Abstract
In the last three decades, sustainability has become a guiding principle for states, organizations, companies, and social movements as well as a general ideal for social change. While sustainability seems to be a rather inevitable path of development, there is no consensus over the goals and visions of the future associated with this concept. Proponents of a “Green Economy,” for instance, regard economic growth as a prerequisite for sustainable development and advocate a modernization of society, which implies moderate adjustments toward a sustainable economy within the current institutional framework. Critics of this ecological modernization approach see the imperative of economic growth as an obstacle for sustainable development and instead support a fundamental transformation of society. A third perspective tries to solve the problems of sustainable development with wide-ranging politics of control, using concepts such as “ecological state of emergency” or enforcing resilience measures for vulnerable populations while creating safe enclaves for a privileged few. These three possible ideal typical trajectories of social change—modernization, transformation, and control—are not fixed yet, but rather represent different and highly contested imaginaries of the future. These imaginaries then structure distinctive practices of sustainability in the fields of politics, the economy, civil society, and science. These practices in turn are interdependent with specific structures, such as material infrastructures or the ecological system of the earth. The proposed conceptional framework uses the theoretical concepts of imaginaries, practices, and structures to study the possible futures of sustainability, specifically modernization, transformation, and control, as well as possible interdependencies between these developments. It focuses on sustainability as a sociological category indicative for understanding socioeconomic change, the emergence of new conflicts, inequalities, hierarchies, and justification patterns that result from including sustainable criteria into different fields, institutions, and value systems. Deciphering futures of sustainability does not aim at providing prognoses or forecasts, but intents to work out an analytical concept that asks how contemporary societies change when they are guided by imaginaries of sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For the older historical roots of the concept see Caradonna 2014.
This refers to the program of the newly established Humanities Centre for Advanced Studies “Futures of Sustainability: Modernization, Transformation, Control” at Universität Hamburg which is funded by the German Research Foundation and directed by the authors of this article.
The concept of the anthropocene is not uncontested because it implicitly downplays the main responsibility of the early industrialized countries for global warming and therefore is criticized to be a normative questionable and apolitical concept, see Swyngedouw and Ernstson (2018).
This is the reason why most approaches that speak of “transition” or “transformation” (e.g., the German WBGU) can nevertheless be subsumed under our concept of modernization (cf. Loorbach et al. 2017).
References
Acosta A (2017): Rethinking the world from the perspective of Buen Vivir. www.degrowth.info
Adams S et al (2015) Social imaginaries in debate. Soc Imag 1(1):15–52
Adloff F (2018) Politik der Gabe. Für ein anderes Zusammenleben. Edition Nautilus, Hamburg
Adloff F, Heins VM (eds) (2015) Konvivialismus. Eine Debatte. Transcript, Bielefeld
Adloff F, Leggewie C (eds) (2014) Convivialist manifesto. A declaration of interdependence. Centre for Global Cooperation Research, Duisburg
Asara V et al (2015) Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability. Sustain Sci 10(3):375–384
Bauhardt C (2011) Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse von der Materialität aus denken. Feministische Ökonomik, Queer Ecologies und das Konzept Ressourcenpolitik. GENDER-Z Geschlecht Kult Ges 3(3):89–110
Beck U (1992) Risk society. Towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Beckert J (2016) Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Besedovsky N (2018) Finanzialisierung von Nachhaltigkeit. In: Neckel S et al (eds) Die Gesellschaft der Nachhaltigkeit. Umrisse eines Forschungsprogramms. Bielefeld, Transcript, pp 25–40
Boatcă M (2016) Global inequalities beyond occidentalism. Routledge, London
Boltanski L, Chiapello È (2007) The new spirit of capitalism. Verso, London
Borup M et al (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 18(3–4):285–298
Bowker GC et al (2010) Toward information infrastructure studies. ways of knowing in a networked environment. In: Hunsinger J, Klastrup L, Allen M (eds) International handbook of internet research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 97–117
Brand U, Wissen M (2017) Imperiale Lebensweise: Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur in Zeiten des globalen Kapitalismus. Oekom, Munich
Brunkhorst H (1998) Demokratischer Experimentalismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
Butollo F, Kalff Y (2017) Entsteht der Postkapitalismus im Kapitalismus? Eine Kritik an Masons Transformationsstrategie. PROKLA 47(2):291–308
Caillé A, Vandenberghe F (2015) Neo-classical sociology. The prospects of social theory today. Eur J Soc Theory 19(1):1–18
Candeias M (2014) Szenarien grüner Transformation. In: Brie M (ed) Futuring. Perspektiven der Transformation im Kapitalismus über ihn hinaus. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster, pp 303–329
Caradonna JL (2014) Sustainability. A history. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Castoriadis C (1987) The imaginary constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge
Chiapello È (2015) Financialisation of valuation. Hum Stud 38(1):13–35
Chiapello È, Godefroy G (2017) The dual function of judgment devices. Why does the plurality of market classifications matter? Hist Soc Res 42(1):152–188
Clark N, Yusoff K (2017) Geosocial formations and the anthropocene. Theory Cult Soc 34(2–3):3–23
Coleman R (2017) A sensory sociology of the future. Affect, hope and inventive methodologies. Sociol Rev 65(3):525–543
Commission E (2010) Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European Commission, Brüssel
Dalby S (2017) Anthropocene formations. Environmental security, geopolitics and disaster. Theory Cult Soc 34(2–3):233–252
Davis M (2007) Planet of slums. Verso, London
Degens, P (2016) Anderes Geld–Anders Wirtschaften? In: Adloff, F, Kocka, J (eds.) Kapitalismus und Zivilgesellschaft, special issue of Forschungs Journal Soziale Bewegungen 29(3):98–109
Delanty G, Mota A (2017) Governing the anthropocene. Agency, governance, knowledge. Eur J Soc Theory 20(1):9–38
Dewey J (1927) The public and its problems. Swallow Press, Denver
Dörre K, Lessenich S, Rosa H (2015) Sociology, capitalism, critique. Verso, London
Edwards PN (2003) Infrastructure and modernity. Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In: Misa TJ, Brey P, Feenberg A (eds) Modernity and technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 185–226
Eisenstadt SN (1973) Tradition, change, and modernity. Wiley, New York
Elder-Vass D (2017) Material parts in social structures. J Soc Ontol 3(1):89–105
Escobar A (1995) Encountering development. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Escobar A (2011) Sustainability. Design for the pluriverse. Development 54(2):137–140
Feist M, Fuchs D (2014) Was heißt hier nachhaltig? In: Heires M, Nölke A (eds) Politische Ökonomie der Finanzialisierung. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 225–240
Folke C et al (2010) Resilience thinking. Integrating resilience, adaptivity and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20 (online)
Fraser N (2017a) Crisis of care? On the social-reproductive contradictions of contemporary capitalism. In: Bhattacharya T (ed) Social reproduction theory. Remapping class, recentering oppression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 21–36
Fraser N (2017b) Progressive neoliberalism versus reactionary populism. A Hobson’s choice. In: Geiselberger H (ed) The great regression. Polity Press, Cambridge, pp 40–48
Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Outline of a theory of structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge
Green New Deal Group (2008) A green new deal. Joined-up policies to solve the triple crunch of the credit crisis, climate change and high oil prices, https://neweconomics.org
Groß M, Mautz R (2014) Renewable energies. Routledge, London
Grunwald A (2010) Wider die Privatisierung der Nachhaltigkeit. Warum ökologisch korrekter Konsum die Umwelt nicht retten kann. GAIA 19(3):178–182
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press, Boston
Hallegatte S et al (2011) From growth to green growth. World Bank, Washington, DC
Harvey D (2004) The ‘new’ imperialism Accumulation by dispossession. Soc Regist 40:63–87
Huber J (2004) New technologies and environmental innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Illich I (1973) Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row, New York
Jänicke M (2012) Megatrend Umweltinnovation: Zur ökologischen Modernisierung von Wirtschaft und Staat. Oekom, Munich
Jerneck M (2017) Financialization impedes climate change mitigation: evidence from the early American solar industry. Sci Adv 3(3):e1601861
Jonas M (2017) Transition or transformation? A plea for the praxeological approach of radical socio-ecological change. In: Jonas M, Littig B (eds) Praxeological political analysis. Routledge, London, pp 116–133
Jorgenson AK (2012) The sociology of ecologically unequal exchange and carbon dioxide emissions, 1960–2005. Soc Sci Res 41(2):242–252
Kallis G, Demaria F, D’Alisa G (eds) (2015) Degrowth. A vocabulary for a new era. Routledge, London
Kosoy N, Corbera E (2010) Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol Econ 69(6):1228–1236
Kothari A, Demaria F, Acosta A (2015) Buen Vivir, degrowth and ecological Swaraj. Alternatives to development and the green economy. Development 57(3):362–375
Latouche S (2009) Farewell to growth. Polity Press, Cambridge
Leggewie C, Welzer H (2011) Das Ende der Welt, wie wir sie kannten. Fischer, Frankfurt
Lenz S, Neckel S (2019) Ethical banks between moral self-commitment and economic expansion. In: Balsiger Ph, Schiller-Merkens S (eds) The contested morality of markets. Emerald, Bingley (UK)
Lessenich S (2016) The externalization society: living beyond the means of others. In: Schulz MS (ed) The futures we want: global sociology and the struggles for a better world. Neopubli, Berlin, pp 66–67
Littig B (2017) Good green jobs for whom? A feminist critique of the green economy. In: MacGregor S (ed) Routledge handbook of gender and environment. Routldege, London, pp 318–330
Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Avelino F (2017) Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annu Rev Resour Environ 42:599–626
Mason P (2015) PostCapitalism. A guide to our future. Allen Lane, London
Mellor M (2010) The future of money from financial crisis to public resource. Pluto Press, London
Meyer JW (2009) World society. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mol AP, Spaargaren G, Sonnenfeld DA (2014) Ecological modernization theory: taking stock, moving forward. In: Lockie S et al (eds) Routledge international handbook of social and environmental change. Routledge, London, pp 15–30
Muraca B (2014) Gut leben. Eine Gesellschaft jenseits des Wachstums. Wagenbach, Berlin
Muraca B, Döring R (2018) From (strong) sustainability to degrowth. A philosophical and historical reconstruction. In: Caradonna JL (ed) Routledge handbook of the history of sustainability. Routledge, London, pp 339–362
Nachtwey O (2018) Germany’s hidden crisis. Social decline in the heart of Europe. Verso, London
Neckel S (2013) “Refeudalisierung”—Systematik und Aktualität eines Begriffs der Habermas’schen Gesellschaftsanalyse. Leviathan 41(1):39–56
Neckel S (2017) The sustainability society: a sociological perspective. Cult Pract Eur 2(2):46–52
Neckel S et al (2018) Die Gesellschaft der Nachhaltigkeit. Umrisse eines Forschungsprogramms. Transcript, Bielefeld
Nowicka M, Vertovec S (2014) Comparing convivialities: dreams and realities of living-with-differences. Eur J Cult Stud 17(4):341–356
O’Sullivan TM (2015) Environmental security is homeland security. Climate disruption as the ultimate disaster risk multiplier. Risk Hazards Cris Public Policy 6(2):183–222
OECD (2011) Towards green growth. OECD Publishing, Paris
Paech N (2012) Liberation from excess The road to a post-growth economy. Oekom, Munich
Parsons T (1966) Societies. Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Patomäki H, Steger MB (2011) Social imaginaries and big history: towards a new planetary consciousness? Futures 42(10):1056–1063
Paulson S (2017) Degrowth: culture, power and chance. J Political Ecol 24(1):425–448
Raskin P et al (2010) The century ahead. Searching for sustainabilty. Sustainability 2(8):2626–2651
Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5(2):243–263
Rifkin J (2014) The zero marginal cost society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Rockström J et al (2009) Planetary boundaries. Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32
Ryan AB (2013) The transformative capacity of the commons and commoning. Ir J Sociol 21(2):90–102
Sassen S (2014) Expulsions. Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, von Savigny E (2001) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London
Schor JB (2010) Plenitude. The new economics of true wealth. Penguin Press, London
Shove E (2016) Infrastructures and practices. In: Coutard O, Rutherford J (eds) Beyond the Networked City. Infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in north and south. Routledge, London, pp 242–258
Shove E (2017) Matters of practice. In: Hui A, Schatzki TR, Shove E (eds) The nexus of practices. Connections, constellations, practitioners. Routledge, London, pp 155–168
Srnicek N, Williams A (2015) Inventing the future. Postcapitalism and a world without work. Verso, London
Steffen W et al (2015) Planetary boundaries. Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855
Stirling A (2014) Emancipating transformations. From controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress. STEPS working paper 64, https://steps-centre.org
Schachtschneider U, Adler F (2010) Green New Deal, Suffizienz oder Ökosozialismus? Konzepte für gesellschaftliche Wege aus der Öko-Krise. Oekom, München
Swyngedouw E, Ernstson H (2018) Interrupting the anthropo-obScene: immuno-biopolitics and depoliticizing ontologies in the anthropocene. Theory Cult Soc 35(6):3–30
Taylor C (2004) Modern social imaginaries. Duke University Press, Durham
UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy—pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. United Nations Environmental Program, Nairobi
U.S. Department of Defense (2015) National security implications of climate-related risks and a changing climate. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC
van Laak D (2004) Technological infrastructure. Concepts and consequences. Icon. J Int Comm Hist Technol 10:53–64
van Lente H (2012) Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations. Lessons from the sociology of expectations. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 24(8):769–782
Walker J, Cooper M (2011) Genealogies of resilience. From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Secur Dialogue 42(2):143–160
Wright EO (2010) Envisioning real utopias. Verso, London
Zebrowski C (2015) The value of resilience. Securing life in the twenty-first century. Routledge, London
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Research Unit. DFG-FOR 2769).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handled by: David Löw Beer, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Germany.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adloff, F., Neckel, S. Futures of sustainability as modernization, transformation, and control: a conceptual framework. Sustain Sci 14, 1015–1025 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00671-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00671-2