Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction of Iron Oxide Fines to Wustite with CO/CO2 Gas of Low Reducing Potential

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reduction of iron oxide fines to wustite between 590 °C and 1000 °C with a CO–CO2 gas mixture of low reducing potential was studied. The reduction kinetics and the dominating reaction mechanism varied with the temperature, extent of reduction, and type of iron oxide. Reduction from hematite to wustite proceeded in two consecutive reaction steps with magnetite as an intermediate oxide. The first reduction step (hematite to magnetite) was fast and controlled by external gas mass transfer independently of the oxide type and the temperature employed. The second reduction step (magnetite to wustite) was the overall reaction-controlling step, and the reduction mechanism varied with the temperature and the oxide type. Moderately porous oxide fines followed the uniform internal reaction for the temperature range studied. For highly porous oxides, the second reduction step was controlled by external gas mass transfer above 700 °C. Below that temperature, a mixed regime that involves external gas mass transfer and limited mixed control, which comprises pore diffusion and chemical reaction, takes place. The rate equations for this mixed control reaction mechanism were developed, and the limited mixed control rate constant (klm) was computed. For denser oxides under uniform internal reaction, the product of the rate constant and pore surface area (k·S) was calculated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.T. Turkdogan and J.V. Vinters: Metall. Trans., 1971 vol. 2, pp. 3175-88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Turkdogan, E.T.: Metall. Trans. B, 1978, vol. 9, pp. 163-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Corbari and R.J. Fruehan: Carnegie Mellon University, unpublished research, 2004.

  4. R.J. Fruehan, K. Ito, and B. Ozturk: Trans. ISS: 1988, pp. 83–91.

  5. R.J. Fruehan: Trans. ISS, 2003, vol. 30 no. 2, pp. 48-60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.S. Sampaio, R.J. Fruehan and B. Ozturk: Trans. ISS, 1993, vol. 14, pp. 59-67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E.T. Turkdogan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1978, vol. 9, pp. 163-79.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.A. El-Geassy and M.I. Nasr: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1988, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 650-8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H.Y. Sohn and J. Szekely: Chem. Eng. Sci., 1972, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S.P. Trushenski, K. Li and W.O. Philbrook: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 1149-58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Szekely, J.W. Evans and H.Y. Sohn: Heterogeneous Reaction Kinetics, Academic Press, Washington, DC, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Szekely and J.W. Evans: Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 1691-711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. E.T. Turkdogan and J.V. Vinters: Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 1561-74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R.H. Spitzer, F.S. Manning and W. Philbrook: Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 1966, vol. 236, no. 5, pp. 726.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. W.M. Mckewan: Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Metall. Eng., 1958, vol. 212, pp. 791–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R.H. Tien and E.T. Turkdogan: Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 2039-48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. S.R. Story and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2000, vol. 31, pp. 43-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R.W. Pollard and R.D. Present: Phys. Rev., 1948, vol. 73, pp. 762-74.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G.R. Youngquist: Flow Through Porous Media, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Wheeler: Reaction Rates and Selectivity in Catalyst Pores, in Advances in Catalysis and Related Subjects, Academic Press, Washington, DC, 1951.

  21. T. Murayama, Y. Ono and Y. Kawai: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1977, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1099-107.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. R.D. Doherty, K.M. Hutchings, J.D. Smith and S. Yörük: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1985, vol. 16, pp. 425-32.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. H.Y. Sohn: Chem. Eng. Sci., 2004, vol. 59, pp. 4361-68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Piotrowski, K. Mondal, T. Wiltowski, P. Dydo and G. Rizeg: Chem. Eng. J., 2007, vol. 131, no. 1-3, pp. 73-82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Ariyama, S. Isozaki, S Matsubara, H. Kawata, K. Kondo and I. Kobayashi: J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1993, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 1323-28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Towhidi and J. Szekely: Metall. Trans. B, 1983, vol. 14, pp. 359-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Wagner, O. Devisme, F. Patisson, and D. Ablitzer: Sohn International Symp., San Diego, CA, 2006.

  28. N.A. Warner: Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 1964, vol. 230, pp. 163-76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Corbari: Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.

  30. P.B. Weisz and A.B. Schwartz: J. Catal., 1962, vol. 1, pp. 399-406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. R.M. German: Sintering Theory and Practice, Wiley, New York, NY, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the member companies of the Center for Iron and Steelmaking Research for the funding of this research. Iron oxide samples provided by Vale and the U.S. Steel Technology Center as well as laboratory analysis by Vesuvius Research also are appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Corbari.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted March 8, 2009.

APPENDIX: External Gas Mass Transfer Determination

APPENDIX: External Gas Mass Transfer Determination

The mass transfer coefficient of CO–CO2 (mCO-CO2) that was used to compute the reduction rate associated with external gas transfer was determined indirectly by measuring the evaporation rate of Mg under Argon-5 pct H2 and H2 at 625 °C. The equipment, flow and geometric conditions of the evaporation experiments were identical to those conditions of the iron oxide reduction. The results are shown in Figure A1.

Fig. A1
figure a

Weight loss of Mg powder as a function of time at 620 °C under a flow of 5 lpm of Ar-5 pct H2 and H2

The evaporation rate of magnesium in Argon (RMg-Ar), which is controlled by external gas phase mass transfer, is expressed in Eq. [A1], where mMg-Ar is the mass transfer coefficient of Mg in Argon, and p SMg and p BMg represent the partial pressure of Mg in the surface and bulk stream, respectively.

$$ {\frac{{dn_{\rm Mg} }}{dt}} = - {\frac{{m_{{\rm Mg} - i} \times A_{\delta } }}{\text{RT}}}(p_{\rm Mg}^{S} - p_{\rm Mg}^{B} ) $$
(A1)

Using Eq. A1, the mass transfer coefficient (m Mg-Ar) is calculated with the experimental evaporation rate and by taking Aδ as the crucible area; \( p_{\rm Mg}^{S} \) is calculated as the equilibrium vapor pressure of Mg, whereas \( p_{\rm Mg}^{B} \) is assumed to be negligibly small. The mass transfer coefficient of Mg–Ar at 625 °C then is extrapolated to the temperature range of interest (600 °C–1000 °C) and converted to mass transfer of CO–CO2 which accounts for the differences in gas diffusivities. This methodology was validated using the Mg–H2 evaporation results also shown in Figure A1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corbari, R., Fruehan, R. Reduction of Iron Oxide Fines to Wustite with CO/CO2 Gas of Low Reducing Potential. Metall Mater Trans B 41, 318–329 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-009-9315-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-009-9315-2

Keywords

Navigation