and X. M. Guo: Int. J. of Miner. Process., 2016, vol. 149, pp. 69-77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC 51874080 and NSFC 51974073) and the Youth Fund of Anhui University of Technology (RD17100210) is much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Jiang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript submitted August 11, 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, X., An, H., Han, H. et al. Reaction Characteristics Between Sinter and Serpentine. Metall Mater Trans B 51, 937–944 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01819-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01819-7

Navigation