Abstract
Brassavola nodosa (L.) Lindl. is an epiphytic orchid with great potential for the ornamental plant industry. The lack of information on propagation and production techniques limits the development of large-scale commercial production. Furthermore, this species is experiencing a reduction in population due to habitat destruction, the impact of climate change, and over-collection from native habitats. This study aimed at developing an efficient protocol for micropropagation of B. nodosa, which could be valuable towards the large-scale commercial production as well as for conservation of this species. Six different concentrations of plant growth regulators (BA or IBA, with or without adenine sulfate) were evaluated in modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium for shoot multiplication. In addition, two concentrations of either NAA or IBA were evaluated for rooting. Explants were cultured under three different culture media conditions: semi-solid medium, liquid medium (partial immersion), and liquid medium (complete immersion). Results indicate that B. nodosa could be successfully micropropagated in liquid culture with partial immersion. The modified MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L−1 BA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate resulted in higher multiplication rates. Rooting was obtained using either 0.5 mg L−1 NAA or 1.0 mg L−1 IBA with no significant differences between both rooting treatments. Plantlets achieved 100% ex vitro survival after 30-d acclimatization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The Orchidaceae is a family of flowering plants with unique diversity and beauty placing them among the top commercialized cut flower or potted flowering plants in the international market (Vendrame 2018). With about 30,000 to 35,000 estimated known species within over 850 genera and over 160,000 hybrids developed, they represent about 10% of all flowering plants (Roberts and Dixon 2008; Vendrame and Khoddamzadeh 2017; Vendrame 2018). Their specialized floral morphology, structure, and physiological properties have always fascinated people making them very popular worldwide (Arditti 1992). Nevertheless, the Orchidaceae features a high proportion of threatened species due to the destruction of natural habitat, the impact of climate change, and over-collection from natural habitats (Swarts and Dixon 2009; Reed et al. 2011; Mengarda et al. 2017). Among threatened orchid species, Brassavola nodosa (L.) Lindl. is an epiphytic orchid found from Mexico through Central America to Venezuela and Peru (Jones 1975; Mata-Rosas and Lastre-Puertos 2015). Their inflorescence is very fragrant at night from whence it gained its common name as the “Lady of the Night.” Some characteristics of this plant, such as fragrant flowers, low maintenance, year-round blooming, and unique flower shape, make it an excellent candidate for the commercial ornamental industry. However, large-scale commercial production is limited due to its recalcitrant propagation nature. Brassavola orchids propagate through branching, pseudobulbs, and seeds. Their natural germination is very low, and propagation by branching or pseudobulbs is time-consuming (Mengarda et al. 2017).
Micropropagation or in vitro propagation could be a feasible alternative for the propagation of B. nodosa (Chugh et al. 2009; Phillips and Garda 2019), thus allowing mass rapid multiplication of plants for commercial use (Kumar and Reddy 2011; Bhoite and Palshikar 2014). In addition, in vitro culture allowed the production of pathogen-free orchids and germplasm storage, and is indispensable to breeding and genetic improvement programs (Bhoite and Palshikar 2014). A number of protocols have been developed for the micropropagation of orchids, including Anoectochillus, Arundina, Cymbidium, Dendrobium, Doritaenopsis, Phalaenopsis, Paphiopedilum, Vanda, and Vanilla, among many others (Griesbach 1986; Jones and Tisserat 1990; Arditti and Ernst 1993; Tokuhara and Mii 1993; Kyte and Kleyn 1996; Devi et al. 1997; Pierik 1997; Tisserat and Jones 1999; Kalimuthu et al. 2006; Chugh et al. 2009; Neumann et al. 2009; Alam et al. 2010; Khoddamzadeh et al. 2011; Paek et al. 2011; Panwar et al. 2012; Zeng et al. 2014; Divakaran et al. 2015; Teixeira da Silva et al. 2015; Rodrigues et al. 2015; 2014; Vendrame and Khoddamzadeh 2017).
Although orchid micropropagation has shown spectacular development in recent years, some hard to propagate genera, such as Brassavola, still remain a challenge. The few studies available on the genus Brassavola include aspects of in vitro germination of Brassavola perrinii hybrid (Chiapim et al. 2012) and B. tuberculata (Soares et al. 2020; Sousa et al. 2020), micropropagation of a Brassavola hybrid (Villa et al. 2014), and acclimatization of in vitro-derived plantlets (Sousa et al. 2015) and in vitro shoot production (Mengarda et al. 2017) of B. tuberculata. In addition, no published reports are available on in vitro establishment and propagation of B. nodosa. Most recently, some studies have showed improved efficiency of orchid micropropagation in liquid culture (Young et al. 2000; Leyva-Ovalle et al. 2020). Liquid culture systems may offer some advantages over semi-solid media in in vitro systems improving plant growth and development and providing higher rates of multiplication and the potential of reduction in manipulation and labor costs via automation (Ziv 2000). The use of liquid cultures also allows better uniformization and distribution of nutrients, including easy renewal of media, the ability to use larger containers, and reduced number of subcultures needed, (Etienne and Berthouly 2002).
Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate different in vitro culture systems by comparing liquid and semi-solid media under different concentrations of plant growth regulators (PGRs) for in vitro propagation of Brassavola nodosa. Rooting of in vitro shoots and acclimatization of in vitro-derived plantlets were also evaluated.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material
Brassavola nodosa ‘Remar’ x ‘Mas Mejor’ hybrid seeds were surface sterilized using 70% ethanol (Decon Labs, Inc., King of Prussia, PA) for 1 min followed by 0.8% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) for 5 min. Subsequently, seeds were rinsed three times in sterile water and germinated on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962, Phytotechnology Laboratories, Lenexa, KS) supplemented with 15 g L−1 sucrose (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 7 g L−1 agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.7 before autoclaving at 121 °C and 15 lbs pressure for 20 min. The medium was dispensed in 100-mm × 15-mm disposable Petri dishes (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 60 d, when seeds germinated and protocorms developed 1 to 2 leaves and roots, seedlings were transferred to MS medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose and 7 g L−1 agar in RA40 Microboxes (Sac O2, Deinze, Belgium).
Shoot Multiplication
Individual shoot tips (0.3 to 0.5 cm) from 1-yr-old in vitro seedlings were used as explants for shoot multiplication. Shoots were cultured on modified MS medium supplemented with 2 mg L−1 glycine (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.1 mg L−1 NAA (naphthaleneacetic acid, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% coconut water (Phytotechnology Laboratories), and 30 g L−1 sucrose. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.2 before autoclaving at 121 °C and 15 lbs pressure for 20 min. Six different concentrations and combinations of PGRs (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were evaluated, as follows:
-
T1—1.0 mg L.−1 BA (6-benzylaminopurine)
-
T2—1.0 mg L−1 BA + 30.0 mg L.−1 adenine sulfate
-
T3—2.0 mg L−1 BA + 30.0 mg L.−1 adenine sulfate
-
T4—1.0 mg L.−1 IBA (indole-3-butyric acid)
-
T5—1.0 mg L−1 IBA + 30.0 mg L.−1 adenine sulfate
-
T6—2.0 mg L−1 IBA + 30.0 mg L.−1 adenine sulfate
Shoots were cultured on these treatments under three different culture methods: (1) in 220-mL baby-food jars (Phytotechnology Laboratories) containing 25 mL semi-solid medium (7 g L−1 agar), (2) in 125-mL Erlenmeyer flasks (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10 mL liquid medium (partial immersion), and (3) in 125-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 mL liquid medium (complete immersion) (Fig. 1). Flasks containing liquid media were placed on an orbital shaker (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ) at 90 rpm. The experiment was comprised of 6 replicates (flasks) per treatment with each replicate (flask) containing 5 explants. Explants were selected randomly before being placed in the flasks under each treatment. The cultures were maintained under controlled environmental conditions under a 16-h photoperiod at light intensity of 50 μmol m−2 s−1 and temperature of 26 ± 4 °C. Shoot multiplication was calculated by the number of shoots forming per initial explant, and shoot survival was estimated by the number of shoots that continued growth and development after multiplication. These parameters were evaluated 45 d after culture establishment for 30 shoots per treatment. The entire experiment was repeated.
Rooting
Adventitious shoots that developed from shoot multiplication were collected and transferred to two different rooting media: (1) MS basal medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose, 7 g L−1 agar, and 0.5 mg L−1 NAA; (2) MS basal medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose, 7 g L−1 agar, and 1.0 mg L−1 IBA. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.2 before autoclaving at 121 °C at 15 lbs pressure for 20 min. Shoots were maintained in rooting media for 60 d, after which they were transferred to PGR-free MS medium for 30 d before being transferred to the greenhouse for acclimatization. The experiment comprised of 3 replicates per treatment with each replicate containing 5 explants. Cultures were maintained under controlled environment with a 12-h photoperiod at light intensity 50 μmol m−2 s−1 provided by fluorescent lights (GE Lighting F96T8/XL/SPP35, East Cleveland, OH) and temperature of 26 ± 4 °C. Shoot multiplication, shoot survival, and number of roots per shoot were evaluated 60 d after culture establishment. Growth and development parameters, including shoot length, root length, number of roots, number of leaves per shoot, and fresh and dry weight, were evaluated 30 d after explants were cultured on PGR-free medium. Dry weight was determined by oven-drying plantlets at 70 °C until they reached constant weight. A total of 30 shoots were used for evaluations of growth and development parameters.
Acclimatization
Ten rooted plants were selected from each treatment for acclimatization. Rooted shoots were transferred to 40-cell plastic trays with soilless media containing orchid bark (Sequoia Bark Sales, Reedley, CA). Plants were maintained in a greenhouse with a mist system running for 20 s every 30 min. Plants were fertilized weekly with 300 ppm of 11–35-15 (N-P2O5-K2O) orchid fertilizer (Better-Gro® Orchid Better-Bloom®, Arcadia, FL). The ex vitro plant survival was evaluated for all treatments after 30 d.
Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis
A completely randomized experimental design was applied for all experiments, where random seedlings were selected and grouped for each treatment. Data were collected and submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the OriginPro® 2021b software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison adjustment (α = 0.05) was used for all pairwise mean comparisons.
Results
Seed Germination
Seed germination was observed within the first 30 d after sowing in Petri dishes, whereas seeds showed enlargement into round and green structures, namely protocorms. After 60 d of sowing, germinated seeds (protocorms) developed 1 to 2 leaflets and root primordia. After transferring germinated seedlings into a large container, the RA40 Microbox allowed for continued growth and development. Growth of seedlings was uniform with shoot size varying from 0.3 to 0.5 cm, which was adequate for subsequent in vitro multiplication studies.
Shoot Multiplication
The different culture methods showed significant differences in shoot multiplication (P < 0.001) and survival (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2A, B). However, the different concentrations of PGRs did not show significant differences in shoot multiplication (P < 0.132) and survival (P < 0.681) after 45 d in culture (Fig. 2C, D).
The mean multiplication rate of explants cultured in 25 mL semi-solid medium, 25 mL liquid medium, and 10 mL liquid medium for all PGR treatments were 1.7, 3.8, and 3.1 shoots per explant, respectively. The multiplication rate of explants cultured in 25 mL semi-solid medium was significantly lower than that of explants cultured in 25 mL and 10 mL liquid media (Fig. 2A).
The average survival of explants cultured in 25 mL semi-solid medium was 95.5%, followed by 90.1% in 10 mL liquid medium, and 51.1% in 25 mL liquid medium. Explants cultured in 25 mL liquid medium had significantly lower survival compared to those cultured in 25 mL semi-solid medium and 10 mL liquid medium (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B).
Phenolic browning was observed in all three media. Dead leaves and shoots appeared in 25 mL liquid medium and in 10 mL liquid medium but rarely in 25 mL semi-solid medium. Although explants cultured in 25 mL liquid medium were larger than those in other treatments, some had a glassy appearance and low lignification.
Rooting
Shoots transferred from the multiplication treatments to the rooting media continued to produce additional shoots with 5.6 shoots per explant on 25 mL liquid medium significantly higher than 2.4 shoots per explant on 25 mL semi-solid medium and 2.6 shoots per explant on 10 mL liquid medium (P < 0.001) (Figs. 3 and 4A). However, some shoots on 25 mL liquid medium did not survive on rooting medium. The survival of shoots on 25 mL liquid medium (64%) was significantly lower than that on 25 mL semi-solid medium (100%) and that on 10 mL liquid medium (90%) (P < 0.001) (Figs. 3 and 4G). Shoots on 25 mL semi-solid medium had an average of 3.0 roots per shoot, which was greater than other treatments (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4D).
The different concentrations of PGRs influenced survival (P < 0.001) and shoot multiplication (P < 0.001) but did not affect rooting (P < 0.115) (Figs. 3 and 4B, E, H). Treatment 2 (1.0 mg L−1 BA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate) showed significantly higher multiplication rates (4.4 to 2.7 shoots per explant, respectively) and survival (89 to 67%, respectively) as compared to treatment 1 containing only 1.0 mg L−1 BA (Figs. 3 and 4B, H). Treatment 3 (2.0 mg L−1 BA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate) showed higher multiplication (7.4 shoots per explant), but similar survival (88%) compared to treatment 2 (Figs. 3 and 4B, H). Treatment 5 (1.0 mg L−1 IBA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate) showed the highest survival (96%) among all treatments (Fig. 4H). When the IBA concentration increased to 2.0 mg L−1 in treatment 6, survival decreased to 87% (Fig. 5H). The two rooting media containing either 0.5 mg L−1 NAA or 1.0 mg L−1 IBA did not show significant differences in shoot multiplication (P < 0.526), rooting(P < 0.263), or survival (P < 0.715) (Figs. 3 and 4C, F, I).
PGR-Free Medium
After the rooting stage, shoots were transferred to PGR-free medium for 30 d. Results showed that there were no significant differences among all treatments (culture condition (P < 0.064), treatments (P < 0.149), and rooting hormone (P < 0.604)) for shoot length (Figs. 5 and 6A, B, C). Plants on semi-solid medium had the highest number of leaves (5.7 leaves) followed by plants on 10 mL (5.3 leaves) and 25 mL (4.7 leaves) liquid media, respectively (P < 0.001) (Fig. 6D). Treatments 4 and 5 showed the highest leaf number (5.6 to 5.8 leaves) among all treatments (P < 0.001) (Fig. 6E). The type of rooting media had no effect on leaf number (P < 0.065) (Fig. 6F).
The highest root number (P < 0.001) and root length (P < 0.001) were observed in plants on semi-solid medium (1.83 cm) followed by the plants on 10 mL (1.19 cm) and 25 mL (0.75 cm) liquid media, respectively (Figs. 5 and 7A, D). Treatment 3 showed the highest root length (P < 0.021) (1.7 cm), but there were no significant differences on root number (P < 0.071) among all treatments (Fig. 7B, E). The rooting media had no effect on root length (P < 0.607) or root number (P < 0.160) (Figs. 6 and 7C, F).
Plants on semi-solid medium had the highest fresh weight (P < 0.008) (0.202 g) and dry weight (P < 0.001) (0.023 g) as compared to other media (Fig. 8A, D). Plants on 25 mL liquid medium had higher fresh weight (0.159 g) than plants on 10 mL liquid medium (0.124 g). However, dry weight was not significantly different (Fig. 8A, D). The different treatments and rooting media had no effect on fresh (P < 0.243) or dry weight (P < 0.338) (Fig. 8B, C, E, F).
Acclimatization
Treatments 2 and 3 on 25 mL liquid medium showed continuous shoot multiplication on PGR-free medium, and shoots were used for acclimatization experiments. The rooting media that previously used supplemented with either 1.0 mg L−1 IBA or 0.5 mg L−1 NAA did not affect survival. Both treatments showed 100% survival after 30 d under acclimatization. New roots were developed from the shoots. No morphological variations were observed in the plants.
Discussion
Although the use of liquid culture systems, including temporary immersion bioreactors, has been developed many years ago and used in the development of various protocols for in vitro propagation, they have very limited use in commercial propagation of the most economically significant species. The use of liquid media for micropropagation of orchids has been reported, although it is limited to a few species and hybrids of Phalaenopsis (Park et al. 2000; Young et al. 2000; Kuo et al. 2005; Nge et al. 2006). The risk of hyperhydricity (vitrification) seems to be one of the reasons why this system is not widely used at the commercial level. This study showed similar results to those previously published. The multiplication rate of explants cultured in 25 mL liquid medium and 10 mL liquid medium was significantly higher than that of explants in 25 mL semi-solid medium. However, the survival of explants in 25 mL liquid medium was significantly lower as compared to other treatments. The explants in 25 mL liquid medium had enlarged, thick stems and leaves. Some of them had glassy appearance, which are typical symptoms of hyperhydricity caused by excessive water uptake. Hyperhydricity is a physiological malformation that results in excessive hydration, low lignification, poorly developed vascular bundles, impaired stomatal function, and reduced mechanical strength of tissue culture-generated plants (Kevers et al. 2004). This could explain why the survival of explants in 25 mL liquid medium was low. One interesting aspect is that explants cultured in 10 mL liquid medium with partial immersion in the medium showed a higher survival and higher multiplication rates than explants in 25 mL semi-solid medium with complete immersion. In addition, those explants on 10 mL liquid medium did not show any symptoms of hyperhydricity. This indicates that B. nodosa could be successfully propagated in liquid culture with partial immersion. It also shows that this species has the potential for being propagated in temporary immersion system (TIS) bioreactors. The application of TIS bioreactors for propagation of orchids has been reported for many genera such as Phalaenopsis (Hempfling and Preil 2005), Anoectochilus (Wu et al. 2007), Guarianthe (Leyva-Ovalle et al. 2020), and Cattleya (Ekmekçigil et al. 2019). These results warrant further investigation on the potential of TIS bioreactors for the micropropagation of B. nodosa.
The PGRs in the early stages of culture can have effects on growth and development in later stages described as carry-over effects. These carry-over effects have been reported previously (Phillips 1987; Bairu et al. 2008; Kane 2011; Amoo et al. 2013). The results in this study showed that explants transferred from the multiplication treatments to the rooting media continued producing shoots. Explants on 25 mL liquid medium produced significantly higher amounts of shoots as compared to other treatments. This indicates a carry-over effect from PGRs used during multiplication. In fact, shoot explants from 25 mL liquid medium were continuously multiplying shoots after being transferred to PGR-free medium. This is characteristic of habituation, the autotrophic in vitro growth in cultures that had previously required auxin or cytokinin for in vitro growth and multiplication (Pischke et al. 2006). Habituation is caused by either DNA modification or mutation (Meins 1989; Limanton-Grevet et al. 2000; Pischke et al. 2006). Therefore, the study of genetic fidelity of explants needs to be considered. However, because habituation is reversible, increasing subculturing frequency may minimize its effects on in vitro cultures.
Among the PGRs used in micropropagation, BA is the most frequently used cytokinin for plant differentiation and regeneration (Giatti et al. 2007; Van Staden et al. 2008; Phillips and Garda 2019). It plays an important role in shoot multiplication. Treatment 3, which had 2.0 mg L−1 BA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate, showed higher multiplication rates but similar survival compared to treatment 2, which had 1.0 mg L−1 BA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate. This indicates that a higher concentration of BA can increase multiplication rates but not survival. Treatment 2, which had 1.0 mg L−1 BA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate, showed significantly higher multiplication and survival as compared to treatment 1, which had only 1.0 mg L−1 BA. This indicates that adenine sulfate could improve survival and multiplication rates during micropropagation of B. nodosa orchids. Culture media containing adenine sulfate in addition to kinetin is conducive to shoot formation, as reported in classic studies with Nicotiana tabacum (Scott et al. 1964; Thorpe and Murashige 1968). The improvement of plant health and multiplication rate by adenine sulfate has been reported previously (George et al. 2008). Treatment 5 containing 1.0 mg L−1 IBA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate showed the highest survival (96%) among all treatments. Paek et al. (1987) showed that adding adenine sulfate to a medium containing IBA resulted in increased shoot weight, darker green leaves, and healthier cultures in Chinese cabbage as compared to those without adenine sulfate. The evaluation of PGRs’ effects on bud induction in Cattleya walkeriana, a species closely related to B. nodosa, showed that IBA could also induce shoots (Prizão et al. 2012). In this study, IBA had a positive effect on shoot multiplication, as compared to BA. However, increased IBA concentrations could have a negative impact on plant development (Morgan et al. 1997), as shown in this study when we increased IBA from 1.0 to 2.0 mg L−1.
B. nodosa as an epiphytic orchid is more dependent on its roots for growth and development as compared to other species. Thus, rooting is key to its successful adaptation to the ex vitro environment. This study showed that two rooting media containing either 0.5 mg L−1 NAA or 1.0 mg L−1 IBA had similar effects on rooting of in vitro shoots. The rooting of explants transferred from liquid culture media was inferior as compared to explants from semi-solid medium. This is likely because the roots of epiphytic orchids require aeration (Mengarda et al. 2017). However, plantlets from all treatments showed 100% survival after 30 d in acclimatization which was enhanced by prior transfer of cultures to PGR-free media. Similar results have been previously reported for in vitro-derived plantlets of date palm cultured on PGR-free media showing higher survival compared to plants on media containing PGRs (Mazri and Meziani 2013).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated the development of a successful protocol for the micropropagation of B. nodosa, which adds value towards the commercial production and conservation of this species. The results indicate that B. nodosa could be successfully micropropagated in liquid culture with partial immersion, thus preventing hyperhydricity and demonstrating that it has the potential for micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors. The medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L−1 BA and 30.0 mg L−1 adenine sulfate resulted in higher multiplication rates and survival. Although no abnormalities were observed, the carry-over effects and habituation need to be further investigated to prevent potential genetic variation.
References
Alam MF, Sinha P, Hakim ML (2010) Micropropagation of Vanda teres (Roxb.) Lindle. In: Jain SM, Ochatt SJ (eds) Methods in molecular biology, Vol. 589. Protocols for in vitro propagation of ornamental plants. Humana Press, New York, pp 21–28
Amoo SO, Aremu AO, Van Staden J (2013) Shoot proliferation and rooting treatments influence secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity in tissue culture-derived Aloe arborescens grown ex vitro. Plant Growth Regul 70:115–122
Arditti J (1992) Fundamentals of orchid biology. Wiley, New York
Arditti J, Ernst R (1993) Micropropagation of orchids. Wiley, New York
Bairu MW, Stirk WA, Doležal K, van Staden J (2008) The role of topolins in micropropagation and somaclonal variation of banana cultivars ‘Williams’ and ‘Grand Naine’ (Musa spp. AAA). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 95:373–379
Bhoite HA, Palshikar GS (2014) Plant tissue culture: a review. World J Pharm Sci 2:565–572
Chiapim C, Souza-Leal T, Cordeiro GM, Massaro R, Moraes CP (2012) Crescimento in vitro em diferentes meios de cultura: avaliação do híbrido Brassavola perrinii Lindl. X Cattleya loddigesii Lindl. Orquidário 26:57–62
Chugh S, Guha S, Rao IU (2009) Micropropagation of orchids: a review on the potential of different explants. Sci Hortic 122:507–520
Devi J, Borthakur B, Deka P (1997) Clonal propagation of Dendrobium moschatum and Cymbidium aloifolium through shoot tip culture. J Orchid Soc India 11:19–21
Divakaran M, Babu KN, Ravindran PN, Peter KV (2015) Biotechnology for micropropagation and enhancing variations in vanilla. Asian J Plant Sci Res 5:52–62
Ekmekçigil M, Bayraktar M, Akkuş Ö, Gürel A (2019) High-frequency protocorm-like bodies and shoot regeneration through a combination of thin cell layer and RITA® temporary immersion bioreactor in Cattleya forbesii Lindl. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 136:451–464
Etienne H, Berthouly M (2002) Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 69:215–231
George EF, Hall MA, Klerk G-JD (2008) Plant growth regulators II: cytokinins, their analogues and antagonists. In: George EF, Hall MA, Klerk G-JD (eds) Plant propagation by tissue culture: Volume 1. The background. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 205–226
Giatti L, Pace G, Lima P (2007) BAP (6-benzylaminopurine) in the regeneration in vitro of Blc Owen Holmes Ponkan x Brassavola digbiana n degrees 2. Ciênc Agrotecn 31:1279–1285
Griesbach RJ (1986) Orchid tissue culture. In: Zimmerman RH, Griesbach RJ, Hammerschlag FA, Lawson RH (eds) Tissue culture as a plant production system for horticultural crops. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 343–349
Hempfling T, Preil W (2005) Application of a temporary immersion system in mass propagation of Phalaenopsis. In: Hvoslef-Eide AK, Preil W (eds) Liquid culture systems for in vitro plant propagation. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 231–242
Jones D, Tisserat B (1990) Clonal propagation of orchids. In: Pollard JW, Walker JM (eds) Methods in molecular biology, Vol. 6. Plant cell and tissue culture. Humana Press, New York, pp 181–191
Jones HG (1975) Nomenclatural revision of the genus Brassavola R. Br. of the Orchidaceae. Ann Naturhist Mus Wien 79:9–22
Kalimuthu K, Senthilkumar R, Murugalatha N (2006) Regeneration and mass multiplication of Vanilla planifolia Andr. – a tropical orchid. Curr Sci 91:1401–1403
Kane M (2011) Propagation by shoot culture. In: Trigiano RN, Gray DJ (eds) Plant tissue culture, development and biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 181–191
Kevers C, Franck T, Strasser RJ, Dommes J, Gaspar T (2004) Hyperhydricity of micropropagated shoots: a typically stress-induced change of physiological state. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 77:181–191
Khoddamzadeh AA, Sinniah UR, Kadir MA, Kadzimin SB, Mahmood M, Sreeramanan S (2011) In vitro induction and proliferation of protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) from leaf segments of Phalaenopsis bellina (Rchb.f.) Christenson. Plant Growth Regul 65:381–387
Kumar N, Reddy M (2011) In vitro plant propagation: a review. J For Environ Sci 27:61–72
Kuo HL, Chen JT, Chang WC (2005) Efficient plant regeneration through direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis ‘Little Steve.’ In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 41:453–456
Kyte L, Kleyn J (1996) Plants from test tubes – an introduction to micropropagation. Timber Press, Portland, p 13
Leyva-Ovalle OR, Bello-Bello JJ, Murguía-González J, Núñez-Pastrana R, Ramírez-Mosqueda MA (2020) Micropropagation of Guarianthe skinneri (Bateman) Dressler et W. E. Higging in temporary immersion systems. 3 Biotech 10:26
Limanton-Grevet A, Sotta B, Brown S, Jullien M (2000) Analysis of habituated embryogenic lines in Asparagus officinalis L.: growth characteristics, hormone content and ploidy level of calli and regenerated plants. Plant Sci 160:15–26
Mata-Rosas M, Lastre-Puertos E (2015) Long-term conservation of protocorms of Brassavola nodosa (L) Lind. (Orchidaceae): effect of ABA and a range of cryoconservation techniques. CryoLetters 36:289–298
Mazri MA, Meziani R (2013) An improved method for micropropagation and regeneration of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 22:176–184
Meins F (1989) Habituation: heritable variation in the requirement of cultured plant cells for hormones. Ann Rev Genet 23:395–408
Mengarda LHG, Cola GPA, Oliveira SC, Freitas AR (2017) Multiplication, rooting in vitro, and acclimatization of Brassavola tuberculata Hook. (Orchidaceae), an orchid endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Biosci J 33:730–738
Morgan ER, Butler RM, Bicknell RA (1997) In vitro propagation of Gentiana cerina and Gentiana corymbifera. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 25:1–8
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Neumann KH, Kumar A, Imani J (2009) In vitro propagation of Cymbidium. In: Neumann KH, Kumar A, Imani J (eds) Plant cell and tissue culture – a tool in biotechnology – basics and application. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, pp 83–86
Nge KL, New N, Chandrkrachang S, Stevens WF (2006) Chitosan as a growth stimulator in orchid tissue culture. Plant Sci 170:1185–1190
Paek K, Chandler S, Thorpe T (1987) In vitro propagation of Chinese cabbage from seedling shoot tips. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 112:841–845
Paek KY, Hahn EJ, Park and SY, (2011) Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis orchids via protocorms and protocorm-like bodies. In: Thorpe TA, Yeung C (eds) Methods in molecular biology. Plant embryo culture: methods and protocols. Springer Science Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 293–306
Panwar D, Ram K, Shekhawat HNS (2012) In vitro propagation of Eulophia nuda Lindl. and endangered orchid. Sci Hortic 139:46–52
Park SY, Murthy HN, Paek KY (2000) Mass multiplication of protocorm like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 63:67–72
Phillips R (1987) Effects of sequential exposure to auxin and cytokinin on xylogenesis in cultured explants of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Ann Bot 59:245–250
Phillips GC, Garda M (2019) Plant tissue culture media and practices: an overview. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 55:242–257
Pierik RLM (1997) Vegetative propagation of orchids. In: Pierik RLM (ed) In vitro culture of higher plants. Kluwer Acad. Publ, Dordrecht, pp 159–167
Pischke MS, Huttlin EL, Hegeman AD, Sussman MR (2006) A transcriptome-based characterization of habituation in plant tissue culture. Plant Physiol 140:1255–1278
Prizão EC, Gonçalves LdM, Gutierre MAM, Mangolin CA, Machado MFPS (2012) Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and an orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence. Acta Scient 34:157–161
Reed BM, Sarasan V, Kane M, Bunn E, Pence VC (2011) Biodiversity conservation and conservation biotechnology tools. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 47:1–4
Roberts DL, Dixon KW (2008) Orchids. Curr Biol 18:325–329
Rodrigues LA, Neto VBP, Boaretto AG, Oliveira JF, Torrezan MA, Lima SF, Otoni WC (2015) In vitro propagation of Cyrtopodium saintlegerianum rchb. f. (orchidaceae), a native orchid of the Brazilian savannah. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 15:10–17
Scott KJ, Daly J, Smith HH (1964) Effects of indoleacetic acid and kinetin on activities of enzymes of the hexose monophosphate shunt in tissue cultures of Nicotiana. Plant Physiol 39:709–711
Soares JS, Sorgato JC, Ribeiro LM (2020) Protocol for asymbiotic germination and initial protocorm development of Brazilian Cerrado native orchids. Rodriguésia 71:1–10
Sousa GG, Rosa YBCJ, Macedo MC, Soares JS (2015) Aclimatização de Brassavola tuberculata com a utilização de ANA em diferentes substratos. Hort Brasil 33:208–215
Sousa GG, Otubo BMR, Sorgato JC, Soares JS, Ribeiro LM (2020) Armazenamento de sementes e concentrações de ágar no cultivo in vitro de Brassavola tuberculata Hook. (Orchidaceae). Iheringia 75:1–6
Swarts ND, Dixon KW (2009) Terrestrial orchid conservation in the age of extinction. Ann Bot 104:543–556
Teixeira da Silva JA, Tsavkelova EA, Ng TB, Parthibhan S, Dobranszi J, Cardoso JC, Rao MV, Zeng S (2015) Asymbiotic in vitro seed propagation of Dendrobium. Plant Cell Rep 34:1685–1706
Thorpe TA, Murashige T (1968) Starch accumulation in shoot-forming tobacco callus cultures. Sci 160:421–422
Tisserat B, Jones D (1999) Clonal propagation of orchids. In: Hall RD (ed) Methods in molecular biology, vol 111. Plant cell culture protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 127–134
Tokuhara K, Mii M (1993) Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep 13:7–11
Van Staden J, Zazimalova E, George E (2008) Plant growth regulators II: cytokinins, their analogues and antagonists. In: George EF, Hall MA, Klerk GJ (eds) Plant propagation by tissue culture, vol 1. the background. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 205–226
Vendrame W (2018) Cryopreservation. In: Yeung ECT, Lee Y-I (eds) Orchid propagation: from laboratories to greenhouses. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, Switzerland, pp 283–302
Vendrame WA, Khoddamzadeh AA (2017) Orchid biotechnology. In: Janick J (ed) Hort Rev 44:173–228
Villa F, Pasqual M, Silva EF (2014) Micropropagation of orchid hybrids in knudson culture medium with addiction of vitamins of MS culture medium, benzilaminopurine and activated charcoal. Ciênc Agrárias 35:683–694
Wu RZ, Chakrabarty D, Hahn EJ, Paek KY (2007) Micropropagation of an endangered jewel orchid (Anoectochilus formosanus) using bioreactor system. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 48:376–380
Young PS, Murthy HN, Yoeup PK (2000) Mass multiplication of protocorm-like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 63:67–72
Zeng S, Zhang Y, Silva JAT, Wu K, Zhang J, Duan J (2014) Seed biology and in vitro seed germination of Cypripedium. Crit Res Biotechnol 34:358–371
Ziv M (2000) Bioreactor technology for plant micropropagation. Hortic Rev 24:1–30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, J., Beleski, D.G. & Vendrame, W.A. Effects of culture methods and plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Brassavola nodosa (L.) Lindl. hybrid. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 58, 931–941 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-022-10276-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-022-10276-7