Skip to main content
Log in

A Case Study of Variation in Aluminum Smelting Cell Thermal State with Control Implications

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The thermal state of an aluminum smelting cell is determined principally by the following parameters: electrolyte temperature and excess aluminum fluoride concentration. Despite the attempts to control them within a predetermined specification range, large variations are observed. The focus of the present study is to identify the causes of the variation and recommend the solutions to minimize it. The task was accomplished by monitoring an industrial operating cell. The Apollo root cause analysis technique has been used to identify the underlying causes of the variation. Smelter’s response of addition of AlF3 in order to control the variation was one of the primary causes. The AlF3 addition to the cell should be based on its mass balance requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Grojtheim, B.J. Welch: Aluminum Smelter Technology, 2nd ed., Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Federal Republic of Germany, 1988, pp. 44–118

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.P. Taylor, B.J. Welch, J.T. Keniry: Light Metals, AIME, New York, NY, 1983, pp. 437–47

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.P. Taylor, B.J. Welch: Metall. Trans. B, 1987, vol. 18B, pp. 391–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.P. Taylor: Proc. Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, 1997, pp. 659–74

  5. M.P. Taylor, X. Liu, K.J. Fraser, B.J. Welch: Light Metals, AIME, New York, NY, 1990, pp. 259–66

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.N. Bruggeman: Proc. 6th Aust. Aluminum Smelting Workshop, Queenstown, New Zealand, 1998, pp. 167–90

  7. F.J. Stevens-McFadden: Proc. 6th Aust. Aluminum Smelting Workshop, Queenstown, New Zealand, 1998, pp. 289–320

  8. G.P. Tarcy: Proc. 5th Aust. Aluminum Smelting Workshop, Melbourne, Australia, 1995, pp. 139–60

  9. E.S. Page: Technometrics, 1961, vol. 3 (1), pp. 1–9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D.J. Wheeler: Advanced Topics in Statistical Process Control, SPC Press, Knoxville, TN, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Kvande and K. Grojtheim: in Introduction to Aluminum Electrolysis, K. Grojtheim, H. Kvande, eds., 2nd ed., Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Federal Republic of Germany, 1993, pp. 214–31

  12. G. Bearne, D. Whitfield: Light Metals, AIME, New York, NY, 2005, pp. 413–18

    Google Scholar 

  13. E.W. Dewing: Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 2699–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M.M. Hyland, E.C. Patterson, F. Stevens-McFadden, B.J. Welch: Scand. J. Metall., 2001, vol. 30, pp. 404–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. P. Taylor: Proc. 4th Aust. Aluminum Smelting Workshop, Sydney, Australia, 1992, pp. 720–32

  16. D.L. Gano: Apollo Root Cause Analysis, 1st ed., Apollonian Publications, Yakimna, Washington, 1999, pp. 35–110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Tandon.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted November 10, 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tandon, G., Taylor, M. & Chen, J. A Case Study of Variation in Aluminum Smelting Cell Thermal State with Control Implications. Metall Mater Trans B 38, 707–712 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-007-9074-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-007-9074-x

Keywords

Navigation