Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuere Beiträge zur empirischen Institutionenanalyse: Von der Gegenstands-zur Problemorientierung

  • Literaturberichte
  • Published:
Politische Vierteljahresschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alt, James, 2002: Comparative Political Economy: Credibility, Accountability, and Institutions, in: Katznelson, Ira/ Milner, Helen V. (Hrsg.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York/London, 147–171.

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., 1951: Social Choice and Individual Values. New York.

  • Bates, Robert H./ Greif, Avner/ Levi, Margaret/ Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent/ Weingast, Barry M., 1998: Analytic Narratives. Princeton.

  • Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M./ Jones, Bradford S., 1997: Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science, in: American Journal of Political Science 41, 1414–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio (Hrsg.), 2006: Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London.

  • Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio, 2006a: Introduction, in: Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio (Hrsg.), Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London, 1–23.

  • Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio, 2006b: Conclusion, in: Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio (Hrsg.), Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London, 239–251.

  • Carey, John M., 2000: Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions, in: Comparative Political Studies 33, 735–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A., 1966: Patterns of Opposition, in: Dahl, Robert A. (Hrsg.), Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven/London, 332–347.

  • Döring, Herbert, 2001: Parliamentary Agenda Control and Legislative Outcomes in Western Europe, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döring, Herbert, 2005: Worauf gründer sich die Agenda-Setzer-Macht der Regierung? Theoretische und Vergleichende Perspektiven auf den deutschen Fall, in: Ganghof, Steffen/ Manow, Philip (Hrsg.), Mechanismen der Politik. Strategische Interaktion im deutschen Regierungssystem. Frankfurt a. M., 109–148.

  • Dowding, Keith, 2006: Can Populism be Defended? William Riker, Gerry Mackie and the Interpretation of Democracy, in: Government and Opposition 41, 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, David/ O’Halloran, Sharyn, 1999: Delegating Powers. A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge.

  • Epstein, David/ O’Halloran, Sharyn, 2006: A Theory of Efficient Delegation, in: Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio (Hrsg.), Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London, 77–98.

  • Ganghof, Steffen/ Manow, Philip (Hrsg.), 2005: Mechanismen der Politik. Strategische Interaktion im deutschen Regierungssystem. Frankfurt a. M.

  • Gilardi, Fabrizio, 2006: Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, in: Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio (Hrsg.), Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London, 125–145.

  • Greif, Avner/ Laitin, David D., 2004: A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change, in: American Political Science Review 98, 633–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A., 2003: Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research, in: Mahoney, James/ Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (Hrsg.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, 373–404.

  • Helmke, Gretchen/ Levitsky, Steven, 2004: Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda, in: Perspectives on Politics 2, 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, Ludger, 2002: Politische Opposition. Theorie und Praxis in Westlichen Regierungssystemen. Opladen.

  • Helms, Ludger/ Jun, Uwe (Hrsg.), 2004: Politische Theorie und Regierungslehre. Eine Einführung in die politikwissenschaftliche Institutionenforschung. Frankfurt a. M.

  • Huber, John D./ Shipan, Charles, 2002: Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge.

  • Kaiser, André, 2006: Die Politische Theorie des Neo-Institutionalismus, in: Brodocz, André/ Schaal, Gary S. (Hrsg.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart II. 2. Aufl., Opladen, 313–342.

  • Kiewiet, D. Roderick/ Loewenberg, Gerhard/ Squire, Peverill, 2002: The Implications of the Study of the U.S. Congress for Comparative Legislative Research, in: Loewenberg, Gerhard/ Squire, Peverill/ Kiewiet, D. Roderick (Hrsg.), Legislatures. Comparative Perspectives on Representative Assemblies. Ann Arbor/Mich., 3–22.

  • Laitin, David D., 2004: The Political Science Discipline, in: Mansfield, Edward D./ Sisson, Richard (Hrsg.), The Evolution of Political Knowledge. Democracy, Autonomy, and Conflict in Comparative and International Politics. Columbus/OH, 11–40.

  • Lauth, Hans-Joachim, 2000: Informal Institutions and Democracy, in: Democratization 7, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret, 2000: The Economic Turn in Comparative Politics, in: Comparative Political Studies 33, 822–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret, 2004: An Analytic Narrative Approach to Puzzles and Problems, in: Shapiro, Ian/ Smith, Rogers M./ Masoud, Tarek E. (Hrsg.), Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge, 201–226.

  • Loewenberg, Gerhard/ Squire, Peverill/ Kiewiet, D. Roderick (Hrsg.), 2002: Legislatures. Comparative Perspectives on Representative Assemblies. Ann Arbor/Mich.

  • Mackie, Gerry, 2003: Democracy Defended. Cambridge.

  • Majone, Giandomenico, 2001: Two Logics of Delegation. Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance, in: European Union Politics 2, 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Bernard, 1999. Elections and Representation, in: Przeworski, Adam/ Stokes, Susan Carol/ Manin, Bernard (Hrsg.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge, 29–54.

  • Mershon, Carol, 2002: The Costs of Coalition. Stanford/CA.

  • Morton, Rebecca B., 1999: Methods and Models. A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political Science. Cambridge.

  • Müller, Wolfgang C./ Strøm, Kaare (Hrsg.), 2003: Coalition Governments in Western Europe. 2. Aufl. Oxford.

  • Olson, Mancur, 1965: The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge/Mass.

  • Patzelt, Werner J., 2004: Parlamentarismus, in: Helms, Ludger/ Jun, Uwe (Hrsg.), Politische Theorie und Regierungslehre. Eine Einführung in die politikwissenschaftliche Institutionenforschung. Frankfurt a. M., 97–129.

  • Peters, B. Guy, 2005: Institutional Theory in Political Science. 2. Aufl., London.

  • Pierson, Paul, 2004: Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton/N.J.

  • Riker, William H., 1988: Liberalism Against Populism. A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights/Ill.

  • Shapiro, Ian, 2004: Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or: What’s Wrong With Political Science and What to Do About It, in: Shapiro, Ian/ Smith, Rogers M./ Masoud, Tarek E. (Hrsg.), Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge, 19–41.

  • Shepsle, Kenneth A./ Weingast, Barry R., 1987: The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power, in: American Political Science Review 81, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Susan C., 2001: Mandates and Democracy. Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge.

  • Stone Sweet, Alec, 2000: Governing with Judges. Oxford.

  • Strøm, Kaare, 1990: A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties, in: American Journal of Political Science 34, 565–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, Kaare/ Müller, Wolfgang C./ Bergman, Torbjörn (Hrsg.), 2003: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford.

  • Strøm, Kaare/ Müller, Wolfgang C./ Bergman, Torbjörn, 2006: The (Moral) Hazards of Parliamentary Democracy, in: Braun, Dietmar/ Gilardi, Fabrizio (Hrsg.), Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London, 27–51.

  • Vanberg, Georg, 2005: The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge.

Download references

Authors
  1. André Kaiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaiser, A. Neuere Beiträge zur empirischen Institutionenanalyse: Von der Gegenstands-zur Problemorientierung. PVS 48, 119–135 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-007-0010-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-007-0010-0

Search

Navigation