Abstract
To assess the current level of acceptance in the United States of complementary and alternative medicine, recent research into the prevalence, acceptance, accessibility, and recognition of complementary and alternative therapies were reviewed. Several signs point to an increasing acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine in the United States; the use of complementary and alternative medicine is significantly increasing, many aspects of Chinese medicine and Ayurveda are becoming mainstream, practitioners in the United States are beginning to be licensed, and insurance companies are beginning to cover some complementary and alternative therapies. Remaining challenges to true acceptance include the restrictive Western mindset, the absence of published studies, a lack of consistent manufacturing processes and quality standards, and a fear of adulteration. Although the field still faces many challenges, alternative and complementary medicine, including Chinese medicine and Ayurvedic medicine, is becoming more accepted and accessible in the United States.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998;280:1569–1575.
Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin R. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States. CDC National Health Statistics Report # 12, 2007.
Baer HA, Jen C, Tanassi LM, Tsia C, Wahben H. The drive for professionalization in acupuncture: A preliminary view from the San Francisco Bay area. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:533–537.
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation & Health Research and Educational Trust. Employer health benefits 2004 annual survey, 2004.
Graziose R, Lila MA, Raskin I. Merging traditional Chinese medicine with modern drug discovery techologies to find novel drugs and functional foods. Curr Drug Discov Technol 2010;7:2–12.
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Traditional Chinese medicine: An introduction. 2010. Retrieved from http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/chinesemed.htm, 24, 2010.
Hung OL, Shih RD, Chiang WK, Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Goldfrank LR. Herbal preparation use among urban emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:209–213.
Mano KEJ, Davies WH. Parental attitudes toward acupuncture in a community sample. J Altern Complement Med 2009;15:661–668.
Yang LH, Corsini-Munt S, Link BG, Phelan JC. Beliefs in traditional Chinese medicine efficacy among Chinese Americans. J Nerv Ment Dis 2009;197:207–210.
Jain N, Astin JA. Barriers to acceptance: An exploratory study of complementary/alternative medicine disuse. J Altern Complement Med 2001;7:689–696.
Mamtani Ravinder & Mamtani Ronac. Ayurveda and yoga in cardiovascular diseases. Cardiol Rev 2005;13:155–162.
Saper RB, Kales SN, Paquin J, Burns MJ, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, et al. Heavy metal content of ayurvedic herbal medicine products. JAMA 2004;292:2868–2873.
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Ayurvedic medicine: An introduction. 2009. Retrieved from http://nccam.nih.gov/health/ayurveda/introduction.htm, 24, 2010.
van Vleck S. Insurance coverage of complementary and alternative medicine. Synapse 1998;44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, J.J., Beckman-Harned, S., Cho, G. et al. The current acceptance, accessibility and recognition of Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine in the United States in the public, governmental, and industrial sectors. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 18, 405–408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-012-1110-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-012-1110-2