Abstract
Background
Under traditional Medicare, accountability measures are specific to each healthcare setting. With the growth of alternative payment models such as Medicare Advantage, the focus of accountability measures can be on the longitudinal episode of care.
Objective
Using the last month of life as the episode of care, examine bereaved family member perceptions of the quality of care by site of death and inpatient palliative/hospice care.
Design
Retrospective cohort study using the National Health Aging Trends Study waves 3–11.
Subjects
US decedents age 65 and older with family member or close friend survey response.
Main Measures
Overall rating of the quality of care, perceptions of symptom management, being treated with respect, emotional/spiritual support, communication, and receipt of care that the decedent did not want.
Key Results
Among 2796 interviews (weighted N = 12.6 million), 25.7% died at home with hospice, 10.9% at home without hospice, 10.0% in the ICU, 6.4% at a palliative care unit (PCU), 6.4% at a hospice IPU, 9.1% at hospital without inpatient palliative care, 13.2% at a nursing home without hospice, 9.8% in a nursing home with hospice, 4.1% at a hospice residence, and 4.4% at other locations without hospice. Dying at home with hospice received the highest rating of quality of care (60.2% stated excellent care) while the adjusted marginal differences in sites of death with inpatient palliative care services were rated lower: hospice residence 25.6% points lower (95% CI (−13.7%, −37.5%)) and a freestanding IPU was 16.9% points lower (95% CI (− 4.9%, −29.0%)).
Conclusion
Examining the episode of care as the last month of life, hospice at home is associated with higher rating of the quality of care while inpatient palliative care services in hospital, hospice residence, or hospice IPU settings are rated lower.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Alternative payment models (apms) overview. Alternative Payment Models Overview. https://qpp.cms.gov/apms/overview. Published 2022. Accessed November 16, 2022.
Center to Advance Palliative Care. Medicare Advantage Hospice Benefit: Carve-in model: Palliative in practice. Medicare Advantage Hospice Benefit | Carve-in Model | Palliative in Practice | Center to Advance Palliative Care. https://www.capc.org/blog/explaining-hospice-benefit-medicare-advantage-carve-in-model/. Published March 5, 2020. Accessed November 16, 2022.
Ankuda CK, Ornstein KA, Covinsky KE, Bollens-Lund E, Meier DE, Kelley AS. Switching Between Medicare Advantage And Traditional Medicare Before And After The Onset Of Functional Disability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(5):809-818. doi:https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01070
Ankuda CK, Morrison RS, Aldridge MD. The 2021 Medicare Advantage Hospice Carve-In. JAMA. 2021;326(23):2367-2368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.21161
Kumar P, Wright AA, Hatfield LA, Temel JS, Keating NL. Family perspectives on hospice care experiences of patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017;35(4):432-439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.68.9257
Zimmermann C, Swami N, Krzyzanowska M, et al. Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1721-1730.
Hughes SL, Cummings J, Weaver F, Manheim L, Braun B, Conrad K. A randomized trial of the cost effectiveness of VA hospital-based home care for the terminally ill. Health Serv Res. 1992;26(6):801- 817.
Kane RL, Wales J, Bernstein L, Leibowitz A, Kaplan S. A randomised controlled trial of hospice care. Lancet. 1984;1(8382):890-894.
Engelhardt JB, McClive-Reed KP, Toseland RW, Smith TL, Larson DG, Tobin DR. Effects of a program for coordinated care of advanced illness on patients, surrogates, and healthcare costs: a randomized trial. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(2): 93-100.
Gade G, Venohr I, Conner D, et al. Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial.J Palliat Med. 2008;11(2):180-190.
Brumley R, Enguidanos S, Jamison P, et al. Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(7):993-1000.
Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291(1):88-93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.1.88
Makaroun LK, Teno JM, Freedman VA, Kasper JD, Gozalo P, Mor V. Late Transitions and Bereaved Family Member Perceptions of Quality of End-of-Life Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(9):1730-1736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15455
Teno JM, Gonzalo PL. Quality and Costs of End-of-life Care: The Need for Transparency and Accountability. JAMA Network . https://jamanetwork-com.revproxy.brown.edu/journals/jama/fullarticle/1930801. Published November 12, 2014. Accessed November 16, 2022.
Anhang Price R, Stucky B, Parast L, et al. Development of Valid and Reliable Measures of Patient and Family Experiences of Hospice Care for Public Reporting. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(7):924-932. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0594
Kasper JD, Freedman VA. National Health and Aging Trends Study User Guide: Rounds 1-11: Final Release. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health; 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 29]. Available from: www.NHATS.org
Teno JM, Casey VA, Welch LC, Edgman-Levitan S. Patient-focused, family-centered end-of-life medical care: views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22(3):738-751. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00335-9
Teno JM, Clarridge B, Casey V, Edgman-Levitan S, Fowler J. Validation of toolkit after-death bereaved family member interview.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22(3):752-758. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00331-1
Freedman VA, Kasper JD. Cohort Profile: The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS). Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(4):1044-1045g. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz109
Teno JM, Ankuda CK, Keohane L, et al. Pathway to Hospice: How Has Place of Care before Hospice Changed with the Growth of Hospice in the United States?. J Palliat Med. 2022;25(11):1661-1667. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2022.0044
Kranker K, Niedzwiecki M, Pohl RV, et al. Evaluation of the Medicare Care Choices Model: Annual Report 4. Mathematica. April 2022.
Baquet-Simpson A, Spettell CM, Freeman AN, et al. Aetna’s Compassionate Care Program: Sustained Value for Our Members with Advanced Illness. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(11):1324-1330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0359
Acknowledgements
National Health and Aging Trends Study. Produced and distributed by www.nhats.org with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number U01AG32947).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest:
The authors certify that they have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of this manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, E., McCreedy, E. & Teno, J.M. Bereaved Respondent Perceptions of Quality of Care by Inpatient Palliative Care Utilization in the Last Month of Life. J GEN INTERN MED 39, 893–901 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08588-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08588-4