Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 1015–1025 | Cite as

Futures of sustainability as modernization, transformation, and control: a conceptual framework

  • Frank Adloff
  • Sighard NeckelEmail author
Special Feature: Original Article The politics of making and un-making (sustainable) futures
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: The politics of making and un-making (sustainable) futures

Abstract

In the last three decades, sustainability has become a guiding principle for states, organizations, companies, and social movements as well as a general ideal for social change. While sustainability seems to be a rather inevitable path of development, there is no consensus over the goals and visions of the future associated with this concept. Proponents of a “Green Economy,” for instance, regard economic growth as a prerequisite for sustainable development and advocate a modernization of society, which implies moderate adjustments toward a sustainable economy within the current institutional framework. Critics of this ecological modernization approach see the imperative of economic growth as an obstacle for sustainable development and instead support a fundamental transformation of society. A third perspective tries to solve the problems of sustainable development with wide-ranging politics of control, using concepts such as “ecological state of emergency” or enforcing resilience measures for vulnerable populations while creating safe enclaves for a privileged few. These three possible ideal typical trajectories of social change—modernization, transformation, and control—are not fixed yet, but rather represent different and highly contested imaginaries of the future. These imaginaries then structure distinctive practices of sustainability in the fields of politics, the economy, civil society, and science. These practices in turn are interdependent with specific structures, such as material infrastructures or the ecological system of the earth. The proposed conceptional framework uses the theoretical concepts of imaginaries, practices, and structures to study the possible futures of sustainability, specifically modernization, transformation, and control, as well as possible interdependencies between these developments. It focuses on sustainability as a sociological category indicative for understanding socioeconomic change, the emergence of new conflicts, inequalities, hierarchies, and justification patterns that result from including sustainable criteria into different fields, institutions, and value systems. Deciphering futures of sustainability does not aim at providing prognoses or forecasts, but intents to work out an analytical concept that asks how contemporary societies change when they are guided by imaginaries of sustainability.

Keywords

Sustainability Modernization Transformation Control Sociology Futures 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Research Unit. DFG-FOR 2769).

References

  1. Acosta A (2017): Rethinking the world from the perspective of Buen Vivir. www.degrowth.info
  2. Adams S et al (2015) Social imaginaries in debate. Soc Imag 1(1):15–52Google Scholar
  3. Adloff F (2018) Politik der Gabe. Für ein anderes Zusammenleben. Edition Nautilus, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Adloff F, Heins VM (eds) (2015) Konvivialismus. Eine Debatte. Transcript, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  5. Adloff F, Leggewie C (eds) (2014) Convivialist manifesto. A declaration of interdependence. Centre for Global Cooperation Research, DuisburgGoogle Scholar
  6. Asara V et al (2015) Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability. Sustain Sci 10(3):375–384Google Scholar
  7. Bauhardt C (2011) Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse von der Materialität aus denken. Feministische Ökonomik, Queer Ecologies und das Konzept Ressourcenpolitik. GENDER-Z Geschlecht Kult Ges 3(3):89–110Google Scholar
  8. Beck U (1992) Risk society. Towards a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckert J (2016) Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Besedovsky N (2018) Finanzialisierung von Nachhaltigkeit. In: Neckel S et al (eds) Die Gesellschaft der Nachhaltigkeit. Umrisse eines Forschungsprogramms. Bielefeld, Transcript, pp 25–40Google Scholar
  11. Boatcă M (2016) Global inequalities beyond occidentalism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Boltanski L, Chiapello È (2007) The new spirit of capitalism. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Borup M et al (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 18(3–4):285–298Google Scholar
  14. Bowker GC et al (2010) Toward information infrastructure studies. ways of knowing in a networked environment. In: Hunsinger J, Klastrup L, Allen M (eds) International handbook of internet research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 97–117Google Scholar
  15. Brand U, Wissen M (2017) Imperiale Lebensweise: Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur in Zeiten des globalen Kapitalismus. Oekom, MunichGoogle Scholar
  16. Brunkhorst H (1998) Demokratischer Experimentalismus. Suhrkamp, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  17. Butollo F, Kalff Y (2017) Entsteht der Postkapitalismus im Kapitalismus? Eine Kritik an Masons Transformationsstrategie. PROKLA 47(2):291–308Google Scholar
  18. Caillé A, Vandenberghe F (2015) Neo-classical sociology. The prospects of social theory today. Eur J Soc Theory 19(1):1–18Google Scholar
  19. Candeias M (2014) Szenarien grüner Transformation. In: Brie M (ed) Futuring. Perspektiven der Transformation im Kapitalismus über ihn hinaus. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster, pp 303–329Google Scholar
  20. Caradonna JL (2014) Sustainability. A history. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Castoriadis C (1987) The imaginary constitution of society. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Chiapello È (2015) Financialisation of valuation. Hum Stud 38(1):13–35Google Scholar
  23. Chiapello È, Godefroy G (2017) The dual function of judgment devices. Why does the plurality of market classifications matter? Hist Soc Res 42(1):152–188Google Scholar
  24. Clark N, Yusoff K (2017) Geosocial formations and the anthropocene. Theory Cult Soc 34(2–3):3–23Google Scholar
  25. Coleman R (2017) A sensory sociology of the future. Affect, hope and inventive methodologies. Sociol Rev 65(3):525–543Google Scholar
  26. Commission E (2010) Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European Commission, BrüsselGoogle Scholar
  27. Dalby S (2017) Anthropocene formations. Environmental security, geopolitics and disaster. Theory Cult Soc 34(2–3):233–252Google Scholar
  28. Davis M (2007) Planet of slums. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Degens, P (2016) Anderes Geld–Anders Wirtschaften? In: Adloff, F, Kocka, J (eds.) Kapitalismus und Zivilgesellschaft, special issue of Forschungs Journal Soziale Bewegungen 29(3):98–109Google Scholar
  30. Delanty G, Mota A (2017) Governing the anthropocene. Agency, governance, knowledge. Eur J Soc Theory 20(1):9–38Google Scholar
  31. Dewey J (1927) The public and its problems. Swallow Press, DenverGoogle Scholar
  32. Dörre K, Lessenich S, Rosa H (2015) Sociology, capitalism, critique. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Edwards PN (2003) Infrastructure and modernity. Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In: Misa TJ, Brey P, Feenberg A (eds) Modernity and technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 185–226Google Scholar
  34. Eisenstadt SN (1973) Tradition, change, and modernity. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Elder-Vass D (2017) Material parts in social structures. J Soc Ontol 3(1):89–105Google Scholar
  36. Escobar A (1995) Encountering development. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  37. Escobar A (2011) Sustainability. Design for the pluriverse. Development 54(2):137–140Google Scholar
  38. Feist M, Fuchs D (2014) Was heißt hier nachhaltig? In: Heires M, Nölke A (eds) Politische Ökonomie der Finanzialisierung. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 225–240Google Scholar
  39. Folke C et al (2010) Resilience thinking. Integrating resilience, adaptivity and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20 (online)Google Scholar
  40. Fraser N (2017a) Crisis of care? On the social-reproductive contradictions of contemporary capitalism. In: Bhattacharya T (ed) Social reproduction theory. Remapping class, recentering oppression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 21–36Google Scholar
  41. Fraser N (2017b) Progressive neoliberalism versus reactionary populism. A Hobson’s choice. In: Geiselberger H (ed) The great regression. Polity Press, Cambridge, pp 40–48Google Scholar
  42. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Outline of a theory of structuration. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Green New Deal Group (2008) A green new deal. Joined-up policies to solve the triple crunch of the credit crisis, climate change and high oil prices, https://neweconomics.org
  44. Groß M, Mautz R (2014) Renewable energies. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Grunwald A (2010) Wider die Privatisierung der Nachhaltigkeit. Warum ökologisch korrekter Konsum die Umwelt nicht retten kann. GAIA 19(3):178–182Google Scholar
  46. Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  47. Hallegatte S et al (2011) From growth to green growth. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Harvey D (2004) The ‘new’ imperialism Accumulation by dispossession. Soc Regist 40:63–87Google Scholar
  49. Huber J (2004) New technologies and environmental innovation. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  50. Illich I (1973) Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Jänicke M (2012) Megatrend Umweltinnovation: Zur ökologischen Modernisierung von Wirtschaft und Staat. Oekom, MunichGoogle Scholar
  52. Jerneck M (2017) Financialization impedes climate change mitigation: evidence from the early American solar industry. Sci Adv 3(3):e1601861Google Scholar
  53. Jonas M (2017) Transition or transformation? A plea for the praxeological approach of radical socio-ecological change. In: Jonas M, Littig B (eds) Praxeological political analysis. Routledge, London, pp 116–133Google Scholar
  54. Jorgenson AK (2012) The sociology of ecologically unequal exchange and carbon dioxide emissions, 1960–2005. Soc Sci Res 41(2):242–252Google Scholar
  55. Kallis G, Demaria F, D’Alisa G (eds) (2015) Degrowth. A vocabulary for a new era. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Kosoy N, Corbera E (2010) Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol Econ 69(6):1228–1236Google Scholar
  57. Kothari A, Demaria F, Acosta A (2015) Buen Vivir, degrowth and ecological Swaraj. Alternatives to development and the green economy. Development 57(3):362–375Google Scholar
  58. Latouche S (2009) Farewell to growth. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Leggewie C, Welzer H (2011) Das Ende der Welt, wie wir sie kannten. Fischer, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  60. Lenz S, Neckel S (2019) Ethical banks between moral self-commitment and economic expansion. In: Balsiger Ph, Schiller-Merkens S (eds) The contested morality of markets. Emerald, Bingley (UK)Google Scholar
  61. Lessenich S (2016) The externalization society: living beyond the means of others. In: Schulz MS (ed) The futures we want: global sociology and the struggles for a better world. Neopubli, Berlin, pp 66–67Google Scholar
  62. Littig B (2017) Good green jobs for whom? A feminist critique of the green economy. In: MacGregor S (ed) Routledge handbook of gender and environment. Routldege, London, pp 318–330Google Scholar
  63. Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Avelino F (2017) Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annu Rev Resour Environ 42:599–626Google Scholar
  64. Mason P (2015) PostCapitalism. A guide to our future. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Mellor M (2010) The future of money from financial crisis to public resource. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Meyer JW (2009) World society. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Mol AP, Spaargaren G, Sonnenfeld DA (2014) Ecological modernization theory: taking stock, moving forward. In: Lockie S et al (eds) Routledge international handbook of social and environmental change. Routledge, London, pp 15–30Google Scholar
  68. Muraca B (2014) Gut leben. Eine Gesellschaft jenseits des Wachstums. Wagenbach, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  69. Muraca B, Döring R (2018) From (strong) sustainability to degrowth. A philosophical and historical reconstruction. In: Caradonna JL (ed) Routledge handbook of the history of sustainability. Routledge, London, pp 339–362Google Scholar
  70. Nachtwey O (2018) Germany’s hidden crisis. Social decline in the heart of Europe. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Neckel S (2013) “Refeudalisierung”—Systematik und Aktualität eines Begriffs der Habermas’schen Gesellschaftsanalyse. Leviathan 41(1):39–56Google Scholar
  72. Neckel S (2017) The sustainability society: a sociological perspective. Cult Pract Eur 2(2):46–52Google Scholar
  73. Neckel S et al (2018) Die Gesellschaft der Nachhaltigkeit. Umrisse eines Forschungsprogramms. Transcript, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  74. Nowicka M, Vertovec S (2014) Comparing convivialities: dreams and realities of living-with-differences. Eur J Cult Stud 17(4):341–356Google Scholar
  75. O’Sullivan TM (2015) Environmental security is homeland security. Climate disruption as the ultimate disaster risk multiplier. Risk Hazards Cris Public Policy 6(2):183–222Google Scholar
  76. OECD (2011) Towards green growth. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  77. Paech N (2012) Liberation from excess The road to a post-growth economy. Oekom, MunichGoogle Scholar
  78. Parsons T (1966) Societies. Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  79. Patomäki H, Steger MB (2011) Social imaginaries and big history: towards a new planetary consciousness? Futures 42(10):1056–1063Google Scholar
  80. Paulson S (2017) Degrowth: culture, power and chance. J Political Ecol 24(1):425–448Google Scholar
  81. Raskin P et al (2010) The century ahead. Searching for sustainabilty. Sustainability 2(8):2626–2651Google Scholar
  82. Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5(2):243–263Google Scholar
  83. Rifkin J (2014) The zero marginal cost society. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Rockström J et al (2009) Planetary boundaries. Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32Google Scholar
  85. Ryan AB (2013) The transformative capacity of the commons and commoning. Ir J Sociol 21(2):90–102Google Scholar
  86. Sassen S (2014) Expulsions. Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  87. Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, von Savigny E (2001) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  88. Schor JB (2010) Plenitude. The new economics of true wealth. Penguin Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  89. Shove E (2016) Infrastructures and practices. In: Coutard O, Rutherford J (eds) Beyond the Networked City. Infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in north and south. Routledge, London, pp 242–258Google Scholar
  90. Shove E (2017) Matters of practice. In: Hui A, Schatzki TR, Shove E (eds) The nexus of practices. Connections, constellations, practitioners. Routledge, London, pp 155–168Google Scholar
  91. Srnicek N, Williams A (2015) Inventing the future. Postcapitalism and a world without work. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  92. Steffen W et al (2015) Planetary boundaries. Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855Google Scholar
  93. Stirling A (2014) Emancipating transformations. From controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress. STEPS working paper 64, https://steps-centre.org
  94. Schachtschneider U, Adler F (2010) Green New Deal, Suffizienz oder Ökosozialismus? Konzepte für gesellschaftliche Wege aus der Öko-Krise. Oekom, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  95. Swyngedouw E, Ernstson H (2018) Interrupting the anthropo-obScene: immuno-biopolitics and depoliticizing ontologies in the anthropocene. Theory Cult Soc 35(6):3–30Google Scholar
  96. Taylor C (2004) Modern social imaginaries. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  97. UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy—pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. United Nations Environmental Program, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  98. U.S. Department of Defense (2015) National security implications of climate-related risks and a changing climate. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  99. van Laak D (2004) Technological infrastructure. Concepts and consequences. Icon. J Int Comm Hist Technol 10:53–64Google Scholar
  100. van Lente H (2012) Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations. Lessons from the sociology of expectations. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 24(8):769–782Google Scholar
  101. Walker J, Cooper M (2011) Genealogies of resilience. From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Secur Dialogue 42(2):143–160Google Scholar
  102. Wright EO (2010) Envisioning real utopias. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  103. Zebrowski C (2015) The value of resilience. Securing life in the twenty-first century. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations