Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digitales Recruiting

Die Evolution des Assessments mittels künstlicher Intelligenz

Digital recruitment

The evolution of assessment by artificial intelligence

  • Hauptbeiträge
  • Published:
Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel der Zeitschrift Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. gibt einen komprimierten Überblick über Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft des Recruiting und Assessment. Es wird dargestellt, wie sich im Zuge der Digitalisierung die Methoden in Recruiting und Assessment durch den Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz ändern, welche Chancen und Risiken die Entwicklungen mit sich bringen und was bei ihrer Einführung beachtet werden sollte.

Abstract

This article in the journal Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. provides an overview of past, present and future of recruitment and assessment. It illustrates how in the process of digitization the methods of recruitment and assessment change through the use of Artificial Intelligence, which opportunities and risks are associated with these developments, and what needs to be considered when introducing the new technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  • Allianz (2018). Allie, the career chatbot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbVc5p-xZ_s (Erstellt: 31. März 2018). Zugegriffen: 31. März 2018. Video file.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak, M. (1997). Internetbasierte, computervermittelte psychologische Fragebogenuntersuchungen. St. Augustin: Gardez.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPM & AT Kearney (2016). Die digitale Revolution. Herausforderungen und Chancen für den Personalbereich. https://www.atkearney.de/documents/856314/9092787/Die-digitale-+Revolution.pdf/6d63c5f7-94fc-4bac-b5b5-750d7fbd3432. Zugegriffen: 11. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. C., Campion, M. A., Campion, E. D., & Reider, M. H. (2016). Initial investigation into computer scoring of candidate essays for personnel selection. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 958–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2018). Four unethical uses of AI in recruitment. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomaspremuzic/2018/05/27/four-unethical-uses-of-ai-in-recruitment/#5408257f15f5. Zugegriffen: 16. Juli 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, G. (2003). Natural language processing. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 37, 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., Warszta, T., Beadle, S., & Sheehan, N. (2005). The impact of mode of administration on the equivalence of a test battery: a quasi-experimental design. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00318.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/01/artificial-intelligence-for-the-real-world. Zugegriffen: 30. Jan. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deller, J., Gotzian, L., & Fortmeier, M. (2017). Digital-Inventur: Status der digitalen Transformation im HR. http://www.exler-kuptsch.de/wp-content/uploads/Bericht-Digital-Inventur.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumais, S. T. (2004). Latent semantic analysis. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 38, 189–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faliagka, E., Ramanatas, K., Tsakalidis, A., & Tzimas, G. (2012). Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to an online Recruitment System. In F. Laux & P. Lorenz, P. (Hrsg.), ICIW 2012: The Seventh International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services: May 27-June 1, 2012, Stuttgart, Germany (S. 215-220). Wilmington, DE, USA: IARIA. http://thinkmind.org/index.php?view=instance&instance=ICIW+2012. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, F., & Kanning, U. P. (2014). Lücken im Lebenslauf – Ein valides Kriterium der Personalauswahl? Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 58, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: an updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 67, 639–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2003). Ziele und Strategien von E‑Assessment aus Sicht der psychologischen Personalauswahl. In U. Konradt & W. Sarges (Hrsg.), Psychologie für das Personalmanagement. E‑Recruitment und E‑Assessment. Rekrutierung, Auswahl und Beurteilung von Personal im Inter- und Intranet (S. 37–54). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Test Commission (2005). The ITC guidelines on computer-based and Internet-delivered testing. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_computer_based_testing.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas, L., & Manger, C. (2010). Ethnic discrimination in Germany’s labour market: a field experiment. IZA discussion paper no. 4741. http://ftp.iza.org/dp4741.pdf. Zugegriffen: 13. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanning, U. P. (2016). Über die Sichtung von Bewerbungsunterlagen in der Praxis der Personalauswahl. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 60, 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz, T., & Dainis, A. (2014). How secure are unproctored pre-employment tests? Analysis of inconsistent test scores. Journal of Business & Psychology, 29(4), 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. E. (2015). Computing, cognition and the future of knowing. How humans and machines are forging a new age of understanding. Somers, NY: IBM Global Services. http://www.research.ibm.com/software/IBMResearch/multimedia/Computing_Cognition_WhitePaper.pdf. Zugegriffen: 12. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2008). Zur Akzeptanz von Intelligenz- und Leistungstests. Report Psychologie, 33, 420–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2018). Was König Bewerber denkt. Zur Akzeptanz von Personalauswahlverfahren. Personalmagazin, 2018(3), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinck, D. (2002). Computergestützte Diagnostik: Beeinflusst das Medium der Testbearbeitung die Testcharakteristika, die Testfairness oder das Erleben der Testsituation? Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, H., & Kirk, S. A. (2003). Using pencil and paper, internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: does methodology matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00008-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolowich, S. (2013). Behind the webcam’s watchful eye, online proctoring takes hold. Chronicle of Higher Education, Apr 2013. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Behind-the-Webcams-Watchful/138505. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konradt, U., & Sarges, W. (2003). Suche, Auswahl und Förderung von Personal im Intra- und Internet: Strategien, Zielerreichung und Entwicklungspfade. In U. Konradt & W. Sarges (Hrsg.), Psychologie für das Personalmanagement. E‑Recruitment und E‑Assessment. Rekrutierung, Auswahl und Beurteilung von Personal im Inter- und Intranet (S. 3–16). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. PNAS, 110(15), 5802–5805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang, C. (2017). Can A.I. be taught to explain itself? The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/magazine/can-ai-be-taught-to-explain-itself.html. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubinger, K. D. (2009). Psychologische Diagnostik: Theorie und Praxis psychologischen Diagnostizierens (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. (2003). Automatic essay assessment. Assessment in education. Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000148154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F. & Burke, E. (2011). Dealing with the threats inherent in unproctored Internet testing of cognitive ability: Results from a large-scale operational test program. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 817-824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, K., Preuß, A. & Justenhoven, R. T. (in Druck). Detecting Who is Going to Innovate. Zur Publikation eingereichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, J. (2015). IBM Watson Personality Insights: the science behind the service. https://developer.ibm.com/watson/blog/2015/03/23/ibm-watson-personality-insights-science-behind-service/. Zugegriffen: 29. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morelli, N., King, R. T., & Campion, M. C. (2017). Artificial intelligence in I‑O – it’s not just a fad. The I‑O podcast. Society of Industrial and Organzational Psychology. http://www.siop.org/podcasts/. Zugegriffen: 6. Febr. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. Adaptive computation and machine learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Obeidat, B. Y. (2012). The relationship between human resource information system functions and human resource management functionalities. Journal of Management Research, 4(4), 192–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, D. E., Burstein, J. C., Chodorow, M., Fowles, M. E., & Kukich, K. (2000). Comparing the validity of automated and human essay scoring. Princeton: ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuß, A., & Lochner, K. (2015). Behind the scores – psychometric paradata generated by new technologies and its implications for the ITC guidelines. In D. Bartram (Chair), Advances in technology-based testing: implications for revising the ITC guidelines. Invited symposium conducted at the 17th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rövekamp, M. (2018). Die Deutsche Bahn schafft das Anschreiben ab. Der Tagesspiegel. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wirtschaft/azubi-mangel-die-deutsche-bahn-schafft-das-anschreiben-ab/22734354.html. Zugegriffen: 16. Juli 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence. A Modern Approach. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 100 years of research findings (version 2). https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.18843.26400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Berger, W. (1979). Physische Attraktivität als Determinante von Beurteilung und Einstellungsempfehlung. Psychologie und Praxis, 23, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., Hell, B., Trapmann, S., Schaar, H., & Boramir, I. (2007). Die Nutzung psychologischer Verfahren der externen Personalauswahl in deutschen Unternehmen. Ein Vergleich über 20 Jahre. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 6, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. (2016). Api tutorial for beginners. https://blog.cloudrail.com/api-tutorial-for-beginners/. Zugegriffen: 12. Febr. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixt (2017). Sixt Karriere startet Facebook Jobbot. https://www.sixtblog.de/karriere/sixt-karriere-startet-facebook-jobbot/. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, J. M. (1998). An empirical assessment of data collection using the internet. Personnel Psychology, 51(3), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00259.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieger, S., & Reips, U.-D. (2010). What are participants doing while filling in an online questionnaire: a paradata collection tool and an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1488–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippins, N. T., Beaty, J., Drasgow, F., Gibson, W. M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D. O., & Shepherd, W. (2006). Unproctored internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 189–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truell, A. D. (2003). Use of internet tools for survey research. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal, 21(1), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuten, T. L., Urban, D. J., & Bosnjak, M. (2002). Internet surveys and data quality: a review. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Hrsg.), Online social sciences (S. 7–26). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völker, S. & van Treeck, J. (2018, März). Ethisches Psychografisches Targeting. Die Verwendung sequenzieller Analysen des Surfverhaltens als best practice. Präsentation auf der 22. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für angewandte Wirtschaftspsychologie (GWPs), Wernigerode.

  • Warszta, T., & Siemsen, A. (2017). Gamified assessment. In K. Lochner (Chair), Game-based assessment – Insights from research and practice. Symposium conducted at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, L. M., & Johnston, L. (2000). Screening job applicants: the impact of physical attractiveness and application quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. D. (1975). Psychographics: a critical review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 196–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, O., & McKnight, P. E. (2002). Ability and achievement testing on the world wide web. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Hrsg.), Online social sciences (S. 151–180). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dortmund, Deutschland

    Katharina Lochner

  2. CTO & Founder, cut-e GmbH, Großer Burstah 18–32, 20457, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Achim Preuß

Authors
  1. Katharina Lochner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Achim Preuß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Lochner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lochner, K., Preuß, A. Digitales Recruiting. Gr Interakt Org 49, 193–202 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-018-0425-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-018-0425-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation