Abstract
Based on the observation that, in a nanograined material, a significant portion of atoms resides in the grain-boundary region and grain-boundary activity plays a key role for its plastic behavior, a micromechanics-based composite model is developed to calculate the transition of yield stress as the grain size decreases from the coarse grain to the nanograin regime. The development makes use of a generalized self-consistent scheme in conjunction with the secant moduli of the constituent phases and a field-fluctuation approach. The constituent grains are modeled by inclusions with a grain-size-dependent plastic property and, in order to reflect the atomic sliding inside the grain boundaries observed in molecular dynamic simulations, the grain-boundary phase is modeled as a soft, ductile material with a pressure-dependent property. Applications of the developed model to a high-density copper showed the distinctive—some experimentally observed—features: (1) the yield stress initially increases following the Hall-Petch equation, but as the grain size reduces to the nanorange, it will depart and decrease; (2) when the grain size drops to a critical value (called the critical equicohesive grain size), the slope turns negative, (3) there is a tension-compression asymmetry (or strength-differential effect) in the yield stress, and (4) parametric calculations for materials whose grains deform only elastically indicate that the Hall-Petch plot will exhibit a continuously decreasing negative slope over the entire range of grain size. Further application of the theory to palladium in the nanorange shows a continuous decrease of the yield strength with decreasing grain size. It can be generally concluded that the range following the Hall-Petch equation is dominated by the deformation of the grains, and the range with a negative slope is controlled by the plasticity of the grain boundaries. During the transitional stage, both grains and grain boundaries deform competitively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.W. Siegel and G.F. Fougere: NanoStr. Mater. 1995, vol. 6, pp. 205–16.
H. Gleiter: Progs. Mater. Sci., 1989, vol. 33, pp. 223–315.
E.O. Hall: Proc. Phys. Soc., 1951, vol. B64, pp. 747–53.
N.J. Petch: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1953, vol. 174, pp. 25–28.
L. Lu, M.L. Sui, and K. Lu: Science, 2000, vol. 287, pp. 1463–66.
B.-N. Kim, K.K. Hiraga, K. Morita, and Y. Sakka: Nature, 2001, vol. 413, pp. 288–91.
A.H. Chokshi, A. Rosen, J. Karch, and H. Gleiter: Scripta Metall., 1989, vol. 23, pp. 1679–83.
P.G. Sanders, J.A. Eastman, and J.R. Weertman: Acta Mater., 1997(a), vol. 45, pp. 4019–25.
P.G. Sanders, C.J. Youngdahl, and J.R. Weertman: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1997(b), vols. A234–A236, pp. 77–82.
J. Schiotz, F.D. Di Tolla, and K.W. Jacobsen: Nature, 1998, vol. 391, pp. 561–63.
R.M. Christensen and K.H. Lo: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1979, vol. 27, pp. 315–30.
H. Gleiter: Acta Mater. 2000, vol. 48, pp. 1–29.
J.D. Eshelby, F.C. Frank, and F.R.N. Naborro: Phil. Mag., 1951, vol. 42, pp. 351–64.
H. Conrad, S. Feuerstein, and L. Rice: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1967, vol. A2, pp. 157–68.
R.L. Jones and H. Conrad: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1969, vol. 245, pp. 779–89.
G.J. Weng: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1983, vol. 31, pp. 193–203.
R. Hill: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1965, vol. 13, pp. 89–101.
M. Berveiller and A. Zaoui: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1979, vol. 26, pp. 325–44.
J. Schiotz, T. Vegge, F.D. Di Tolla, and K.W. Jacobsen: Phys. Rev. B, 1999, vol. 60, pp. 11971–83.
H. Van Swygenhoven and A. Caro: Appl. Phys. Lett., 1997, vol. 71, pp. 1652–54.
Y. Yamakov, D. Wolf, S.R. Phillpot, and H. Gleiter: Acta Mater., 2002, vol. 50, pp. 61–73.
P.E. Donovan: Acta Metall., 1989, vol. 37, pp. 445–56.
D.C. Drucker: Q. Appl. Math, 1950, vol. 7, pp. 411–18.
Z. Hashin: J. Appl. Mech., 1962, vol. 29, pp. 143–50.
Z. Hashin and S. Shtrikman: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1963, vol. 11, pp. 127–40.
G.J. Weng: Int. J. Eng. Sci., 1984, vol. 22, pp. 845–56.
H.A. Lo and G.J. Weng: Mech. Mater., 1987, vol. 6, pp. 347–61.
G.P. Tandon and G.J. Weng: J. Appl. Mech., 1988, vol. 55, pp. 126–35.
R. Hill: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1963, vol. 11, pp. 357–72.
M. Bobeth and G. Diener: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1986, vol. 34, pp. 1–17.
W. Kreher and W. Pompe: Internal Stress in Heterogeneous Solids, Akademie, Berlin, 1989.
G.K. Hu: Int. J. Plasticity, 1996, vol. 12, pp. 439–49.
T.H. Courtney: Mechanical Behavior of Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2000, p. 60.
Z. Jeffries: Trans. AIME, 1919, vol. 60, p. 474.
C. Crussard and R. Tamhankar: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1958, vol. 212, pp. 718–30.
M.A. Meyers, D.J. Benson, and H.-H. Fu: in Advanced Materials for the 21st Century: The 1999 Julia R. Weertman Symp., Y.-W. Chung, D.C. Dunand, P.K. Liaw, and G.B. Olson, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1999, pp. 499–512.
M.A. Meyers and E. Ashworth: Phil. Mag., 1982, vol. A46, pp. 737–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, B., Weng, G.J. A composite model for the grain-size dependence of yield stress of nanograined materials. Metall Mater Trans A 34, 765–772 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0111-3
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0111-3