Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neue TNM-Klassifikation beim Endometriumkarzinom

Konsequenzen für die Behandlung

  • Topic
  • Published:
best practice onkologie Aims and scope

Das Endometriumkarzinom ist in Deutschland mit über 11.000 Neuerkrankungen pro Jahr das vierthäufigste Malignom der Frau. Es hat einen Anteil von 5,1 % an bösartigen Neuerkrankungen der Frau. Der Altersgipfel liegt zwischen 65 und 85 Jahren, mit ansteigender Tendenz angesichts der demographischen Entwicklung wie auch einer Zunahme der Adipositas. Die relative 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate liegt in Deutschland bei ca. 79 % [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

1
2

Literatur

  1. GEKID/RKI (2012) Krebs in Deutschland 2007/2008. Endometriumkarzinom. RKI, Berlin

  2. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (Hrsg) (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

  3. Creasman W (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105: 109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fanning J, Alvarez PM, Tsukada Y, Piver MS (1991) Prognostic significance of the extent of cervical involvement by endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 40: 46–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sartori E, Gadducci A, Landoni F et al (2001) Clinical behavior of 203 stage II endometrial cancer cases: the impact of primary surgical approach and of adjuvant radiation therapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11: 430–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewin SN, Herzog TJ, Barrena Medel NI, et al (2010) Comparative performance of the 2009 international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics' staging system for uterine corpus cancer. Obstet Gynecol 116: 1141–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Straughn JM Jr, Huh WK, Kelly FJ et al (2002) Conservative management of stage I endometrial carcinoma after surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 84: 194–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan JK, Wu H, Cheung MK, et al (2007) The outcomes of 27,063 women with unstaged endometrioid uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 106: 282–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abu-Rustum NR, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, et al (2011) The revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: should the 1988 FIGO stages IA and IB be altered? Int J Gynecol Cancer 21: 511–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al (1987) Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 60(8 Suppl): 2035–2041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kommission Uterus der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V. in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e. V. sowie in der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft eV. Interdisziplinäre S2K-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik und Therapie des Endometriumkarzinoms. (Registernummer 032–034). http: //www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/032-034.html. Aktualisierte Empfehlungen (2013). http://www.ago-online.de/fileadmin/downloads/leitlinien/uterus/empfehlungen_diagnostik_therapie_EC.pdf

  12. Barton DP, Naik R, Herod J (2009) Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC Trial): a randomized study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19: 1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al (2008) Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 1707–1716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith DC, Macdonald OK, Lee CM, Gaffney DK (2008) Survival impact of lymph node dissection in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18: 255–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, et al (2010) Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet 375(9721): 1165–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zorlu CG, Simsek T, Ari ES (2005) Laparoscopy or laparotomy for the management of endometrial cancer. JSLS 9: 442–446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A (2005) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12: 130–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fram KM (2002) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12: 57–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F et al (2009) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 112: 126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zullo F, Palomba S, Falbo A et al (2009) Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200: 296.e1–e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohn DE, Woeste EM, Cacchio S, et al (2007) Clinical and pathologic correlates in surgical stage II endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 109: 1062–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nout RA, Putter H, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, et al (2009) Quality of life after pelvic radiotherapy or vaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer: first results of the randomized PORTEC-2 trial. J Clin Oncol 27: 3547–3556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, et al (2004) A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 92: 744–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H et al (2006) Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 24: 36–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Susumu N, Sagae S, Udagawa Y et al (2008) Randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 108: 226–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Greven K, Winter K, Underhill K et al (2006) Final analysis of RTOG 9708: adjuvant postoperative irradiation combined with cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy following surgery for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103: 155–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hogberg T (2008) Adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: overview of randomised trials. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 20: 463–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neubergstr. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland

    P. Hillemanns

Authors
  1. P. Hillemanns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Hillemanns.

Additional information

Einhaltung der ethischen Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. P. Hillemanns, H. Hertel und T.-W. Park-Simon geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hillemanns, P. Neue TNM-Klassifikation beim Endometriumkarzinom. best practice onkologie 8, 22–27 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11654-013-0102-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11654-013-0102-9

Search

Navigation