Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 635–648 | Cite as

Trends in social metabolism and environmental conflicts in four Andean countries from 1970 to 2013

  • Mario Pérez-Rincón
  • Julieth Vargas-Morales
  • Zulma Crespo-Marín
Special Feature: Original Article The EJAtlas: Ecological Distribution Conflicts as Forces for Sustainability
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: The EJAtlas: Ecological Distribution Conflicts as Forces for Sustainability

Abstract

In the global map of environmental injustices (http://www.ejatlas.com), the Andean countries (AC) report many ecological distribution conflicts. Our hypothesis is that the patterns of such conflicts are explained by the structural shifts of the economies and the concomitant changes in their metabolic profiles. Since the 1990s, these countries went through a strong reprimarization process, which changed their social metabolism as well as intensified environmental pressures and conflicts. In monetary terms, in the AC group of countries (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia), the primary sector increased its importance both in exports as well as in GDP. In the metabolic dynamics, the Domestic Extraction of materials (measured in tons) increased by a factor of 3.4 after jumping from 336 to 1145 MT between 1970 and 2012. This was driven by the fossil fuel and mining sectors. This reality was reflected in the environmental conflicts. Mining, fossil fuels, biomass and hydropower plants are the most conflictive sectors. The research in this article relies on a study of material flow analysis for the four AC carried out by the authors as well as 244 environmental conflicts reported in the EJAtlas until August 2016. The shifts in the metabolic–economic patterns help explain the dynamics and characteristics of the environmental conflicts in the AC. Such conflicts produce social mobilizations, which if successful, might help move society towards sustainability and environmental equity.

Keywords

Environmental conflicts Environmental justice Neo-extractivism Andean countries Social metabolism Material flow analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support from the project “Social Metabolism and environmental conflicts in Andean and Central American Countries” (MESOCA-ANCA), CI 2826, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, is acknowledged. We are grateful to careful revisions by Joan Martinez-Alier (ICTA UAB) and by two anonymous reviewers. Funding was provided by Universidad del Valle (Call for Strengthening of the International Visibility of 2014).

References

  1. Albuquerque MDC (ed) (2004) La Construcción Democrática desde abajo en el Cono Sur. Instituto Polis, Sao PauloGoogle Scholar
  2. Alimonda H (2016) Notas sobre la ecología política latinoamericana: arraigo, herencias, diálogos. Ecología Política 51:36–42Google Scholar
  3. Archila M, García MC, Restrepo AM, Parra L (2014) Informe Especial: Luchas sociales en Colombia 2013 CINEP/Programa por la Paz. Bogotá DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Avila S (2017) (this issue)Google Scholar
  5. Ayres R, Simonis U (1994) Industrial metabolism: restructuring for sustainable development. UN University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  6. Bielschowsky R, Izam M, Mulder N (2011) Dos estudios de la evolución del pensamiento de la CEPAL sobre la diversificación productiva y la inserción internacional (1949–2008). Series Comercio Internacional (vol 12). Santiago de ChileGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunker S (1984) Modes of extraction, unequal exchange, and the progressive underdevelopment of an extreme periphery: the Brazilian Amazon, 1600–1980. Am J Sociol 89(5):1017–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Defensoría del Pueblo (2016) Reporte mensual de conflictos sociales. Lima, Peru. Retrieved from http://www.defensoria.gob.pe/conflictos-sociales/home.php. Accessed 5 Nov 2016
  9. EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) (2015) International energy statistic. EIA, Washington DC. https://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm. Accessed 12 Dec 2015
  10. Escobar A (2014) Sentipensar con la tierra: nuevas lecturas sobre desarrollo, territorio y diferencia. Ediciones UNAULA, MedellínGoogle Scholar
  11. EUROSTAT (2013) Economy-wide material flow accounts (EW-MFA). Compilation guide. Statistical Office of the European Communities. Eurostat, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015a) FAOSTAT Database. FAO, Roma. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/S. Accessed 25 Nov 2015
  13. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015b) Fisheries and aquaculture information and statistics branch. FAO, Roma. http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/es. Accessed 28 Nov 2015
  14. Fischer-Kowalski M (1997) Society’s metabolism: on the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star. In: Redclift M, Woodgate G (eds) The international handbook of environmental sociology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 119–137Google Scholar
  15. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H (2015) Social metabolism: a metric for biophysical growth and degrowth. In: Martínez-Alier J, Muradian R (eds) Handbook of ecological economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 100–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster JB (2000) Marx’s ecology: materialism and nature. Monthly Review Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. García Canclini N (1990) Culturas híbridas. Estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. Editorial Grijalbo, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  18. Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) Entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giljum S (2004) Trade, materials flows, and economic development in the South: the example of Chile. J Ind Ecol 241(8):1–2Google Scholar
  20. Global Witness (2016) On dangerous ground. Global Witness, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. González Casanova P (2006) El colonialismo interno. In: Sociología de la explotación. CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, Buenos Aires, p 240Google Scholar
  22. Gudynas E (2013) Extracciones, extractivismos y extrahecciones. Un marco conceptual para la apropiación de recursos naturales. Centro de Latinoamericano de Desarrollo Social (CLAES), MontevideoGoogle Scholar
  23. Guha R, Martínez-Alier J (1997) Varieties of environmentalism: essays North and South. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Hornborg A (1998) Commentary: towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics. Ecol Econ 25(1):127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hornborg A (2006) Footprints in the cotton fields: the Industrial Revolution as time–space appropriation and environmental load displacement. Ecol Econ 59:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hornborg A (2009) Zero-sum world: challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. Int J Comp Sociol 50:237–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hornborg A, Jorgenson AK (2010) International trade and environmental justice: toward a global political ecology. Nova Science Publishers Inc, HauppaugeGoogle Scholar
  28. Hornborg A, Martinez-Alier J (2016) Ecologically unequal exchange and ecological debt. J Political Ecol 23:328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalmanovitz S, López E (2006) La agricultura colombiana en el Siglo XX. Bogotá, Fondo de Cultura EconómicaGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapp KW (1950) The social costs of private enterprise. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Krausmann F, Fischer-Kowalski M, Schandl H, Eisenmenger N (2008) The global sociometabolic transition. J Ind Ecol 12(5–6):637–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krausmann F, Weisz H, Eisenmenger N, Schütz H, Haas W, Schaffartzik A (2015) Economy-wide material flow accounting introduction and guide. Social Ecology Working Paper, 151 (February), pp 1–121Google Scholar
  33. Lander E (2014) El Neoextractivismo como modelo de desarrollo en América Latina y sus contradicciones. In: (Neo) Extractivismo y el Futuro de la Democracia en América Latina: Diagnóstico y Retos. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Berlín, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  34. Laserna R, Villarroel M (2008) 38 años de conflictos sociales en Bolivia. CERES, COSUDE, Instituto para la Democracia, La PazGoogle Scholar
  35. Latorre S, Farrell KN, Martínez-Alier J (2015) The commodification of nature and socio-environmental resistance in Ecuador: an inventory of accumulation by dispossession cases, 1980–2013. Ecol Econ 116:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martinez-Alier J (2002) The environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinez-Alier J, O’Connor M (1996) Ecological and economic distribution conflicts. In: Costanza R, Martinez-Alier J, Segura O (eds) Getting down to earth: practical applications of ecological economics. Island Press/ISEE, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Martinez-Alier J, Schlüpmann Klaus (1987) Ecological economics: energy environment and society. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Martinez-Alier J, Kallis G, Veuthey S, Walter M, Temper L (2010) Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and valuation languages. Ecol Econ 70(2):153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinez-Alier J, Demaria F, Temper L, Walter M (2016) Changing social metabolism and environmental conflicts in India and South America. J Political Ecol 23:467–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martínez-Alier J, Temper L, Del Bene D, Scheidel A (2016) Is there a global environmental justice movement? J Peasant Stud 43(3):731–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C (2001) Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. Am J Sociol 82:1212–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merlinsky G (2013) La cuestión ambiental en la agenda pública. In: Merlinsky G (ed) Cartografias del conflicto ambiental en Argentina. CLACSO CICCUS, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  45. Mignolo W (2011) The coloniality: the hidden face of modernity. In: Quijano A (ed) Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural studies, vol 21(2–3), pp 155–167Google Scholar
  46. Moore J (2000) Sugar and the expansion of the early modern world-economy: commodity frontiers, ecological transformation, and industrialization. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 23(3):409–433Google Scholar
  47. Orellana R (1999) Aproximaciones a un marco teórico para la comprensión de conflictos socio-ambientales. In: Ortíz P (ed) Comunidades y conflictos socioambientales: experiencias y desafíos en América Latina. Ediciones ABYALA-YALA, Quito, pp 89–108Google Scholar
  48. Ortíz P (1999) Apuntes teórico-conceptuales para el diseño de una propuesta metodológica de manejo de conflictos socioambientales a través de la forestería comunitaria. In: Ortíz P (ed) Comunidades y conflictos socioambientales: experiencia y desafíos en América Latina. Ediciones ABYALA-YALA, Quito, pp 7–34Google Scholar
  49. Pérez Manrique PL, Brun J, González-Martínez AC, Walter M, Martínez-Alier J (2013) The biophysical performance of Argentina (1970–2009). J Ind Ecol 17(4):590–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pérez-Rincón MA (2006) Colombian international trade from a physical perspective: towards an ecological “Prebisch thesis”. Ecol Econ 59(4):519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pérez-Rincón MA (2007) Comercio internacional y medio ambiente en Colombia: mirada desde la economía ecológica. (Universidad del Valle, Ed.), CaliGoogle Scholar
  52. Pérez-Rincón MA (2014) Conflictos ambientales en Colombia: inventario, caracterización y análisis. In: Garay L (ed) Minería en Colombia: control público, memoria y justicia socio-ecológica, movimientos sociales y posconflicto. Contraloría General de la República, Bogotá, pp 253–326Google Scholar
  53. Perreault T, Valdivia G (2010) Hydrocarbons, popular protest and national imaginaries: Ecuador and Bolivia in comparative context. Geoforum 41(5):689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Quijano A (2011) "Bien Vivir”, entre el “desarrollo” y la Des/Colonialidad del Poder. In: Ecuador debate. Acerca del Buen Vivir. Centro Andino de Acción Popular CAAP, Quito. No. 84, pp 77–87Google Scholar
  55. Ramírez Gallegos F (2010) Fragmentación, reflujo y desconcierto. Movimientos sociales y cambio político en el Ecuador (2000–2010). Osal XI(28):17–47Google Scholar
  56. Russi D, Gonzalez-Martinez AC, Silva-Macher JC, Giljum S, Martinez-Alier J, Vallejo MC (2008) Material flows in Latin America: a comparative analysis of Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru, 1980–2000. J Ind Ecol 12(5–6):704–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sabatini F (1997) Conflictos ambientales y desarrollo sostenible de las regiones urbanas. Eure 23(68):77–91Google Scholar
  58. Samaniego P, Vallejo MC, Martínez-Alier J (2017) Commercial and biophysical deficits in South America, 1990–2013. Ecol Econ 133:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scheidel A, Temper L, Demaria F, Martinez-Alier J (2017) (this issue)Google Scholar
  60. Schlosberg D (2007) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements and nature. Oxford University Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Silva-Macher JC (2016) A metabolic profile of Peru: an application of multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM) to the mining sector’s exosomatic energy flows. J Ind Ecol 20(5):1072–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Slipak A (2013) De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de reprimarización. In: VI Jornadas de Economía Crítica de la Sociedad de Economía Crítica (SEC). Buenos Aires, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  63. Stavenhagen R (1963) Clases, colonialismo y aculturación. Revista América Latina 6(4):63–104Google Scholar
  64. Svampa M (2013) Consenso de los Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad 244:30–46Google Scholar
  65. Svampa M (2015) Modelos de desarrollo, cuestión ambiental y giro eco-territorial. In: Alimonda H (ed) La naturaleza colonizada: ecologia política y minería en Amércia Latina. CLACSO, Ediciones CICCUS, Buenos Aires, pp 181–215Google Scholar
  66. Temper L, Del Bene D, Martinez-Alier J (2015) Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas. J Political Ecol 22:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. UNEP (2016) Global material flows and resource productivity. United Nations Environment Programme, ParisGoogle Scholar
  68. UNSD (United Nations Statistical Division) (2015) Commodity trade database (COMTRADE). UNSD, Washington DC. http://comtrade.un.org/data/. Accessed 15 Dec 2015
  69. USGS (United States Geological Survey) (2015) National minerals information center. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/. Accessed 18 Dec 2015
  70. Vallejo MC (2010) Biophysical structure of the Ecuadorian economy, foreign trade and policy implications. Ecol Econ 70(2):159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vallejo MC (2015) Perfiles metabólicos de tres economías andinas: Colombia, Ecuador y Perú. FLACSO Ecuador: Tesis doctoral, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  72. Vallejo MC, Pérez Rincón M, Martínez Alier J (2011) Metabolic Profile of the Colombian Economy from 1970 to 2007. J Ind Ecol 15(2):245–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vélez-Torres I, Ruiz-Torres G (2015) Extractivismo neoliberal minero y conflictos socio-ambientales en Perú y Colombia. Ambiente y Sostenibilidad 2015(5):3–15Google Scholar
  74. Wallerstein I (1974) The modern world system: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the sixteenth century. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Warlenius R (2016) Linking ecological debt and ecologically unequal exchange: stocks, flows, and unequal sink appropriation. J Political Ecol 23:364–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Warlenius R, Pierce G, Ramasar V (2015) Reversing the arrow of arrears: the concept of “Ecological Debt” and its value for environmental justice. Glob Environ Change 30:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. West J, Schandl H (2013) Material use and material efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean. Ecol Econ 94:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad del Valle-Instituto CinaraCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations