Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used in clinical practice, most commonly administered intravascularly (Moll et al. 2019). Rapid, high-dose administration of cells into blood vessels increases the risk of vascular embolization; thus, intravascular cells are administered slowly over a period of approximately 1 h (Adas et al. 2021). Cells are typically administered at room temperature, and the cells are often suspended in a saline solution with or without dextrose (Riordan et al. 2018; Adas et al. 2021; Dilogo et al. 2021; Murata et al. 2021). We considered that saline solution is not an ideal medium for cell administration performed slowly at room temperature; therefore, we developed several improved cell preservation solutions, namely, lactated Ringer’s solution containing 3% trehalose (LR-3T) and lactated Ringer’s solution containing 3% trehalose and 5% dextran 40 (LR-3T-5D). LR-3T maintains cell viability during storage for up to 24 h under refrigeration or at room temperature. The risk of vascular embolization is thought to increase during rapid cell administration. As sedimentation of cells in the infusion line can increase the rate of cell administration, it is necessary to equalize the cell concentration throughout the suspension. Dextran, a component of LR-3T-5D, suppresses cell sedimentation and thereby helps maintain a stable concentration of cells in the infusion line (Fujita et al. 2020). This solution was shown to improve the preservation of porcine embryos (Lin et al. 2022a; Lin et al. 2022b), and the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide or propylene glycol allows solutions to be used for cryopreservation (Fujita et al. 2021) of, for example, porcine bone marrow–derived MSCs (Nishimura et al. 2019; Kikuchi et al. 2021).
Aggregates in blood vessels can cause embolization in microvessels (Yaykasli et al. 2021); thus, cells administered into blood vessels must be non-aggregated. The risk of embolization is particularly high in the lungs due to the high number of microvessels. The efficacy of intravascular administration of MSCs for treating coronavirus infectious disease–2019 (COVID-19)–related acute respiratory distress syndrome was recently reported (Qu et al. 2022), heightening the importance of obtaining safety information on the aggregation of administered cells.
In this study, we investigated the conditions under which cell aggregation occurs and methods for suppressing this aggregation by varying preservation time, temperature, and trypsin treatment time using human bone marrow–derived (hBM)-MSCs stored in LR-3T and LR-3T-5D.
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. hBM-MSCs (male, 31 years, lot no. 0000527428; Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Walkersville, MD), lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution (Lactec® Injection), LR-3T (Cellstor-W), and LR-3T-5D (Cellstor-S) were used in this study. These solutions were supplied by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., Tokushima, Japan. hBM-MSCs were expanded and used according to previous reports (Nishimura et al. 2019).
The first experiment examined the effect of storage time on the aggregation and viability of hBM-MSCs stored in LR, LR-3T, or LR-3T-5D at 25°C. After centrifugation at 600 × g for 5 min, the cells were resuspended at a density of 5 × 105 cells/mL in LR, LR-3T, or LR-3T-5D, and 500-μL aliquots of each cell suspension were transferred to low-cell adsorption 15-mL tubes (STEMFULL™, Sumitomo Bakelite Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The tubes were tightly capped and then stored at 25°C in an incubator for various times (0, 1, 3, 6, and 24 h). The total numbers of cells and cell aggregates were determined using a NucleoCounter® NC-200™ (ChemoMetec A/S, Allerød, Denmark). Cell aggregation was defined as an association of ≥5 cells (Figure 1). The cell aggregation rate (%) was calculated from the total number of cells counted. The cells were stained with trypan blue to assess viability. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
As shown in Figure 2A, there were no significant differences in cell aggregation rates after storage in each solution at 25°C for up to 6 h compared with before storage (Pre). However, the aggregation rate of hBM-MSCs stored in LR-3T or LR-3T-5D for 24 h was significantly higher (p<0.01) than the pre-storage rate. A comparison between solutions at each time point showed that storage in LR-3T-5D resulted in significantly higher aggregation than storage in LR-3T or LR at 6 h (p<0.01) and higher than storage in LR at 24 h (p<0.05). When stored at 25°C for 24 h, the viability of hBM-MSCs stored in LR was significantly lower (p<0.001) than the pre-storage rate, whereas the viability of cells stored in LR-3T or LR-3T-5D was comparable to the pre-storage rate (Figure 2B). In addition, the viability of hBM-MSCs stored in LR was significantly lower than that of cells stored in LR-3T-5D for 1, 3, or 24 h (p<0.05) and lower than that of cells stored in LR-3T for 24 h (p<0.05). It has been suggested that cells with low viability show low adhesion and proliferation in colony-forming assays (Fujita et al. 2021). Our observations may also indicate that a decline in cell viability during storage would be associated with low cell aggregation. Storage in LR-3T-5D at 25°C for 6 h resulted in more cell aggregation than when cells were stored in LR-3T. The difference between the two solutions is the presence or absence of dextran 40. The dextran 40 in LR-3T-5D inhibits the sedimentation of cells in bags or syringes and helps maintain a given concentration of cells at the time of administration (Fujita et al. 2020). However, dextran coatings reportedly enhance the adhesion of BM-MSCs to sponge scaffolds (Togami et al. 2014); thus, the adhesion-enhancing effect of dextran 40 may be responsible for the observed high degree of cell aggregation in LR-3T-5D at room temperature.
Aggregation rate (A) and viability (B) of hBM-MSCs after storage at 25°C for various times in LR, LR-3T, or LR-3T-5D. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Dunnett’s test vs. before storage (Pre): **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and using two-tailed Tukey’s test: †p<0.05, ††p<0.01.
The second experiment examined the effect of storage temperature on aggregation and viability of hBM-MSCs stored at 5 or 25°C for 24 h in LR-3T-5D, the solution in which the greatest amount of cell aggregation occurred in the first experiment. As described above, the cells were resuspended in LR-3T-5D at a density of 5 × 105 cells/mL, and 500-μL aliquots of the cell suspension were transferred to separate tubes and stored for 24 h at 25°C and 5°C. As shown in Figure 3A, the aggregation rate of hBM-MSCs stored in LR-3T-5D for 24 h at 25°C was significantly higher (p<0.01) than the pre-storage rate, whereas the aggregation rate of hBM-MSCs stored in LR-3T-5D for 24 h at 5°C was similar to the pre-storage rate. The viability of hBM-MSCs stored in LR-3T-5D for 24 h at 5°C and 25°C was similar to the pre-storage viability (Figure 3B). The expression of membrane proteins such as cadherins may play an important role in MSC adhesion (Wuchter et al. 2007). The mechanism of storage-associated cell aggregation remains unclear, but cell aggregation may be inhibited due to the suppression of membrane protein function at low temperatures.
The third experiment examined the effect of trypsinization treatment time during cell collection on aggregation and viability of hBM-MSCs stored at 25°C for 24 h in LR-3T-5D. Immediately following cell collection from the flasks, the cells were trypsinized with trypsin/EDTA solution for 5 or 10 min at 25°C and resuspended in LR-3T-5D at a density of 5 × 105 cells/mL. The cell suspensions (500 μL each) were transferred to separate tubes and stored for 24 h at 25°C. As shown in Figure 4A, when, the aggregation rate after storage of hBM-MSCs trypsinized for 10 min for cell collection was significantly lower than that of cells trypsinization for 5 min (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in cell viability, however (Figure 4B). Thus, cell aggregation was not inhibited due to a decrease in viability, as was the case when cells were stored at 25°C for 24 h in LR. A number of reports have indicated that trypsin treatment decreases the expression of surface proteins on MSCs (Garg et al. 2014; Tsuji et al. 2017; Nakao et al. 2019). High concentrations of trypsin were shown to suppress CXCR4 expression in BM-MSCs (Pervin et al. 2021). N-cadherin is required for the aggregation of HEK293T cells after trypsin detachment, and suppressing N-cadherin also suppresses aggregation (Tachibana 2019). We therefore believe that a trypsin treatment time of 10 min suppresses the function of surface proteins involved in adhesion, including cadherins, thereby also suppressing storage-associated aggregation.
This study showed that storage of hBM-MSCs in LR-3T or LR-3T-5D for 24 h at 25°C is associated with high cell aggregation rates, although cell viability is maintained. In contrast, aggregation is suppressed when the cells are stored at 5°C. Furthermore, cell aggregation might be suppressed by prolonging the length of trypsinization from 5 to 10 min.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are therefore not publicly available. However, data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with permission of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc.
References
Adas G, Cukurova Z, Yasar KK, Yilmaz R, Isiksacan N, Kasapoglu P et al (2021) The systematic effect of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in critical COVID-19 patients: a prospective double controlled trial. Cell Transplant 30:9636897211024942
Dilogo IH, Aditianingsih D, Sugiarto A, Burhan E, Damayanti T, Sitompul PA et al (2021) Umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells as critical COVID-19 adjuvant therapy: A randomized controlled trial. Stem Cells Transl Med 10(9):1279–1287
Fujita Y, Nishimura M, Komori N, Sawamoto O, Kaneda S (2021) Protein-free solution containing trehalose and dextran 40 for cryopreservation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Cryobiology 100:46–57
Fujita Y, Nishimura M, Komori NW, Wada T, Shirakawa C, Takenawa T et al (2020) A pair of cell preservation solutions for therapy with human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Regen Ther 14:95–102
Garg A, Houlihan DD, Aldridge V, Suresh S, Li KK, King AL, Sutaria R, Fear J, Bhogal RH, Lalor PF, Newsome PN (2014) Non-enzymatic dissociation of human mesenchymal stromal cells improves chemokine-dependent migration and maintains immunosuppressive function. Cytotherapy 16(4):545–559
Kikuchi T, Nishimura M, Hirata M, Tanihara F, Komori N, Tanaka M, Sawamoto O, Otoi T, Matsumoto S (2021) Development and characterization of Gal KO porcine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Xenotransplantation 8(6):e12717
Lin Q, Le QA, Takebayashi K, Hirata M, Tanihara F, Sawamoto O, Kikuchi T, Otoi T (2022b) Short-term preservation of porcine zygotes at ambient temperature using a chemically defined medium. Anim Sci Jan-Dec 93(1):e13711
Lin Q, Le QA, Takebayashi K, Hirata M, Tanihara F, Thongkittidilok C, Sawamoto O, Kikuchi T, Otoi T (2022a) Viability and developmental potential of porcine blastocysts preserved for short term in a chemically defined medium at ambient temperature. Reprod Domest Anim 57(5):556–563
Moll G, Ankrum JA, Kamhieh-Milz J, Bieback K, Ringdén O, Volk HD, Geissler S, Reinke P (2019) Intravascular mesenchymal stromal/stem cell therapy product diversification: time for new clinical guidelines. Trends Mol Med 25(2):149–163
Murata M, Terakura S, Wake A, Miyao K, Ikegame K, Uchida N et al (2021) Off-the-shelf bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease: real-world evidence. Bone Marrow Transplant 56(10):2355–2366
Nakao M, Kim K, Nagase K, Grainger DW, Kanazawa H, Okano T (2019) Phenotypic traits of mesenchymal stem cell sheets fabricated by temperature-responsive cell culture plate: structural characteristics of MSC sheets. Stem Cell Res Ther 10(1):353
Nishimura M, Nguyen L, Watanabe N, Fujita Y, Sawamoto O, Matsumoto S (2019) Development and characterization of novel clinical grade neonatal porcine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Xenotransplantation 26(3):e12501
Pervin B, Aydın G, Visser T, Uçkan-Çetinkaya D, Aerts-Kaya FSF (2021) CXCR4 expression by mesenchymal stromal cells is lost after use of enzymatic dissociation agents, but preserved by use of non-enzymatic methods. Int J Hematol 113(1):5–9
Qu W, Wang Z, Engelberg-Cook E, Yan D, Siddik AB, Bu G et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of MSC cell therapies for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stem Cells Transl Med 11(7):688–703
Riordan NH, Morales I, Fernández G, Allen N, Fearnot NE, Leckrone ME et al (2018) Clinical feasibility of umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Transl Med 16(1):57
Tachibana K (2019) N-cadherin-mediated aggregate formation; cell detachment by Trypsin-EDTA loses N-cadherin and delays aggregate formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 516(2):414–418
Togami W, Sei A, Okada T, Taniwaki T, Fujimoto T, Nakamura T, Tahata S, Nakanishi Y, Mizuta H (2014) Effects of water-holding capability of the PVF sponge on the adhesion and differentiation of rat bone marrow stem cell culture. J Biomed Mater Res A 102(1):247–253
Tsuji K, Ojima M, Otabe K, Horie M, Koga H, Sekiya I, Muneta T (2017) Effects of different cell-detaching methods on the viability and cell surface antigen expression of synovial mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant 26(6):1089–1102
Wuchter P, Boda-Heggemann J, Straub BK, Grund C, Kuhn C, Krause U et al (2007) Processus and recessus adhaerentes: giant adherens cell junction systems connect and attract human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Tissue Res 328(3):499–514
Yaykasli KO, Schauer C, Muñoz LE, Mahajan A, Knopf J, Schett G, Herrmann M (2021) Neutrophil extracellular trap-driven occlusive diseases. Cells 10(9):2208
Acknowledgements
We thank T. Takenawa for support with the experiments.
Funding
This study was funded by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TK wrote the main manuscript text. MN, CS prepared Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4. YF managed and coordinated responsibility for the research activity planning. TO supervised and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. All human cells used in this study were purchased from suppliers as reagents.
Competing interests
Financial interest: T. Kikuchi, M. Nishimura, C. Shirakawa, and Y. Fujita are employees of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. T. Otoi has no financial interest. Non-financial interest: none.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kikuchi, T., Nishimura, M., Shirakawa, C. et al. Avoiding aggregation of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells stored in cell preservation solutions. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal 60, 123–127 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-024-00849-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-024-00849-8