Skip to main content
Log in

Les manœuvres de soutènement sont-elles prédictives du résultat de la chirurgie de l’incontinence urinaire ?

Do support manoeuvres predict the results of surgery for urinary incontinence?

  • Mise au Point / Update
  • Published:
Pelvi-périnéologie

Résumé

Parmi les éléments pronostiques du succès de la mise en place d’une bandelette sous-urétrale, le défaut de soutien de l’urètre, évalué par exemple par les manoeuvres de soutènement, est peu cité. Pourtant, sur le plan physiopathologique, la différenciation de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort (IUE) par défaut de soutien de l’urètre, de l’IUE par insuffisance sphinctérienne paraît essentielle pour optimiser la prise en charge. De récentes publications amènent à penser que le paramètre fonction sphinctérienne évalué urodynamiquement ne peut être considéré isolément et que d’autres facteurs, lorsque la fonction sphinctérienne est défaillante, sont susceptibles d’intervenir. C’est probablement le cas du défaut de soutien de l’urètre. Il reste cependant à standardiser les manoeuvres de soutènement urétral et à réaliser des études spécifiques pour le démontrer.

Abstract

Failure of urethral support, which can be assessed using support manoeuvres, is rarely quoted as a prognostic factor for the success of sub-urethral taping. Yet, the pathophysiological distinction between urinary stress incontinence (SUI) due to defective urethral support and that due to sphincter deficiency is essential for optimal management. Recent publications suggest that urodynamically assessed sphincter function should not be considered in isolation. Other factors may well be playing a part when sphincter function is poor. Of these, defective urethral support is the likeliest. It is, however, important to standardise urethral support manoeuvres and carry out specific studies to validate this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Debodinance P, Hermieu JF, Lucot JP (2009) Traitement chirurgical de première intention de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort de la femme. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 38:S182–S200

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hermieu JF, Debodinance P (2010) Guidelines for the surgical treatment of female urinary stress incontinence in women using the suburethral sling. Prog Urol 20(Suppl 2):S112–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller M, Koebele A, Delplancque K, et al (2006) Facteurs pronostiques de la prise en charge chirurgicale de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort (IUE) par bandelette sous-urétrale libre. Pelv Perineol 1:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al (2010) Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:149–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquarius AE, et al (2009) Risk factors for failure of retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:202e1–202e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swift SE, Ostergard DR (1995) Evaluation of current urodynamic testing methods in the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 86:85–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Swift SE, Yoon EA (1999) Test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 94:9–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klutke JJ, Carlin BI, Klutke CG (2000) The tension-free vaginal tape procedure: correction of stress incontinence with minimal alteration in proximal urethral mobility. Urology 55:512–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Atherton MJ, Stanton SL (2000) A comparison of bladder neck movement and elevation after tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension. BJOG 107:1366–1370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paick JS, Cho MC, Oh SJ, et al (2007) Is proximal urethral mobility important for transobturator tape procedure in management of female patients with stress urinary incontinence? Urology 70:246–250; discussion 250–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyazaki FS (1997) The Bonney test: a reassessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:1322–1328; discussion 1328–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacquetin B (1998) Can a very simple test justify using a new intervention in stress urinary incontinence? The Ulmsten prosthetic sub-urethral support. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 27:215–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Flock F, Reich A, Reister F (2005) Evaluation of the tension free vaginal tape by ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 16(Suppl 2):S52

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, et al (2008) Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 27:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fritel X, Zabak K, Pigne A, et al (2002) Predictive value of urethral mobility before suburethral tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in women. J Urol 168:2472–2475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai SW, Jung YH, Jeon MJ, et al (2007) Treatment outcome of tension-free vaginal tape in stress urinary incontinence: comparison of intrinsic sphincter deficiency and nonintrinsic sphincter deficiency patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:1431–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meschia M, Pifarotti P, Gattei U, Bertozzi R (2007) Tension-free vaginal tape: analysis of risk factors for failures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:419–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anast JW, Skolarus TA, Yan Y, Klutke CG (2008) Transobturator sling with intraoperative cough test is effective for patients with low valsalva leak point pressure. Can J Urol 15:4153–4157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Romancik M, Lutter I, Goncalves F, et al (2006) Valsalva leak point pressure predicts outcome after transobturator suburethral tape implantation: fact or fiction? Bratisl Lek Listy 107:426–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen HY, Yeh LS, Chang WC, Ho M (2007) Analysis of risk factors associated with surgical failure of inside-out transobturator vaginal tape for treating urodynamic stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:443–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kulseng-Hanssen S (2001) Success rate of TVT operation in patients with low urethral pressure. Neurourol Urodyn 20:417

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rezapour M, Ulmsten U (2001) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in women with mixed urinary incontinence: a long-term followup. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(Suppl 2):S15–S18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paick JS, Ku JH, Shin JW, et al (2004) Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence with low Valsalva leak point pressure. J Urol 172(4 Pt 1):1370–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guerette NL, Bena JF, Davila GW (2008) Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:97–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Clemons JL, LaSala CA (2007) The tension-free vaginal tape in women with a non-hypermobile urethra and low maximum urethral closure pressure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:727–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haliloglu B, Karateke A, Coksuer H, et al (2010) The role of urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincteric deficiency on the outcome of transobturator tape procedure: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Calestroupat JP, Triopon G, Soustelle L, et al (2004) Traitement de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort féminine par TVT: valeur prédictive de l’examen clinique. Prog Urol 14(5 Supp1):28A

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miller JJ, Botros SM, Akl MN, et al (2006) Is transobturator tape as effective as tension-free vaginal tape in patients with borderline maximum urethral closure pressure? Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1799–1804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeon MJ, Jung HJ, Chung SM, et al (2008) Comparison of the treatment outcome of pubovaginal sling, tension-free vaginal tape, and transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:76e1–76e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al (2008) Effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 112:1253–1261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gungorduk K, Celebi I, Ark C, et al (2009) Which type of midurethral sling procedure should be chosen for treatment of stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency? Tensionfree vaginal tape or transobturator tape. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:920–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. -F. Hermieu.

Additional information

Public/Intérêt: Chercheurs/Élevé. Cliniciens/Majeur. Enseignants/Majeur. Étudiants/Majeur. Autres professions de santé/Élevé. Cadres santé publique/Faible.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hermieu, J.F. Les manœuvres de soutènement sont-elles prédictives du résultat de la chirurgie de l’incontinence urinaire ?. Pelv Perineol 6, 118–122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-011-0369-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-011-0369-7

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation