Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
With rising numbers of reproductive-age women using Veterans Health Administration (VA) services, demand for maternity services has increased.1 Obstetric care is a VA benefit provided by contracted community providers.2 Like other Americans, Veterans suffer from high rates of severe maternal morbidity and stark racial inequities in maternal health outcomes.3 Geographic access to prenatal care is associated with lower risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes.4
VA classifies geographic network adequacy using drive time between the Veteran’s residence and VA-based or community-contracted care provider.5 This measure of network adequacy for all eligible Veterans is distinct from community care eligibility standards under the MISSION Act. Primary care networks are considered inadequate if drive time exceeds 30 min (45 min for rural Veterans) while specialty care networks are inadequate if drive time exceeds 45 min (100 min for rural Veterans). Current VA policy classifies obstetric care as specialty care. However, among maternal and public health experts, obstetric care is commonly viewed as primary care given its acuity and need for frequent visits.
We assessed the prevalence of inadequate geographic access to VA community obstetric care among women VA users residing in the Greater Los Angeles (GLA) catchment area, comparing use of primary versus specialty care designations.
METHODS
Using the VA Provider Profile Management System (PPMS), a database of VA-contracted community providers, we identified all California network general obstetric providers as of 10/01/2021. Using ArcGIS Pro, we mapped these providers, overlaying a shapefile to identify those in the GLA catchment area, and conducted a systematic internet search to confirm they were actively practicing in California. Providers were excluded if they were not practicing obstetrics in California.
We identified reproductive-age (18–44 years) women Veteran VA enrollees with a valid address in the GLA catchment area as of 10/01/2021, using VA’s Corporate Data Warehouse, excluding those with missing urbanicity designations (45 of 8254 Veterans). We obtained Veteran age, race/ethnicity, urbanicity, and geocoded address. We mapped Veteran addresses and obstetric care sites in ArcGIS Pro and calculated nearest facility drive time. Geographic network adequacy was determined using both primary care and specialty care definitions. We compared Veterans with adequate versus inadequate obstetric care access, performing chi-square tests for categorical variables and Student’s t-tests for continuous variables, using Stata/MP v.17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). The GLA Institutional Review Board approved this study.
RESULTS
We identified 431 obstetric VA-contracted community providers, with 220 unique addresses, and 8209 women Veterans in the GLA catchment area. When using VA specialty care drive time targets, 84/8209 (1.0%) Veterans lacked adequate geographic access (Table 1). However, using VA primary care geographic access targets, 2480 (30.2%) had inadequate geographic access. Using a primary care designation, 31.3% of urban and 18.6% of rural Veterans lacked adequate geographic access to care (compared to 0.2% and 10.2% using specialty care designations, respectively). Veterans who identified as non-Hispanic White were more likely to have inadequate access (37.9% using a primary care designation), compared to others (range 22–29%) (Table 1).
DISCUSSION
There was a marked difference in the proportion of Veterans classified as having adequate versus inadequate geographic access to obstetric care based on whether specialty or primary care drive time designations were used. Over 30% of our cohort lacked adequate geographic access to obstetric care when using primary care designations, compared to just 1% when classified as specialty care.
This study was limited by using PPMS, which may overestimate numbers of providers accepting VA patients. We did not include family medicine physicians since there were not specific designations available for obstetric care provision. Finally, we did not include information regarding Veterans’ parity or surgical history (including sterilization and hysterectomy). We were also limited by the availability of only mailing address geocodes, which may not always correspond to residential address. Future studies will include residential geocodes once these become available.
A shift to classifying obstetric care as primary care would be consistent with Medicaid access standards in many states.6 Further, given the frequency and acuity of obstetric care, using primary care rather than specialty drive time would be a more appropriate gauge of care accessibility and could guide VA in providing pregnant Veterans with access to more timely and Veteran-centered obstetric care.
References
Women Veterans Report: The Past, Present, and Future of Women Veterans. National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2017. https://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/SpecialReports/Women_Veterans_2015_Final.pdf.Accessed 21 June 2021
Mattocks KM, Frayne S, Phibbs CS, et al. Five-year trends in women veterans’ use of VA maternity benefits, 2008-2012. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(1):e37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.002
Combellick JL, Bastian LA, Altemus M, et al. Severe Maternal Morbidity Among a Cohort of Post-9/11 Women Veterans. J Women’s Health. 2020;29(4):577-584. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.7948
Holcomb DS, Pengetnze Y, Steele A, Karam A, Spong C, Nelson DB. Geographic barriers to prenatal care access and their consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(5):100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100442
United States Government Accountability Office. Veterans Community Care Program: VA Needs to Strengthen Its Oversight and Improve Data on the Community Care Network Providers.; 2022. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-105290.pdfAccessed 1 Dec 2022.
Office of Inspector General. State Standards for Access to Care in Medicaid Managed Care (OEI-02-11-00320; 09/14); 2014. https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-11-00320.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2022.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the editorial review and feedback of Dr. Chloe Bird, PhD, Senior Sociologist, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica. Her time was supported through the VA Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (Project ID CIN 13-417). The authors also thank Mr. Harold Krivell at VA GeoBISL for guidance with VA geographic information systems analyses.
Funding
This study was funded by the VA HSR&D CSHIIP grant #SWI 22-002. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vinekar, K., Chu, K., Tan, G.J. et al. Using Primary Care Geographic Network Adequacy Metrics for VA Obstetric Referrals: a Foundation for Equitable, Timely, and Veteran-Centered Care. J GEN INTERN MED 38 (Suppl 3), 829–831 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08191-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08191-7