Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The assessment of heavy metal pollution in river sands of Jalingo, Nigeria using magnetic proxy parameters, pollution, and ecotoxicological indices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Geochimica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of environmental magnetic properties and metal contents of sands from Nukkai (NKR), Mayo-Gwoi (RMYG) and Lamurde (LR) rivers located in Jalingo, Nigeria are reported. We seek to determine the extent of anthropogenic impact on the river sands using magnetic-proxy-parameters, pollution and ecotoxicological indices and multivariate statistics. Measurements of magnetic susceptibility χ, frequency-dependent susceptibility χfd%, anhysteric remanent magnetization, isothernal remanent magnetization and X-ray fluorescence were undertaken. The average values of the χ (in × 10–8 m3 kg−1) were 24.53, 12.76 and 39.27 for NKR, RMYG and LR sites respectively, implying that the magnetic minerals in the sands were mostly ferrimagnetic. The mean χfd% value of 2.64%, 4.85% and 3.53% for NKR, RMYG and LR respectively suggest that the study area was dominated by multi-domain magnetic grain sizes. The value of the S-ratio is ~ 1 in all river samples, suggesting that low coercivity magnetic minerals (e.g., magnetite) dominated the samples. The mean concentrations of Ti, Zr, Sn, Ba and Pb were higher than the background values in the studied samples. All the estimated pollution indices puts the level of pollution of the river sands between low and moderate pollution with Sn, Ba and Pb as the elements of concern. Multiple sources of metal contents such as fertilizers, pesticides, waste dumps and vehicular sources etc. were found. Significant positive correlations between magnetic parameters (particularly, SIRM) and some heavy metals and pollution/ecotoxicological indices were obtained, showing that magnetic methods could be used as a geochemical proxy for pollution assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Any additional data and material in respect of this manuscript will be made available on request.

References

  • Abraham GMS, Parker RJ (2008) Assessment of heavy metal enrichment factors and the degree of contamination in marine sediments from Tamaki Estuary, Auckland, New Zealand. Environ Monit Assess 136:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asanulla RM, Radhakrishna T, Venkatachalapathy R, Manoharan C, Soumya GS, Sutharsan P (2017) Rock magnetic and geomagnetic field strength of the rare Iron Age (300–500 BC) artifacts from Tamilnadu: the first Virtual Axial Dipole Moment determination from India. Geo Res J 14:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • ATSDR (2005) Public health statement, tin and tin compounds. www.atsdr.cdc.gov/. Accessed 15 Jul 2020

  • Basavaiah N (2011) Geomagnetism: solid earth and upper atmosphere perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benson NU, Adedapo AE, Fred-Ahmadu OH, Williams AB, Udosen ED, Ayejuyo OO, Olajire AA (2018) New ecological risk indices for evaluating heavy metals contamination in aquatic sediment: a case study of the Gulf of Guinea. Reg Stud Mar Sci 18:44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Canbay M (2010) Investigation of the relationship between heavy metal contamination of soil and its magnetic susceptibility. Int J Phys Sci 5(5):393–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Cempel M, Nikel GN (2006) A review of its sources and environmental toxicology. Pol J Environ Stud 15:375–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan LS, Ng SL, Davis AM, Yim WWS, Yeung CH (2001) Magnetic properties and heavy metal contents of contaminated seabed sediments of Penny’s Bay, Hong Kong. Mar Poll Bull 42:569–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro MAE, Sinito AM, Ramasamy V, Marinelli C, Chaparro MAE, Mullainathan S, Murugesan S (2008) Magnetic measurements and pollutants of sediments from Cauvery and Palaru River, India. Environ Geol 56:425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng JL, Shi Z, Zhu YW (2007) Assessment and mapping of environmental quality in agricultural soils of Zhejiang province, China. J Environ Sci 19:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing JA (1999) Environmental magnetic susceptibility, using the Bartington MS2 system, 2nd edn. Chi Publishing, England

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Alfy MA, El-Amier YA, El-Eraky TE (2020) Land use/cover and ecotoxicology indices for identifying metal contamination in sediments of drains, Manzala Lake, Egypt. Heliyon 6:e03177. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjheliyon.2020.e03177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans ME, Heller F (2003) Environmental magnetism: principles and application of enviromagnetics. International geophysical series, vol 86. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng H, Hang HY, Gao WS, Weinstein MP, Zhang WG, Yu LZ, Yuan DK, Tao JH (2011) Metal contamination in the sediments of the Western Bohai Bay and adjacent estuaries, China. J Environ Manag 92:1185–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke C, Kissel C, Robin E, Bonté P, Lagroix F (2009) Magnetic particle characterization in the seine river system: implications for the determination of natural versus anthropogenic input. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 10:Q08Z05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Du F, Li W, Han J, Wang X, Bao J et al (2016) Content and accumulation characteristics of heavy metals in dominant plants in Xiao Bai He Area of the Yellow River Wetland. J Agro-Environ Sci 35(11):2180–2186. https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2016-0335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiss CE (1999) The development of rock magnetic proxies for paleomagnetic reconstruction. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota

  • Guan Q, Wang F, Xu C, Pan N, Lin J, Zhao R, Yang Y, Luo H (2018) Source apportionment of heavy metals in agricultural soils based on PMF: a case study in Hexi Corridor, northwest China. Chemosphere 193:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson L (1980) An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. a sedimentological approach. Water Res 14:975–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu XF, Su Y, Ye R, Li XQ, Zhang GL (2007) Magnetic Properties of the urban soils in Shanghai and their environmental implications. CATENA 70:428–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7(2):60–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H-H, Cai L-M, Wien H-H, Hu G-C, Chen L-G, Lao J (2020) An integrated approach to quantifying ecological and human health risks from different sources of soil heavy metals. Sci Total Environ 70:134466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordanova D, Veneva L, Hoffmann V (2003) Magnetic susceptibility screening of anthropogenic impact on the Danube River sediments in Northwestern Bulgaria- Preliminary results. Stud Geophys Geod 47:403–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanu MO, Basavaiah N, Meludu OC, Oniku AS (2017) Investigating the potential of using environmental magnetism techniques as pollution proxy in urban road deposited sediment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:2745–2758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1356-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlim R, Lyle M, Ross HG (1987) Authigenic magnetite formation in suboxic marine sediments. Nature 326:490–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knab M, Hoffmann V, Petrovský E, Kapička A, Jordanova N, Appel E (2006) Surveying the anthropogenic impact of the Moldau river sediments and nearby soils using magnetic susceptibility. Environ Geol 49:527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalska JB, Mazurek R, Gasiorek M, Zaleski T (2018) Pollution indices as useful tools for the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of soil contamination–a review. Environ Geochem Health 40:2395–2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0106-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SB, Padhi RK, Mohanty AK, Satpathy KK (2016) Elemental distribution and trace metal contamination in the surface sediment of south east coast of India. Mar Pollut Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepland A, Stevens RL (1996) Mineral magnetic and textural interpretations of sedimentation in the Skagerrak, eastern North Sea. Mar Geol 135:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Feng C, Zeng G, Gao X, Zhong M, Li X, Li X, He X, Fang Y (2017). Spatial distribution and source identification of heavy metals in surface soils in a typical coal mine city, Lianyuan, China. Environ. Pollut 225:681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu N, Zeng J, Li X, Hou Z, Xie Y (2015) Characteristics and potential ecological risk of heavy metals in wetland soils around East Dongting Lake. Res Agric Mod 36(5):901–905. https://doi.org/10.13872/j.1000-0275.2015.0081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long ER, Ingersoll CG, MacDonald DD (2006) Calculation and uses of mean sediment quality guideline quotients: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 40:1726–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loska K, Wiechula D (2003) Application of principle component analysis for the estimation of source of heavy metal contamination in surface sediments from the Rybnik Reservoir. Chemosphere 51:723–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovely DR, Stolz JF, Nord GL Jr, Philips EJP (1987) Anaerobic production of magnetite by a dissimilatory iron-reducing microorganism. Nature 330:279–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons R, Oldfield F, Williams E (2010) Mineral magnetic properties of surface soils and sands across four North African transects and links to climatic gradients. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 11:Q08023. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher BA, Taylor RM (1988) Formation of ultrafine grained magnetite in soils. Nature 336:368–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariyanto M, Amir MF, Utama W, Hamdan AM, Bijaksana S, Pratama A, Yunginger R, Sudarningsih S (2019) Heavy metal contents and magnetic properties of surface sediments in volcanic and tropical environment from Brantas River, Jawa Timur Province, Indonesia. Sci Total Environ 675:632–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masri S, LeBron AMW, Logue MO, Valencia E, Ruiz A, Reyes A, Wu J (2021) Risk assessment of soil heavy metal contamination at the census tract level in the city of Santa Ana, CA: implications for health and environmental justice. Environ Sci Process Impacts 23:812–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller G (1969) Index of geo-accumulation in sediments of the Rine River. Geo J 2(3):108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller G (1981) The heavy metal pollution of the sediments of neckars and its tributaries: an inventory. Chem Zeitung 105:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Novakova T, Grygar TM, Babek O, Famera M, Mihaljevic M, Strnad L (2013) Distinguishing Regional and local sources of pollution by trace metals and magnetic particles in fluvial sediments of the morava river, Czech Republic. J Soils Sediments 13:460–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obaje NG (2009) Geology and mineral resources of Nigeria, Lecture notes in Earth sciences, vol 120. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92685-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield F, Hunt A, Jones MDH, Chester R, Dearing JA, Olsson L, Prospero JM (1985) Magnetic differentiation of atmospheric dusts. Nature 317:516–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panaiotu CG, Necula C, Panaiotu CE, Axente V (2005) A magnetic investigation of heavy metals pollution in Bucharest. In: Ionel I (ed) Sustainability for humanity & environment in the extended connection field science-economy-policy, Scientific reunion of the special program of Alexander von Humbold Foundation concerning the reconstruction of the South Eastern Europe, Editura Politehnica, Timisoara. ISBN 973.625-204-3

  • Pobi KK, Satpati S, Dutta S, Nayek S, Saha RN, Gupta S (2019) Sources evaluation and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals accumulated within a natural stream of Durgapur industrial zone, India, by using multivariate analysis and pollution indices. Appl Water Sci 9:58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-0946-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DJ, Taylor KG, Hoon SR (2003) Geochemical and mineral magnetic characterisation of urban sediment particulates, Manchester, U.K. Appl Geochem 18:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick RL, Gao S (2014) 4.1-Composition of the continental crust. In: Holland H, Turekian K (eds) Treatise on geochemistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00301-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Senesi GS, Baldassarre G, Senesi N, Radina B (1999) Trace element inputs into soils by anthropogenic activities and implications for human health. Chemosphere 39(2):343–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid M, Ferrand E, Schreck E, Dumat C (2013) Behavior and impact of Zirconium in the soil-plant system: plant uptake and phytoxicity. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 221:107–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiteri C, Kalinski V, Rosler W, Hoffmann V, Appel E, MAXPROX Team (2005) Magnetic screening of a pollution hotspot in the Lausitz Area, Eastern Germany: correlation analysis between magnetic proxies and heavy metal contamination in soils. Environ Geol 49:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surdarningsih LM, Bijaksana S, Hafidz A, Pratama AW, Iskandar I (2017) Magnetic characterization of sand and Boulder samples from Citarum river and their origin. J Math Fund Sci 49(2):116–126. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.math.fund.sci.2017.49.2.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Oldfield F (1986) Environmental magnetism. Allen and Unwin, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Togibasa O, Bijaksana SI, Novala GC (2018) Magnetic properties of iron sand from the Tor River Estuary, Sarmi, Papua. Geosciences 8:113. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varol M (2011) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) using pollution indices and multivariate statistical techniques. J Hazard Mater 195:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschot IHM (2001) Chemical distinction between lithogenic and pedogenic iron oxides in environmental magnetism. Ph.D. thesis, Univesiteit Utrecht

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Veerasingam S, Basavaiah N, Ramkumar T, Deenadayalan K (2011) Environmental magnetic and geochemical characteristics of Chennai coastal sediments, Bay of Bengal, India. J Earth Syst Sci 120(5):885–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Rajeswari V, Basavaiah N, Balasubramanian T (2013) Environmental magnetic studies on surface sediments: a proxy for metal and hydrocarbon contamination. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0355-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walden J, Oldfield F, Smith J (eds) (1999) Environmental magnetism: a practical guide, technical guide, No. 6, Quaternary Research Association, London

  • Warrier AK, Shankar R (2009) Geochemical evidence for the use of magnetic susceptibility as a paleorainfall proxy in the tropics. Chem Geol 265:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Sun Y, Li S, Wang H (2019) Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in soil from the Raoyanghe Wetland, China. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0220409. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedepohl KH (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59(7):1217–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Sun Q, Yi L, Yin X, Wang A, Li Y, Chen J (2014) The source of natural and anthropogenic heavy metals in the sediments of the Minjiang River Estuary (SE China): implications for historical pollution. Sci Total Environ 493:729–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Wang M, Lu H, Ding Z, Liu J, Yan C (2019) Magnetic properties and correlation with heavy metals in mangrove sediments, the case study on the coast of Fujian, China. Mar Pollut Bull 146:865–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Liu Q, Li H, Zeng Q, Chan L (2010) Anthropogenic magnetic particles and heavy metals in the road dust: Maggnetic identification and its implications. Atmospheric Environ 44:1175–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Liu CJ (2002) Riverine composition of estuarine geochemistry of particulate metals in China—weathering features, anthropogenic impact and chemical fluxes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 54:1051–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Qiao Q, Piper JDA, Huang B (2011) Assessment of heavy metal pollution from Fe-smelting plant in urban river sediments using environmental magnetic and geochemical methods. Environ Pollut 159:3057–3070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang FS, Li YX, Yang M, Li N (2012) Content of heavy metals in animal feeds and manures from farms of different scales in northeast China. J Environ Res Public Health 9:2658–2668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YQ, Pang LL, Yan P, Liu DY, Zhang W, Yost R, Zhang FS, Zou CQ (2013) Zinc fertilizer placement affects zinc content in maize plant. Plant Soil 372:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1904-9doi:

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the Director, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Mumbai, India who granted the permission to use the Environmental Magnetism laboratory where all measurements were taken. The assistance rendered by the Environmental Magnetism Research Group most specifically Prof. N. Basavaiah, Drs. Deena K. and P. K. Das is hereby acknowledged.

Funding

No funding was received for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Taraba State University, P.M.B. 1167, Jalingo, Taraba State, Nigeria

    Maxwell O. Kanu

  2. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Cross River University of Technology, P.M.B. 1123, Calabar, Nigeria

    Augustine A. Abong

Authors
  1. Maxwell O. Kanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Augustine A. Abong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxwell O. Kanu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 772 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanu, M.O., Abong, A.A. The assessment of heavy metal pollution in river sands of Jalingo, Nigeria using magnetic proxy parameters, pollution, and ecotoxicological indices. Acta Geochim 41, 1083–1103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-022-00564-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-022-00564-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation