Akenji L, Chen H (2016) A framework for shaping sustainable lifestyles: determinants and strategies. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi
Akenji L, Bengtsson M, Bleischwitz R et al (2016) Ossified materialism: Introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions. J Clean Prod 132:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.071
Article
Google Scholar
Bailey T, Berensson M, Huxley R et al (2019) The future of urban consumption in a 1.5 °C world. C40 cities headline report. C40 Cities, Arup and University of Leeds
Barrett J, Vallack H, Jones A, Haq G (2002) A material flow analysis and ecological footprint of york technical report. SEI, Stockholm
Article
Google Scholar
Bjelle LE, Steen-Olsen K, Wood R (2018) Climate change mitigation potential of Norwegian households and the rebound effect. J Clean Prod 172:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.089
Article
Google Scholar
Climate Analytics, NewClimate Institute (2020) The climate action tracker. https://climateactiontracker.org/. Accessed 30 Sep 2020
Commission for Sustainable Development (2020) Sitoumus2050. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office. https://sitoumus2050.fi/en/lifestyles#/. Accessed 20 Dec 2020
Creutzig F, Roy J, Lamb WF et al (2018) Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Chang 8:260–263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
Article
Google Scholar
Dao H, Friot D, Peduzzi P et al (2015) Environmental limits and swiss footprints based on planetary boundaries. UNEP/GRID-Geneva and University of Geneva, Geneva
Davies AR, Doyle R (2015) Transforming household consumption: from backcasting to homelabs experiments. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105:425–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.1000948
Article
Google Scholar
Devaney L, Davies AR (2017) Disrupting household food consumption through experimental HomeLabs: outcomes, connections, contexts. J Consum Cult 17:823–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516631153
Article
Google Scholar
Doyle R, Davies AR (2013) Towards sustainable household consumption: exploring a practice oriented, participatory backcasting approach for sustainable home heating practices in Ireland. J Clean Prod 48:260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.015
Article
Google Scholar
Dubois G, Sovacool B, Aall C et al (2019) It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Res Soc Sci 52:144–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001
Article
Google Scholar
European Commission (2018) A clean planet for all. A European long-term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Com(2018) 773
Evans D, Jackson T (2007) Towards a sociology of sustainable lifestyles. RESOLVE Working Paper 03-07
Figge F, Young W, Barkemeyer R (2014) Sufficiency or efficiency to achieve lower resource consumption and emissions? The role of the rebound effect. J Clean Prod 69:216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.031
Article
Google Scholar
Froemelt A, Dürrenmatt DJ, Hellweg S et al (2018) Using data mining to assess environmental impacts of household consumption behaviors. Environ Sci Technol 52:8467–8478. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01452
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Girod B, de Haan P, Ecology I et al (2010) More or better? A model for changes in household greenhouse gas emissions due to higher income. J Ind Ecol 14:31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00202.x
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Girod B, van Vuuren DP, Hertwich EG (2014) Climate policy through changing consumption choices: options and obstacles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Glob Environ Chang 25:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.004
Article
Google Scholar
Government of Japan (2019) The long-term strategy under the Paris agreement. Cabinet Decision, June 11, 2019.
Greiff K, Teubler J, Baedeker C, et al (2017) Material and carbon footprint of household activities. In: Keyson D, Guerra-Santin O, Lockton D (eds) Living labs: design and assessment of sustainable living. pp 259–275 Springer, Cham
Hedenus F (2011) Report prepared for “One Tonne Life project”—method for estimation of a families’ greenhouse gas emissions. Chalmers University of Technology
Herrera NR (2017) The Emergence of Living Lab Methods. In: Keyson D, Guerra-Santin O, Lockton D (eds) Living labs: design and assessment of sustainable living. pp 9–22 Springer, Cham
Hersey J, Lazarus N, Chance T et al (2009) Capital consumption: the transition to sustainable consumption and production in London. Greater London Authority, London
Google Scholar
Hertwich EG (2005) Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 39:4673–4684. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0497375
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Hertwich EG, Peters GP (2009) Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43:6414–6420. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803496a
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Hirano Y, Ihara T, Yoshida Y (2016) Estimating residential CO2 emissions based on daily activities and consideration of methods to reduce emissions. Build Environ 103:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.02.021
Article
Google Scholar
Hossain M, Leminen S, Westerlund M (2019) A systematic review of living lab literature. J Clean Prod 213:976–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
Article
Google Scholar
Hughes N, Strachan N (2010) Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios. Energy Policy 38:6056–6065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.061
Article
Google Scholar
Hussain M, Tapinos E, Knight L (2017) Scenario-driven roadmapping for technology foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Change 124:160–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.005
Article
Google Scholar
IGES, Aalto University, D-mat (2019) 1.5-Degree Lifestyles: Targets and options for reducing lifestyle carbon footprints. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan
Impiö J, Lähteenoja S, Orasmaa A (2020) Pathways to 1.5-degree lifestyles by 2030. Sitra. https://www.sitra.fi/en/publications/pathways-to-1-5-degree-lifestyles-by-2030/. Accessed 3 Dec 2020
IPCC (2018) Global Warming of 1.5 °C: an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
Ivanova D, Wood R (2020) The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability. Glob Sustain 3:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.12
Article
Google Scholar
Ivanova D, Stadler K, Steen-Olsen K et al (2016) Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. J Ind Ecol 20:526–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12371
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Ivanova D, Barrett J, Wiedenhofer D et al (2020) Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environ Res Lett 15:9301. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589
Article
Google Scholar
Jensen CL, Goggins G, Fahy F et al (2018) Towards a practice-theoretical classification of sustainable energy consumption initiatives: Insights from social scientific energy research in 30 European countries. Energy Res Soc Sci 45:297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.025
Article
Google Scholar
Jones CM, Kammen DM (2011) Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environ Sci Technol 45:4088–4095. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102221h
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kainuma M, Shukla PR, Jiang K (2012) Framing and modeling of a low carbon society: an overview. Energy Econ 34:S316–S324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.015
Article
Google Scholar
Kartha S, Kemp-Benedict E, Ghosh E et al (2020) The carbon inequality era: an assessment of the global distribution of consumption emissions among individuals from 1990 to 2015 and beyond. Joint Research Report. Oxfam International and SEI
Kivimaa P, Hildén M, Huitema D et al (2017) Experiments in climate governance—a systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. J Clean Prod 169:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027
Article
Google Scholar
Koide R, Lettenmeier M, Kojima S et al (2019) Carbon footprints and consumer lifestyles: an analysis of lifestyle factors and gap analysis by consumer segment in Japan. Sustain 11:5983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215983
Article
Google Scholar
Laakso S, Lettenmeier M (2016) Household-level transition methodology towards sustainable material footprints. J Clean Prod 132:184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.03.009
Article
Google Scholar
Lahtinen S, Sihto-Nissilä S-L, Kolehmainen J et al (2020) Kestävien elämäntapojen kiihdyttämö 2019. Loppuraportti—Vantaa. Sustainable lifestyles accelerator 2019 final report—City of Vantaa (In Finnish). Helsinki
Leppänen J, Neuvonen A, Ritola M et al (2012) Scenarios for sustainable lifestyles 2050: from global champions to local loops. Future scenarios for new european social models with visualisations. SPREAD Sustainable Lifestyles 2050
Lettenmeier M, Liedtke C, Rohn H (2014) Eight tons of material footprint—suggestion for a resource cap for household consumption in Finland. Resources 3:488–515. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030488
Article
Google Scholar
Lettenmeier M (2018) A sustainable level of material footprint—Benchmark for designing one-planet lifestyles. Doctoral dissertation. Aalto University, Helsinki
Moore J, Kissinger M, Rees WE (2013) An urban metabolism and ecological footprint assessment of Metro Vancouver. J Environ Manag 124:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.009
Article
Google Scholar
Moran D, Wood R, Hertwich E et al (2020) Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions. Clim Policy 20:S28–S38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1551186
Article
Google Scholar
Nansai K, Kondo Y, Kagawa S et al (2012) Estimates of embodied global energy and air-emission intensities of Japanese products for building a Japanese input-output life cycle assessment database with a global system boundary. Environ Sci Technol 46:9146–9154. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2043257
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Nelldal B-L, Andersson E (2012) Mode shift as a measure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Proc Soc Behav Sci 48:3187–3197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1285
Article
Google Scholar
Nissinen A, Grönroos J, Heiskanen E et al (2007) Developing benchmarks for consumer-oriented life cycle assessment-based environmental information on products, services and consumption patterns. J Clean Prod 15:538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.016
Article
Google Scholar
Nykvist B, Persson Å, Moberg F, et al (2013) National environmental performance on planetary boundaries. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
Peters GP (2010) Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.004
Article
Google Scholar
Ranger N, Gohar LK, Lowe JA et al (2012) Is it possible to limit global warming to no more than 1.5°C?. Climatic Change 111:973–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0414-8
Article
Google Scholar
Raskin P, Swart R, Robinson J (2004) Navigating the sustainability transition: the future of scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change “Knowledge for the sustainability transition. the challenge for social science”, pp 53–66
Rockstrom J (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
Article
Google Scholar
Rockström J, Gaffney O, Rogelj J et al (2017) A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355:1269–1271. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443
Article
Google Scholar
Salomaa A, Juhola S (2020) How to assess sustainability transformations: a review. Glob Sustain 3:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.17
Article
Google Scholar
Saujot M, Le Gallic T, Waisman H (2021) Lifestyle changes in mitigation pathways: policy and scientific insights. Environ Res Lett 16:015005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd0a9
Article
Google Scholar
Schanes K, Giljum S, Hertwich E (2016) Low carbon lifestyles: a framework to structure consumption strategies and options to reduce carbon footprints. J Clean Prod 139:1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.154
Article
Google Scholar
Schliwa G, Evans JP, McCormick K, Voytenko Y (2015) Living labs and sustainability transitions—assessing the impact of urban experimentation. Paper presented at ‘Innovations in Climate Governance’ Helsinki Finland 12–13 March
Seppälä J, Mäenpää I, Koskela S et al (2009) Suomen Kansantalouden Materiaalivirtojen Ympäristövaikutusten Arviointi ENVIMAT-Mallilla. Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Material Flows Caused by the Finnish Economy with the ENVIMAT Model (In Finnish). The Finnish Environment 20
Shrivastava P, Smith MS, O’Brien K, Zsolnai L (2020) Transforming sustainability science to generate positive social and environmental change globally. One Earth 2:329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010
Article
Google Scholar
Spaargaren G, Oosterveer P (2009) Life(style) Politics for sustainable consumption: analyzing the role of citizen-consumers in global environmental change. European-American workshop on Climate Change Mitigation; Considering Lifestyle Options in Europe and the US
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9629
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
van Timmeren A, Keyson DV (2017) Towards sustainable living. In: Keyson D., Guerra-Santin O., Lockton D. (eds) Living labs: design and assessment of sustainable living. pp 3–7. Springer, Cham
Tukker A, Cohen MJ, Hubacek K, Mont O (2010) The Impacts of household consumption and options for change. J Ind Ecol 14:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00208.x
Article
Google Scholar
UNEP (2020) Emissions Gap Report 2020. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi
United Nations (2017) World population prospects: the 2017 revision
van den Berg NJ, Hof AF, Akenji L et al (2019) Improved modelling of lifestyle changes in integrated assessment models: cross-disciplinary insights from methodologies and theories. Energy Strategy Rev 26:100420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100420
Article
Google Scholar
van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, Gernaat DEHJ et al (2018) Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nat Clim Chang 8:391–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8
Article
Google Scholar
Vita G, Lundström JR, Hertwich EG et al (2019) The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in Europe: connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences. Ecol Econ 164:106322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002
Article
Google Scholar
von Geibler J, Erdmann L, Liedtke C et al (2014) Exploring the potential of a German living lab research infrastructure for the development of low resource products and services. Resources 3:575–598. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030575
Article
Google Scholar
Voytenko Y, McCormick K, Evans J, Schliwa G (2016) Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod 123:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
Article
Google Scholar
Weber CL, Matthews HS (2008) Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecol Econ 66:379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.021
Article
Google Scholar
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Article
Google Scholar
West SE, Owen A, Axelsson K, West CD (2016) Evaluating the use of a carbon footprint calculator: communicating impacts of consumption at household level and exploring mitigation options. J Ind Ecol 20:396–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12372
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Wood R, Moran D, Stadler K et al (2018) Prioritizing consumption-based carbon policy based on the evaluation of mitigation potential using input-output methods. J Ind Ecol 22:540–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12702
Article
Google Scholar
Wright LA, Coello J, Kemp S, Williams I (2011) Carbon footprinting for climate change management in cities. Carbon Manag 2:49–60. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.41
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Wynes S, Nicholas KA, Zhao J, Donner SD (2018) Measuring what works: Quantifying greenhouse gas emission reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7
Article
Google Scholar
Wynes S, Nicholas KA (2017) The climate mitigation gap : education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett 12:074024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541