Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of stress state on cavitation during hot working of Ti-6Al-4V

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Notched-tension tests were conducted on Ti-6Al-4V samples with a colony-alpha microstructure to determine the effect of the stress state on cavitation during hot working of alpha/beta titanium alloys. The experiments were complemented by finite-element-method analyses to establish the local stress state, strain, and damage factor for different areas within each sample. A critical damage factor, defined by a modified Cockcroft-and-Latham criterion, was found to be applicable for the prediction of cavity initiation for the different notch geometries. Measured cavity growth rates were also correlated to the stress state (i.e., ratio of mean-to-effective stress, σ M e ) and compared to predictions of prior models. Model predictions showed reasonable agreement with measurements at low levels of stress triaxiality, but exhibited some deviations at higher values of σ M e . The differences were attributed to differences in the properties of the present material and those assumed in deriving the models as well as the neglect of cavity interaction in one of the models. The results were summarized in terms of a processing map, which delineates the initiation of cavities and their size as a function of the stress state and effective strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.D. Nicolaou, R.E. Bailey, and S.L. Semiatin: in Handbook of Workability and Process Design, G.E. Dieter, H.A. Kuhn, and S.L. Semiatin, eds., ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 2003, pp. 68–85.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.C. Bampton and J.W. Edington: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1983, vol. 105, pp. 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.B. Taylor, H.M. Zbib, and M.A. Khaleel: Int. J. Plasticity, 2002, vol. 18, pp. 415–42.

    Article  MATH  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M.M.I. Ahmed and T.G. Langdon: Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1832–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.J. Stowell: in Superplastic Forming of Structural Alloys, N.E. Paton and C.H. Hamilton, eds., TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1982, pp. 321–26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B.P. Kashyap and M.K. Mukherjee: Res. Mech., 1986, vol. 17, pp. 293–355.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.D. Nicolaou and S.L. Semiatin: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 613–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Verma, P.A. Friedman, A.K. Ghosh, S. Kim, and C. Kim: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1996, vol. 27A, pp. 1889–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Pilling and N. Ridley: in Superplasticity in Aerospace, H.C. Heikkenen and T.R. McNelley, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1988, pp. 183–97.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.Q. Tong and K.C. Chan: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2002, vol. A325, pp. 79–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D.J. Zhou, J. Lian, and M. Suery: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1988, vol. 4, pp. 348–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Agarwal, A.M. Gokhale, S. Graham, and M.F. Horstemeyer: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, vol. A341, pp. 35–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.W. Hancock and A.C. Mackenzie: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1976, vol. 14, pp. 107–69.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.D. Nicolaou, R.L. Goetz, J.D. Miller, and S.L. Semiatin: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2003, vol. 34A, pp. 2397–2400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. DEFORM TM Users Manual, Version 7.1, Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation, Columbus, OH, 1993.

  16. S.L. Semiatin, V. Seetharaman, and I. Weiss: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1998, vol. A243, pp. 1–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. S.L. Semiatin, V. Seetharaman, A.K. Ghosh, E.B. Shell, M.P. Simon, and P.N. Fagin: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1998, vol. A256, pp. 92–110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P.W. Bridgman: Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1952.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. M.G. Cockcroft and D.J. Latham: J. Inst. Met., 1968, vol. 96, pp. 33–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. S.L. Semiatin, R.L. Goetz, E.B. Shell, V. Seetharaman, and A.K. Ghosh: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1999, vol. 30A, pp. 1411–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. S.L. Semiatin, P.D. Nicolaou, T.R. Bieler, and A.K. Ghosh: Mater. Techn., 2002, Nos. 5–6, pp. 31–40.

  22. P.D. Nicolaou and S.L. Semiatin: Acta Mater., 2000, vol. 48, pp. 3441–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. P.D. Nicolaou and S.L. Semiatin: J. Mater. Sci., 2001, vol. 36, pp. 5155–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J.R. Rice and D.M. Tracey: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1969, vol. 17, pp. 201–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Pilling and N. Ridley: Acta Metall., 1986, vol. 34, pp. 669–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. T.R. Bieler and S.L. Semiatin: in Lightweight Alloys for Aerospace Applications VI (PDF Only Edition), K.V. Jata, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2001, pp. 161–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicolaou, P.D., Goetz, R.L. & Semiatin, S.L. Influence of stress state on cavitation during hot working of Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Mater Trans A 35, 655–663 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0377-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0377-0

Keywords

Navigation