Amazeen, M. A., Thorson, E., Muddiman, A., & Graves, L. (2016). Correcting political and consumer misperceptions: the effectiveness and effects of rating scale versus contextual correction formats. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 28–48.
Google Scholar
Ammann, B. (2016). Verschwörungstheorien in Endlosschlaufe. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. www.nzz.ch/international/amerika/folgenreiche-fake-news-in-den-usa-verschwoerungstheorien-in-endlosschlaufe-ld.133292 (Erstellt: 7. Dez. 2016). Zugegriffen: 17.04.2021
Arendt, F., Haim, M., & Beck, J. (2019). Fake News, Warnhinweise und perzipierter Wahrheitsgehalt: Zur unterschiedlichen Anfälligkeit für Falschmeldungen in Abhängigkeit von der politischen Orientierung. Publizistik, 64, 181–204.
Google Scholar
Asp, E., Manzel, K., Koestner, B., Cole, C. A., Denburg, N. L., & Tranel, D. (2012). A neuropsychological test of belief and doubt. Frontiers in neuroscience, 6, 1–9.
Google Scholar
Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446–458.
Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47, 241–262.
Google Scholar
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: the correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65, 619–638.
Google Scholar
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). See something, say something: correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33, 1131–1140.
Google Scholar
Brady, W. J., Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). Attentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 746–756.
Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N., Maloney, E., Ophir, Y., & Brennan, E. (2015). Interventions to correct misinformation about tobacco products. Tobacco Regulatory Science, 2, 186–197.
Google Scholar
Chan, M. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: a meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28, 1531–1546.
Google Scholar
Chang, C. (2015). Motivated processing: How people perceive news covering novel or contradictory health research findings. Science Communication, 37, 602–634.
Google Scholar
Chua, A. Y. K., & Banerjee, S. (2018). Intentions to trust and share online health rumors: an experiment with medical professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 1–9.
Google Scholar
Citron, D. K., & Chesney, R. (2019). Deep fakes: a looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1640&context=faculty_scholarship. Zugegriffen: 17.04.2021
Dan, V. (2018). Integrative framing analysis: Framing health through words and visuals. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DiFonzo, N., Robinson, N., Suls, J., & Rini, C. (2012). Rumors about cancer: content, sources, coping, transmission, and belief. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 1099–1115.
Google Scholar
Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35, 358–382.
Google Scholar
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cheung, C. S. C., & Maybery, M. T. (2015). He did it! She did it! No, she did not! Multiple causal explanations and the continued influence of misinformation. Journal of Memory and Language, 85, 101–115.
Google Scholar
Elizabeth, J., & Mantzarlis, A. (2016). The week in fact-checking: The fact is, fact-checking can get better. American Press Institute. www.americanpressinstitute.org/factchecking-project/week-fact-checking-fact-fact-checking-can-better/. Zugegriffen: 17.04.2021
Eslick, A. N., Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2011). Ironic effects of drawing attention to story errors. Memory, 19, 184–191.
Google Scholar
Fazio, L. K., Dolan, P. O., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Learning misinformation from fictional sources: Understanding the contributions of transportation and item-specific processing. Memory, 23, 167–177.
Google Scholar
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). system justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338.
Google Scholar
Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication, 37, 145–156.
Google Scholar
Frenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). False memories of fabricated political events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 280–286.
Google Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217–234.
Google Scholar
Ganesan, A., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2019). Experimental examination of social transmission of health information using an online platform. Health Communication, 36, 392–400.
Google Scholar
Garrett, R. K., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and naïve theory. Journal of Communication, 63, 617–637.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, C. (2016). Vaxxed | my son became autistic after his MMR vaccine. www.youtube.com/watch?v=deEeJT7WFsA. Zugegriffen: 17.04.2021
Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: news and the visual framing of elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Donahue, J. K. (2018). The effects of false information in news stories. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Hrsg.), Misinformation and mass audiences (S. 109–123). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar
Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2020). “Fake News” and emerging online media ecosystem: an integrated intermedia agenda-setting analysis of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Communication Research, 47, 178–200.
Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Hall, S. (2012). The spectacle of the ‘Other. In S. Hall (Hrsg.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (S. 223–209). London: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Hamby, A., Ecker, U., & Brinberg, D. (2020). How stories in memory perpetuate the continued influence of false information. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30, 240–259.
Google Scholar
Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2020). Misinformation and polarization in a high-choice media environment: how effective are political fact-checkers? Communication Research, 47, 227–250.
Google Scholar
Hameleers, M., Powell, T. E., Van Der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Bos, L. (2020). A picture paints a thousand lies? The effects and mechanisms of multimodal disinformation and rebuttals disseminated via social media. Political Communication, 37, 281–301.
Google Scholar
Hemsley, J., & Snyder, J. (2018). Dimensions of visual misinformation in the emerging media landscape. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Hrsg.), Misinformation and mass audiences (S. 91–106). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar
Hohlfeld, R. (2020). Wahr oder falsch? Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Wahrnehmung von „Fake News“ und echten Nachrichten in der politischen Kommunikation. In R. Hohlfeld, M. Harnischmacher, E. Heinke, L. Lehner & M. Sengl (Hrsg.), Fake News und Desinformation: Herausforderungen für die vernetzte Gesellschaft und die empirische Forschung (S. 179–202). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Google Scholar
Huang, Y. L., Starbird, K., Orand, M., Stanek, S. A., & Pedersen, H. T. (2015). Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. CSCW, 14–18, 969–980.
Google Scholar
Humprecht, E. (2019). Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: a comparison across four western democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 22, 1973–1988.
Google Scholar
Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., & Austin, L. L. (2011). Examining the role of social media in effective crisis management: the effects of crisis origin, information form, and source on publics’ crisis responses. Communication Research, 41, 74–94.
Google Scholar
Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: when misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 1420–1436.
Google Scholar
Jowett, G. (2008). Propaganda, visual communication of. In W. Donsbach (Hrsg.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp110.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Kelley, D. E., Noar, S. M., & Seidenberg, A. B. (2018). Understanding misinformation in the pro-tanning communication environment: a content analysis. American Journal of Health Education, 49, 234–245.
Google Scholar
Kim, J. W. (2018). Rumor has it: the effects of virality metrics on rumor believability and transmission on Twitter. New Media & Society, 20, 4807–4825.
Google Scholar
Konkes, C., & Lester, L. (2017). Incomplete knowledge, rumour and truth seeking. Journalism Studies, 18, 826–844.
Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: information processing during election campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131.
Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005). Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: the Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science, 16, 190–195.
Google Scholar
Linde-Arias, A. R., Roura, M., & Siqueira, E. (2020). Solidarity, vulnerability and mistrust: How context, information and government affect the lives of women in times of Zika. BMC Infectious Diseases, 20, 1–12.
Google Scholar
Marcus, B. (2020). A nursing approach to the largest measles outbreak in recent U.S. history: Lessons learned battling homegrown vaccine hesitancy. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 25, 1–19.
Google Scholar
Marsh, E. J., & Yang, B. W. (2018). Believing things that are not true. A cognitive science perspective on misinformation. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Hrsg.), Missinformation and mass audiences (S. 15–34). Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
Google Scholar
Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56, 27–51.
Google Scholar
Messaris, P., & Abraham, L. (2001). The role of images in framing news stories. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 215–226). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Moran, M. B., Lucas, M., Everhart, K., Morgan, A., & Prickett, E. (2016). What makes anti-vaccine websites persuasive? A content analysis of techniques used by anti-vaccine websites to engender anti-vaccine sentiment. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 9, 151–163.
Google Scholar
Moravec, P. L., Minas, R. K., & Dennis, A. R. (2019). Fake news on social media: People believe what they want to believe when it makes no sense at all. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1343–1360.
Google Scholar
Mourão, R. R., & Robertson, C. T. (2019). Fake news as discursive integration: an analysis of sites that publish false, misleading, hyperpartisan and sensational information. Journalism Studies, 20, 2077–2095.
Google Scholar
Neuberger, C., Bartsch, A., Reinemann, C., Fröhlich, R., Hanitzsch, T., & Schindler, J. (2019). Der digitale Wandel der Wissensordnung. Theorierahmen für die Analyse von Wahrheit, Wissen und Rationalität in der öffentlichen Kommunikation. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 67, 167–186.
Google Scholar
Newman, E., & Zhang, L. (2021). Truthiness. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffe, E. Newman & N. Schwarz (Hrsg.), The psychology of fake news. Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (S. 90–114). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.
Google Scholar
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: how dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 36–66.
Google Scholar
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303–330.
Google Scholar
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2019). The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29, 222–244.
Google Scholar
Pal, A., Chua, A. Y. K., & Hoe-Lian Goh, D. (2019). Debunking rumors on social media: the use of denials. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 110–122.
Google Scholar
Parks, C. M., & Toth, J. P. (2006). Fluency, familiarity, aging, and the illusion of truth. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 225–253.
Google Scholar
Peter, C., & Koch, T. (2016). When debunking scientific myths fails (and when it does not). Science Communication, 38, 3–25.
Google Scholar
Pfau, M., & Louden, A. (1994). Effectiveness of adwatch formats in deflecting political attack ads. Communication Research, 21, 325–341.
Google Scholar
Pham, V. N. (2015). Our foreign President Barack Obama: the racial logics of birther discourses. Journal of International & Intercultural Communication, 8, 86–107.
Google Scholar
Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Radechovsky, J., Berger, P., & Wolling, J. (2019). Nothing’s gonna change my world—Or do journalistic clarifications help against rumors? SCM Studies in Communication and Media,, 8, 497–522.
Google Scholar
Reardon, S. (2020). Adding a personal backstory could boost your scientific credibility with the public. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00857-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.
Google Scholar
Sangalang, A., Ophir, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2019). The potential for narrative correctives to combat misinformation. Journal of Communication, 69, 298–319.
Google Scholar
Seymour, B., Getman, R., Saraf, A., Zhang, L. H., & Kalenderian, E. (2015). When advocacy obscures accuracy online: Digital pandemics of public health misinformation through an antifluoride case study. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 517–523.
Google Scholar
Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017). Political rumoring on twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 19, 1214–1235.
Google Scholar
Smelter, T. J., & Calvillo, D. P. (2020). Pictures and repeated exposure increase perceived accuracy of news headlines. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3684.
Article
Google Scholar
Sommariva, S., Vamos, C., Mantzarlis, A., Đào, L. U.-L., & Tyson, M. D. (2018). Spreading the (fake) news: Exploring health messages on social media and the implications for health professionals using a case study. American Journal of Health Education, 49, 246–255.
Google Scholar
Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (2018). Introduction: Misinformation among mass audiences as a focus for inquiry. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Hrsg.), Misinformation and mass audiences (S. 1–11). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar
Sundar, S. (2008). The MAIN model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. Metzger & A. Flanagin (Hrsg.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (S. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Swire, B., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2018). Misinformation and its correction: Cognitive mechanisms and recommendations for mass communication. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Hrsg.), Misinformation and mass audiences (S. 195–211). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar
Tandoc, E. C., Jenkins, J., & Craft, S. (2019). Fake news as a critical incident in journalism. Journalism Practice, 13, 673–689.
Google Scholar
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018a). Defining “fake news”. a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6, 137–153.
Google Scholar
Tandoc, E. C., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., & Wei, Z. L. (2018b). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: a conceptual framework. New Media & Society, 20, 2745–2763.
Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67–85.
Google Scholar
Thorson, E. (2016). Belief echoes: the persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, 33, 460–480.
Google Scholar
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the Internet. Political Psychology, 29, 247–273.
Google Scholar
Van Damme, I., & Smets, K. (2014). The power of emotion versus the power of suggestion: memory for emotional events in the misinformation paradigm. Emotion, 14, 310–320.
Google Scholar
Van der Linden, S. L., Clarke, C. E., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment. BMC Public Health, 15, 1207.
Google Scholar
Van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Jin, Y. (2020). Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: the effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication, 35, 560–575.
Google Scholar
Van Heekeren, M. (2020). The curative effect of social media on fake news: a historical re-evaluation. Journalism Studies, 21, 306–318.
Google Scholar
Vivion, M., Hennequin, C., Verger, P., & Dubé, E. (2020). Supporting informed decision-making about vaccination: an analysis of two official websites. Public Health, 178, 112–119.
Google Scholar
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39, 621–645.
Google Scholar
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2018). I do not believe you: how providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21, 1337–1353.
Google Scholar
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37, 136–144.
Google Scholar
Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: how powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47, 155–177.
Google Scholar
Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S., & Goldring, A. (2017). Fact-checking effectiveness as a function of format and tone: evaluating FactCheck.org and FlackCheck.org. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 49–75.
Google Scholar
Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2018). „Fake News“ als aktuelle Desinformation. Systematische Bestimmung eines heterogenen Begriffs. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 66, 526–541.
Google Scholar