Abstract
Collective agency, the capacity of individuals to mobilise according to shared goals, is crucial for social–ecological transformation. However, in stagnant situations, where individuals in a social–ecological system tend to resist transformation due to interests in the status quo, the emergence of collective agency faces numerous barriers. This research asks how to design and implement spaces and methodologies that help to address such barriers. We posit that these spaces and methodologies ought to facilitate processes to reframe shared perceptions of social–ecological situations through: (1) questioning dominant narratives about a situation, (2) building capacities to reframe the situation, and (3) enacting new compelling narratives that support the group’s transformative agency. Our research shows that building a strong bond among participants is key but requires reframing tools that are infrequently used in academically driven participatory research; in particular, tools for reflexivity together with creating safe-enough spaces where participants can be truly open. Reflexivity and openness are conditions for allowing deep transformations of meanings, fostering new collaborations and promoting agency towards novel pathways forward. Through convening diverse social actors—from local farmers, residents in irregular settlements, governmental and non-governmental organisations, to academics—our 2.5-year “Transformation Laboratory” (T-Lab) showed the effectiveness of experiencing reflexive reframing tools to transform both perceived situations, and the participants' agency (i.e., the meanings and values of their role, capacities, and interests) concerning the situation. Our results support the importance of reframing in building collective agency for transformations. Throughout the process, participants deconstructed their narratives, constructed new ones, and enacted them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For details, see Table A in https://github.com/sostenibilidad-unam/tlabs/tree/master/CogMaps_integrated
For details, see Table B in https://github.com/sostenibilidad-unam/tlabs/tree/master/CogMaps_integrated
For details, see https://github.com/sostenibilidad-unam/tlabs/tree/master/viz
References
Abson DJ, Fischer J, Leventon J et al (2017) Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13280-016-0800-Y
Alkire S, Deneulin S (2009) The human development and capability approach. In: Deneulin S, Sahani L (eds) An Introduction to the human development and capability approach. Earthscan, London, pp 22–48
Armillas P (1971) Gardens on swamps. Science (80-) 174:653–661. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.174.4010.653
Armstrong A (2009) Autonomy and the relational individual: Spinoza and Feminism. In: Gatens M (ed) Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
Avelino F (2021) Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation. J Polit Power 14:425–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1875307
Benessaiah K, Eakin H (2021) Crisis, transformation, and agency: why are people going back-to-the-land in Greece? Sustain Sci 16:1841–1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-021-01043-5/TABLES/1
Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 26:611–639
Bentz J, do Carmo L, Schafenacker N et al (2022a) Creative, embodied practices, and the potentialities for sustainability transformations. Sustain Sci 17:687–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01000-2
Bentz J, O’Brien K, Scoville-Simonds M (2022b) Beyond “blah blah blah”: exploring the “how” of transformation. Sustain Sci 17:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01123-0
Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Ryan ME et al (2021) Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nat Sustain 4:983–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Klenk NL et al (2022) Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations. Glob Environ Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422
Charli-Joseph L, Siqueiros-Garcia JM, Eakin H et al (2018) Promoting agency for social–ecological transformation: a transformation-lab in the Xochimilco social–ecological system. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10214-230246
Chemero A (2009) Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge
Colombetti G, Krueger J (2015) Scaffoldings of the affective mind. Philos Psychol 28:1157–1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.976334
Cram S, Cotler H, Morales LM et al (2008) Identificación de los servicios ambientales potenciales de los suelos en el paisaje urbano del Distrito Federal. Investig Geográficas 66:81–104
Di Paolo EA, Buhrmann T, Barandiaran XE (2017) Sensorimotor life: an enactive proposal. Sensorimotor Life Enactive Propos. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198786849.001.0001
Drimie S, Hamann R, Manderson A et al (2018) Creating transformative spaces through moving from dialogue to action: reflecting on the experience of the Southern Africa Food Lab. Ecol Soc 10177:1–21
Drimie S, Magner C, Pereira L et al (2021) Facilitated dialogues. In: The Routledge handbook of research methods for social–ecological systems, pp 136–147
Eakin H, Shelton RE, Mario Siqueiros-Garcia J et al (2019a) Loss and social–ecological transformation: pathways of change in xochimilco. Mexico Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11030-240315
Eakin H, Siqueiros-García JM, Hernández-Aguilar B et al (2019b) Mental models, meta-narratives, and solution pathways associated with socio-hydrological risk and response in Mexico City. Front Sustain Cities. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRSC.2019.00004
Eakin H, Charli-Joseph L, Shelton R et al (2021) Wetlands under pressure. Transform Pathw Sustain. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331930-12
Ely A, Marin A, Marshall F et al (2021) Emerging insights and lessons for the future. Transform Pathw Sustain. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331930-16
Emirbayer MAM (1998) What is agency? Am J Sociol 103:962–1023
Fairbairn M (2012) Framing transformation: The counter-hegemonic potential of food sovereignty in the US context. Agric Human Values 29:217–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9334-x
Fals-Borda O (1987) The application of participatory action-research in latin america. Int Sociol 2:329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858098700200401
FAO (2018) Chinampas of Mexico City were recognized as an agricultural heritage system of global importance. https://www.fao.org/americas/noticias/ver/en/c/1118851/. Accessed 31 Dec 2021
Gergen KJ, McNamee S, Barrett FJ (2007) Toward transformative dialogue. Int J Public Adm 24:679–707. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100104770
GODF (2006) Acuerdo por el que se aprueba el programa de manejo del Área Natural Protegida con carácter de Zona de Conservación Ecológica “Ejidos de Xochimilco y San Gregorio Atlapulco.” https://paot.org.mx/centro/gaceta/2006/enero06/11enero06.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2021
GODF (2012) Decreto por el que se crea la Autoridad de la Zona Patrimonio Mundial Natural y Cultural de la Humanidad en Xochimilco, Tláhuac y Milpa Alta, como un órgano de apoyo a las actividades de la Jefatura de Gobierno. http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Documentos/Estatal/DistritoFederal/wo76119.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2021
Goffman E (1977) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. 4:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400406
González-Pozo A (2016) Las chinampas: patrimonio mundial de la Ciudad de México. Universidad Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México
Heras M, Tàbara JD (2014) Let’s play transformations! Performative methods for sustainability. Sustain Sci 93(9):379–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-014-0245-9
Heras M, Tàbara JD (2015) Conservation theatre: mirroring experiences and performing stories in community management of natural resources. Soc Nat Resour 29:948–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1095375
Jiménez M, Pérez-Belmont P, Schewenius M et al (2020) Assessing the historical adaptive cycles of an urban social–ecological system and its potential future resilience: the case of Xochimilco, Mexico City. Reg Environ Chang. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01587-9
Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A (2010) Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. Dyn Sustain Technol Environ Soc Justice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775069
Lerner AM, Eakin HC, Tellman E et al (2018) Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity: the example of hydrological risk in Mexico City. Cities 83:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.009
Lumosi CK, Pahl-Wostl C, Scholz G (2019) Can ‘learning spaces’’ shape transboundary management processes? Evaluating emergent social learning processes in the Zambezi basin’. Environ Sci Policy 97:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.005
Maiese ML (2019) Transformative learning and the affordance of flexible habits of mind. Learn Des Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_153-1
Manuel-Navarrete D, Morehart C, Tellman B et al (2019) Intentional disruption of path-dependencies in the Anthropocene: gray versus green water infrastructure regimes in Mexico City, Mexico. Anthropocene 26:100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100209
Manuel-Navarrete D, Charli-Joseph L, Eakin H, Siqueiros-García JM (2021) Applying technologies of the self in transformation labs to mobilize collective agency. Soc Innov J 5:1–10
Marshall F, Dolley J, Priya R (2018) Transdisciplinary research as transformative space making for sustainability: enhancing pro-poor transformative agency in peri-urban. Ecol Soc 10249:1–28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10249-230308
Marshall F, Van ZP, Eakin H et al (2021) Reframing sustainability challenges. Transform Pathw Sustain. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331930-15
Mazari-Hiriart M, Ponce-de-León S, López-Vidal Y et al (2008) Microbiological implications of periurban agriculture and water reuse in Mexico City. PLoS ONE 3:e2305. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0002305
Merçon J (2018) Participatory action research and decolonial studies. Critical mirrors. In: Decolonial education in the americas: lessons of resistance, pedagogies of hope. Lat Am Philos Educ J, vol 3, pp 20–29
Mostert E, Craps M, Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management? Water Int 33:293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060802275757
Nightingale AJ, Gonda N, Eriksen SH (2021) Affective adaptation = effective transformation? Shifting the politics of climate change adaptation and transformation from the status quo. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.740
O’Brien K (2012) Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Prog Hum Geogr 36:667–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767
O’Brien K, Sygna L (2013) Responding to climate change: the three spheres of transformation. Proc Transform Chang Clim 16:23
Ojha H, Nightingale AJ, Gonda N et al (2022) Transforming environmental governance: critical action intellectuals and their praxis in the field. Sustain Sci 17:621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01108-z
Olsson P, Galaz V, Boonstra WJ (2014) Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecol Soc 19:1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06799-190401
Pahl-Wostl C (2006) The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267781?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. Accessed 31 Dec 2021
Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A et al (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12:5
PAOT (2010) Estudio espacio-temporal del uso del suelo en el área localizada entre el trazo de la Línea 12 del metro y el sitio Ramsar 1363. www.paot.org.mx. Accessed 31 Dec 2021
Pelenc J, Bazile D, Ceruti C (2015) Collective capability and collective agency for sustainability: a case study. Ecol Econ 118:226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.001
Pelling M (2014) Transformation: a renewed window on development responsibility for risk management. J Extreme Events 01:1402003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737614020035
Pelling M, O’Brien K, Matyas D et al (2015) Adaptation and transformation. Clim Change 133:113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10584-014-1303-0
Pereira L, Frantzeskaki N, Hebinck A et al (2020) Transformative spaces in the making: key lessons from nine cases in the Global South. Sustain Sci 15:161–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-019-00749-X
Pereira L, Olsson P, Charli-Joseph L et al (2021) Transdisciplinary methods and T-Labs as transformative spaces for innovation in social–ecological systems. Transform Pathw Sustain. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331930-6
Pereira LM, Karpouzoglou T, Frantzeskaki N, Olsson P (2018) Guest Editorial, part of a special feature on designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social–ecological systems. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10607-230432
Pérez-Belmont P, Lerner AM, Mazari-Hiriart M, Valiente E (2021) The survival of agriculture on the edge: perceptions of push and pull factors for the persistence of the ancient chinampas of Xochimilco, Mexico City. J Rural Stud 86:452–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.018
Pesch U (2015) Tracing discursive space: agency and change in sustainability transitions. Technol Forecast Soc Change 90:379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.009
Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A et al (2010) Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy 37:267–281. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496628
Riedy C (2022) Discursive entrepreneurship: ethical meaning-making as a transformative practice for sustainable futures. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00978-z
Robbins P (2012) Political ecology: a critical introduction, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
Rosenberg MN (2022) What matters? The role of values in transformations toward sustainability: a case study of coffee production in Burundi. Sustain Sci 17:507–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00974-3
Ruizpalacios B, Charli-Joseph L, Eakin H et al (2018) Creating bridges in Xochimilco through the “Pathways to Sustainability Game.” In: STEPS Cent. https://steps-centre.org/blog/creating-bridges-through-the-pathways-to-sustainability-game/. Accessed 2 Jan 2022
Ruizpalacios B, Charli-Joseph L, Eakin H et al (2019) The transformation laboratory of the social–ecological system of Xochimilco, Mexico City: description of the process and methodological guide. Ciudad de México, México: LANCIS-IE, UNAM https://steps-centre.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Guide-T-Lab-Xochi-screen-version-English-NA-Hub.pdf
Saltelli A, Benini L, Funtowicz S et al (2020) The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 106:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.008
Schneider F, Rist S (2014) Envisioning sustainable water futures in a transdisciplinary learning process: combining normative, explorative, and participatory scenario approaches. Sustain Sci 9:463–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0232-6
Schneider F, Giger M, Harari N et al (2019) Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environ Sci Policy 102:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017
Scoones I, Stirling A, Abrol D et al (2020) Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004
Sen AK (1999) Introduction—development as freedom. Dev Free 525:3–12
Sharpe B, Hodgson A, Leicester G et al (2016) Three horizons: a pathways practice for transformation. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08388-210247
Siqueiros-García JM, Manuel-Navarrete D, Eakin H et al (2022) Sense of agency, affectivity and social–ecological degradation: an enactive and phenomenological approach. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911092
Snow DA, Rochford EB, Worden SK, Benford RD (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Am Sociol Rev 51:464. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
Tellman B, Bausch JC, Eakin H et al (2018) Adaptive pathways and coupled infrastructure: seven centuries of adaptation to water risk and the production of vulnerability in Mexico city. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09712-230101
Tschakert P, Das PJ, Shrestha Pradhan N et al (2016) Micropolitics in collective learning spaces for adaptive decision making. Glob Environ Chang 40:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2016.07.004
Turnhout E, Metze T, Wyborn C et al (2020) The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 42:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
UNESCO (1987) Xochimilco—Patrimonio Mundial de México. https://www.patrimoniomundial.com.mx/xochimilco/. Accessed 31 Dec 2021
van Zwanenberg P, Cremaschi A, Obaya M et al (2018) Seeking unconventional alliances and bridging innovations in spaces for transformative change: the seed sector and agricultural sustainability in Argentina. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10033-230311
Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience, p 308
Vilsmaier U, Faschingender G, Merçon J (2020) Methods for inter- and transdisciplinary research and learning based on Paulo Freire. J Für Entwicklungspolitik XXXVI, pp 44–69
Vogel C, O’Brien K (2021) Getting to the heart of transformation. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01016-8
Webler T, Danielson S, Tuler S (2009) Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Soc Environ Res 01301:1–54
Westley F, Olsson P, Folke C et al (2011) Tipping toward sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio 40:762–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13280-011-0186-9
Westley FR, Tjornbo O, Schultz L et al (2013) A theory of transformative agency in linked social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327
Wickson F, Strand R, Kjølberg KL (2015) The walkshop approach to science and technology ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 21:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9526-z
Wigle J (2010) The “ Xochimilco model” for managing irregular settlements in conservation land in Mexico City. Cities 27:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.04.003
Wigle J (2014) The ‘graying’ of ‘green’ zones: spatial governance and irregular settlement in Xochimilco, Mexico City. Int J Urban Reg Res 38:573–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12019
Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N (2014) Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustain Sci 9(4):483–496
Wittmayer JM, Backhaus J, Avelino F et al (2019) Narratives of change: How social innovation initiatives construct societal transformation. Futures 112:102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.005
Zabala A (2014) qmethod: a package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. R J 6:163–173
Acknowledgements
We greatly appreciate and thank all the T-Lab participants for their valuable time, effort, and interest in sharing their experiences and knowledge throughout the process. We acknowledge Elsa Valiente for facilitating the chinampa space that hosts the NGO Restauración Ecológica y Desarrollo where some of the interactions were held. We thank Rodrigo García-Herrera, academic technician at LANCIS-IE-UNAM, for developing software used for data wrangling and visualisation. This work was based on research supported by the Transformations to Sustainability Programme, which was coordinated by the International Science Council and funded by the Swedish Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), and implemented in partnership with the National Research Foundation of South Africa. The Transformations to Sustainability Programme represents a contribution to Future Earth. This study has been developed in the North America Sustainability Hub, hosted by Arizona State University (ASU) and the National Laboratory for Sustainability Sciences (Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad-LANCIS), housed at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-UNAM). It is part of the STEPS Pathways to Sustainability Global Consortium (https://steps-centre.org/global/). Finally, the first author extends acknowledgment to the PhD Program in Sustainability Sciences, UNAM “Doctorado en Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handled by Julia Bentz, Nova University Lisbon, Portugal.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Charli-Joseph, L., Siqueiros-García, J.M., Eakin, H. et al. Enabling collective agency for sustainability transformations through reframing in the Xochimilco social–ecological system. Sustain Sci 18, 1215–1233 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01224-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01224-w