Abstract
Clinical outcome, economics aspects and life quality are compared in a significant population of elderly patients with neck fracture.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of a retrospective series of primary arthroplasty with a cementless dual mobility socket versus emyarthroplasty in ederly patients with neck fractures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliografia
Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G (2008) Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup; minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 THA. Revue Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 94:731–739
Aubriot P (1993) Study on cementless Bousquet type cup in one hundred hybrid total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg 59(Suppl 1):267–271
Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP (2000) Charnley-Kerboull-Bousquet hybrid THR after 10 years total hip arthroplasty. In: 3rd international symposium
Katz JN, Phillis CB, Poss R (1995) The validity and reliability of a THA outcome evaluation questionnaire. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1528–1534
Conflitto di interessi
Nessuno.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Amato, P.A., Gambardella, A. & Scotto di Luzio, A. Studio retrospettivo comparato su due popolazioni di pazienti affetti da frattura mediale di collo femore: emiartroplastica versus PTA a doppia mobilità. LO SCALPELLO 27, 59–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-013-0029-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-013-0029-5