Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate people’s preferences for the geographical distance between residential locales and two types of urban agricultural land, namely, traditional agricultural land and a more complex and intensive agricultural landscape called “satoyama” and to evaluate the heterogeneity in people’s preferences. The enhancement of urban sustainability is a crucial issue in sustainable development that can be potentially improved by urban agriculture. However, urban residents' perceptions and preferences regarding the distance between urban agricultural land and their locales remain unclear, and concrete measures to maintain and expand urban agriculture are still vague. Therefore, an online survey and choice experiment was conducted, with respondents from Ishikawa Prefecture in Japan, who are assumed to be familiar with the agricultural context. Mixed logit and latent class logit models were employed to evaluate urban residents' heterogeneous perceptions and preferences. The results reveal that: (1) urban residents generally prefer urban agricultural land in areas away from their residence; (2) preferences are diverse, and those who are relatively young, with higher income, and more environmentally conscious favor dwelling near urban agricultural land; (3) there is a quadratic relationship between the distance connecting people’s locales and urban agricultural land, and thus, the most desirable distance exists; and (4) there is a difference in the proximity that people prefer between traditional agricultural land and satoyama. Based on the results, policy implications for urban planners and policymakers include implementing urban agriculture in peri-urban areas and handling a tradeoff between residential opposition and the intensity of urban agriculture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman K, Conard M, Culligan P et al (2014) Sustainable food systems for future cities: the potential of urban agriculture. Econ Soc Rev 45:189–206
Albaladejo-García JA, Alcon F, Martínez-Paz JM (2021) Economic valuation of allotment gardens in peri-urban degraded agroecosystems: the role of citizens’ preferences in spatial planning. Sustain Cities Soc 68:102771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102771
Arata L, Guastella G, Pareglio S et al (2021) Do city dwellers care about peri-urban land use? The case of environment-friendly agriculture around Milan. J Environ Plan Manag 64:1044–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1799765
Artmann M, Sartison K (2018) The role of urban agriculture as a nature-based solution: a review for developing a systemic assessment framework. Sustainability 10:1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061937
Ayambire RA, Amponsah O, Peprah C, Takyi SA (2019) A review of practices for sustaining urban and peri-urban agriculture: implications for land use planning in rapidly urbanising Ghanaian cities. Land Use Policy 84:260–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.004
Azunre GA, Amponsah O, Peprah C et al (2019) A review of the role of urban agriculture in the sustainable city discourse. Cities 93:104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006
Bakhtiari F, Jacobsen JB, Strange N, Helles F (2014) Revealing lay people’s perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 1: 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.003
Batáry P, Dicks LV, Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2015) The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 29:1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12536
Beaudet C, Tardieu L, David M (2022) Are citizens willing to accept changes in public lighting for biodiversity conservation? Ecol Econ 200:107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107527
Bergstrom JC, Ready RC (2009) What have we learned from over 20 years of farmland amenity valuation research in North America? Rev Agric Econ 31:21–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.01424.x
Berman JD, Ebisu K (2020) Changes in US air pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Total Environ 739:139864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139864
Bertram C, Rehdanz K (2015) The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecol Econ 120:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013
Botzat A, Fischer LK, Kowarik I (2016) Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation. Glob Environ Change 39:220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008
Bretzel F, Caudai C, Tassi E et al (2018) Culture and horticulture: protecting soil quality in urban gardening. Sci Total Environ 644:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.289
Brinkley C (2012) Evaluating the benefits of peri-urban agriculture. J Plan Lit 27:259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412211435172
Brown G, Glanz H (2018) Identifying potential NIMBY and YIMBY effects in general land use planning and zoning. Appl Geogr 99:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.026
Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Johan Lagerkvist C (2005) Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments. Econ Lett 89:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.03.010
ChoiceMetrics (2018) Ngene 1.2 user manual and reference guide
Clinton N, Stuhlmacher M, Miles A et al (2018) A global geospatial ecosystem services estimate of urban agriculture. Earths Future 6:40–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000536
d’Amour CB, Reitsma F, Baiocchi G et al (2017) Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:8939–8944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114
De Valck J, Rolfe J (2018) Spatial heterogeneity in stated preference valuation: status, challenges and road ahead. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 11:355–422. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000097
Dear M (1992) Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. J Am Plan Assoc 58:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975808
Demuzere M, Orru K, Heidrich O et al (2014) Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. J Environ Manag 146:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
Dramstad WE, Fjellstad WJ (2011) Landscapes: bridging the gaps between science, policy and people. Landsc Urban Plan 100:330–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.003
Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE (2011) Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut 159:2078–2087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010
FAO (2011) Noto’s satoyama and satoumi, Japan. In: Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems. https://www.fao.org/giahs/giahsaroundtheworld/designated-sites/asia-and-the-pacific/notos-satoyama-and-satoumi/detailed-information/en/. Accessed 14 Feb 2022
Ferreira AJD, Guilherme RIMM, Ferreira CSS, de Oliveira MDFML (2018) Urban agriculture, a tool towards more resilient urban communities? Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 5:93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.06.004
Fukamachi K (2017) Sustainability of terraced paddy fields in traditional satoyama landscapes of Japan. J Environ Manag 202:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.061
Galli A, Iha K, Moreno Pires S et al (2020) Assessing the ecological footprint and biocapacity of Portuguese cities: critical results for environmental awareness and local management. Cities 96:102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102442
Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2010) The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J Urban Econ 67:404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.006
Glenk K, Johnston RJ, Meyerhoff J, Sagebiel J (2020) Spatial dimensions of stated preference valuation in environmental and resource economics: methods, trends and challenges. Environ Resour Econ 75:215–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-00311-w
Goertzen D, Suhling F (2013) Promoting dragonfly diversity in cities: major determinants and implications for urban pond design. J Insect Conserv 17:399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9522-z
Hake BJ (2017) Gardens as learning spaces: intergenerational learning in urban food gardens. J Intergener Relatsh 15:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2017.1260369
Hara Y, McPhearson T, Sampei Y, McGrath B (2018) Assessing urban agriculture potential: a comparative study of Osaka, Japan and New York city, United States. Sustain Sci 13:937–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0535-8
Hashimoto S, Nakamura S, Saito O et al (2015) Mapping and characterizing ecosystem services of social–ecological production landscapes: case study of Noto, Japan. Sustain Sci 10:257–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0285-1
Hashimoto S, DasGupta R, Kabaya K et al (2019) Scenario analysis of land-use and ecosystem services of social-ecological landscapes: implications of alternative development pathways under declining population in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. Sustain Sci 14:53–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0626-6
Hole AR (2007) Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood. Stata J 7:388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700306
Huber J, Zwerina K (1996) The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J Mark Res 33:307–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379603300305
Ishikawa Prefecture (2018) Ishikawa in statistics 2018
Iwata Y, Fukamachi K, Morimoto Y (2011) Public perception of the cultural value of satoyama landscape types in Japan. Landsc Ecol Eng 7:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0128-x
Jansma JE, Wertheim-Heck SCO (2022) Feeding the city: a social practice perspective on planning for agriculture in peri-urban Oosterwold, Almere, the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 117:106104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106104
Jin J, He R, Wang W, Gong H (2018) Valuing cultivated land protection: a contingent valuation and choice experiment study in China. Land Use Policy 74:214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.023
Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Naumann S, Davis M, Artmann M, Haase D, Knapp S, Korn H, Stadler J, Zaunberger K (2016) Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol Soc 21(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
Kadoya T, Washitani I (2011) The Satoyama Index: a biodiversity indicator for agricultural landscapes. Agr Ecosyst Environ 140:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.007
Khan I, Lei H, Muhammad I, Zhao M (2021) Do residential localities matter? Revisiting preference heterogeneity and ranking of ecological attributes of an inland river basin. Sci Total Environ 763:142970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142970
Kobori H, Primack RB (2003) Participatory conservation approaches for satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan. Ambio 32:307–311
Kyoi S (2021) People’s avoidance of neighboring agricultural urban green infrastructure: evidence from a choice experiment. Sustainability 13:6930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126930
La Rosa D, Barbarossa L, Privitera R, Martinico F (2014) Agriculture and the city: a method for sustainable planning of new forms of agriculture in urban contexts. Land Use Policy 41:290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.014
Lackey NQ, Tysor DA, McNay GD et al (2021) Mental health benefits of nature-based recreation: a systematic review. Ann Leis Res 24:379–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2019.1655459
Langemeyer J, Madrid-Lopez C, Beltran AM, Mendez GV (2021) Urban agriculture—a necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landsc Urban Plan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104055
Le T, Wang Y, Liu L et al (2020) Unexpected air pollution with marked emission reductions during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science 369:702–706. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7431
Liu G, Yang Z, Chen B, Ulgiati S (2011) Monitoring trends of urban development and environmental impact of Beijing, 1999–2006. Sci Total Environ 409:3295–3308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.045
Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M (2009) Hopping on one leg—the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban for Urban Green 8:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003
Madureira H, Nunes F, Oliveira JV et al (2015) Urban residents’ beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Urban Green 14:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008
MAFF (2021) FY2020 Summary of the annual report on food, agriculture and rural areas in Japan
MAFF (2022) FY2021 summary of the annual report of food, agriculture and rural areas in Japan
Mancebo F (2018) Gardening the city: addressing sustainability and adapting to global warming through urban agriculture. Environments 5:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5030038
Mariel P, Arata L (2022) Incorporating attitudes into the evaluation of preferences regarding agri-environmental practices. J Agric Econ 73:430–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12456
Martínez-Paz JM, Albaladejo-García JA, Barreiro-Hurle J et al (2021) Spatial effects in the socioeconomic valuation of peri-urban ecosystems restoration. Land Use Policy 105:105426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105426
McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ 15:447–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5%3c447::aid-jae570%3e3.0.co;2-1
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2021) National land numerical information. https://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/ksj/. Accessed 1 Feb 2022
Mok H-F, Williamson VG, Grove JR et al (2014) Strawberry fields forever? Urban agriculture in developed countries: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0156-7
Mori K, Christodoulou A (2012) Review of sustainability indices and indicators: towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environ Impact Assess Rev 32:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001
Nijkamp P, Vindigni G, Nunes PALD (2008) Economic valuation of biodiversity: a comparative study. Ecol Econ 67:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.003
Orsini F, Kahane R, Nono-Womdim R, Gianquinto G (2013) Urban agriculture in the developing world: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:695–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0143-z
Pacifico D, Yoo H (2013) Lclogit: a stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm. Stata J 13:625–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1301300312
Pearson LJ, Pearson L, Pearson CJ (2010) Sustainable urban agriculture: stocktake and opportunities. Int J Agric Sustain 8:7–19. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2009.0468
Sahlén G, Ekestubbe K (2001) Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodivers Conserv 10:673–690
Sanyé-Mengual E, Specht K, Krikser T et al (2018) Social acceptance and perceived ecosystem services of urban agriculture in Southern Europe: the case of Bologna. Italy. Plos One 13:e0200993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200993
Seto KC, Reenberg A, Boone CG et al (2012) Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7687–7692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117622109
Silva A, Nayga RM, Campbell BL, Park JL (2011) Revisiting cheap talk with new evidence from a field experiment. J Agric Resour Econ 36:280–291
Specht K, Weith T, Swoboda K, Siebert R (2016) Socially acceptable urban agriculture businesses. Agron Sustain Dev 36:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0355-0
Toledo-Gallegos VM, Long J, Campbell D et al (2021) Spatial clustering of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. J Agric Econ 72:673–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12428
Tornaghi C (2014) Critical geography of urban agriculture. Prog Hum Geogr 38:551–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513512542
Train KE (2009) Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Viana CM, Freire D, Abrantes P et al (2022) Agricultural land systems importance for supporting food security and sustainable development goals: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ 806:150718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150718
Von Döhren P, Haase D (2015) Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol Indic 52:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027
Walls M, Kousky C, Chu Z (2015) Is what you see what you get? The value of natural landscape views. Land Econ 91:1–19
Yang J (2021) The heterogeneous preferences for conservation and management in urban wetland parks: a case study from China. Urban for Urban Green 60:127064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127064
Yang X, Burton M, Cai Y, Zhang A (2016) Exploring heterogeneous preference for farmland non-market values in Wuhan, central China. Sustainability 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010012
Yumoto T, Iwata Y, Morimoto Y (2012) Evaluating cultural values of the satoyama using the preference method. Glob Environ Res 16:153–162
Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28:639–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008
Acknowledgements
The author would like to extend our gratitude to the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (JPMEERF16S11510 and 1FS-2201) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan. The author thanks Shizuka HASHIMOTO and Koichi KURIYAMA for their productive supports, as well as the survey participants for their input. This research was financially supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant number 22H03812.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handled by Maike Hamann, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kyoi, S. Utilization of urban agriculture to enhance urban sustainability: investigating people’s heterogeneous preferences for proximity to urban agriculture through a choice experiment. Sustain Sci 18, 1851–1870 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01282-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01282-0