Skip to main content
Log in

Christian Thiel, Christoph Thiel

Distributed Ledger Technologie (DLT) im Kontext europäischer Vertrauensdienste

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die EU versucht mit Hilfe der in der eiDAS-VO eingeführten qualifizierten Vertrauensdienste eine Basis für eine europaweite, sichere und rechtsgültige elektronische Kommunikation und sichere elektronische Identifizierung zu schaffen. Während qualifizierte Vertrauensdienste von ihren Nutzern im Kern das Vertrauen in zentrale Dritte (Trusted Third Parties) fordern, wächst das Interesse an Distributed Ledger Technologie und ihre Anwendungen mit ihrem dezentralen Ansatz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. IOTA – https://iota.org/. Last visited 09.02.2020

  2. Projekt uPort – https://www.uport.me/. Last visited 09.02.2020

  3. Sovrin – https://sovrin.org/. W3C – Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v0.10 Last visited 09.02.2020

  4. Turek, J., & Shasha, D. (1992). The many faces of consensus in distributed systems. Computer, 25(6), 8-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. REGULATION (EU) No 910/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 July 2014on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC[6] Mandate M460: “Standardisation Mandate to the European Standardisation Organisations CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in the Field of Information and Communication Technologies Applied to Electronic Signatures”.

  6. Blockchain sicher gestalten, Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), Mai 2019

  7. Fiedler, A., Thiel, C., Der grenzenlose digitale Binnenmarkt. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 37(1): 14-19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Locher, T., Obermeier, S., & Pignolet, Y.A. (2018) When Can a Distributed Ledger Replace a Trusted Third Party? arXiv, 1806.10929.

  9. Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016) Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts. In Proc. 37th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P).

  10. Pahl, C., El Ioini, N., Helmer, S., & Lee, B. (2018) An architecture pattern for trusted orchestration in IoT edge clouds. In: 2018 Third International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC), pp. 63–70. IEEE

  11. Schoder, D., Beiträge zu: Disintermediationsthese, E-Commerce, intermediär/Intermediation, TTP (Trusted Third Partys), Zertifizierungsstelle, in:Schildhauer, Th. (Hrsg.): Lexikon Electronic Business, Oldenbourg Verlag München, ISBN 3-486-27263-2, 2003

  12. Walport, M. (2016) Distributed ledger technology: beyond blockchain. UK Government Office for Science.

  13. ISO/DIS 22739 Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies – Terminology

  14. Distributed ledger technology overview, concepts, ecosystem, Technical Report FG DLT D1.2, , ITU-T (2019)

  15. Ballandies, M.C., Dapp, M.M., Pournara, E. (2018) Decrypting Distributed Ledger Design -- Taxonomy, Classification and Blockchain Community Evaluation. arXiv, 1811.03419.

  16. Fernández Anta A., Georgiou C., Konwar K., Nicolaou N. (2019) Formalizing and Implementing Distributed Ledger Objects. In: Podelski A., Taïani F. (eds) Networked Systems. NETYS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11028. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putz B., Pernul G. (2019) Trust Factors and Insider Threats in Permissioned Distributed Ledgers. In: Hameurlain A., Wagner R. (eds) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XLII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11860. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fraga-Lamas, P., & Fernández-Caramés, T.M. (2019). A Review on Blockchain Technologies for an Advanced and Cyber-Resilient Automotive Industry. IEEE Access, 7, 17578-17598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glaser, F. (2017) Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: a framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. In HICSS 2017 Proceedings, pp. 1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1145/1235

  20. Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., Teubner, T.: The limits of trust-free systems: a literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Litke, A., Anagnostopoulos, D., Varvarigou, T.: Blockchains for supply chain management: architectural elements and challenges towards a global scale deployment. Logistics 3(1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics3010005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffers, H.: The relevance of blockchain for collaborative networked organizations. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Rezgui, Y. (eds.) PRO-VE 2018. IAICT, vol. 534, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99127-6 1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Thiel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiel, C., Thiel, C. Distributed Ledger Technologie (DLT) im Kontext europäischer Vertrauensdienste . Datenschutz Datensich 44, 250–253 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-020-1261-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-020-1261-9

Navigation