Abstract
Background
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training has been increasing among internal medicine (IM) residency programs, but few programs can provide longitudinal training due to barriers such as lack of trained faculty.
Aim
Describe the development of a longitudinal POCUS track for IM residents using local and external resources, including a national POCUS certificate program.
Setting
University-based IM residency program affiliated with a public and veterans affairs hospital.
Participants
Twelve IM residents from 2018 to 2021.
Program Description
Residents complete a national POCUS certificate program by attending live courses and completing online modules, an image portfolio, and final knowledge/skills assessments. Locally, residents participate in 1-month procedure and diagnostic POCUS rotations and provide peer-to-peer POCUS teaching of residents and medical students.
Program Evaluation
The POCUS track increased residents’ use and comfort with diagnostic and procedural applications. All residents rated being satisfied or very satisfied with the track and would recommend it to prospective applicants (100%). The most commonly reported barriers to utilizing POCUS per residents were time constraints (83%), lack of available ultrasound equipment (83%), and lack of trained faculty (58%).
Discussion
IM residency programs with limited faculty expertise in POCUS can leverage external resources to provide longitudinal POCUS training to its residents.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
Internal medicine (IM) physicians are increasingly incorporating point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) into patient care for procedural and diagnostic applications.1 POCUS use to guide bedside procedures improves patient safety by increasing procedural success rates, reducing complications, and avoiding unnecessary attempts and has evolved to become the standard of care for certain bedside procedures.2–7 Diagnostic POCUS applications can improve diagnostic accuracy, prognostication, patient satisfaction, and shared diagnostic understanding.6, 8, 9 By guiding clinical decision-making, POCUS can contribute to more efficient and cost-effective medical care.10
The Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine (AAIM) has endorsed POCUS training in IM residency programs, and programs have been seeking creative ways to implement POCUS training.11 Despite the high demand12–14, incorporation of POCUS curricula by IM residency programs has been slow, increasing from 25% to 37.5% between 2012 and 2016.15, 16 Major barriers to incorporating POCUS training in IM residency programs include lack of faculty with POCUS expertise, time and cost of training faculty, and time required to train residents.15,16,17,18,19
To meet the demand for POCUS training, some IM residency programs have created POCUS electives or held workshops that provide an immersive experience.13, 18, 20–22 However, longitudinal POCUS training has been shown to increase knowledge and skills retention among IM residents better than stand-alone workshops, but few programs currently can offer longitudinal POCUS training.23, 24 Among the IM residency tracks in hospital medicine in 2017, only one included a rotation in ultrasound diagnostics, and none was dedicated to POCUS training.25
In 2018, we created a unique IM residency track, the POCUS track, that utilizes both local and external resources through a national certificate program in order to provide a 3-year longitudinal POCUS training experience. Here, we describe the development of our POCUS residency track including resources required, perspectives of residents and residency program leadership, and barriers to establishing a POCUS track.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
We developed a POCUS track for our IM residency, a university-based program with 95 categorical residents that is affiliated with a public and veterans affairs hospital. Candidates apply for the POCUS track through a separate NRMP number. Our program accepts 4 residents per year with a total of 12 residents in all three years on the POCUS track.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
POCUS track residents receive longitudinal ultrasound training during all three years (Supplemental Table 1).
Year 1
Online Modules
Interns complete self-directed online modules on the fundamentals of ultrasound and focused cardiac, pulmonary, and vascular ultrasound per the Society of Hospital Medicine – American College of Chest Physicians (SHM-ACCP) POCUS Certificate of Completion (COC) program.26 Interns are recommended to complete the modules during an elective rotation as the modules require 10–20 h of work.
Procedure Rotation
All IM interns participate in a 1-month procedure service rotation focusing on ultrasound-guided paracentesis, thoracentesis, and lumbar puncture. Large joint arthrocentesis and vascular access procedures are occasionally performed. Procedures are performed by interns under the supervision of a procedure chief resident or attending hospitalist.
POCUS CME Course #1
Interns attend an introductory 2- or 3-day POCUS course per the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program that teaches goal-directed echocardiography, pulmonary, vascular, and abdominal ultrasound applications through a combination of lectures, image interpretation sessions, and hands-on scanning sessions with live models. Afterwards, interns are encouraged to start collecting images for their portfolios.
Year 2
Image Portfolio
Residents are registered for the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program’s image portfolio in year 1 and focus on building their portfolios in year 2. The COC program requires 209 images of the heart, lungs, abdomen, and lower extremity vasculature. Expert SHM POCUS faculty use standardized image quality criteria to provide feedback on the images. Residents largely collect portfolio images during their inpatient rotations and POCUS elective.
POCUS Elective
During this 4-week rotation, residents receive refresher training on focused cardiac, pulmonary, lower extremity vascular, abdominal, and other POCUS applications, including clinical integration of findings into the management of shock and cardiac arrest. Training is led by the POCUS track faculty director and includes a combination of didactics and hands-on scanning sessions in our Center for Clinical Ultrasound Education. During this rotation, residents attend four 2-h scanning sessions for image acquisition practice with live models, continue building their image portfolios, and meet weekly to bi-weekly with the POCUS track faculty director to review their collected images.
POCUS CME Course #2
SHM-ACCP POCUS COC participants must attend an approved regional POCUS course. Currently, approved courses are offered in San Francisco, Denver, New York, Minneapolis, Chicago, and San Antonio. In addition to reviewing core POCUS applications, these courses provide training in ultrasound-guided procedures; basic skin, soft tissue, and joint ultrasound; and discussion of ultrasound program development.
Year 3
POCUS Teaching
Third-year POCUS track residents are assigned POCUS teaching activities to solidify their knowledge and skills and help meet the demand for POCUS training of residents and medical students. Our residency program utilizes a 4+1 block schedule, and one half-day is dedicated to POCUS teaching during each ambulatory week. Peer-to-peer instruction is provided during skills workshops and hands-on scanning sessions of the resident POCUS elective and during various medical student POCUS sessions. Additionally, the POCUS track residents themselves created and implemented new POCUS workshops for our IM residency program.
Final Assessments
The final knowledge and skills exams are taken in the spring of the 3rd year of IM residency during the SHM annual conference or an approved regional POCUS course. During the COVID-19 pandemic, both the written and skills exams were administered virtually in 2020–2021. The written exam was conducted online through the SHM learning portal and proctored by SHM staff virtually. The skills exam was administered virtually by an expert SHM POCUS faculty using REACTS tele-ultrasound software (Philips/Innovative Imaging Technologies, Montreal, Canada). After passing the final knowledge and skills exams, POCUS track residents were granted a certificate for completing the SHM-ACCP POCUS program.
Resources Required
Resources for developing our POCUS track are summarized in Table 1. The POCUS track faculty director serves as a clinical POCUS mentor and supervisor of residents, liaison to the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program, and collaborator with the IM residency program leadership. Other specific responsibilities include leading the POCUS elective, coordinating the ambulatory-week POCUS teaching activities, and providing instruction and feedback on peer-to-peer ultrasound teaching. The POCUS track faculty director role requires at least 15% protected time.
Completing a training certificate through the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program costs approximately $7000 per resident including travel. Our IM residency program had to be creative about securing institutional funding for this program. At our institution, university funds were reallocated to accept up to 4 residents/year on the POCUS track. We were fortunate that our Department of Medicine leadership supported the creation of the POCUS track.
PROGRAM EVALUATION
All POCUS track residents were surveyed in April 2021 with a response rate of 100% (Table 2). The project was reviewed by the IRB and deemed to be non-research. Characteristics of POCUS track residents are summarized in Supplemental Table 2.
Frequently reported reasons for choosing the POCUS track included the desire to obtain POCUS training and certification, teaching opportunities, and important skills for career development. All residents rated being satisfied or very satisfied overall with the POCUS track and would recommend it to prospective applicants. All third-year POCUS track residents successfully completed the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program prior to graduation and felt participation in the track was advantageous for their job search or fellowship application. The most commonly reported barriers to utilizing POCUS per POCUS track residents were time constraints (83%), lack of available ultrasound equipment (83%), and too few faculty trained in POCUS to supervise scanning (58%).
Frequency of use and comfort levels for different diagnostic and procedural POCUS applications are shown in Supplemental Tables 3 and 4. In general, the reported frequency of use and comfort levels increased between the 1st and 3rd years of residency.
DISCUSSION
We have described the development of an IM residency POCUS track combining local and external educational resources to provide longitudinal POCUS training. Direct benefits to POCUS track residents included the attainment of POCUS knowledge and skills and completion of a certificate program. Indirect benefits included increased institutional capacity for POCUS training by creating additional POCUS instructors for peer-to-peer teaching of residents and medical students. Our experience revealed important barriers and challenges that can help an IM residency program interested in developing a POCUS track.
POCUS skills are highly desired but inconsistently taught in IM residency programs across the country.15, 16 Longitudinal POCUS training has been shown to increase the frequency of ultrasound use and increase retention of knowledge and skills.11, 18, 23, 24 Creation of a POCUS track allowed residents with a deep interest in POCUS to receive comprehensive, longitudinal training and complete a certification endorsed by two national specialty organizations. POCUS track residents’ comfort and frequency of POCUS use increased and overall satisfaction with the program was positive. However, we recognize that our total sample size is relatively small, and future surveys will give us a better understanding of residents’ comfort level with different POCUS applications.
Several institutional benefits were realized by the creation of a POCUS track for IM residents. First, the lack of POCUS-trained IM faculty is a major barrier to POCUS implementation nationwide.15, 18, 19 For programs with limited local expertise, our POCUS track can serve as a model for providing longitudinal training by leveraging available external educational resources. We utilized the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program, a nationally recognized POCUS certificate program, to overcome a shortage of local POCUS-trained faculty to provide feedback and assess the knowledge and skills of our POCUS track residents. Second, peer-to-peer instruction has been shown to be effective for POCUS education.27–29 POCUS track residents increased our institutional capacity to provide POCUS training by serving as instructors to teach residents and medical students. Third, our residency program anticipated attracting competitive candidates due to the uniqueness of the POCUS track. The number of candidates matching the POCUS track coming from the first quartile of our residency program’s rank list has been increasing since 2019. Fourth, POCUS track residents have increased the residency program’s scholarly output, including peer-reviewed publications and national conference presentations. Additionally, a POCUS track can provide early faculty development during residency and may better prepare residents for careers in academic medicine.30 Thus far, one-third of our POCUS track residents have been recruited as academic hospitalist faculty or chief residents.
The most commonly reported barriers to POCUS use per POCUS track residents were time constraints, lack of available ultrasound equipment, and limited number of faculty trained in POCUS to supervise scanning. These barriers are consistent with past national surveys of POCUS training in IM residency programs.15, 16 Specific challenges per POCUS track residents were completion of the image portfolio (limited protected time to collect images; limited availability of faculty to review and provide feedback on images) and arranging schedules to attend required in-person courses. Lack of available ultrasound equipment presented challenges for both portfolio development and skills practice, and our IM residency program recently purchased two handheld ultrasound units specifically for the POCUS track residents to overcome this barrier.
We recognize our experience has limitations. First, core components of our POCUS track have been demonstrated to increase knowledge and skills of practicing clinicians, including participation in 2- or 3-day immersive POCUS CME courses31, 32 and collection of an image portfolio.33 However, the impact of a POCUS track on IM residents’ long-term knowledge and skills retention, and changes to clinical practice is unknown. Furthermore, the current training paradigm provides limited experience in clinical integration of POCUS findings into bedside decision-making, but as more faculty become trained, residents will have more frequent supervised clinical integration in the future. Second, peer-to-peer POCUS instruction has been shown to be effective for medical student POCUS training,27–29 but its effectiveness among IM residents has not been well studied which we plan to evaluate in the coming years. Third, POCUS use is beneficial in outpatient settings to monitor high-risk patients for decompensation, expedite workups, and improve the availability of diagnostic resources for underserved populations.34 Our POCUS track curriculum focuses primarily on inpatient applications, and additional training in outpatient applications, including skin, soft tissues, and joint ultrasound, shall be added to the curriculum in the future. Finally, the costs of the national certificate program and availability of a local POCUS faculty director may be limitations for residency programs desiring to start a POCUS track. Alternatively, institutions without local expertise could support interested faculty in completing the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program. Investing in the development of institutional POCUS faculty champions could allow for the creation of a local certificate program for IM residents, similar to the SHM-ACCP POCUS COC program.
In conclusion, we have described the development of a dedicated POCUS track in IM residency that can provide longitudinal POCUS training and certification for a select group of IM residents. Our POCUS track leverages external educational resources to help overcome local barriers to POCUS training for IM residents. Our POCUS track may serve as a model for IM residencies interested in providing longitudinal training to its residents but lack the required resources or local expertise to offer such training.
References
Morrow D, Cupp J, Schrift D, Nathanson R, Soni NJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Established Settings. South Med J. 2018 Jul;111(7):373-381.
Dancel R, Schnobrich D, Puri N, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Thoracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2018 Feb;13(2):126-135.
Franco-Sadud R, Schnobrich D, Mathews BK, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Central and Peripheral Vascular Access in Adults: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019 Sep 6;14:E1-E22.
Cho J, Jensen TP, Reierson K, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Abdominal Paracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan 2;14:E7-E15.
Soni NJ, Franco-Sadud R, Kobaidze K, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Lumbar Puncture: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):591-601.
Soni NJ, Schnobrich D, Mathews BK, et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Hospitalists: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan 2;14:E1-E6.
Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M, et al. Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part I: General Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2479-502.
Soni NJ, Lucas BP. Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2015 Feb;10(2):120-4.
Mathews BK, Miller PE, Olson APJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Improves Shared Diagnostic Understanding Between Patients and Providers. South Med J. 2018 Jul;111(7):395-400.
Bahner DP, Goldman E, Way D, Royall NA, Liu YT. The state of ultrasound education in U.S. medical schools: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2014 Dec;89(12):1681-6.
LoPresti CM, Jensen TP, Dversdal RK, Astiz DJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Internal Medicine Residency Training: A Position Statement from the Alliance of Academic Internal Medicine. Am J Med. 2019 Nov;132(11):1356-1360.
Kessler C, Bhandarkar S. Ultrasound training for medical students and internal medicine residents--a needs assessment. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010 Oct;38(8):401-8.
Anstey JE, Jensen TP, Afshar N. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Needs Assessment, Curriculum Design, and Curriculum Assessment in a Large Academic Internal Medicine Residency Program. South Med J. 2018 Jul;111(7):444-448.
LoPresti CM, Boyd JS, Schott C, et al. A National Needs Assessment of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training for Hospitalists. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep;94(9):1910-1912
Schnobrich DJ, Gladding S, Olson AP, Duran-Nelson A. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Internal Medicine: A National Survey of Educational Leadership. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Sep;5(3):498-502.
Reaume M, Siuba M, Wagner M, Woodwyk A, Melgar TA. Prevalence and Scope of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Education in Internal Medicine, Pediatric, and Medicine-Pediatric Residency Programs in the United States. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jun;38(6):1433-1439.
LoPresti CM, Schnobrich D, Novak W, et al. Current Point of Care Ultrasound Use and Training Among Internal Medicine Residency Programs from the 2020 APDIM Program Director's Survey. Am J Med. 2022 Mar;135(3):397-404.
LoPresti CM, Schnobrich DJ, Dversdal RK, Schembri F. A road map for point-of-care ultrasound training in internal medicine residency. Ultrasound J. 2019 May 9;11(1):10.
Kugler J. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Internal Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities for Expanding Use. South Med J. 2016 Dec;109(12):750-753.
Schnobrich DJ, Olson AP, Broccard A, Duran-Nelson A. Feasibility and acceptability of a structured curriculum in teaching procedural and basic diagnostic ultrasound skills to internal medicine residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Sep;5(3):493-7.
Skalski JH, Elrashidi M, Reed DA, McDonald FS, Bhagra A. Using Standardized Patients to Teach Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Physical Examination Skills to Internal Medicine Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar;7(1):95-7.
Clay RD, Lee EC, Kurtzman MF, Dversdal RK. Teaching the internist to see: effectiveness of a 1-day workshop in bedside ultrasound for internal medicine residents. Crit Ultrasound J. 2016 Dec;8(1):11.
Kelm DJ, Ratelle JT, Azeem N, et al. Longitudinal Ultrasound Curriculum Improves Long-Term Retention Among Internal Medicine Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Sep;7(3):454-7.
Boniface MP, Helgeson SA, Cowdell JC, et al. A Longitudinal Curriculum In Point-Of-Care Ultrasonography Improves Medical Knowledge And Psychomotor Skills Among Internal Medicine Residents. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Nov 4;10:935-942.
Sweigart JR, Tad-Y D, Kneeland P, Williams MV, Glasheen JJ. Hospital Medicine Resident Training Tracks: Developing the Hospital Medicine Pipeline. J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):173-176.
Society of Hospital Medicine. POCUS Certificate of Completion. Available at: https://www.hospitalmedicine.org/clinical-topics/ultrasound/pocus-certificate-of-completion/. Accessed June 10, 2021.
Dickerson J, Paul K, Vila P, Whiticar R. The role for peer-assisted ultrasound teaching in medical school. Clin Teach. 2017 Jun;14(3):170-174.
Siegel-Richman Y, Kendall J. Establishing an Ultrasound Curriculum in Undergraduate Medical Education: How Much Time Does It Take? J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Mar;37(3):569-576.
Alba GA, Kelmenson DA, Noble VE, Murray AF, Currier PF. Faculty staff-guided versus self-guided ultrasound training for internal medicine residents. Med Educ. 2013 Nov;47(11):1099-108.
Boulger C, Adams DZ, Hughes D, Bahner DP, King A. Longitudinal Ultrasound Education Track Curriculum Implemented Within an Emergency Medicine Residency Program. J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Jun;36(6):1245-1250.
Greenstein YY, Littauer R, Narasimhan M, Mayo PH, Koenig SJ. Effectiveness of a Critical Care Ultrasonography Course. Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):34-40.
Schott CK, LoPresti CM, Boyd JS, et al. Retention of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills Among Practicing Physicians: Findings of the VA National POCUS Training Program. Am J Med. 2021 Mar;134(3):391-399.e8.
Mathews BK, Reierson K, Vuong K, et al. The Design and Evaluation of the Comprehensive Hospitalist Assessment and Mentorship with Portfolios (CHAMP) Ultrasound Program. J Hosp Med. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):544-550.
Wagner M, Shen-Wagner J, Zhang KX, Flynn T, Bergman K. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Applications in the Outpatient Clinic. South Med J. 2018 Jul;111(7):404-410.
Contributors
None.
Funding
Dr. Soni reports receiving grant funding from the Department of Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Partnered Evaluation Initiative (I50 HX002263-01A1). No funding agencies were involved with the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the article for publication. The contents of this publication do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Prior presentations: An abstract of this manuscript was presented at the University of Texas Shine Academy Innovations in Health Science Education Conference (February 2022) and the Society of Hospital Medicine Annual Conference (April 2022).
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 47 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nathanson, R., Le, MP.T., Proud, K.C. et al. Development of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Track for Internal Medicine Residents. J GEN INTERN MED 37, 2308–2313 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07505-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07505-5